Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post descriptions of your brilliant victories and unfortunate defeats here.

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Lowpe »

The massive American Air Force is sending over 25 squadrons to India...the first have arrived on the map.



Image
Attachments
a.jpg
a.jpg (52.93 KiB) Viewed 930 times
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Lowpe »

Our Port Stanley build up.

Dispatching lone cargo ships, and tankers, almost daily. They will stagger their arrival. The long legged merchants will head off to New Zealand, one ship at a time. This is a longer term project to get rolling but looks prudent given Japans attack in the South Pacific.

Should I send some of this fuel to New Zealand? My guess is to send a lot of it. There are a lot of USN Warships at Sydney...so much that I am really watching the fuel quite closely.

Lots of work needs to be done to make the route safer.

Image
Attachments
a.jpg
a.jpg (404.7 KiB) Viewed 930 times
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Lowpe »

On the western side of Australia the first convoys from Cape Town arrive at Adelaide...several already have arrived at Esperance.

Sydney also got 16k fuel from the first run from New Zealand to Sydney. Will change that and deliver the fuel further south in the future.


Image
Attachments
a.jpg
a.jpg (283.47 KiB) Viewed 930 times
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Lowpe »

Our hardworking subs. Using the linger feature on the patrol settings.[;)]



Image
Attachments
a.jpg
a.jpg (114.69 KiB) Viewed 930 times
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Lowpe »

Sub losses

Image
Attachments
a.jpg
a.jpg (84.93 KiB) Viewed 930 times
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Lowpe »

Plane losses for the day. A lot of the losses come from trying to bomb Singers because they ran a few B17 raids out of them...plus Repulse is there.



Image
Attachments
a.jpg
a.jpg (93.85 KiB) Viewed 930 times
User avatar
BBfanboy
Posts: 20695
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 5:36 pm
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Contact:

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by BBfanboy »

ORIGINAL: Lowpe

Our Port Stanley build up.

Dispatching lone cargo ships, and tankers, almost daily. They will stagger their arrival. The long legged merchants will head off to New Zealand, one ship at a time. This is a longer term project to get rolling but looks prudent given Japans attack in the South Pacific.

Should I send some of this fuel to New Zealand? My guess is to send a lot of it. There are a lot of USN Warships at Sydney...so much that I am really watching the fuel quite closely.

Lots of work needs to be done to make the route safer.
Buildup of enough supply and fuel in Oz/NZ is why the Allies usually do not start their comeback until Fall 1942. In your case I am guessing Spring 1942!
No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth
User avatar
BBfanboy
Posts: 20695
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 5:36 pm
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Contact:

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by BBfanboy »

ORIGINAL: Lowpe

On the western side of Australia the first convoys from Cape Town arrive at Adelaide...several already have arrived at Esperance.

Sydney also got 16k fuel from the first run from New Zealand to Sydney. Will change that and deliver the fuel further south in the future.


Image
Japanese subs usually stake out Bass Strait and the Melbourne approaches, but sometimes they ignore Sale ...
No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth
User avatar
RangerJoe
Posts: 19522
Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2015 2:39 pm
Location: Who knows?

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by RangerJoe »

Bass Strait and the Melbourne approaches are easy to patrol with air and naval assets if there is little risk of Japanese air activity. Then it becomes just air searches. They are also shallow waters which is makes it easier to kill subs.
Seek peace but keep your gun handy.

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing! :o

“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”
:twisted: ; Julia Child


Image
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Lowpe »

Allied tanks attacking tomorrow!



Image
Attachments
a.jpg
a.jpg (266.12 KiB) Viewed 930 times
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Lowpe »

ORIGINAL: BBfanboy


Buildup of enough supply and fuel in Oz/NZ is why the Allies usually do not start their comeback until Fall 1942. In your case I am guessing Spring 1942!

Why? It doesn't seem to me I am doing anything original here.[&:]

User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Lowpe »

ORIGINAL: RangerJoe

Bass Strait and the Melbourne approaches are easy to patrol with air and naval assets if there is little risk of Japanese air activity. Then it becomes just air searches. They are also shallow waters which is makes it easier to kill subs.

Being patrolled now...night and day.


User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Lowpe »

West Coast work....

Battleship row is moving to Alameda...subs would have to penetrate the mines and ASW at San Francisco to get to them.

Pearl Harbor could be raided...and is not safe.

The US battleships simply aren't ready for war yet. AAA is anemic, and crew training, especially at night when Iboats are most active, is very low.

The pilots in the floatplanes are training at recon...for it is anticipated they will become a major shore bombardment factor later in the war.





In less than a week there will be 7 battleships there.

Image
Attachments
a.jpg
a.jpg (239.71 KiB) Viewed 930 times
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Lowpe »

KB

Lots of low hanging fruit here.

Image
Attachments
a.jpg
a.jpg (175.12 KiB) Viewed 930 times
Ambassador
Posts: 1756
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 5:15 pm
Location: Brussels, Belgium

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Ambassador »

ORIGINAL: Lowpe

West Coast work....

Battleship row is moving to Alameda...subs would have to penetrate the mines and ASW at San Francisco to get to them.

Pearl Harbor could be raided...and is not safe.

The US battleships simply aren't ready for war yet. AAA is anemic, and crew training, especially at night when Iboats are most active, is very low.

The pilots in the floatplanes are training at recon...for it is anticipated they will become a major shore bombardment factor later in the war.





In less than a week there will be 7 battleships there.

Image
They’re several months from war ready. Does the mod start them at a lower XP than stock ? Some of them look like they haven’t progressed a bit in six weeks, even counting the fact some might have had an upgrade in January. Or maybe you didn’t let them leave Pearl Harbor when there were enemy subs around ?
User avatar
witpqs
Posts: 26376
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2004 7:48 pm
Location: Argleton

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by witpqs »

ORIGINAL: Lowpe

KB

Lots of low hanging fruit here.

Image
Santa Maria!
User avatar
BBfanboy
Posts: 20695
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 5:36 pm
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Contact:

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by BBfanboy »

ORIGINAL: Lowpe

ORIGINAL: BBfanboy


Buildup of enough supply and fuel in Oz/NZ is why the Allies usually do not start their comeback until Fall 1942. In your case I am guessing Spring 1942!

Why? It doesn't seem to me I am doing anything original here.[&:]

Your aggressive defence is having far more impact on the Japanese expansion and bleeding their best assets faster than any other Sir Robin phase I have seen!
I am learning a lot.

Image
Attachments
thumbsup.gif
thumbsup.gif (8.83 KiB) Viewed 931 times
No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Lowpe »

ORIGINAL: BBfanboy

Your aggressive defence is having far more impact on the Japanese expansion and bleeding their best assets faster than any other Sir Robin phase I have seen!
I am learning a lot.

Image

Thanks, but part of it is reading your opponent. I don't think I would have success using this tactic against myself for example.[;)]

User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Lowpe »

Feb 1, 1942

Submarine success again! I thought these torpedoes don't work.[;)]



Image
Attachments
a.jpg
a.jpg (258.18 KiB) Viewed 930 times
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Lowpe »

Our forward base doesn't surprise the IJN...we were hoping the 6" guns would be a surprise and the mines are still on the Dutch sub in transit. No hits.[:(]



Image
Attachments
admiral.jpg
admiral.jpg (270.14 KiB) Viewed 930 times
Post Reply

Return to “After Action Reports”