Scary U.S Armed Forces - United States Military Power | How Powerful is USA?

The sequel of the legendary wargame with a complete graphics and interface overhaul, major new gameplay and design features such as full naval combat modelling, improved supply handling, numerous increases to scenario parameters to better support large scenarios, and integrated PBEM++.
Post Reply
User avatar
larryfulkerson
Posts: 42682
Joined: Sat Apr 16, 2005 9:06 pm
Location: Tucson, AZ,usa,sol, milkyway
Contact:

Scary U.S Armed Forces - United States Military Power | How Powerful is USA?

Post by larryfulkerson »

Scary U.S Armed Forces - United States Military Power | How Powerful is USA?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7LIzKEc4n_w

highly reccommended. I watched it twice.



Image
Attachments
armymilit..dgif13.gif
armymilit..dgif13.gif (1.72 MiB) Viewed 486 times
Hermann Göring Laughed At US Plan For 50,000 Planes - Then America Built 100,000
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FATxplEQXPk
User avatar
Fred98
Posts: 4019
Joined: Fri Jan 05, 2001 10:00 am
Location: Wollondilly, Sydney

RE: Scary U.S Armed Forces - United States Military Power | How Powerful is USA?

Post by Fred98 »

The Chinese are highly trained. Both sides have technology. Any individual action can go either way.

After 6 individual actions, the Chinese will have the numbers. The US will run out of trained pilots first.

The US will lose.
.
User avatar
altipueri
Posts: 1055
Joined: Sat Nov 14, 2009 9:09 am

RE: Scary U.S Armed Forces - United States Military Power | How Powerful is USA?

Post by altipueri »

Agreed.

Quantity has a quality all its own.

-----

We've just lost an eighth of our carrier planes by one ditching on take off.
User avatar
Lobster
Posts: 5471
Joined: Thu Aug 08, 2013 2:12 pm
Location: Third rock from the Sun.

RE: Scary U.S Armed Forces - United States Military Power | How Powerful is USA?

Post by Lobster »

Carriers are what battleships were in WW2. A huge waste of resources but great for target practice. [:D]
ne nothi tere te deorsum (don't let the bastards grind you down)

If duct tape doesn't fix it then you are not using enough duct tape.

Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity and I’m not sure about the universe-Einstein.
User avatar
golden delicious
Posts: 4121
Joined: Tue Sep 05, 2000 8:00 am
Location: London, Surrey, United Kingdom

RE: Scary U.S Armed Forces - United States Military Power | How Powerful is USA?

Post by golden delicious »

ORIGINAL: Lobster

Carriers are what battleships were in WW2. A huge waste of resources but great for target practice. [:D]

Carriers are useful for the wars the US is likely to get into, where some place on the far side of the world needs to be plastered with smart bombs for whatever reason, and the other side has nothing more sophisticated than a twenty year old shoulder mounted SAM.

However, for such a purpose it's an awful lot of money to spend and I think when it comes to a war with another major power your post is by now more or less a truism.

The other albatross I suspect the US has around its neck is an unhealthy attachment to centralised control. One always sees in the movies the HQ watching the live footage from helmet cameras and giving orders from their comfy chairs, and more materially I recall one anecdote from the Iraqi invasion where an USAF pilot reported seeing coalition vehicles (with the chevron) and was told by HQ that there were no friendly troops in the area, that ipso facto they must be Iraqi troops, and that they should be fired upon. The pilot followed his orders and, of course, later found out that he'd just destroyed two British army vehicles.

All of this is bad enough as the HQ is never going to be best placed to make decisions, but what happens when the other guy promptly shuts down all your comms? The guys on the ground need to know what to do without being able to talk to another guy fifty miles away.
"What did you read at university?"
"War Studies"
"War? Huh. What is it good for?"
"Absolutely nothing."
User avatar
Lobster
Posts: 5471
Joined: Thu Aug 08, 2013 2:12 pm
Location: Third rock from the Sun.

RE: Scary U.S Armed Forces - United States Military Power | How Powerful is USA?

Post by Lobster »

Going into a conflict where tech superiority is ensured you could easily use a cargo ship to launch aircraft. VTOL. They are what will ensure the demise of the super carrier. So many eggs in one very expensive basket.

ne nothi tere te deorsum (don't let the bastards grind you down)

If duct tape doesn't fix it then you are not using enough duct tape.

Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity and I’m not sure about the universe-Einstein.
Itzkabel
Posts: 3
Joined: Tue Apr 05, 2022 2:39 am

Re: RE: Scary U.S Armed Forces - United States Military Power | How Powerful is USA?

Post by Itzkabel »

Fred98 wrote: Sat Nov 20, 2021 8:20 am The Chinese are highly trained. Both sides have technology. Any individual action can go either way.

After 6 individual actions, the Chinese will have the numbers. The US will run out of trained pilots first.

The US will lose.
.
the chinese are not highly trained, the entire military is corrupt worse than the soviet union with many high ranking positions bought instead of earned. china will not win they would be contained. also the different branches dont even communicate so it wouldnt be the USA vs a combined chinese military. imagine the japanese in ww2 how there branches bickered except worse. if you want to see some good videos breaking things down how it would go from an unbiased perspective check out this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J3VqF2d ... tlegrounds
User avatar
golden delicious
Posts: 4121
Joined: Tue Sep 05, 2000 8:00 am
Location: London, Surrey, United Kingdom

Re: RE: Scary U.S Armed Forces - United States Military Power | How Powerful is USA?

Post by golden delicious »

Itzkabel wrote: Sat Apr 09, 2022 3:49 pm the chinese are not highly trained, the entire military is corrupt worse than the soviet union with many high ranking positions bought instead of earned. china will not win they would be contained. also the different branches dont even communicate so it wouldnt be the USA vs a combined chinese military. imagine the japanese in ww2 how there branches bickered except worse. if you want to see some good videos breaking things down how it would go from an unbiased perspective check out this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J3VqF2d ... tlegrounds
The thing is modern China is the master of soft power. Look how they control American businesses and celebrities by threatening to cut off their Chinese markets if they criticise China. In the meantime, China is buying influence around the developing world with major infrastructure projects which the west has dithered over for decades. China has absolutely no intention of fighting a war of the kind Russia has blundered into in Ukraine. Why should it? It can become top dog without one.
"What did you read at university?"
"War Studies"
"War? Huh. What is it good for?"
"Absolutely nothing."
Post Reply

Return to “The Operational Art of War IV”