Making the last Beta Official

This new stand alone release based on the legendary War in the Pacific from 2 by 3 Games adds significant improvements and changes to enhance game play, improve realism, and increase historical accuracy. With dozens of new features, new art, and engine improvements, War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition brings you the most realistic and immersive WWII Pacific Theater wargame ever!

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

Panjack
Posts: 487
Joined: Sun Jul 12, 2009 2:08 am
Location: Southern California

RE: Making the last Beta Official

Post by Panjack »

Let me throw something out...

I agree with several others above that an updated version of the manual would be very beneficial to new (and current) players.

Previous discussions of the creation of an updated manual have presumed that the end product would be a new static PDF version of the manual. The production of such a PDF document, however, is a mistake.

An updated version of the manual should be an HTML document, readable in any browser. The virtue of an HTML document is that unlike with a PDF: (a) little layout is needed and (b) an updated manual can be produced piecemeal instead of being fully completed before it sees the light of day.

Below is a screenshot of one small part of an HTML document I just created that updates the current manual with information about running the game with modern hardware. You will recognize the text as coming from the "What's New" document which appears in the main game directory. What you see below is the only change I made to the original manual and is only a proof of concept.

The process involved in creating the HTML document was simple: I used Adobe Acrobat Pro to export the PDF of the current manual to HTML. Then, I added the text at the bottom using Dreamweaver (an HTML editor). This approach, however, is imperfect. First, the HTML created by Adobe Acrobat is horribly verbose, which matters for speed and ease of editing of the document. Second, the quality of the images created by this process is often quite low. Third, Acrobat is unable to strip out the background on the pages and, so, adds hundreds of image files of the background throughout the HTML document.

A better pathway to an HTML update of the manual: Matrix (actually, its designer) opens the original design document for the print/PDF manual, removes the background from the pages, removes the page number from the pages, and then generates HTML documents for each chapter.

These files could be uploaded to the server Matrix uses, and someone could be given access to the appropriate directories so that a team of people could make the many small and big changes the manual needs. (I'm not sure that anyone would want to host the new manual because of potential bandwidth costs.) The manual would not be a static PDF document but a "living manual" that slowly integrates updated information. So, instead of waiting for a mythical complete rewrite of the whole manual, players would have access to a (slowly) updated manual starting in a few weeks.

If InDesign was used to create the print/PDF manuals and if the full package of files (including images) were sent to me, I could create the HTML versions of the chapters for other people to edit. (I just opened up a 2003 InDesign document with the current version of InDesign, so I'm pretty sure a 2009 InDesign document can be opened up.)

If Matrix if fine with the above process, I imagine that at least three people would have to agree to work on the living manual to make it become a reality.

(A separate issue is what use could be made of material appearing on the forum, say by Alfred. Certainly anything appearing on the forum could be rewritten, but I don't know anything about matters related to copyright claims on material appearing on Internet forums.)

Image
Attachments
Capture99.jpg
Capture99.jpg (183.76 KiB) Viewed 1522 times
User avatar
Tanaka
Posts: 5167
Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2003 3:42 am
Location: USA

RE: Making the last Beta Official

Post by Tanaka »

ORIGINAL: pz501

This is going to sound incredibly stupid, but who is Alfred? Is there any particular thread where I can read posts from him?

Everyone says he has the most knowledge when it comes to the workings of the game.

I've been away from WITP-AE for a long while, and I'm trying to catch up, so I'll appreciate any help.

Also, some posts say Alfred is "gone". Can anyone shed some light on this for me?

Again my apology for sounding uneducated, and I hope you'll forgive my asking about something that appears to be common community knowledge.

If you search for answers to any difficult topic or questions about the way AE operates, you will likely find an attack or insult from Alfred. He is a very knowledgeable poster with an ego/attitude problem who ran the forum like his own private club who consistently ran newbies and old vets away from the forum. He was banned and refuses to follow forum rules and thus the ban remains in effect until he agrees to do so. But with his ego I highly doubt he will agree to that. It's a shame because his input would be valuable to this project.
ORIGINAL: pz501

Thanks guys for the information regarding Alfred.

The responses were to say the least, educational, especially the picture of Michael Caine.

I'll leave everyone alone now, since I don't want to intrude any further into what appears to be a semi-private forum. Please forgive my ignorance. It won't happen again.

Please stay. A semi-private forum is what we are trying to avoid now. We are trying to become a positive welcoming community again.
Image
User avatar
Tanaka
Posts: 5167
Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2003 3:42 am
Location: USA

RE: Making the last Beta Official

Post by Tanaka »

ORIGINAL: Kull

Although it is discussed in the Bug Compilation thread I linked earlier, the "TRACOM Bug" is very serious and should be looked at. TRACOM is supposed to be a pilot training acceleration mechanism, but unfortunately it can do much more. Several players have reported that when TRACOM contains more than 100 pilots, it also increases the national experience number. When you look at the screenshot below, keep in mind that the IJN pilot national experience number (the highest level of experience a new pilot can graduate with) is supposed to be capped at 34 in 1943. Instead, the bug produces results like this:

ORIGINAL: GetAssista
ORIGINAL: Kull
... but a player who makes a serious effort to populate TRACOM (with say 100 or more pilots) is going to see some very noticeable improvements.

Oh yeah, improvements you might see. just maybe not what you could've expected [;)]

Both are stock 1 scenarios

Image

This reminds me. Isn't it a bug that when you individually add a pilot to a group it takes weeks for them to arrive but when you add groups of pilots to a group it is instant? Aren't they supposed to work the same?
Image
Rogue188
Posts: 60
Joined: Mon Nov 25, 2019 11:37 pm

RE: Making the last Beta Official

Post by Rogue188 »

Thank you for the answers RangerJoe, but I have not had much luck searching the forums. At least when I use the search bar. I get lots of answers that have nothing to do with my question. Overall, my point is that the information I pointed out should be obvious. Why should I have to search thousands of threads in the forums to understand how big AF my planes can land on?
User avatar
Kull
Posts: 2744
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2007 3:43 am
Location: El Paso, TX

RE: Making the last Beta Official

Post by Kull »

ORIGINAL: Rogue188

Thank you for the answers RangerJoe, but I have not had much luck searching the forums. At least when I use the search bar. I get lots of answers that have nothing to do with my question. Overall, my point is that the information I pointed out should be obvious. Why should I have to search thousands of threads in the forums to understand how big AF my planes can land on?

Actually the forum should be your "search of last resort". I just opened up the pdf manual, typed in "airfield size", and within seconds it took me to section 9.4 which would answer most of your questions. "Rearmament" was even faster, taking me to the Rearmament table at 20.1.2.2, which, if nothing else, shows that port size is only one factor when it comes to loading of ammo.

Please don't take this the wrong way, but many folks do not search the manual, when the answers can usually be found there, and pretty quickly, too. Now if we're talking about paging through a paper manual, then yes, kill.me.now. but the pdf version is easy to use.
User avatar
RangerJoe
Posts: 18248
Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2015 2:39 pm
Location: Who knows?

RE: Making the last Beta Official

Post by RangerJoe »

ORIGINAL: Rogue188

Thank you for the answers RangerJoe, but I have not had much luck searching the forums. At least when I use the search bar. I get lots of answers that have nothing to do with my question. Overall, my point is that the information I pointed out should be obvious. Why should I have to search thousands of threads in the forums to understand how big AF my planes can land on?

As long as it is size 1 for wheeled aircraft they can land. Flying boats without wheels (some do have them, they are amphibious like the PBY-5A) and float planes generally do better landing on water.
Seek peace but keep your gun handy.

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing! :o

“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”
:twisted: ; Julia Child
Image
User avatar
RangerJoe
Posts: 18248
Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2015 2:39 pm
Location: Who knows?

RE: Making the last Beta Official

Post by RangerJoe »

ORIGINAL: Kull

ORIGINAL: Rogue188

Thank you for the answers RangerJoe, but I have not had much luck searching the forums. At least when I use the search bar. I get lots of answers that have nothing to do with my question. Overall, my point is that the information I pointed out should be obvious. Why should I have to search thousands of threads in the forums to understand how big AF my planes can land on?

Actually the forum should be your "search of last resort". I just opened up the pdf manual, typed in "airfield size", and within seconds it took me to section 9.4 which would answer most of your questions. "Rearmament" was even faster, taking me to the Rearmament table at 20.1.2.2, which, if nothing else, shows that port size is only one factor when it comes to loading of ammo.

Please don't take this the wrong way, but many folks do not search the manual, when the answers can usually be found there, and pretty quickly, too. Now if we're talking about paging through a paper manual, then yes, kill.me.now. but the pdf version is easy to use.

Thank you Kull.

For searching the forums:

searching the posts on this forum? Erroneous retrieval...

https://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=2672439

For many other answers:

FAQ / Info for Newb's

https://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=2260137

This last one is stickied on top of The War Room subset of threads . . . [8|]
Seek peace but keep your gun handy.

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing! :o

“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”
:twisted: ; Julia Child
Image
User avatar
Maallon
Posts: 242
Joined: Sun Dec 27, 2020 7:48 am
Location: Germany

RE: Making the last Beta Official

Post by Maallon »

I also pledge for an updated manual this is probably the single most meaningful point that would make the game more accessible to newcomers and also make it easier for veterans to look stuff up.

1) The least I can say is that I play this game nearly daily for 1,5 years now and have not encountered anything that would be game breaking or I would consider problematic.
This is not to be said that there aren't bugs that need to be fixed, just that after all that time, I didn't notice any.

2) I do not think that there are any mods/maps/arts that should be part of the standard game, the mods for this game are wonderful, but the game is probably best learned in the vanilla version and players can install mods them self if they are interested in them.
That said it would be nice to integrate the functionality of the seabee tool into the launcher.
Also please keep the possibility to install multiple instances of the game, as this is in my experience the safest way to divide multiple ongoing games from each other.

4) I actually play the game on 1600*900 even though I have a 1920*1080 Monitor. The reason for that is that the UI elements in the game don't scale to large resolutions, so windows are smaller with bigger resolutions and it is not possible to resize them. In my opinion the combat replay especially is much more enjoyable to watch if the air combat window occupies 50% of the screen instead of something like 20% with 1920*1080, also the readability of the text is better. So I think using a smaller resolution with the game is actually more beneficial than using a large one.
My switches are: -f -px1600 -py900 -deepColor -skipVideo -archive -altFont
User avatar
Macquarrie1999
Posts: 77
Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2021 6:52 am
Location: California

RE: Making the last Beta Official

Post by Macquarrie1999 »

The only mods that should be added are various art mods (not for the map though).


The one thing I really wish this game would have is the ability to zoom out the map a bit. I want the ability to see more of the map at the same time. Also, the -altFont switch is basically a necessity.
Ian R
Posts: 3440
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Cammeraygal Country

RE: Making the last Beta Official

Post by Ian R »

ORIGINAL: Tanaka

ORIGINAL: Kull

Although it is discussed in the Bug Compilation thread I linked earlier, the "TRACOM Bug" is very serious and should be looked at. TRACOM is supposed to be a pilot training acceleration mechanism, but unfortunately it can do much more. Several players have reported that when TRACOM contains more than 100 pilots, it also increases the national experience number. When you look at the screenshot below, keep in mind that the IJN pilot national experience number (the highest level of experience a new pilot can graduate with) is supposed to be capped at 34 in 1943. Instead, the bug produces results like this:

ORIGINAL: GetAssista



Oh yeah, improvements you might see. just maybe not what you could've expected [;)]

Both are stock 1 scenarios

Image

This reminds me. Isn't it a bug that when you individually add a pilot to a group it takes weeks for them to arrive but when you add groups of pilots to a group it is instant? Aren't they supposed to work the same?


Your comment contains a sweeping generalisation which is incorrect.

If you add a group of pilots from the reserve list, filtered by highest skill, then some are immediately available, while others may take days or a week to get to the air group.

"I am Alfred"
User avatar
HansBolter
Posts: 7457
Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2006 12:30 pm
Location: United States

RE: Making the last Beta Official

Post by HansBolter »

Glitches still in the game:

If you attempt to use the mouse scroll wheel to scroll the combat reports instead of grabbing the scroll bar with the mouse a bleed through of text lists occurs which once it clears wipes out the Done button making the use of the Escape key the only way to close the combat report:



Image
Attachments
GraphicsGlitch.jpg
GraphicsGlitch.jpg (236.88 KiB) Viewed 1527 times
Hans

User avatar
HansBolter
Posts: 7457
Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2006 12:30 pm
Location: United States

RE: Making the last Beta Official

Post by HansBolter »

Glitches still in the game:

1. Cascading Selection: Sometimes selecting a TF or Air unit results in the selection cascading two units down the list. The base interface shows the yellow selection outline around the chosen unit, but the displayed unit is two units down the list from the chosen unit.

2. Non Display of Ground Units at bottom of Base Interface: Sometimes if selecting the Airbase or TF icon at a Base hex the Land Unit icons fail to display at the bottom of the interface. To get them to display you have to select the Ground Unit icon in the Base hex on the map.
Hans

User avatar
Erik Rutins
Posts: 39662
Joined: Tue Mar 28, 2000 4:00 pm
Location: Vermont, USA
Contact:

RE: Making the last Beta Official

Post by Erik Rutins »

Well, it seems that I caused some confusion with my initial post and that things went off-track again as well. Let me clarify a few things:

1. A re-master in this context just means that we re-build the store installer to the latest version and include as default any command line switches that are helpful for standard modern operating systems. It does not mean re-doing the game. I realized after reading a few of the replies that re-master may have been understood to mean some kind of re-make, but it means an installer rebuild as I intended it.

2. We would not be looking to make a new big update. This would just be wrapping up the last public beta to resolve any critical issues that could be easily resolved before making it official. This would be done by Michael, who made the public beta updates. It doesn't really make sense to leave it in a public beta state in a somewhat buried forum post when we could make it more easily available, especially for new players.

3. This is intended to just be a final tying up of loose ends with the public beta as well as making the initial install more friendly for new players and modern systems. Updating the Members Club with the most popular mods will also help with that so that they're not as hard to find.

4. There is no intention at this point to re-do the manual, though if the community updated it in some reasonable way, I'd be happy to add that to the Members Club or even add it to the installer.

5. Alfred is welcome back to the forum, as I've mentioned before. There's only one condition which applies to every poster on this forum. You have to agree to follow the forum rules - that's all that has been asked of him. He has not agreed to follow the forum rules, therefore the ban remains in place.

Please keep this thread on the original topic. I'll be reviewing the feedback on bugs and mods in detail later.

Regards,

- Erik


Erik Rutins
CEO, Matrix Games LLC


Image

For official support, please use our Help Desk: http://www.matrixgames.com/helpdesk/

Freedom is not Free.
User avatar
CaptBeefheart
Posts: 2598
Joined: Fri Jul 04, 2003 2:42 am
Location: Seoul, Korea

RE: Making the last Beta Official

Post by CaptBeefheart »

Great news, Erik. I think sorting out a few bugs would be nice. The port(0) lack of naval support functionality and the AKE bugs come to mind. Also, the pilot limit and other database limits (such as number of devices) should be increased if possible.

Folding in the functionality of Tracker and Seabee would be helpful. Making it easy for new players to get started will help.

I also think it would be helpful to add some DaBabes and most or all of Any Mac's scenarios, plus the extended map.

Cheers,
CB
Beer, because barley makes lousy bread.
User avatar
Kull
Posts: 2744
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2007 3:43 am
Location: El Paso, TX

RE: Making the last Beta Official

Post by Kull »

ORIGINAL: HansBolter

Glitches still in the game:

If you attempt to use the mouse scroll wheel to scroll the combat reports instead of grabbing the scroll bar with the mouse a bleed through of text lists occurs which once it clears wipes out the Done button making the use of the Escape key the only way to close the combat report:

You might want to check your settings, as that doesn't happen on mine. It sounds like either a resource issue or something akin to the Win10 bleedthrough issue when running full screen. Your other problems sound similar (and I've never seen those either).
User avatar
Macquarrie1999
Posts: 77
Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2021 6:52 am
Location: California

RE: Making the last Beta Official

Post by Macquarrie1999 »

ORIGINAL: HansBolter

Glitches still in the game:

1. Cascading Selection: Sometimes selecting a TF or Air unit results in the selection cascading two units down the list. The base interface shows the yellow selection outline around the chosen unit, but the displayed unit is two units down the list from the chosen unit.

2. Non Display of Ground Units at bottom of Base Interface: Sometimes if selecting the Airbase or TF icon at a Base hex the Land Unit icons fail to display at the bottom of the interface. To get them to display you have to select the Ground Unit icon in the Base hex on the map.

1. Is such an annoying bug. I hope it can be fixed.

I have had what you describe with ground units happen to industry as well.
User avatar
Erik Rutins
Posts: 39662
Joined: Tue Mar 28, 2000 4:00 pm
Location: Vermont, USA
Contact:

RE: Making the last Beta Official

Post by Erik Rutins »

ORIGINAL: Panjack
A better pathway to an HTML update of the manual: Matrix (actually, its designer) opens the original design document for the print/PDF manual, removes the background from the pages, removes the page number from the pages, and then generates HTML documents for each chapter.

These files could be uploaded to the server Matrix uses, and someone could be given access to the appropriate directories so that a team of people could make the many small and big changes the manual needs. (I'm not sure that anyone would want to host the new manual because of potential bandwidth costs.) The manual would not be a static PDF document but a "living manual" that slowly integrates updated information. So, instead of waiting for a mythical complete rewrite of the whole manual, players would have access to a (slowly) updated manual starting in a few weeks.

If InDesign was used to create the print/PDF manuals and if the full package of files (including images) were sent to me, I could create the HTML versions of the chapters for other people to edit. (I just opened up a 2003 InDesign document with the current version of InDesign, so I'm pretty sure a 2009 InDesign document can be opened up.)

If Matrix if fine with the above process, I imagine that at least three people would have to agree to work on the living manual to make it become a reality.

We did use InDesign, but frankly I'm not sure if the files are still available. I'll have a look around.

Regards,

- Erik

Erik Rutins
CEO, Matrix Games LLC


Image

For official support, please use our Help Desk: http://www.matrixgames.com/helpdesk/

Freedom is not Free.
User avatar
Lokasenna
Posts: 9304
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2012 3:57 am
Location: Iowan in MD/DC

RE: Making the last Beta Official

Post by Lokasenna »

ORIGINAL: Kull

Although it is discussed in the Bug Compilation thread I linked earlier, the "TRACOM Bug" is very serious and should be looked at. TRACOM is supposed to be a pilot training acceleration mechanism, but unfortunately it can do much more. Several players have reported that when TRACOM contains more than 100 pilots, it also increases the national experience number. When you look at the screenshot below, keep in mind that the IJN pilot national experience number (the highest level of experience a new pilot can graduate with) is supposed to be capped at 34 in 1943. Instead, the bug produces results like this:

ORIGINAL: GetAssista
ORIGINAL: Kull
... but a player who makes a serious effort to populate TRACOM (with say 100 or more pilots) is going to see some very noticeable improvements.

Oh yeah, improvements you might see. just maybe not what you could've expected [;)]

Both are stock 1 scenarios

Image

This would qualify as 'gamebreaking bug' to me. It's not huge because you have to embark on this path and you can avoid triggering it, but it seems like something that should be an easy fix in the code.
User avatar
RangerJoe
Posts: 18248
Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2015 2:39 pm
Location: Who knows?

RE: Making the last Beta Official

Post by RangerJoe »

ORIGINAL: Lokasenna

ORIGINAL: Kull

Although it is discussed in the Bug Compilation thread I linked earlier, the "TRACOM Bug" is very serious and should be looked at. TRACOM is supposed to be a pilot training acceleration mechanism, but unfortunately it can do much more. Several players have reported that when TRACOM contains more than 100 pilots, it also increases the national experience number. When you look at the screenshot below, keep in mind that the IJN pilot national experience number (the highest level of experience a new pilot can graduate with) is supposed to be capped at 34 in 1943. Instead, the bug produces results like this:

ORIGINAL: GetAssista



Oh yeah, improvements you might see. just maybe not what you could've expected [;)]

Both are stock 1 scenarios

Image

This would qualify as 'gamebreaking bug' to me. It's not huge because you have to embark on this path and you can avoid triggering it, but it seems like something that should be an easy fix in the code.

Maybe there should be a different thread with the "bugs" and/or "features" so players can agree to avoid them since it does not appear that there will be any fixes for those.

It seems to me that what is going to be attempted would be a program to install the game with the proper switches for new machines. As I pointed out before, SeaBee would be a good choice. Then the most popular mods and other items to be added so they are easily installed.

So no new updated manual although that would be nice and I would pay for that.
Seek peace but keep your gun handy.

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing! :o

“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”
:twisted: ; Julia Child
Image
User avatar
Tanaka
Posts: 5167
Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2003 3:42 am
Location: USA

RE: Making the last Beta Official

Post by Tanaka »

ORIGINAL: Ian R

ORIGINAL: Tanaka

ORIGINAL: Kull

Although it is discussed in the Bug Compilation thread I linked earlier, the "TRACOM Bug" is very serious and should be looked at. TRACOM is supposed to be a pilot training acceleration mechanism, but unfortunately it can do much more. Several players have reported that when TRACOM contains more than 100 pilots, it also increases the national experience number. When you look at the screenshot below, keep in mind that the IJN pilot national experience number (the highest level of experience a new pilot can graduate with) is supposed to be capped at 34 in 1943. Instead, the bug produces results like this:




This reminds me. Isn't it a bug that when you individually add a pilot to a group it takes weeks for them to arrive but when you add groups of pilots to a group it is instant? Aren't they supposed to work the same?


Your comment contains a sweeping generalisation which is incorrect.

If you add a group of pilots from the reserve list, filtered by highest skill, then some are immediately available, while others may take days or a week to get to the air group.


This is what I was referring to:

https://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=4923122
9. 3 available ways of pulling a pilot into an airgroup from the reserve pool all produce different results with respect to arrival delay and XP loss. https://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.a ... ey=�
Image
Post Reply

Return to “War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition”