@Alcibiades73 - We should battle, do AAR, good for ratings :)

[ElvisJJonesRambo]

Hello Buddy Alcibiades73,

Sent you a private message to battle.
Want to help marketing here, get some ratings.

Ready for You and I? 1 v 1.
As you can see, my record is around .500.
I beat bums, lose to top talent.
I'm also very beatable, I make mistakes and have not really studied the game. (I don't read much, only 1-book)

You can have choice of sides.

-Legend

[IIo4Tu]

ORIGINAL: ElvisJJonesRambo

Hello Buddy Alcibiades73,

Sent you a private message to battle.
Want to help marketing here, get some ratings.

Ready for You and I? 1 v 1.
As you can see, my record is around .500.
I beat bums, lose to top talent.
I'm also very beatable, I make mistakes and have not really studied the game. (I don't read much, only 1-book)

You can have choice of sides.

-Legend

Dear EJR!
I want to note that it is because you are really very good, but sometimes make mistakes, when playing with you, I can count on winning, because for example, I myself make many different mistakes in the process due to my inattention, although I try to avoid such as the unnecessary battle for Syria, well, you know what I mean )

[ElvisJJonesRambo]

@IIo4Tu --- You've kicked my a-- 3 times in row, and didn't even change strategies. You're opening move on Low Countries to France is rather well planned. The sorry fortresses in Middle East get ripped. Turkey going your side. What sux, the British were so damaged, and the Indians, we didn't even get to the main course, Russia vs Germany.

[IIo4Tu]

In my opinion, the main problem here is that at this time period there is a certain imbalance in the direction of the axis, which lays a convincing success for victory in Russia. And it's not even about Turkey, Turkey just facilitates and accelerates the victory, you can safely do without Turkey just moving through Persia to the Caucasus with a battle-hardened group, plus Germany receives an additional inflow of income from the Middle East, even Italy gets a little.
If everything is done more or less correctly, then Russia will actually be defeated at the end of 1942, while the Allies do not have time to assemble a powerful landing force by this time.

Therefore, I believe that to equalize the balance for England in Egypt, something is missing to slow down the victorious march, it is necessary to add quite a bit, so as not to upset the balance already in favor of England, but I can not yet understand what to add myself.

P.S. And yet, the Nazi cash in Africa can be further strengthened at the expense of Italy, adding for example paratroopers and another bomber, for this you only need to keep a clear calculation of Italian resources, which I forget to do because of my inattention. You've seen the role paratroopers play on this front...