Eric Muenter was a very bad boy!

Strategic Command is back, and this time it is bringing you the Great War!

Moderator: MOD_Strategic_Command_3

Post Reply
stockwellpete
Posts: 592
Joined: Thu Dec 20, 2012 2:18 pm

Eric Muenter was a very bad boy!

Post by stockwellpete »

This dishevelled looking character popped up in a caption in my latest game this week. I had never heard of him but, of course, Wikipedia has an entry for him . . .

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eric_Muenter
User avatar
BillRunacre
Posts: 6723
Joined: Mon Jul 22, 2013 2:57 pm
Contact:

RE: Eric Muenter was a very bad boy!

Post by BillRunacre »

Indeed, there's lot of history in the game!
Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/FurySoftware

We're also on Facebook! https://www.facebook.com/FurySoftware/
User avatar
Tanaka
Posts: 5191
Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2003 3:42 am
Location: USA

RE: Eric Muenter was a very bad boy!

Post by Tanaka »

Very cool always learning something new!
Image
1775Cerberus
Posts: 40
Joined: Sun Aug 11, 2019 11:48 am

RE: Eric Muenter was a very bad boy!

Post by 1775Cerberus »

There was quite the active sabotage network going in North America. Arms factories, port facilities, besides the shipments themselves. I have argued since the first SC:WW1 that the USA mobilization should be increased to reflect the events going on and the publics reaction to it.

Its a bit of a dichotomy that Wilson, a pacifist, had to deal with a very large "Warhawk" faction in the public and congress. He maneuvered, sometimes clumsily, in congress to keep the US out of the war. When the US did enter the war the Wilson government basically threw the Constitution out the window and ran the country with complete central government control. Then Roosevelt, not a "warhawk" but in some ways more progressive than even Wilson, understanding that the US would be in the war at some point needed to be prepared. Roosevelt faced a large "peace" faction in congress and the public. He, having learned from his earlier stumbles in congress and the Supreme Court maneuvered well and was able to get many pieces of what history would view as important legislation through the public and congress aiding the allies before Dec 7th, 1941.
avensis
Posts: 10
Joined: Mon Sep 02, 2019 12:07 pm

RE: Eric Muenter was a very bad boy!

Post by avensis »

really very good to know thank you for sharing
Chernobyl
Posts: 640
Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2012 5:51 am

RE: Eric Muenter was a very bad boy!

Post by Chernobyl »

ORIGINAL: 1775Cerberus
I have argued since the first SC:WW1 that the USA mobilization should be increased to reflect the events going on and the publics reaction to it.

Perhaps they could add a fun decision of whether to go ahead with a sabotage campaign in the USA. When things mysteriously go boom on US soil, there's a % chance Germany will get caught and suffer a relations hit.
stockwellpete
Posts: 592
Joined: Thu Dec 20, 2012 2:18 pm

RE: Eric Muenter was a very bad boy!

Post by stockwellpete »

Just flagging this up from the Wikipedia link in my first post. There is a recent book ("Dark Invasion" 2014) on this subject and it looks like a film is going to be made with the usually excellent Bradley Cooper in it. I hope the project survives all this COVID disruption . . .

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_Invasion
User avatar
BillRunacre
Posts: 6723
Joined: Mon Jul 22, 2013 2:57 pm
Contact:

RE: Eric Muenter was a very bad boy!

Post by BillRunacre »

Interesting, and that could make for a good film.
Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/FurySoftware

We're also on Facebook! https://www.facebook.com/FurySoftware/
Post Reply

Return to “Strategic Command: World War I”