Nirosi vs Boldairade(Nirosi welcome)

Post here your best AAR
boldairade
Posts: 1020
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 11:07 pm

RE: Nirosi vs Boldairade(NO Nirosi for now...)

Post by boldairade »

April 9, 1943 Africa

Flush with success in Greece, Allied planners notice a possibility to stress the Axis line. The Italian 2nd Fortress Corps holds the southern part of the Axis line here. It is an anti tank specialist. The last few turns, we have moved forces around so that two US infantry corps(II and VI Corps) are adjacent to it. We get 2-1 odds here, and decide to attack. It is a bloody battle, with lots of step losses, air and ground, on both sides. Italian bombers hammer away at the attack forces. 3 assaults by US infantry see at first Allied forces taking more casualties, but by the third attack, the tables are turning. The fourth assault goes even better, but the fifth sees the worn down US troops score 2 hits and take 2 hits. We rotate out VI Corps and move up the elite 2nd Armor Corps. The fifth attack destroys the Italian corps.

We study the situation, and decide to move up the anti armor US 3rd Armor. After moving it up, we feel some trepidation. It will certainly be hit with a massive Axis counter attack next turn. Still, it should be able to retreat behind friendly troops next turn.

The US, incidentally, hit 1944 tech in breakthrough and assault techs last turn. All of these forces were upgraded, because we had very high expenditures on reinforcement for our bombers, but these ground troops were also earmarked for upgrades.

Africa now-



Image
Attachments
africa6.jpg
africa6.jpg (33.4 KiB) Viewed 505 times
boldairade
Posts: 1020
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 11:07 pm

RE: Nirosi vs Boldairade(NO Nirosi for now...)

Post by boldairade »

April 9, 1943

East Front

North(Konev) German forces here remain in garrison mode. Soviet sub group K-12 sinks Axis MM for the second turn, which makes me stupidly happy. Unfortunately a fliegerkorps spots them and hammers them, dealing 3 step losses and sending them back to port. Do I even have to say how jealous I am?

Center(Vatutin)-No noticeable Axis activity here.

South(Zhukov/Rokossovsky)-Axis forces seal the breach in the Pripyet caused by Broler and reoccupy all territory.

One other movement of note-Elite Axis armor in the salient near Dnepropetrovsk is no longer there. Was it rotated out to give infantry a position to breach the river defenses? Or was it rotated out to move to Greece? And which would be worse?

Oddly, north and central fronts see clear weather, only the south is snowy. The last of the 'free' Russian reserve formations becomes available this turn. Stavka continues to build one AT army and one supply truck each turn. The Red Air Force is also now being earmarked for reinforcements to try and make the remaining formations available in late spring or summer.

At this point, there are three notable Axis troops concentrations, one south of Smolensk, one near Kiev, and the largest one near Dnepropetrovsk. Stavka continues to puzzle over what the possible motivations of Axis planners are. If they are gearing up for a defensive struggle, our devotion to AT infantry might be a mistake. For now, Stavka plays it safe and orders the construction of yet another AT army.

Southern Front-



Image

Russia is 32 days away from 1944 heavy armor tech. This is a breakthrough that could seriously impact the front.
Attachments
south11.jpg
south11.jpg (113.39 KiB) Viewed 505 times
boldairade
Posts: 1020
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 11:07 pm

RE: Nirosi vs Boldairade(NO Nirosi for now...)

Post by boldairade »

Italians troops in this war have been a tough mark for Allied forces. On many occasions, they have stood and fought to their own destruction rather than surrender.

Image
Attachments
italians.jpg
italians.jpg (7.89 KiB) Viewed 505 times
boldairade
Posts: 1020
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 11:07 pm

RE: Nirosi vs Boldairade(NO Nirosi for now...)

Post by boldairade »

Newly upgunned Sherman Fireflies move forward in the dessert. Next turn, they will likely get to test their mettle vs the very best the Afrika Korps has to offer.

Image
Attachments
firefly.jpg
firefly.jpg (122.37 KiB) Viewed 505 times
boldairade
Posts: 1020
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 11:07 pm

RE: Nirosi vs Boldairade(NO Nirosi for now...)

Post by boldairade »

The USA carrier Ranger attempts to support convoy routes in the Northern Atlantic without success.

Image
Attachments
carrier2.jpg
carrier2.jpg (195.94 KiB) Viewed 505 times
User avatar
John B.
Posts: 3985
Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2011 6:45 pm
Location: Virginia
Contact:

RE: Nirosi vs Boldairade(NO Nirosi for now...)

Post by John B. »

Way to go with Athens! And, any clear turn he does not attack you in the USSR is a victory of it's own kind. :)
John Barr
boldairade
Posts: 1020
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 11:07 pm

RE: Nirosi vs Boldairade(NO Nirosi for now...)

Post by boldairade »

ORIGINAL: John B.

Way to go with Athens! And, any clear turn he does not attack you in the USSR is a victory of it's own kind. :)


Thank you.

Though I can’t really take credit. It was really meant to be a spoiling attack in preparation for next turn. But man was I happy.

In the East, it’s clear and cold. Perhaps Nirosi is waiting for even better weather.

That said I agree. I’m a bit perplexed as to what is coming in the East.
aoffen
Posts: 508
Joined: Fri Jun 07, 2002 10:28 am
Location: Brisvegas, Australia

RE: Nirosi vs Boldairade(NO Nirosi for now...)

Post by aoffen »

Keep up the pressure. Things are looking better. The BoA is a worry though. I haven’t got this far in a game against a love opponent yet so it worries me. What is your convoy tech for the Alllies?
michaelCLARADY
Posts: 212
Joined: Mon Dec 02, 2019 1:41 pm

RE: Nirosi vs Boldairade(NO Nirosi for now...)

Post by michaelCLARADY »

April' 43..... What does Vichy North Africa look like? Who is in control there?
boldairade
Posts: 1020
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 11:07 pm

RE: Nirosi vs Boldairade(NO Nirosi for now...)

Post by boldairade »

ORIGINAL: michaelCLARADY

April' 43..... What does Vichy North Africa look like? Who is in control there?


If you read earlier in the AAR you'll see I launched an ill conceived invasion of NW africa in 1941. It left N africa firmly in axis hands with the vichy formations untouched and allied with the Axis.



Image
Attachments
NA.jpg
NA.jpg (63.91 KiB) Viewed 505 times
boldairade
Posts: 1020
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 11:07 pm

RE: Nirosi vs Boldairade(NO Nirosi for now...)

Post by boldairade »

April 23, 1943

BOA-It is an all out effort by Nazi Uboats. Five raids by 3 large uboat packs sink 13 MM. Uboats suffer only 5 step hits. Our new escort tech seems to be failing. We are guessing right, and they are hitting well escorted convoys. They are just winning.

Norway-Improved weather sees formations recovering effectiveness. No major movements on either side.

Germany-US Bomber Command sends all five heavy bomber squadrons into the skies, escorted by upgraded escort fighters. The Germans are waiting. We take immense damage, but despite making sure initial sorties are well escorted and flown by our best squadrons, we do little damage to German interceptors. German flack is also more accurate. Overall, we suffer a staggering 22 air step losses, but even though our bombers start the raids at high readiness, we can only reduce one German city(Dusseldorf). Losses of this magnitude are not sustainable. This does not figure in the huge cost of supply trucks. We may have to wait for tech upgrades.

Africa-Germany's vengeance is swift here. They quickly drive back the US II Corps, and that isolates 3rd US Armor. The Axis hits the fresh US formation from 4 directions with III Pz, IV Pz, LXVIII Corps, and the new Italian armor corps, Scipio Armored. The US formation is fresh and game, however. It takes three attacks to drive back 3rd Armored, and the Axis suffer losses. This allows us to launch an attack this turn involving an infantry corps and eventually all 4 of our operational armored corps. Our attack drives back III Pz and Scipio Armor Corps. We end up essentially where we were before we launched our initial offensive. It is a functional draw, but Allied Command counts that as a win. Anything that occupies Axis formations right now is worthwhile.



Image
Attachments
africa7.jpg
africa7.jpg (31.65 KiB) Viewed 507 times
boldairade
Posts: 1020
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 11:07 pm

RE: Nirosi vs Boldairade(NO Nirosi for now...)

Post by boldairade »

April 23, 1943

Greece/Olympus

Allied planners expected Axis forces here to adopt a defensive posture to take advantage of rough terrain if Allied units could take Athens. This is NOT what happens.

The Axis forces railed into this theater are powerful and built for offensive maneuvers. A panzer grenadier corps, armor corps, and alpine corps have arrived on the front.

Seeing that the worn down US VII Corps is holding Athens, the Axis attack. Air strikes soften up US defenses, and then the 7th Pz Grenadiers, supported by 32nd Coastal division and Italian tac bombers go over to the offensive. Two attacks, however, are stopped cold by Allied bombers and especially the Allied fleet.

Allied planners are sure that next turn, we will see more powerful Axis forces contesting Athens. XIX Pz Corps will likely attack with support for 7th Pz Grenadiers and 2nd Italian Alpine Corps. The Allies do everything they can to prepare a defense of the key port city. Worn down naval units are rotated out, but relatively fresh BB and CA are moved in to support the ground troops. Battered VII Corps is withdrawn, and the elite III Canadian Corps moves up. Additionally, with Axis bombers exhausted and Italian subs withdrawn, the Canadian HQ and General Simmonds land in the south. Finally, another fighter formation lands in Athens itself, UK No 1 Fighter.

This is all an immense risk. Should Athens fall, we will be able to neither supply or effectively withdraw the number of formations in Greece. Nirosi knows this. He is likely gambling absolutely everything on driving us out. On the one hand, it is a huge opportunity for him to make a kill. On the other, he may feel a need to eliminate this theater. Right now, Germany is fighting the BOA, the air war over the Reich, Norway, Africa, Greece, and of course the Eastern Front. Nirosi may feel that this is just too much for Germany to handle in the long run, and is going for broke to eliminate Greece. This is precisely why the original Olympus was to be launched only AFTER Germany launched its spring offensive in the East-so that top German formations could not react.



Image


A mild positive: A fresh US heavy bomber arrived in Rhodes last turn and this turn hammers Axis oil fields in Ploesti, doing significant damage.
Attachments
olympus3.jpg
olympus3.jpg (111.54 KiB) Viewed 507 times
boldairade
Posts: 1020
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 11:07 pm

RE: Nirosi vs Boldairade(NO Nirosi for now...)

Post by boldairade »

April 23, 1943

East Front

North-Little to report here. German formations remain in garrison mode. Repairs continue on Russian surface vessels and subs.

Center-There are certainly some powerful Axis formations on this front, but there does not seem to be enough of them to really sustain a large scale push. They could likely make a broad push, but it seems unlikely they could penetrate deeply and quickly, as they lack the formations to guard the flanks of that type of operation.

South-Here, the Germans have concentrated considerable attack power deep in the salient near Dnepropetrovsk, and also near Kiev. We wondered if German forces would show up here or in Greece. Unfortunately, the answer is both. Weather here is clear but cold. Likely the Axis forces are waiting for perfect weather before launching their attacks here. That makes Stavka believe their goals are likely fairly modest-perhaps to seize Rostov? Additionally, Stavka believes the Axis forces will move fairly cautiously to protect their forces, likely smashing forward with their powerful Pz groups, then covering them up with infantry in a slow, methodical advance, as opposed to a deep encirclement.

Image


In a stroke of good fortune, Russia achieves 44 heavy armor tech this turn. Upgrade budget is increased, and several formations are earmarked for upgrades.
Attachments
south.jpg
south.jpg (87.45 KiB) Viewed 507 times
User avatar
John B.
Posts: 3985
Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2011 6:45 pm
Location: Virginia
Contact:

RE: Nirosi vs Boldairade(NO Nirosi for now...)

Post by John B. »

I am way too involved in this AAR. :) Way to go on Athens and in hammering Ploesti. Don't get down about US bombers in Germany. 1943 is the year of the Schweinfurt and Regensburg disasters.
John Barr
boldairade
Posts: 1020
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 11:07 pm

RE: Nirosi vs Boldairade(NO Nirosi for now...)

Post by boldairade »

ORIGINAL: John B.

I am way too involved in this AAR. :) Way to go on Athens and in hammering Ploesti. Don't get down about US bombers in Germany. 1943 is the year of the Schweinfurt and Regensburg disasters.


I'm very glad anyone is reading it! Never wrote one before.

I literally was laying in bed last night thinking how bad it will be if Athens falls, which is pretty silly.

That said, i'm at a very weird place in my life where i have a lot of time, which is pretty unusual. I'm glad i have this to occupy my thoughts sometimes. It's a great diversion.
boldairade
Posts: 1020
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 11:07 pm

RE: Nirosi vs Boldairade(NO Nirosi for now...)

Post by boldairade »

As concerning as Africa, Greece and the Eastern Front are, it is the BOA that is most troublesome.

Despite ruinous expenditures on MM, escorts, and tech as well as good luck guessing where the Axis subs are headed, we are still losing this battle, and losing badly. Every shipyard in the US, Canada, and the UK is kept at capacity at all times, yet we are losing ground.

Last turn, Russian production was diverted to MM, meaning they had to skip one turn of producing armies. It is a large sacrifice. But without MM, there will be no aid. Without aid, defeat is all but assured.

Image
Attachments
merchant2.jpg
merchant2.jpg (146.92 KiB) Viewed 507 times
boldairade
Posts: 1020
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 11:07 pm

RE: Nirosi vs Boldairade(NO Nirosi for now...)

Post by boldairade »

A Panzer IV burns in Africa. Attrition is the name of the game for the Allies. But will that doctrine prevail?

Image
Attachments
Pz4.jpg
Pz4.jpg (37.95 KiB) Viewed 507 times
User avatar
ncc1701e
Posts: 10725
Joined: Tue Oct 29, 2013 7:50 pm
Location: Utopia Planitia Fleet Yards

RE: Nirosi vs Boldairade(NO Nirosi for now...)

Post by ncc1701e »

I am reading your AAR, both you and Nirosi are doing a great summary of the operations. Attrition is never good at the end for the Axis.
Chancellor Gorkon to Captain James T. Kirk:
You don't trust me, do you? I don't blame you. If there is to be a brave new world, our generation is going to have the hardest time living in it.
michaelCLARADY
Posts: 212
Joined: Mon Dec 02, 2019 1:41 pm

RE: Nirosi vs Boldairade(NO Nirosi for now...)

Post by michaelCLARADY »

ORIGINAL: boldairade

ORIGINAL: michaelCLARADY

April' 43..... What does Vichy North Africa look like? Who is in control there?


If you read earlier in the AAR you'll see I launched an ill conceived invasion of NW africa in 1941. It left N africa firmly in axis hands with the vichy formations untouched and allied with the Axis.



Image

Thanks for the response!
User avatar
John B.
Posts: 3985
Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2011 6:45 pm
Location: Virginia
Contact:

RE: Nirosi vs Boldairade(NO Nirosi for now...)

Post by John B. »

ORIGINAL: boldairade

ORIGINAL: John B.

I am way too involved in this AAR. :) Way to go on Athens and in hammering Ploesti. Don't get down about US bombers in Germany. 1943 is the year of the Schweinfurt and Regensburg disasters.


I'm very glad anyone is reading it! Never wrote one before.

I literally was laying in bed last night thinking how bad it will be if Athens falls, which is pretty silly.

That said, i'm at a very weird place in my life where i have a lot of time, which is pretty unusual. I'm glad i have this to occupy my thoughts sometimes. It's a great diversion.
I hear you on the idea of laying up at night wondering what will happen in a game you're playing. The only thing that seems out of whack in this game is the fact that the Axis navies seem to have developed stealth technology. There may be a simple explanation but I have no idea what that is.

Good luck to the Canadians! Hold that line!!!
John Barr
Post Reply

Return to “AAR”