High Priority Targets

Take command of air and naval assets from post-WW2 to the near future in tactical and operational scale, complete with historical and hypothetical scenarios and an integrated scenario editor.

Moderator: MOD_Command

Post Reply
User avatar
AdmiralSteve
Posts: 288
Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2011 2:32 pm
Location: Red Bluff, CA

High Priority Targets

Post by AdmiralSteve »

I'm looking to put into a scenario some high priority targets that if destroyed would the degrade the sides ability to perform certain functions, i.e. communicate with other elements of the side. Creating targets isn't the problem for me but coming up with ideas that would limit a sides ability to wage war, and of course fall within the capabilities of CMO.

Any suggestions?

Thanks,

Steve
“There are no extraordinary men...just extraordinary circumstances that ordinary men are forced to deal with.”
Admiral William Frederick Halsey Jr. 1882-1959

thewood1
Posts: 10271
Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2005 6:24 pm
Location: Boston

RE: High Priority Targets

Post by thewood1 »

I've played around with this concept quite a bit. I used the limiting comms function through a lua call on an event that destroys a comms center. I also created separate but allied sides so I could knock out comms on certain types of units or only certain organizations.

You can take this to very detailed levels, depending how much work you want to put into it.
User avatar
SeaQueen
Posts: 1436
Joined: Sat Apr 14, 2007 4:20 am
Location: Washington D.C.

RE: High Priority Targets

Post by SeaQueen »

I wrote some LUA code that allows you to build a hierarchical IADS, with various echelons of command posts and radars. The code makes SAM sites more survivable, but at the same time facilitates the possibility of "clipping the kill chain" in various places by striking command posts you identify (how do you know which one is the right one? ;-) ). I've found that it makes SEAD/DEAD a lot more interesting and rewarding, because it's no longer about just attacking the missile sites. It's now about attacking the network and its constituents.

For example, if you have a strike that needs to flow through a sector, you might choose to strike that sector operations center in the hope of crippling that area, or at least forcing the missile sites to reveal themselves for follow on strikes or avoidance purposes. Using the LUA code I wrote, you can do all that, provided you have a vision for the IADS architecture to depict in the game, and an assumption about how the computer controlled side might respond to a strike on a command post. The Iraqis, for example, might have just shut down and given up, or maybe only a fraction of them would have chosen to continue the fight and operate autonomously. How many even were trained to operate independently? A more advanced military might just reconnect to another command post and continue the fight with minimal interruption.

There's lots of things to play with in the code. I'm still messing with it. I've found that it adds a lot of nuance to the game.
Post Reply

Return to “Command: Modern Operations series”