Tactical Bomber vs Carrier Damage?

Moderator: Hubert Cater

Post Reply
redrum68
Posts: 1698
Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2017 1:53 am

Tactical Bomber vs Carrier Damage?

Post by redrum68 »

I saw a tactical bomber with level 0 naval attack (4 base attack vs carriers) do 6 damage to a carrier with level 1 fighters (3 base defense vs bombers). I believe both were a little over 100% readiness. This seems quite high, any ideas what could have caused that?
SittingDuck
Posts: 1203
Joined: Sat Aug 31, 2002 9:08 pm

RE: Tactical Bomber vs Carrier Damage?

Post by SittingDuck »

Well, were they intercepted?
SittingDuck
Posts: 1203
Joined: Sat Aug 31, 2002 9:08 pm

RE: Tactical Bomber vs Carrier Damage?

Post by SittingDuck »

Yeah so it is hard to say, to me. I am unsure of the battle outcome algorithm. I don't know if 'critical hits' are a thing with it. While nailing 6/10's of the unit's 'health' is a good chunk, it doesn't seem unreasonable, especially if there wasn't much damage to the tac air.

I would like to hear more about the combat algorithm, but suspect there are several variations, especially for the sea combat. I mean, consider Elessar2's question about "when exactly do Fighters (and Carriers in Fighter mode) use their Attack & Defense? Is Attack used in Interceptions, or in Escorting? Is Defense used only when strafed or bombed directly?" this thread:
https://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=5075248

It's sticky.
Marcinos1985
Posts: 441
Joined: Wed Jan 22, 2020 6:17 am

RE: Tactical Bomber vs Carrier Damage?

Post by Marcinos1985 »

ORIGINAL: redrum68

I saw a tactical bomber with level 0 naval attack (4 base attack vs carriers) do 6 damage to a carrier with level 1 fighters (3 base defense vs bombers). I believe both were a little over 100% readiness. This seems quite high, any ideas what could have caused that?

If TAC was attached to high level, experienced HQ, this result doesn't seem beyond probability.
SittingDuck
Posts: 1203
Joined: Sat Aug 31, 2002 9:08 pm

RE: Tactical Bomber vs Carrier Damage?

Post by SittingDuck »

Agreed. I would want that result, truthfully.
Post Reply

Return to “Strategic Command WWII: World at War”