Torpedo bombers and bombing accuracy

This new stand alone release based on the legendary War in the Pacific from 2 by 3 Games adds significant improvements and changes to enhance game play, improve realism, and increase historical accuracy. With dozens of new features, new art, and engine improvements, War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition brings you the most realistic and immersive WWII Pacific Theater wargame ever!

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

Alfred
Posts: 6683
Joined: Thu Sep 28, 2006 7:56 am

RE: Torpedo bombers and bombing accuracy

Post by Alfred »

ORIGINAL: Professor Chaos

Well far be it for a lowly newb like me to dispute Alfred, but one is tempted to call shenanigans. I re-ran some turns, and here are combat reports from three days of air attacks by Devastators equipped with bombs against various Japanese TFs in May 1942. Every such attack is recorded here:

Afternoon Air attack on TF, near Deboyne Islands at 103,135

Weather in hex: Moderate rain

Raid spotted at 9 NM, estimated altitude 18,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 4 minutes

Allied aircraft
TBD-1 Devastator x 15

No Allied losses

Japanese Ships
xAK Genoa Maru, Bomb hits 1, on fire

Aircraft Attacking:
15 x TBD-1 Devastator bombing from 15000 feet
Naval Attack: 2 x 500 lb SAP Bomb

Massive explosion on xAK Genoa Maru
Heavy smoke from fires obscuring xAK Genoa Maru
Afternoon Air attack on TF, near Port Moresby at 97,132

Weather in hex: Light cloud

Raid spotted at 14 NM, estimated altitude 13,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 7 minutes

Allied aircraft
F4F-3 Wildcat x 19
TBD-1 Devastator x 15

No Allied losses

Japanese Ships
TB Hayabusa, Bomb hits 1, and is sunk

Aircraft Attacking:
15 x TBD-1 Devastator bombing from 10000 feet
Naval Attack: 2 x 500 lb GP Bomb

Heavy smoke from fires obscuring TB Hayabusa
Morning Air attack on TF, near Goodenough Island at 101,131

Weather in hex: Heavy cloud

Raid spotted at 4 NM, estimated altitude 18,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 1 minutes

Allied aircraft
F4F-4 Wildcat x 19
TBD-1 Devastator x 15

No Allied losses

Japanese Ships
xAP Haruna Maru
xAP Hie Maru, Bomb hits 6, and is sunk

Aircraft Attacking:
15 x TBD-1 Devastator bombing from 15000 feet *
Naval Attack: 2 x 500 lb SAP Bomb

Heavy smoke from fires obscuring xAP Hie Maru
Morning Air attack on TF, near Deboyne Islands at 103,134

Weather in hex: Clear sky

Raid spotted at 16 NM, estimated altitude 20,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 8 minutes

Allied aircraft
F4F-3 Wildcat x 19
TBD-1 Devastator x 15

No Allied losses

Japanese Ships
BB Kirishima, Bomb hits 4
BB Kongo, Bomb hits 2

Aircraft Attacking:
15 x TBD-1 Devastator bombing from 15000 feet *
Naval Attack: 2 x 500 lb SAP Bomb
Morning Air attack on TF, near Deboyne Islands at 103,134

Weather in hex: Clear sky

Raid spotted at 14 NM, estimated altitude 17,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 7 minutes

Allied aircraft
F4F-4 Wildcat x 19
TBD-1 Devastator x 15

No Allied losses

Japanese Ships
DD Kuretake, Bomb hits 1, on fire, heavy damage

Aircraft Attacking:
15 x TBD-1 Devastator bombing from 15000 feet
Naval Attack: 2 x 500 lb SAP Bomb
Afternoon Air attack on TF, near Goodenough Island at 101,131

Weather in hex: Thunderstorms

Raid spotted at 11 NM, estimated altitude 17,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 5 minutes

Allied aircraft
F4F-3 Wildcat x 19
F4F-4 Wildcat x 19
TBD-1 Devastator x 15

No Allied losses

Japanese Ships
xAP Haruna Maru, Bomb hits 2, heavy fires, heavy damage
PB Chitose Maru

Aircraft Attacking:
15 x TBD-1 Devastator bombing from 15000 feet *
Naval Attack: 2 x 500 lb SAP Bomb

Heavy smoke from fires obscuring xAP Haruna Maru
Afternoon Air attack on TF, near Deboyne Islands at 103,134

Weather in hex: Severe storms

Raid spotted at 17 NM, estimated altitude 16,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 8 minutes

Allied aircraft
F4F-4 Wildcat x 19
TBD-1 Devastator x 15

No Allied losses

Japanese Ships
DD Kuretake, on fire, heavy damage

Aircraft Attacking:
15 x TBD-1 Devastator bombing from 15000 feet
Naval Attack: 2 x 500 lb SAP Bomb

In every attack except the last, the Devastators scored bomb hits from 10,000 or 15,000 feet. Even in clouds, rain, and thunderstorms. Even against small ships like DDs and TBs. (The average NavB skill of the squads (Lexington, Saratoga, Hornet) ranged from 40 to 63). Two of these attacks scored 20% hits from 15,000 feet.
















Facts constitute such a disarming weapon against opinionated polemicists. Seven combat report extracts, not one showing there is a problem. Let's go through each combat and allow the facts to speak for themselves.


#1 at hex 103,135

* No CAP to disrupt the bombers aiming
* Weather not great but not the worst possible, would likely have some disruption impact on the bombers aiming
* Target is a solitary xAK with very weak AA, most unlikely to have disrupted the bombers aiming
* Target bomb evasion rating is poor
* Altitude is 15k, not the best for aiming but not one which makes it impossible to hit a ship

Result = 1 hit out of 30 bombs dropped


#2 at hex 97,132

* No CAP to disrupt the bombers aiming
* Weather is excellent, in fact the best possible in the game, perfect for aiming bombs
* Target is a solitary TB with weak AA, most unlikely to have disrupted the bombers aiming
* Target bomb evasion rating is good
* Altitude is 10k, not too far off the ideal range for level bomb aiming

Result = 1 hit out of 30 bombs dropped


#3 at hex 101,131

* No CAP to disrupt the bombers aiming
* Weather is the next best to perfect in AE. Still very good for bomb aiming purposes
* Target is two xAP weak AA, most unlikely to have disrupted the bombers aiming
* Target bomb evasion rating is poor
* Altitude is 15k, not the best for aiming but not one which makes it impossible to hit a ship

Result = 6 hit out of 30 bombs dropped


#4 at hex 103,134

* No CAP to disrupt the bombers aiming
* Weather is excellent, in fact the best possible in the game, perfect for aiming bombs
* Target is two bqttleships with a thin AA coverge, depending on vector of enemy attack might have put up inadequate flack to significantly disrupt the bombers aiming
* Target bomb evasion rating is poor
* Altitude is 15k, not the best for aiming but not one which makes it impossible to hit a ship

Result = 6 hits out of 30 bombs dropped


#5 at hex 103,134

* No CAP to disrupt the bombers aiming
* Weather is excellent, in fact the best possible in the game, perfect for aiming bombs
* Target is a solitary DD with thin AA coverage, depending on vector of enemy attack might have put up inadequate flack to significantly disrupt the bombers aiming
* Target bomb evasion rating is good
* Altitude is 15k, not the best for aiming but not one which makes it impossible to hit a ship

Result = 1 hit out of 30 bombs dropped


#6 at hex 101,131

* No CAP to disrupt the bombers aiming
* Weather is poor, the worst possible in AE, probably did put off the bombers aiming
* Target is one xAP and one PB with very weak AA, most unlikely to have disrupted the bombers aiming
* Target bomb evasion rating is poor, except for the PB if it is a Tosa class PB in which case the evasion rating is good
* Altitude is 15k, not the best for aiming but not one which makes it impossible to hit a ship

Result = 2 hits out of 30 bombs dropped


#7 at hex 103,134

* No CAP to disrupt the bombers aiming
* Weather is poor, the worst possible in AE, probably did put off the bombers aiming
* Target is a solitary DD which has already been hit in combat #5
* Target bomb evasion rating is good when undamaged but how much it has been degraded by the earlier bomb hit is unknown
* Altitude is 15k, not the best for aiming but not one which makes it impossible to hit a ship

Result = no hits out of 30 bombs dropped


Conclusions from looking at all the facts are:

1. No CAP ever present. This is a very significant fact and removes one of the most important means to disrupt enemy bombing.

2. Predominantly only ineffective Flak in play. Again one of the main means to disrupt enemy bombing is missing.

3. Weather was mainly excellent to very good, which combined with the lack of CAP, poor Flak, and generally poor ship bomb evasion ratings, should have resulted in at least double digit bomb hits. That the number of actual hits achieved was so low under such good weather conditions and favourable battlefield conditions (practically shooting at fish in a barrel), is quite likely the result from pilot stats, plus bombing from extended range plus the always present Grigsby die rolls.


There is zero evidence presented that a mean bomb hit quantum of less than 2.5 per combat demonstrates a problem exists or that the call of shenanigans is warranted. What we do have here is another exemplar of someone, for the benefit of advancing their narrative, selectively highlighting only part of the matrix which is involved in any AE combat.

Alfred
Alfred
Posts: 6683
Joined: Thu Sep 28, 2006 7:56 am

RE: Torpedo bombers and bombing accuracy

Post by Alfred »

ORIGINAL: witpqs

I do remember this being a topic of discussion long ago but I don't remember what the conclusion was. Are you running the very latest version? It's possible they did make a change to address this.

What was changed is a condition not found in the combat reports presented in post #98.

Alfred
Professor Chaos
Posts: 98
Joined: Wed Sep 25, 2013 5:49 pm

RE: Torpedo bombers and bombing accuracy

Post by Professor Chaos »

I will pass over the irony of being labeled an 'opinionated polemicist' in post #101. My apologies for the offense of being tempted to call shenanigans.

In any case, if the answer is that yes, one should generally expect "at least double digit bomb hits" from decent pilots level bombing under good conditions at altitudes of 10 - 15k, then that is all I needed to know.
User avatar
Yaab
Posts: 5475
Joined: Tue Nov 08, 2011 2:09 pm
Location: Poland

RE: Torpedo bombers and bombing accuracy

Post by Yaab »

I can dismiss all the Clear/Cloud weather attacks but the attack on xAP Haruna Maru from 15,000 feet in thunderstorms must surely be either a miracle or bug.

BTW, those Wildcat pilots must be super experienced. Every raid came escorted, even though the cruise speed delta between those Wildcats and Devastators is HUGE.
Alfred
Posts: 6683
Joined: Thu Sep 28, 2006 7:56 am

RE: Torpedo bombers and bombing accuracy

Post by Alfred »

ORIGINAL: Yaab

I can dismiss all the Clear/Cloud weather attacks but the attack on xAP Haruna Maru from 15,000 feet in thunderstorms must surely be either a miracle or bug.

BTW, those Wildcat pilots must be super experienced. Every raid came escorted, even though the cruise speed delta between those Wildcats and Devastators is HUGE.

Why?

The only element helping the xAP is the weather. All the other key known elements are either neutral or favouring the bombers. When it comes to helping "dodge" air dropped bombs, the weather status is a very distant aid compared to CAP and flak. That is without taking into account the other relevant elements of the matrix which may assist or hinder the bombers. Even then only 2 hits out of 30 bombs dropped were scored. Not much of a miracle.

The major defensive value of weather lies in hiding the target. If the attackers could (a) take off and (b) find the target much of the defensive value of weather has been lost. Besides there is no altitude to weather. Who is to say the bombers weren't below the cloud cover.

Alfred
Alfred
Posts: 6683
Joined: Thu Sep 28, 2006 7:56 am

RE: Torpedo bombers and bombing accuracy

Post by Alfred »

ORIGINAL: Professor Chaos

...if the answer is that yes, one should generally expect "at least double digit bomb hits" from decent pilots level bombing under good conditions at altitudes of 10 - 15k, then that is all I needed to know.

Still being selective, overlooking other components of the matrix which were mentioned.

Alfred
User avatar
witpqs
Posts: 26376
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2004 7:48 pm
Location: Argleton

RE: Torpedo bombers and bombing accuracy

Post by witpqs »

Very good analysis, Alfred. 👍
User avatar
Yaab
Posts: 5475
Joined: Tue Nov 08, 2011 2:09 pm
Location: Poland

RE: Torpedo bombers and bombing accuracy

Post by Yaab »

I wonder where is the limit to TB accuracy? Can TB hit ships from 20k,25k,30k feet? So far I have seen hits from 17k.
Alfred
Posts: 6683
Joined: Thu Sep 28, 2006 7:56 am

RE: Torpedo bombers and bombing accuracy

Post by Alfred »

ORIGINAL: Yaab

I wonder where is the limit to TB accuracy? Can TB hit ships from 20k,25k,30k feet? So far I have seen hits from 17k.

Where is the concern for a dive bomber, or a level bomber, or a fighter bomber, or a fighter operating at those altitudes too? Especially when no one shows an excessive number of hits results.

Alfred
Dili
Posts: 4742
Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2004 4:33 pm

RE: Torpedo bombers and bombing accuracy

Post by Dili »

Many here showed excessive number of hits by torpedo bombers in bombing missions, and at low level many more that they can do with own torpedoes. You just choose to ignore them Alfred.
Alfred
Posts: 6683
Joined: Thu Sep 28, 2006 7:56 am

RE: Torpedo bombers and bombing accuracy

Post by Alfred »

ORIGINAL: Dili

Many here showed excessive number of hits by torpedo bombers in bombing missions, and at low level many more that they can do with own torpedoes. You just choose to ignore them Alfred.

Really, I "just choose to ignore"?

This would be evidence of the calibre found in post #98 of this thread.

Maybe you might care to bother reading what I said in post #102. Then you can proceed to explain what I referred to and explain, for the benefit of the inexperienced AE players who read the forum why the change was made, and what is the new paradigm. Then you will show the purported examples post the change which you allege I "just choose to ignore".

Whilst you are at it, again for the benefit of the inexperienced readers, you might explain why in AE it might be more difficult to score a torpedo hit than a bomb hit. Nor forget to explain how the other elements in the matrix operate, carefully separating their impact so that the bomb hits achieved can only be due to the alleged TB accuracy.

Also useful to put up a screenshot which displays the accuracy rating of a torpedo bomber, and how it is so much better than other aircraft types. After all, the fundamental claim made here is that a TB is more "accurate" than a MB, or FB, or HB.

Being so much more thorough than me who in your eyes simply chooses to ignore the facts, you will also inform the forum what is the correct number of bomb hits which a TB should not exceed, under any circumstances. After all the bomb hits listed in post #98, which I put into context in post #101 are clearly excessive in your view.

Don't overlook what are the consequences of abstraction.

Be brave and thorough, you know there will be others fully rooting for you to conclusively demonstrate I have no idea about this games mechanics. Nor did the devs also understand how AE plays.

Alfred
User avatar
castor troy
Posts: 14331
Joined: Mon Aug 23, 2004 10:17 am
Location: Austria

RE: Torpedo bombers and bombing accuracy

Post by castor troy »

ORIGINAL: Alfred

ORIGINAL: Dili

Many here showed excessive number of hits by torpedo bombers in bombing missions, and at low level many more that they can do with own torpedoes. You just choose to ignore them Alfred.

Really, I "just choose to ignore"?

This would be evidence of the calibre found in post #98 of this thread.

Maybe you might care to bother reading what I said in post #102. Then you can proceed to explain what I referred to and explain, for the benefit of the inexperienced AE players who read the forum why the change was made, and what is the new paradigm. Then you will show the purported examples post the change which you allege I "just choose to ignore".

Whilst you are at it, again for the benefit of the inexperienced readers, you might explain why in AE it might be more difficult to score a torpedo hit than a bomb hit. Nor forget to explain how the other elements in the matrix operate, carefully separating their impact so that the bomb hits achieved can only be due to the alleged TB accuracy.

Also useful to put up a screenshot which displays the accuracy rating of a torpedo bomber, and how it is so much better than other aircraft types. After all, the fundamental claim made here is that a TB is more "accurate" than a MB, or FB, or HB.

Being so much more thorough than me who in your eyes simply chooses to ignore the facts, you will also inform the forum what is the correct number of bomb hits which a TB should not exceed, under any circumstances. After all the bomb hits listed in post #98, which I put into context in post #101 are clearly excessive in your view.

Don't overlook what are the consequences of abstraction.

Be brave and thorough, you know there will be others fully rooting for you to conclusively demonstrate I have no idea about this games mechanics. Nor did the devs also understand how AE plays.

Alfred

If you haven't yet noticed that torpedo bombers dropping two bombs each have an insanely higher accuracy than any medium bomber dropping 4 or 6 bombs than this might have a) something to do with the fact that you haven't shown any evidence you have played a single turn of this game or b) google hasn't brought up enough combat reports showing you the difference between attacks of medium bombers dropping twice or three times the bombs than torpedo bombers which can hit ships at will, all bombers flown by the same nav bomb skilled pilots or c) you just don't get it which is the most likely reason (Dili was friendly enough to aks if you would ignore it)

a classic, once again, so much nonsene and blah blah blah in a single post


Image
Attachments
alfred.jpg
alfred.jpg (139.17 KiB) Viewed 1032 times
mind_messing
Posts: 3394
Joined: Mon Oct 28, 2013 11:59 am

RE: Torpedo bombers and bombing accuracy

Post by mind_messing »

ORIGINAL: castor troy

[...]

a classic, once again, so much nonsene and blah blah blah in a single post

It is altogether fitting and proper that you would support Dili's position in this matter.

You are one of the few posters to beat the (admittedly high) bar that Dili has set when it comes to choosing to ignore the facts that are inconvenient to the position held.
User avatar
Shellshock
Posts: 571
Joined: Fri Dec 31, 2010 2:23 pm
Location: U.S.

RE: Torpedo bombers and bombing accuracy

Post by Shellshock »

ORIGINAL: castor troy

Image

We are poor little lambs,
Who have lost our way.
Blaah, Blaah, Blaaaaah.


I guess it's a good thing Allied intelligence never code-named a Japanese plane the "Greta".

Ian R
Posts: 3440
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Cammeraygal Country

RE: Torpedo bombers and bombing accuracy

Post by Ian R »

Why are people picking on Greta?

She seems like a nice young lady, and quite intelligent.
"I am Alfred"
User avatar
Maallon
Posts: 242
Joined: Sun Dec 27, 2020 7:48 am
Location: Germany

RE: Torpedo bombers and bombing accuracy

Post by Maallon »

ORIGINAL: Ian R

Why are people picking on Greta?

She seems like a nice young lady, and quite intelligent.
+1
I was asking myself the same question just now. [:D]
User avatar
RangerJoe
Posts: 18284
Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2015 2:39 pm
Location: Who knows?

RE: Torpedo bombers and bombing accuracy

Post by RangerJoe »

ORIGINAL: Maallon

ORIGINAL: Ian R

Why are people picking on Greta?

She seems like a nice young lady, and quite intelligent.
+1
I was asking myself the same question just now. [:D]

She has indicated her willingness to shoot people who disagree with her views. Among other things.
Seek peace but keep your gun handy.

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing! :o

“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”
:twisted: ; Julia Child
Image
User avatar
Maallon
Posts: 242
Joined: Sun Dec 27, 2020 7:48 am
Location: Germany

RE: Torpedo bombers and bombing accuracy

Post by Maallon »

ORIGINAL: RangerJoe

ORIGINAL: Maallon

ORIGINAL: Ian R

Why are people picking on Greta?

She seems like a nice young lady, and quite intelligent.
+1
I was asking myself the same question just now. [:D]

She has indicated her willingness to shoot people who disagree with her views. Among other things.
Not saying that you are wrong, because I am not following her every move and don't agree with absolutely everything she says, also she is young and fiery, a combination which can lead to unfortunate wording.
But for me to believe your exact statement you would need to send me the source. [:)]
User avatar
RangerJoe
Posts: 18284
Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2015 2:39 pm
Location: Who knows?

RE: Torpedo bombers and bombing accuracy

Post by RangerJoe »

ORIGINAL: Maallon

ORIGINAL: RangerJoe

ORIGINAL: Maallon



+1
I was asking myself the same question just now. [:D]

She has indicated her willingness to shoot people who disagree with her views. Among other things.
Not saying that you are wrong, because I am not following her every move and don't agree with absolutely everything she says, also she is young and fiery, a combination which can lead to unfortunate wording.
But for me to believe your exact statement you would need to send me the source. [:)]

There is even a video with her speaking in English.

Greta Thunberg turns heads when she threatens to put world leaders ‘against the wall’
Wearing what appeared to be a mass-produced plastic raincoat, on Friday fanatical 16-year-old climate change activist Greta Thunberg promised her followers that they would one day force the world’s leaders to do their bidding, one way or another.

“Unfortunately, we probably already know the outcome,” she said at a climate change protest in Italy, referring to she and her acolytes’ efforts to persuade world leaders to jettison the fruits of Western civilization so that the Earth may be saved from doom.

“World leaders are still trying to run away from their responsibilities but we have to make sure they cannot do that. We will make sure that we put them against the wall and they will have to do their job to protect our futures.”

https://www.bizpacreview.com/2019/12/14 ... ll-864506/
up against the wall in an inextricable situation; in great trouble or difficulty.
The image here is of someone facing execution by a firing squad.
See also: up, wall

https://idioms.thefreedictionary.com/up ... t+the+wall
Seek peace but keep your gun handy.

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing! :o

“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”
:twisted: ; Julia Child
Image
User avatar
Maallon
Posts: 242
Joined: Sun Dec 27, 2020 7:48 am
Location: Germany

RE: Torpedo bombers and bombing accuracy

Post by Maallon »

ORIGINAL: RangerJoe

ORIGINAL: Maallon

ORIGINAL: RangerJoe




She has indicated her willingness to shoot people who disagree with her views. Among other things.
Not saying that you are wrong, because I am not following her every move and don't agree with absolutely everything she says, also she is young and fiery, a combination which can lead to unfortunate wording.
But for me to believe your exact statement you would need to send me the source. [:)]

There is even a video with her speaking in English.

Greta Thunberg turns heads when she threatens to put world leaders ‘against the wall’
Wearing what appeared to be a mass-produced plastic raincoat, on Friday fanatical 16-year-old climate change activist Greta Thunberg promised her followers that they would one day force the world’s leaders to do their bidding, one way or another.

“Unfortunately, we probably already know the outcome,” she said at a climate change protest in Italy, referring to she and her acolytes’ efforts to persuade world leaders to jettison the fruits of Western civilization so that the Earth may be saved from doom.

“World leaders are still trying to run away from their responsibilities but we have to make sure they cannot do that. We will make sure that we put them against the wall and they will have to do their job to protect our futures.”

https://www.bizpacreview.com/2019/12/14 ... ll-864506/
up against the wall in an inextricable situation; in great trouble or difficulty.
The image here is of someone facing execution by a firing squad.
See also: up, wall

https://idioms.thefreedictionary.com/up ... t+the+wall
This is exactly what I meant with unfortunate wording and also speaking in a second language.
Here is her apology and reasoning for that phrase:
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-50799233
Post Reply

Return to “War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition”