Ground Support is Broken

[ncc1701e]

ORIGINAL: Harrybanana

So if Alvaro is using a beta where GS had been fixed, well then "Never Mind". I will just wait for the Beta to become official and test again.

I have done few more tests here:
https://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=5104711

[Harrybanana]

ORIGINAL: ncc1701e

ORIGINAL: Nikel

From an outsider the evident question is, why is Harrybanana not included in the beta team?

Perhaps because he did not ask for?

I have not asked. I have been a game tester a couple times now, but I got too bored too quickly and quit. If I find a problem with a game while playing it I am like a dog with a bone trying to get it fixed. But to actually test play games without an opponent just to look for problems; sorry that is not for me. But I have the greatest admiration for those who do.

[Harrybanana]

ORIGINAL: ncc1701e

ORIGINAL: Harrybanana

So if Alvaro is using a beta where GS had been fixed, well then "Never Mind". I will just wait for the Beta to become official and test again.

I have done few more tests here:
https://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=5104711

Thank you for sharing this ncc1701e. It would appear that whatever Alvaro did to fix it so that an air unit's tactical strength is now included in the displayed Combat Odds of the Combat Report has also fixed it so that this tactical strength is now actually included in the Combat Odds. I suppose where Alvaro and I disagree is he says that tactical strength has always been included in determining the Combat Odds, but it just wasn't showing up in the Combat Report; whereas I say it wasn't being added to determine the Combat Odds. But so long as it has been fixed I don't care who was right.

[ncc1701e]

ORIGINAL: Harrybanana

ORIGINAL: ncc1701e

ORIGINAL: Harrybanana

So if Alvaro is using a beta where GS had been fixed, well then "Never Mind". I will just wait for the Beta to become official and test again.

I have done few more tests here:
https://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=5104711

Thank you for sharing this ncc1701e. It would appear that whatever Alvaro did to fix it so that an air unit's tactical strength is now included in the displayed Combat Odds of the Combat Report has also fixed it so that this tactical strength is now actually included in the Combat Odds. I suppose where Alvaro and I disagree is he says that tactical strength has always been included in determining the Combat Odds, but it just wasn't showing up in the Combat Report; whereas I say it wasn't being added to determine the Combat Odds. But so long as it has been fixed I don't care who was right.