Air attack effectiveness

Take command of air and naval assets from post-WW2 to the near future in tactical and operational scale, complete with historical and hypothetical scenarios and an integrated scenario editor.

Moderator: MOD_Command

Locked
BobTank63
Posts: 154
Joined: Thu Sep 23, 2021 2:49 pm

Re: Air attack effectiveness

Post by BobTank63 »

mustang191 wrote: Thu May 26, 2022 8:18 pm
BobTank63 wrote: Thu May 26, 2022 7:02 pm I've directed OP's thoughts to a forum where I think they might be more appreciated.

https://www.reddit.com/r/NonCredibleDef ... &context=3
They didn't even dispute it.

They said a single bullet has a .01% chance so a company firing a clip is 50%.
One, it's a magazine.
Two, that's not even how probability works. What, do two mags mean 100% chance? 3 mags 150%?
Three, read further on the source.
mustang191
Posts: 93
Joined: Wed May 18, 2022 5:30 am

Re: Air attack effectiveness

Post by mustang191 »

BobTank63 wrote: Thu May 26, 2022 9:08 pm
mustang191 wrote: Thu May 26, 2022 8:18 pm
BobTank63 wrote: Thu May 26, 2022 7:02 pm I've directed OP's thoughts to a forum where I think they might be more appreciated.

https://www.reddit.com/r/NonCredibleDef ... &context=3
They didn't even dispute it.

They said a single bullet has a .01% chance so a company firing a clip is 50%.
One, it's a magazine.
Two, that's not even how probability works. What, do two mags mean 100% chance? 3 mags 150%?
Three, read further on the source.
Your objections are underwhelming.
BobTank63
Posts: 154
Joined: Thu Sep 23, 2021 2:49 pm

Re: Air attack effectiveness

Post by BobTank63 »

mustang191 wrote: Thu May 26, 2022 10:11 pm
BobTank63 wrote: Thu May 26, 2022 9:08 pm
mustang191 wrote: Thu May 26, 2022 8:18 pm

They didn't even dispute it.

They said a single bullet has a .01% chance so a company firing a clip is 50%.
One, it's a magazine.
Two, that's not even how probability works. What, do two mags mean 100% chance? 3 mags 150%?
Three, read further on the source.
Your objections are underwhelming.
Your entire argument is nonsensical and not backed by any sources or proper math.
mustang191
Posts: 93
Joined: Wed May 18, 2022 5:30 am

Re: Air attack effectiveness

Post by mustang191 »

BobTank63 wrote: Fri May 27, 2022 3:05 am
mustang191 wrote: Thu May 26, 2022 10:11 pm
BobTank63 wrote: Thu May 26, 2022 9:08 pm

One, it's a magazine.
Two, that's not even how probability works. What, do two mags mean 100% chance? 3 mags 150%?
Three, read further on the source.
Your objections are underwhelming.
Your entire argument is nonsensical and not backed by any sources or proper math.
Same, I suppose.
Locked

Return to “Command: Modern Operations series”