Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post descriptions of your brilliant victories and unfortunate defeats here.

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Lowpe »

So much opportunity!

Image
Attachments
a.jpg
a.jpg (353.27 KiB) Viewed 468 times
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Lowpe »

Ceylon...

Image
Attachments
a.jpg
a.jpg (283.86 KiB) Viewed 468 times
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Lowpe »

April 21, 1942

Allies have so many interesting devices and toys. Here we try out some of the new ASW weapons, with kind of poor results to be honest, as the Iboat managed many attacks.

I will check and see what it did to the night crew experience...hopefully a tick up. Benham picked up 3 points, Ward 1 point.





Image
Attachments
a.jpg
a.jpg (306.13 KiB) Viewed 468 times
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Lowpe »

Quiet here last night...PT boats swept Bundaberg Harbor, nobody home.

IJN building up ships at Rockhampton, but have they all rearmed...my guess is yes.

Continue pesky night naval bombing, but no hits....especially for 10K. Still it is very good intel as I await a better runway and HQa at Marysborough.

I have lots of CAs and CLs and DDs finishing their radar upgrades at Melbourne plus more DDs at Sydney. I could make a real naval fight of this...and with Brisbane to fall back upon, I won't have to send any fleet carriers.

Although, this is a half decent time to look for a CV clash, as long as the Allies have fully radar equipped ships their CVs can pack quite a punch, AA is weak on IJN.

Image
Attachments
a.jpg
a.jpg (274.64 KiB) Viewed 468 times
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Lowpe »

China



Image
Attachments
a.jpg
a.jpg (535.41 KiB) Viewed 468 times
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Lowpe »

Taking Ceduna back...with very little force.



Image
Attachments
a.jpg
a.jpg (146.36 KiB) Viewed 468 times
User avatar
RangerJoe
Posts: 19245
Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2015 2:39 pm
Location: Who knows?

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by RangerJoe »

ORIGINAL: Lowpe

Quiet here last night...PT boats swept Bundaberg Harbor, nobody home.

IJN building up ships at Rockhampton, but have they all rearmed...my guess is yes.

Continue pesky night naval bombing, but no hits....especially for 10K. Still it is very good intel as I await a better runway and HQa at Marysborough.

I have lots of CAs and CLs and DDs finishing their radar upgrades at Melbourne plus more DDs at Sydney. I could make a real naval fight of this...and with Brisbane to fall back upon, I won't have to send any fleet carriers.

Although, this is a half decent time to look for a CV clash, as long as the Allies have fully radar equipped ships their CVs can pack quite a punch, AA is weak on IJN.

Image

It looks like that CV TF is vulnerable without a lot of fighters compared to bombers. Maybe even 4Es on Naval can reduce the fighter numbers some more.

Do you have any Cats available for night torpedo attacks? Or even with bombs?
Seek peace but keep your gun handy.

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing! :o

“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”
:twisted: ; Julia Child


Image
User avatar
ny59giants
Posts: 9902
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 12:02 pm

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by ny59giants »

American TBs - Others may disagree with me, but I think you need to seriously consider taking off the TBs (Avengers) from the CVs and add extra fighters and SBD units. Their experience levels are often too low to get enough TT hits on the Jap CV/CVLs at this point in the game. While most player train them up in NavT and NavB, they typically need either a third skill like GndB and/or actually lots of missions to get their experience levels up. I would use the TBs on ground attacks to do so.
[center]Image[/center]
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Lowpe »

ORIGINAL: ny59giants

American TBs - Others may disagree with me, but I think you need to seriously consider taking off the TBs (Avengers) from the CVs and add extra fighters and SBD units. Their experience levels are often too low to get enough TT hits on the Jap CV/CVLs at this point in the game. While most player train them up in NavT and NavB, they typically need either a third skill like GndB and/or actually lots of missions to get their experience levels up. I would use the TBs on ground attacks to do so.

I took them off and trained them in ASW already, plus there is one squadron performing night torpedo attacks against Bundaberg.
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Lowpe »

ORIGINAL: RangerJoe

It looks like that CV TF is vulnerable without a lot of fighters compared to bombers. Maybe even 4Es on Naval can reduce the fighter numbers some more.

Do you have any Cats availible for night torpedo attacks? Or even with bombs?

Don't have strong enough night naval search to get a decent night DL on KB.
User avatar
RangerJoe
Posts: 19245
Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2015 2:39 pm
Location: Who knows?

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by RangerJoe »

ORIGINAL: Lowpe

ORIGINAL: RangerJoe

It looks like that CV TF is vulnerable without a lot of fighters compared to bombers. Maybe even 4Es on Naval can reduce the fighter numbers some more.

Do you have any Cats available for night torpedo attacks? Or even with bombs?

Don't have strong enough night naval search to get a decent night DL on KB.

I understand but they might also be able to be used against SCTFs should they drop in for a visit. They could detach some ships to be swarmed by PTs and DDs.
Seek peace but keep your gun handy.

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing! :o

“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”
:twisted: ; Julia Child


Image
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Lowpe »

Bombs won't do it, and it will be several days before an HQa arrives at Marysborough with torpedoes.

User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Lowpe »

Line Islands building up...



Image
Attachments
a.jpg
a.jpg (373.96 KiB) Viewed 459 times
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Lowpe »

Pretty sure our first offensive will be aimed at Canton and Baker.



Image
Attachments
a.jpg
a.jpg (143.24 KiB) Viewed 459 times
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Lowpe »

I have 600 PP, I was thinking on buying out the last American fractional Division in Mombasa, but the priority isn't there yet, perhaps a NZ unit and some Americans. Can't decide, so for now we are simply accumulating points.



Image
Attachments
a.jpg
a.jpg (387.28 KiB) Viewed 459 times
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Lowpe »

Bering Sea



Image
Attachments
a.jpg
a.jpg (356.88 KiB) Viewed 459 times
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Lowpe »

Deathstar is a Pearl, most slow Battleships at Mare Island.

Saratoga, and the light cruiser forces is at Melbourne, along with several heavy cruisers.



Image
Attachments
a.jpg
a.jpg (577.28 KiB) Viewed 459 times
User avatar
RangerJoe
Posts: 19245
Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2015 2:39 pm
Location: Who knows?

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by RangerJoe »

ORIGINAL: Lowpe

Bombs won't do it, and it will be several days before an HQa arrives at Marysborough with torpedoes.

Bombs can do it. 500 pound bombs can wreck the topside of BBs, they can but do not always penetrate the CAs but the CLs and smaller are vulnerable. Enough bombs on a BB can leave it a flaming wreck which is a good use for the Devastators early on but Avengers are the better aircraft. Slow the ships down and/or detach them from the main task force and they are vulnerable. I sank a Japanese BB using Devastators with 21 or 23 topside 500 pound bomb hits. [X(] The Devastators and the Avengers on Low Naval set for torpedoes with none available will carry four 500 bombs each.
Seek peace but keep your gun handy.

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing! :o

“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”
:twisted: ; Julia Child


Image
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Lowpe »

My goodness, the Dutch are coming in at Aden. I have pilots and air frames....they should add a lot of utility.



Image
Attachments
a.jpg
a.jpg (502.76 KiB) Viewed 459 times
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Lowpe »

The remains of Wenchow![:)]

Image
Attachments
a.jpg
a.jpg (23.28 KiB) Viewed 459 times
Post Reply

Return to “After Action Reports”