Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post descriptions of your brilliant victories and unfortunate defeats here.

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Lowpe »

Helm caught and sunk!

Image
Attachments
a.jpg
a.jpg (94.69 KiB) Viewed 475 times
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Lowpe »

Phelps caught and sunk!

Image
Attachments
a.jpg
a.jpg (94.3 KiB) Viewed 475 times
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Lowpe »

The tide is turning...against us!



Image
Attachments
a.jpg
a.jpg (103.89 KiB) Viewed 475 times
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Lowpe »

Daylight arrives...



Image
Attachments
a.jpg
a.jpg (91.44 KiB) Viewed 475 times
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Lowpe »

Air power...no fighter protection...



Image
Attachments
a.jpg
a.jpg (122.64 KiB) Viewed 475 times
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Lowpe »

Going in fast and low...



Image
Attachments
a.jpg
a.jpg (84.94 KiB) Viewed 475 times
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Lowpe »

And the bloody day is over...but, wait, another deliberate attack on the Ankang road...and we hold!


Ground combat at 83,45 (near Nanyang)

Japanese Deliberate attack

Attacking force 28313 troops, 281 guns, 251 vehicles, Assault Value = 867

Defending force 22556 troops, 120 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 564

Japanese adjusted assault: 413

Allied adjusted defense: 1219

Japanese assault odds: 1 to 2

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), leaders(+), fatigue(-), experience(-)
supply(-)
Attacker:

Japanese ground losses:
756 casualties reported
Squads: 3 destroyed, 55 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 11 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 7 disabled
Vehicles lost 21 (2 destroyed, 19 disabled)

Allied ground losses:
354 casualties reported
Squads: 1 destroyed, 42 disabled
Non Combat: 1 destroyed, 2 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 3 disabled

Assaulting units:
15th Division
13th Tank Regiment
116th Division
3rd Tank Regiment
5th Tank Regiment
23rd Tank Regiment
10th Tank Regiment
51st Ind.Mtn.Gun Battalion
13th Army
11th Field Artillery Regiment

Defending units:
55th Chinese Corps
41st Chinese Corps
77th Chinese Corps

Image

SB recon did a good job at pinpointing IJA troop movement off road in this picture![:)]
Attachments
a.jpg
a.jpg (338.53 KiB) Viewed 475 times
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Lowpe »

What a day...don't know how it all turned out yet!

We should still have a strong force rearmed at Maryborough for this next day...



User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Lowpe »

ORIGINAL: RangerJoe

There is a way to get the fighters to sweep first . . . [;)]

That is true, but when the entire squadron elects not to fly because of a failed roll...
User avatar
witpqs
Posts: 26376
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2004 7:48 pm
Location: Argleton

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by witpqs »

ORIGINAL: Lowpe

ORIGINAL: RangerJoe

There is a way to get the fighters to sweep first . . . [;)]

That is true, but when the entire squadron elects not to fly because of a failed roll...
I have three B-29 aces now. Use them instead... [:'(]
User avatar
RangerJoe
Posts: 19250
Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2015 2:39 pm
Location: Who knows?

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by RangerJoe »

ORIGINAL: Lowpe

ORIGINAL: RangerJoe

There is a way to get the fighters to sweep first . . . [;)]

That is true, but when the entire squadron elects not to fly because of a failed roll...

If you break them into thirds, then the /A, /B, /C will have lower numbers and be checked first. If they pass, then they tend to have their combats decided first.
Seek peace but keep your gun handy.

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing! :o

“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”
:twisted: ; Julia Child


Image
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Lowpe »

ORIGINAL: witpqs

ORIGINAL: Lowpe

ORIGINAL: RangerJoe

There is a way to get the fighters to sweep first . . . [;)]

That is true, but when the entire squadron elects not to fly because of a failed roll...
I have three B-29 aces now. Use them instead... [:'(]

2nd Lt. Ellard has 2 kills, 8 others have one kill flying beasts.
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Lowpe »

ORIGINAL: RangerJoe

ORIGINAL: Lowpe

ORIGINAL: RangerJoe

There is a way to get the fighters to sweep first . . . [;)]

That is true, but when the entire squadron elects not to fly because of a failed roll...

If you break them into thirds, then the /A, /B, /C will have lower numbers and be checked first. If they pass, then they tend to have their combats decided first.

Won't that increase my stack level...perhaps overloading the facility?
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Lowpe »

Recap:

Haguro, 1Torp, 8 Hits, Hvy F, Hvy D
Nachi: sunk
Furutaka: 4Hits, Hvy F
Myoko: 14 hits, Hvy F, Hvy D
Nagara: 3 Hits
Kiso: 12 Hits, Hvy F, Hvy D
Mikuma: 3 Hits, 1 1000# hit (bounced)
Aoba: 1 hit, 1 1000# hit (penetrated)
Mogami: 3 hits

DD Hyashio sunk
Kagero: on fire
Nasushio, 2 Hits on fire
Mutsuki, 1 hit, on fire
Hagikaze: 2 hits, on fire
Yunagi: 1 hit
Uzuki: 1 500# hit



User avatar
witpqs
Posts: 26376
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2004 7:48 pm
Location: Argleton

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by witpqs »

ORIGINAL: Lowpe

ORIGINAL: RangerJoe

ORIGINAL: Lowpe




That is true, but when the entire squadron elects not to fly because of a failed roll...

If you break them into thirds, then the /A, /B, /C will have lower numbers and be checked first. If they pass, then they tend to have their combats decided first.

Won't that increase my stack level...perhaps overloading the facility?
No. Divided squadrons count as 1.

It's a little more complicated if they go to different bases, but as far as I have seen I've never been penalized for it.
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Lowpe »

The butchers bill...probably scuttle two more destroyers today.



Image
Attachments
a.jpg
a.jpg (186.66 KiB) Viewed 475 times
User avatar
JohnDillworth
Posts: 3104
Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2009 5:22 pm

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by JohnDillworth »

That's a lot of float planes for a single CA, no?
Today I come bearing an olive branch in one hand, and the freedom fighter's gun in the other. Do not let the olive branch fall from my hand. I repeat, do not let the olive branch fall from my hand. - Yasser Arafat Speech to UN General Assembly
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Lowpe »

It is very messy here...IJA has close to 2K AV at Rockhampton via the rule of 30.





Image
Attachments
a.jpg
a.jpg (565.25 KiB) Viewed 475 times
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Lowpe »

ORIGINAL: JohnDillworth

That's a lot of float planes for a single CA, no?

Yep, maybe as many as three went down...not sure if Kiso carries floatplanes. 1 plane for CL if they have them, 2-3 planes for most Cruisers, although some carry as many as 5 like Tone.

Nachi had 2 according to the combat report.
User avatar
BBfanboy
Posts: 20561
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 5:36 pm
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Contact:

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by BBfanboy »

ORIGINAL: JohnDillworth

That's a lot of float planes for a single CA, no?
Typically they come with one Jake and two Petes, but can add another FP. But to me 3 Jakes and 8 Petes = 2 CA and CL.
No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth
Post Reply

Return to “After Action Reports”