Program exactly?

A complete overhaul and re-development of Gary Grigsby's War in the East, with a focus on improvements to historical accuracy, realism, user interface and AI.

Moderator: Joel Billings

Post Reply
HOTEC
Posts: 828
Joined: Sat Nov 23, 2013 3:34 am

Program exactly?

Post by HOTEC »

Should it be 10% then 1 and 20% then 2 morale points lost?
What is it written in the program?
Attachments
Typo_02.jpg
Typo_02.jpg (118.42 KiB) Viewed 749 times
Stamb
Posts: 2470
Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2021 1:07 pm

Re: Program exactly?

Post by Stamb »

why would you lose 2 points with 20% of supplies while losing 1 point with 10%?
Слава Україні!
Glory to Ukraine!
Veterin
Posts: 503
Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2022 9:27 am

Re: Program exactly?

Post by Veterin »

It reads ok to me. If suppliers are less than 10%, chance to lose 2 points. If supplies are between 10%-20%, then 1 point
HOTEC
Posts: 828
Joined: Sat Nov 23, 2013 3:34 am

Re: Program exactly?

Post by HOTEC »

My layman sense is:

Let say morale is 75 and 100 tons is the need. You receive 89 tons which is less than 10% of the need. Morale is reduced to 73 (75-2). If you receive 79 tons which is less than 20% of the need. The morale becomes 74 (75-1). The less the receipt is the higher the morale.

Unique.

Think about your paycheck.
User avatar
loki100
Posts: 11708
Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2012 12:38 pm
Location: Utlima Thule

Re: Program exactly?

Post by loki100 »

I'd suggest not to look at it as a 'layman' but read exactly what it says.

Its not a 10% shortfall against need, which I think is how you are reading it.

its 10% of need, so if you need 90 and have 9 or less, that is 10% of need.

do hope you are not involved in wage negotiations or your work colleagues are going to be disappointed
HOTEC
Posts: 828
Joined: Sat Nov 23, 2013 3:34 am

Re: Program exactly?

Post by HOTEC »

Thanks.

That is good.
HOTEC
Posts: 828
Joined: Sat Nov 23, 2013 3:34 am

Re: Program exactly?

Post by HOTEC »

In consideration of the case as attached, please advise which case would be applied for the minimum of supply to be received without the penalty of morale:

a) Min. supply req'd = 288 * 20% = 58 (57.6 rounded up)
b) Min. supply req'd = (288 - 177) * 20% = 23 (22.2 rounded up)

Would some kinds of leader checks required for losing the morale point? If so, what kind?
Attachments
Supply_03.jpg
Supply_03.jpg (205.79 KiB) Viewed 580 times
HOTEC
Posts: 828
Joined: Sat Nov 23, 2013 3:34 am

Re: Program exactly?

Post by HOTEC »

Any idea?
User avatar
56ajax
Posts: 2303
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2007 3:43 am
Location: Cairns, Australia

Re: Program exactly?

Post by 56ajax »

HOTEC wrote: Thu Jun 23, 2022 2:56 amAny idea?
a;

but it is not what supply is received but what is stored in the unit at the end of the logistics phase. So in your example :

177 is stored in the unit but it needs 288 stored to be at 100% of need. What is stored is 64% of need so no penalty

If the values were...

144/288 then 50% stored so no morale penalty

100/288 then 35% stored so no morale penalty

72/288 then 25% stored so no morale penalty

58/288 then 20% stored so no morale penalty

55/288 then 19% stored so 1 morale point penalty (as it has dropped below 20%)

30/288 then 10% stored so 1 morale point penalty

26/288 then 9% stored so 2 morale point penalty (as it has dropped below 10%)
Molotov : This we did not deserve.

Foch : This is not peace. This is a 20 year armistice.

C'est la guerre aérienne
HOTEC
Posts: 828
Joined: Sat Nov 23, 2013 3:34 am

Re: Program exactly?

Post by HOTEC »

Thanks.
Post Reply

Return to “Gary Grigsby's War in the East 2”