Subs & Torpedoes

Share your gameplay tips, secret tactics and fabulous strategies with fellow gamers.
Post Reply
rmarine
Posts: 4
Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2004 2:48 pm

Subs & Torpedoes

Post by rmarine »

[&:]Hi all

I've been playing the game for a couple of weeks now ... absolutely brilliant!! However, one thing is really puzzling (and annoying) me!! Hope someone can explain.

Why is it that whenever one of my subs contacts an enemy Capital ship (eg CV, BB, CA, CL, DD), fires a spread of torps and actually manages to hit the thing, I will only ever hit with one torpedo (and then hardly ever) ... but when my subs fire at a poxy little MSW, they will hit with normally two and often three torpedoes??? Very frustrating!

Carl
Philwd
Posts: 285
Joined: Tue Mar 19, 2002 7:22 am
Location: Arizona

RE: Subs & Torpedoes

Post by Philwd »

Are you playing as USN? The USN fleet subs(not the S-boats) have the historical torpedo dud problem. I have found thier success improves dramatically in early '43.

One other thought is speed of the target. Slower targets would get hit more.

Quark
rmarine
Posts: 4
Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2004 2:48 pm

RE: Subs & Torpedoes

Post by rmarine »

Thanks for the input Quark. Much appreciated.

Yes I am playing as the Allies and I can see the sense of the duds (should have thought of that myself). I think you're right that speed of target must be the answer ... all of my attacks on Capital ships are at sea, whilst the MSWs are poodling around their port hexes. I think that distance to target must have something to do with as well (the further the distance the greater the spread) ... or am I attributing too much to a computer program?

Carl
User avatar
pasternakski
Posts: 5567
Joined: Sat Jun 29, 2002 7:42 pm

RE: Subs & Torpedoes

Post by pasternakski »

I don't know if there is a calculation for distance, Carl, but torpedoes have an effective range, so there's probably something to it. I think, too, that TFs containing ASW capable ships like DDs (even the IJN ones) inhibit your sub attack results through some calculation involving their ASW ratings.

I always think of getting a torpedo hit on anything as sort of an unexpected Christmas present. I never count on submarines being able to accomplish anything, so I just try to put 'em where they can do some damage and hope for the best. The nasty little minefields they can lay are worth thinking about, too.
Put my faith in the people
And the people let me down.
So, I turned the other way,
And I carry on anyhow.
User avatar
Drex
Posts: 2512
Joined: Wed Sep 13, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Chico,california

RE: Subs & Torpedoes

Post by Drex »

I am trying to hang on to my subs by using them as minelayers in '42 and then switching to patrol by '43. I lose them too fast by putting them on patrol but minelaying allows them to place their mines and haul ass out of the area. By '43 I still have the majority of my subs and can cover the enemy's routes pretty well.
Col Saito: "Don't speak to me of rules! This is war! It is not a game of cricket!"
User avatar
Nomad
Posts: 7273
Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2001 8:00 am
Location: West Yellowstone, Montana

RE: Subs & Torpedoes

Post by Nomad »

I am sure that target speed plays a large role. I had one of my I subs hit a heavily damaged USN CV with 3 torps in one firing. She did not stay afloat long. [:D]
rmarine
Posts: 4
Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2004 2:48 pm

RE: Subs & Torpedoes

Post by rmarine »

Thanks for all the replies guys.

I think you're all correct ... speed of target seems to be the main factor. I've also been reading up on the Sub war in the Pacific and all books seem to point to the fact that the US torps where pretty crap until 1943ish. They either didn't explode on impact or went off too early or too late. We shall see what happens when I enter 1943! Having said that though, 2 nights ago I managed to put 2 torps into an undamaged Japanese CV!! Woo hoo!

Carl
Post Reply

Return to “The War Room”