ORIGINAL: BBfanboy
That must have been a nail biter for both sides to watch! [:D]
Yes indeed, these big gun brawls are always tremendous fun. [:)]
Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition
ORIGINAL: BBfanboy
That must have been a nail biter for both sides to watch! [:D]
ORIGINAL: JanSako
Certainly can't argue with the results!
Trying to understand the reason though.
There were 2 enemy task forces & 4 yours.
Why split yourself up?
If you don't, there would be one large TF of yours vs 2 smaller (relatively) of his.
- the total ammo pool is the same in both cases
- bringing all your guns & all your ammo against 1/2 of his should be better no?
- if you have all your ships in one place, the damage received is spread out more, so more of your ships keep firing back for longer, inflicting more damage (in your first battle, I bet your CL's just stopped firing back (effectively) after a certain damage threshold
- after one battle your TF can retreat home & does not have to face another fully intact TF (subject to luck & settings, of course!)
- the risk is if you get caught after the first battle, it would be bad, but the idea was to inflict maximum damage even if you lose your ships.
Maybe I am missing some sort of game mechanics?
ORIGINAL: Lowpe
Well done.
Another victory for the MST Tactic (multiple small taskforce).
You are becoming quite the adept at using it, especially as the Allies. Did you hang back at port specifically to engineer a daytime encounter or to prevent detection or a bit of both?
Appreciate how the care taken in staging the encounter, especially the ordering.
If I had sent a bigger task forces against equal numbers there would have been fewer engagements and thus none where the Japanese fleet is with very low ammo. Under different circumstances I would have gone with different strategies.
ORIGINAL: JanSako
That is what I meant. Your combined units were stronger than any one of the enemy TF's, so if you only engage one, you should have the upper hand. Wiping out any one of the 3 enemy TF's would have yielded about the same result. Of course if you then get 'reacted on' by any of the other fresh ones...
ORIGINAL: witpqs
Great battle!
Your prior post showed an image, but this one does not (just like Lowpe's posts now). Instead it shows "B-17s.jpg" at the bottom.DesertWolf101 wrote: Mon Feb 28, 2022 1:04 pm Unfortunately it seems that with the transition to the new forum format all my previous date entries for my AARs are lost - sigh....
April 5, 1942
I have been quite busy in real life with the events in Ukraine but Wirraway and I have still managed to do consistent if not frequent turns. Did not have much time to update the AAR but not much has actually happened since the last update. Wirraway has finally moved forward and captured Magwe which triggered the Allied operation to bomb the oil fields there. Before that occurs in the next turn, my bombers plastered the Japanese Chiang Mai airfields for some good bombing practice. (I tried to attach the image but it won't work)
B-17s.jpg