Cudos on latest Beta...

[DeletedUser44]

With the latest beta patch addressing so many of my bug reports, had to say I noticed and it was appreciated.

* Good job on the aircraft-compare view. It scales now and I can actually read it.
* Good to see the aircraft range rings were acknowledged (and presumably fixed).
* Also you guys seemed to find and fix the AC transfer bug (where it did not increment travel(%) ).
* ... and even the Ju 52/3m data was addressed. (completely surprised by this, given the previous (inappropriate) push-back responses. "hey dude, don't question our data. We are data-gods, after all...." )

* You guys, appropriately, bumped the Ju 52/3m armor rating to match the "civilian" DC3s.
(previously, the "militarized" Ju 52s had armor of '0', while the "civilian", pressed into service, DC3s had an armor of '1' ???)

* You guys also tried to address the crazy, transport intercept mechanics going on.

WOW! That was like, 4 or 5 things fixed!

[DeletedUser1769703214]

ORIGINAL: Sauron_II

With the latest beta patch addressing so many of my bug reports, had to say I noticed and it was appreciated.

* Good job on the aircraft-compare view. It scales now and I can actually read it.
* Good to see the aircraft range rings were acknowledged (and presumably fixed).
* Also you guys seemed to find and fix the AC transfer bug (where it did not increment travel(%) ).
* ... and even the Ju 52/3m data was addressed. (completely surprised by this, given the previous (inappropriate) push-back responses. "hey dude, don't question our data. We are data-gods, after all...." )

* You guys, appropriately, bumped the Ju 52/3m armor rating to match the "civilian" DC3s.
(previously, the "militarized" Ju 52s had armor of '0', while the "civilian", pressed into service, DC3s had an armor of '1' ???)

* You guys also tried to address the crazy, transport intercept mechanics going on.

WOW! That was like, 4 or 5 things fixed!

Sooooooo...... You are saying, "Thank you"?