China not receiving lend lease.

Moderator: Hubert Cater

Post Reply
CrackingShow
Posts: 160
Joined: Tue Dec 29, 2020 6:58 am

China not receiving lend lease.

Post by CrackingShow »

Hello

I hold Ledo, Burma, and the relevant Chinese cities but I'm not receiving either the Burma road MPPs or the Ledo airlift MPPs.
User avatar
BillRunacre
Posts: 6896
Joined: Mon Jul 22, 2013 2:57 pm
Contact:

RE: China not receiving lend lease.

Post by BillRunacre »

Hi

I'm just looking at the scripts and if the US said YES to DE 305 to send supplies via the Burma Road, then China should receive 60 MPPs a turn providing the following conditions apply:

; Haiphong Port is in Axis hands
#ALIGNMENT_POSITION= 185,69 [1]
; Kunming is in Allied hands
#ALIGNMENT_POSITION= 180,65 [2]
; Rangoon is in Allied hands
#ALIGNMENT_POSITION= 174,74 [2]
; Mandalay is in Allied hands
#ALIGNMENT_POSITION= 174,70 [2]
; Lashio is in Allied hands
#ALIGNMENT_POSITION= 177,67 [2]

Please can you check the status of these locations and advise if any aren't being satisfied, i.e. are held by the other side?

If so, the Decision to fly supplies over the Hump should be presented, however, that decision is contingent on Burma having surrendered, i.e. Rangoon having fallen, and from your description I don't think it has?
Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/FurySoftware

We're also on Facebook! https://www.facebook.com/FurySoftware/
User avatar
BillRunacre
Posts: 6896
Joined: Mon Jul 22, 2013 2:57 pm
Contact:

RE: China not receiving lend lease.

Post by BillRunacre »

The conditions for DE 306 to be presented, in order to airlift supplies over the Hump also include these:

; Haiphong Port is in Axis hands
#ALIGNMENT_POSITION= 185,69 [1]
; Kunming is in Allied hands
#ALIGNMENT_POSITION= 180,65 [2]
; Ledo is in Allied hands
#ALIGNMENT_POSITION= 175,62 [2]
; Calcutta is in Allied hands
#ALIGNMENT_POSITION= 167,67 [2]
Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/FurySoftware

We're also on Facebook! https://www.facebook.com/FurySoftware/
CrackingShow
Posts: 160
Joined: Tue Dec 29, 2020 6:58 am

RE: China not receiving lend lease.

Post by CrackingShow »

I think the issue is that Haiphong is not in Axis hands, Indochina is neutral. That would explain it.
User avatar
BillRunacre
Posts: 6896
Joined: Mon Jul 22, 2013 2:57 pm
Contact:

RE: China not receiving lend lease.

Post by BillRunacre »

If Indochina is neutral and with a pro-Allied leaning then China should be receiving 60 MPPs a turn via the Hanoi-Kunming railway, hopefully that is the case?
Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/FurySoftware

We're also on Facebook! https://www.facebook.com/FurySoftware/
CrackingShow
Posts: 160
Joined: Tue Dec 29, 2020 6:58 am

RE: China not receiving lend lease.

Post by CrackingShow »

Indochina has a 4% Axis leaning. I will initiate diplomacy with them and see what happens.
CrackingShow
Posts: 160
Joined: Tue Dec 29, 2020 6:58 am

RE: China not receiving lend lease.

Post by CrackingShow »

I just had a diplo hit, Indochina is now at 21% allied, but no increase in MPPs for CHina yet.
User avatar
BillRunacre
Posts: 6896
Joined: Mon Jul 22, 2013 2:57 pm
Contact:

RE: China not receiving lend lease.

Post by BillRunacre »

The income should commence in the first Allied turn after the diplo hit. Providing of course that the USA had originally said YES at the start of the game to sending supplies to China via the Hanoi-Kunming railway.

I'll keep my fingers crossed for hearing that it does recommence...
Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/FurySoftware

We're also on Facebook! https://www.facebook.com/FurySoftware/
CrackingShow
Posts: 160
Joined: Tue Dec 29, 2020 6:58 am

RE: China not receiving lend lease.

Post by CrackingShow »

It's working now. Thanks.
User avatar
BillRunacre
Posts: 6896
Joined: Mon Jul 22, 2013 2:57 pm
Contact:

RE: China not receiving lend lease.

Post by BillRunacre »

Great, thanks for letting me know! [:)]
Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/FurySoftware

We're also on Facebook! https://www.facebook.com/FurySoftware/
Post Reply

Return to “Strategic Command WWII: World at War”