Difference between "hard" attack/defense & "tank" attack/defense?

Moderator: Hubert Cater

Post Reply
User avatar
Elessar2
Posts: 1478
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 12:35 am

Difference between "hard" attack/defense & "tank" attack/defense?

Post by Elessar2 »

Unit stats.

If a unit is in combat with a hard unit like a tank, does it use the Hard ratings (both ways) or the Tank ratings? Likewise, if we have Tank ratings, why is the Hard category even necessary?

The manual isn't clear on this point, doesn't even mention Tank ratings.
The Land
Posts: 940
Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2010 4:58 pm

RE: Difference between "hard" attack/defense & "tank" attack/defense?

Post by The Land »

If you are attacking or defending against a Hard unit you use your Hard attack and defence score. The other side uses whatever stat apples to you, so if you're Mechanised then they are using their Light Armour stat.

Tanks are not Hard, they're Tanks. Front-line infantry (e.g. Corps and Armies) are Hard. Garrisons and other miscellaneous second-line infantry are Soft.

Hope that helps.
1985 Red Storm mod - Beta testing!

Always wanted to play a "Cold War goes hot" scenario? Come and join in!
User avatar
Elessar2
Posts: 1478
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 12:35 am

RE: Difference between "hard" attack/defense & "tank" attack/defense?

Post by Elessar2 »

Yes, it does, thanks. I simply assumed Hard was all armored/mechanized, and Soft all of the various kinds of Squishy Infantry.

Opens another can of worms: are the said infantry classifications hard-coded? My issue is that I expect Inf. Divisions to go toe to toe against Inf. Corps (and other frontline units), but if that unit slot is determined to be "soft" then I may have to reclassify some units.

User avatar
Hubert Cater
Posts: 6101
Joined: Mon Jul 22, 2013 11:42 am
Contact:

RE: Difference between "hard" attack/defense & "tank" attack/defense?

Post by Hubert Cater »

Correct, all the classifications are currently hard coded.
Post Reply

Return to “Strategic Command WWII: World at War”