More Variants - The Allies ride again - No xargun please

Post descriptions of your brilliant victories and unfortunate defeats here.

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

User avatar
CaptBeefheart
Posts: 2619
Joined: Fri Jul 04, 2003 2:42 am
Location: Seoul, Korea

Re: More Variants - The Allies ride again - No xargun please

Post by CaptBeefheart »

Now that you have some time, can you show us a screenshot of one of your Vanguards? Screens of some of your naval reinforcement lists (CVs, CVLs, BBs, etc.) would be interesting as well.

Cheers,
CB
Beer, because barley makes lousy bread.
User avatar
Nomad
Posts: 7273
Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2001 8:00 am
Location: West Yellowstone, Montana

More Variants - The Allies ride again - No xargun please

Post by Nomad »

Two lists for now.

My CVLs are normal a scenario 2.
420410 Vanguard.png
420410 Vanguard.png (575.38 KiB) Viewed 1055 times
420410 USN CVs.png
420410 USN CVs.png (131.19 KiB) Viewed 1055 times
User avatar
CaptBeefheart
Posts: 2619
Joined: Fri Jul 04, 2003 2:42 am
Location: Seoul, Korea

Re: More Variants - The Allies ride again - No xargun please

Post by CaptBeefheart »

Thanks, Nomad. I went back to the beginning of your AAR to fill in some blanks in my knowledge. I noticed you have 10 Essexes coming in without air groups or aircraft. Do you expect VF-17 and other land-based USN, as well as USMC, units to fill those decks?

Cheers,
CB
Beer, because barley makes lousy bread.
User avatar
Nomad
Posts: 7273
Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2001 8:00 am
Location: West Yellowstone, Montana

Re: More Variants - The Allies ride again - No xargun please

Post by Nomad »

That is a yes, and I will soon be actively seeking CV-CV combat, hopefully to exchange CV losses. If not, then I will have
to use what I can.

As a note, Xargun and I agreed to a modification of the data to allow all of his and my CV squadrons to resize as of Dec 7, 1941.
User avatar
Nomad
Posts: 7273
Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2001 8:00 am
Location: West Yellowstone, Montana

More Variants - The Allies ride again - No xargun please

Post by Nomad »

April 10, 1942

not much, some bombing at Bataan and Wenchow.
combatreport.txt
(6.39 KiB) Downloaded 15 times
T Rav
Posts: 417
Joined: Sat May 29, 2004 6:59 am

Re: More Variants - The Allies ride again - No xargun please

Post by T Rav »

It always hurts to lose a carrier, but losing one to a submarine seems to hurt more, Pretty good job by an old S-Boat.

Nice shooting,
T Rav
User avatar
Nomad
Posts: 7273
Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2001 8:00 am
Location: West Yellowstone, Montana

More Variants - The Allies ride again - No xargun please

Post by Nomad »

April 11, 1942

Even though it was a CVL and not a CV, everything helps.

Xargun did a DA at Wenchow, he is wearing them down.

Ground combat at Wenchow (89,58)

Japanese Deliberate attack

Attacking force 55303 troops, 498 guns, 153 vehicles, Assault Value = 1474

Defending force 25083 troops, 132 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 294

Japanese engineers reduce fortifications to 0

Japanese adjusted assault: 707

Allied adjusted defense: 673

Japanese assault odds: 1 to 1 (fort level 0)

Japanese Assault reduces fortifications to 0

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), experience(-)
Attacker:

Japanese ground losses:
1436 casualties reported
Squads: 4 destroyed, 100 disabled
Non Combat: 1 destroyed, 17 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 10 disabled
Vehicles lost 1 (1 destroyed, 0 disabled)

Allied ground losses:
1318 casualties reported
Squads: 61 destroyed, 31 disabled
Non Combat: 3 destroyed, 24 disabled
Engineers: 1 destroyed, 10 disabled

Assaulting units:
32nd Division
2nd Ind.Mixed Regiment
55th Infantry Brigade
22nd Division
116th Division
36th Division
138th Infantry Regiment

Defending units:
88th Chinese Corps
28th Chinese Corps
100th Chinese Corps
14th Chinese Base Force
25th Group Army
10th Group Army
3rd War Area
16th Construction Regiment
And a DA at Batavia, he did not lower the forts.

Ground combat at Batavia (49,98)

Japanese Deliberate attack

Attacking force 20858 troops, 204 guns, 235 vehicles, Assault Value = 733

Defending force 21166 troops, 195 guns, 81 vehicles, Assault Value = 514

Japanese engineers reduce fortifications to 2

Japanese adjusted assault: 300

Allied adjusted defense: 1571

Japanese assault odds: 1 to 5 (fort level 2)

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), forts(+), experience(-)
Attacker:

Japanese ground losses:
998 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 119 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 16 disabled
Engineers: 2 destroyed, 24 disabled
Guns lost 5 (1 destroyed, 4 disabled)

Allied ground losses:
721 casualties reported
Squads: 4 destroyed, 34 disabled
Non Combat: 2 destroyed, 7 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 2 disabled
Vehicles lost 12 (1 destroyed, 11 disabled)

Assaulting units:
5th Division
6th Tank Regiment
16th Guards Regiment
14th Guards Rgt /6
10th Ind. Mountain Gun Regiment
3rd Ind.Hvy.Art. Battalion
1st Hvy.Artillery Regiment
20th Ind. Mtn Gun Battalion

Defending units:
1st Regt Cavalerie
Batavia Coastal Gun Battalion
4th KNIL Landstorm Battalion
1st KNIL Regiment
2nd KNIL Regiment
1st KNIL Landstorm Battalion
Roodenburg Battalion
Merak Base Force
KNIL Army Command
ABDA
1st KNIL AA Battalion
ML-KNIL
1 ML-KNIL Aviation
Batavia Base Force
Landing at Siberoet and island West of Sumatra.

Bombings of Bataan and Wenchow.
combatreport.txt
(10.21 KiB) Downloaded 26 times
User avatar
Nomad
Posts: 7273
Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2001 8:00 am
Location: West Yellowstone, Montana

More Variants - The Allies ride again - No xargun please

Post by Nomad »

April 12, 1942

Another DA at Wenchow

Ground combat at Wenchow (89,58)

Japanese Deliberate attack

Attacking force 54452 troops, 498 guns, 153 vehicles, Assault Value = 1383

Defending force 23981 troops, 132 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 238

Japanese adjusted assault: 615

Allied adjusted defense: 481

Japanese assault odds: 1 to 1 (fort level 0)

Japanese Assault reduces fortifications to 0

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), leaders(+), experience(-)
Attacker:

Japanese ground losses:
1494 casualties reported
Squads: 1 destroyed, 111 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 15 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 10 disabled

Allied ground losses:
1026 casualties reported
Squads: 64 destroyed, 42 disabled
Non Combat: 6 destroyed, 60 disabled
Engineers: 1 destroyed, 12 disabled
Guns lost 21 (4 destroyed, 17 disabled)

Assaulting units:
32nd Division
55th Infantry Brigade
2nd Ind.Mixed Regiment
22nd Division
36th Division
116th Division
138th Infantry Regiment

Defending units:
88th Chinese Corps
28th Chinese Corps
100th Chinese Corps
3rd War Area
25th Group Army
10th Group Army
14th Chinese Base Force
16th Construction Regiment
combatreport.txt
(1.4 KiB) Downloaded 16 times
User avatar
Nomad
Posts: 7273
Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2001 8:00 am
Location: West Yellowstone, Montana

More Variants - The Allies ride again - No xargun please

Post by Nomad »

April 13, 1942

He did a DA at Malaybalay

Ground combat at Malaybalay (80,90)

Japanese Deliberate attack

Attacking force 8440 troops, 63 guns, 161 vehicles, Assault Value = 362

Defending force 7277 troops, 58 guns, 21 vehicles, Assault Value = 274

Japanese adjusted assault: 223

Allied adjusted defense: 139

Japanese assault odds: 1 to 1 (fort level 2)

Japanese Assault reduces fortifications to 1

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), forts(+), preparation(-), experience(-)
supply(-)
Attacker:

Japanese ground losses:
227 casualties reported
Squads: 1 destroyed, 10 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 6 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 1 disabled

Allied ground losses:
364 casualties reported
Squads: 2 destroyed, 45 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 9 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled

Assaulting units:
8th Tank Regiment
146th Infantry Regiment
Kure 2nd SNLF
16th Naval Guard Unit

Defending units:
102nd PA Infantry Regiment
103rd PA Infantry Regiment
3rd PA Constabulary Regiment
102nd PA Infantry Division
Cagayan USAAF Base Force
And one at Batavia

Ground combat at Batavia (49,98)

Japanese Deliberate attack

Attacking force 20113 troops, 204 guns, 243 vehicles, Assault Value = 740

Defending force 20636 troops, 196 guns, 80 vehicles, Assault Value = 446

Japanese adjusted assault: 352

Allied adjusted defense: 619

Japanese assault odds: 1 to 2 (fort level 2)

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), leaders(+), experience(-)
Attacker:

Japanese ground losses:
1625 casualties reported
Squads: 1 destroyed, 139 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 9 disabled
Engineers: 1 destroyed, 21 disabled

Allied ground losses:
744 casualties reported
Squads: 4 destroyed, 73 disabled
Non Combat: 1 destroyed, 6 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 1 disabled
Vehicles lost 3 (1 destroyed, 2 disabled)

Assaulting units:
5th Division
16th Guards Regiment
7th Ind.Tank Brigade
6th Tank Regiment
14th Guards Rgt /6
3rd Ind.Hvy.Art. Battalion
10th Ind. Mountain Gun Regiment
1st Hvy.Artillery Regiment
20th Ind. Mtn Gun Battalion

Defending units:
1st Regt Cavalerie
2nd KNIL Regiment
4th KNIL Landstorm Battalion
Batavia Coastal Gun Battalion
1st KNIL Regiment
1st KNIL Landstorm Battalion
Roodenburg Battalion
Merak Base Force
ML-KNIL
1st KNIL AA Battalion
KNIL Army Command
ABDA
1 ML-KNIL Aviation
Batavia Base Force
I expelled a Japanese Mixed Regiment from the hex between Nanning and Liuchow.
I thought it interesting that he had negatives for fatigue and supply. He is not cut off and has road access to Canton.


Ground combat at 73,55 (near Nanning)

Allied Deliberate attack

Attacking force 40220 troops, 268 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 1293

Defending force 3768 troops, 32 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 121

Allied adjusted assault: 963

Japanese adjusted defense: 33

Allied assault odds: 29 to 1

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), leaders(-), fatigue(-), supply(-)
Attacker:

Japanese ground losses:
1224 casualties reported
Squads: 31 destroyed, 70 disabled
Non Combat: 36 destroyed, 16 disabled
Engineers: 3 destroyed, 11 disabled
Guns lost 17 (7 destroyed, 10 disabled)
Units retreated 1

Allied ground losses:
463 casualties reported
Squads: 2 destroyed, 49 disabled
Non Combat: 1 destroyed, 1 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 4 disabled

Defeated Japanese Units Retreating!

Assaulting units:
44th Chinese Corps
2nd Chinese Corps
26th Chinese Corps
53rd Chinese Corps
7th Artillery Regiment
3rd Heavy Mortar Regiment

Defending units:
4th Ind.Mixed Regiment
Here is the area in question
430414 Nanning area.png
430414 Nanning area.png (293.86 KiB) Viewed 904 times
Bombers attacked Bataan

and my bombers attacked an infantry regiment near Hengyang.
combatreport.txt
(9.56 KiB) Downloaded 18 times
User avatar
Nomad
Posts: 7273
Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2001 8:00 am
Location: West Yellowstone, Montana

More Variants - The Allies ride again - No xargun please

Post by Nomad »

April 14, 1942

SS O16 hit an xAK, damaged it but I am sure it did not sink it. It was carrying troops
but I am not sure where it was going to.
Sub attack near Billiton at 53,92

Japanese Ships
xAK Nihonka Maru, Torpedo hits 1, on fire, heavy damage
xAK Mexico Maru
PB Naruto Maru #3

Allied Ships
SS O16

Japanese ground losses:
34 casualties reported
Squads: 1 destroyed, 1 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled

SS O16 launches 4 torpedoes at xAK Nihonka Maru
Bombs fell at Wenchow again.
combatreport.txt
(3.93 KiB) Downloaded 13 times
User avatar
Nomad
Posts: 7273
Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2001 8:00 am
Location: West Yellowstone, Montana

More Variants - The Allies ride again - No xargun please

Post by Nomad »

April 15, 1942

DA attacks at Wenchow and Batavia



Ground combat at Wenchow (89,58)

Japanese Deliberate attack

Attacking force 54056 troops, 498 guns, 153 vehicles, Assault Value = 1331

Defending force 23286 troops, 129 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 216

Japanese adjusted assault: 890

Allied adjusted defense: 778

Japanese assault odds: 1 to 1 (fort level 0)

Japanese Assault reduces fortifications to 0

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), leaders(+), experience(-)
Attacker:

Japanese ground losses:
846 casualties reported
Squads: 1 destroyed, 62 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 12 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 8 disabled

Allied ground losses:
1436 casualties reported
Squads: 68 destroyed, 18 disabled
Non Combat: 3 destroyed, 69 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 13 disabled
Guns lost 13 (2 destroyed, 11 disabled)

Assaulting units:
32nd Division
2nd Ind.Mixed Regiment
55th Infantry Brigade
116th Division
36th Division
22nd Division
138th Infantry Regiment

Defending units:
88th Chinese Corps
28th Chinese Corps
100th Chinese Corps
3rd War Area
10th Group Army
25th Group Army
14th Chinese Base Force
16th Construction Regiment
========================================================================
Ground combat at Batavia (49,98)

Japanese Deliberate attack

Attacking force 20749 troops, 216 guns, 440 vehicles, Assault Value = 693

Defending force 20222 troops, 196 guns, 79 vehicles, Assault Value = 397

Japanese engineers reduce fortifications to 1

Japanese adjusted assault: 417

Allied adjusted defense: 447

Japanese assault odds: 1 to 2 (fort level 1)

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), experience(-)
Attacker:

Japanese ground losses:
1213 casualties reported
Squads: 26 destroyed, 43 disabled
Non Combat: 1 destroyed, 17 disabled
Engineers: 4 destroyed, 13 disabled
Vehicles lost 16 (2 destroyed, 14 disabled)

Allied ground losses:
924 casualties reported
Squads: 42 destroyed, 59 disabled
Non Combat: 1 destroyed, 17 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 2 disabled
Vehicles lost 12 (1 destroyed, 11 disabled)

Assaulting units:
5th Guards Cav Regiment
16th Guards Regiment
7th Ind.Tank Brigade
6th Tank Regiment
5th Division
14th Guards Rgt /6
1st Hvy.Artillery Regiment
3rd Ind.Hvy.Art. Battalion
10th Ind. Mountain Gun Regiment
20th Ind. Mtn Gun Battalion

Defending units:
4th KNIL Landstorm Battalion
1st Regt Cavalerie
1st KNIL Regiment
2nd KNIL Regiment
Batavia Coastal Gun Battalion
1st KNIL Landstorm Battalion
Roodenburg Battalion
ABDA
Merak Base Force
ML-KNIL
KNIL Army Command
1st KNIL AA Battalion
1 ML-KNIL Aviation
Batavia Base Force
Both base's defenses are giving way, but they have held well for a good long time.

Air attacks at both Wenchow and Bataan
combatreport.txt
(9.23 KiB) Downloaded 14 times
User avatar
Nomad
Posts: 7273
Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2001 8:00 am
Location: West Yellowstone, Montana

More Variants - The Allies ride again - No xargun please

Post by Nomad »

April 16, 1942

DAs at Batavia and Wenchow, still holding, but defenses crumbling.

Malaybalay fell with large losses. That was the last base on Mindanao

Ground combat at Malaybalay (80,90)

Japanese Shock attack

Attacking force 8354 troops, 63 guns, 161 vehicles, Assault Value = 357

Defending force 6955 troops, 56 guns, 21 vehicles, Assault Value = 230

Japanese adjusted assault: 427

Allied adjusted defense: 82

Japanese assault odds: 5 to 1 (fort level 1)

Japanese forces CAPTURE Malaybalay !!!

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), preparation(-), morale(-), experience(-)
supply(-)
Attacker: shock(+)

Japanese ground losses:
498 casualties reported
Squads: 1 destroyed, 43 disabled
Non Combat: 1 destroyed, 3 disabled
Engineers: 1 destroyed, 1 disabled
Guns lost 4 (1 destroyed, 3 disabled)

Allied ground losses:
9898 casualties reported
Squads: 402 destroyed, 0 disabled
Non Combat: 508 destroyed, 0 disabled
Engineers: 7 destroyed, 0 disabled
Guns lost 75 (75 destroyed, 0 disabled)
Vehicles lost 22 (22 destroyed, 0 disabled)
Units destroyed 5

Assaulting units:
Kure 2nd SNLF
8th Tank Regiment
146th Infantry Regiment
16th Naval Guard Unit

Defending units:
102nd PA Infantry Regiment
3rd PA Constabulary Regiment
103rd PA Infantry Regiment
102nd PA Infantry Division
Cagayan USAAF Base Force
Bombs fell on Bataan and Wenchow.
combatreport.txt
(11.29 KiB) Downloaded 16 times
User avatar
Nomad
Posts: 7273
Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2001 8:00 am
Location: West Yellowstone, Montana

More Variants - The Allies ride again - No xargun please

Post by Nomad »

April 17, 1942

Semarang falls. Ramree Island is taken by paratroops.
DAs at Bandoeng and Wenchow, both hold for now.

Bombings at Bataan and Wenchow.
combatreport.txt
(10.61 KiB) Downloaded 14 times
User avatar
Nomad
Posts: 7273
Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2001 8:00 am
Location: West Yellowstone, Montana

More Variants - The Allies ride again - No xargun please

Post by Nomad »

April 18, 1942

Xargun did a SA at Wenchow

Ground combat at Wenchow (89,58)

Japanese Shock attack

Attacking force 52656 troops, 498 guns, 153 vehicles, Assault Value = 1182

Defending force 20754 troops, 124 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 123

Japanese adjusted assault: 805

Allied adjusted defense: 871

Japanese assault odds: 1 to 2 (fort level 0)

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), leaders(+), experience(-)
Attacker: shock(+)

Japanese ground losses:
382 casualties reported
Squads: 1 destroyed, 107 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 7 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 7 disabled

Allied ground losses:
1028 casualties reported
Squads: 36 destroyed, 15 disabled
Non Combat: 1 destroyed, 52 disabled
Engineers: 7 destroyed, 7 disabled
Guns lost 19 (15 destroyed, 4 disabled)

Assaulting units:
22nd Division
32nd Division
116th Division
2nd Ind.Mixed Regiment
55th Infantry Brigade
36th Division
138th Infantry Regiment

Defending units:
88th Chinese Corps
28th Chinese Corps
100th Chinese Corps
3rd War Area
14th Chinese Base Force
25th Group Army
10th Group Army
16th Construction Regiment
He bombed Bataan and my troops that are in the hex SW of Liuchow.
No real damage, just some disabled devices.
combatreport_420418.txt
(10.78 KiB) Downloaded 13 times
Last edited by Nomad on Sun Jun 19, 2022 11:36 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Nomad
Posts: 7273
Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2001 8:00 am
Location: West Yellowstone, Montana

More Variants - The Allies ride again - No xargun please

Post by Nomad »

April 19, 1942

SS KXIII, NW of Muntok, put a torpedo into a PB and sank her

After yesterday I put up some CAP over my units SW of Liuchow and downed a few aircraft.
An Ida, 2 Sonia and an Oscar.
combatreport.txt
(8.06 KiB) Downloaded 14 times
User avatar
Nomad
Posts: 7273
Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2001 8:00 am
Location: West Yellowstone, Montana

More Variants - The Allies ride again - No xargun please

Post by Nomad »

April 20, 1942

Cocos Island was invaded and taken.

Landings at Bima, Ruteng and Salajar also.

Bombings at Bataan.

It looks like he is moving the 38th Division from Singapore to Java. From sigint.
8/38th/C Division is loaded on a Japanese xAK moving to Kalidjati.
User avatar
Nomad
Posts: 7273
Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2001 8:00 am
Location: West Yellowstone, Montana

More Variants - The Allies ride again - No xargun please

Post by Nomad »

April 21, 1942

Not a lot of importance occurred today.

Unoccupied Salajar and Ruteng were captured by Japan.
Bima flipped before combat.

A SA at Batavia

Ground combat at Batavia (49,98)

Japanese Shock attack

Attacking force 22370 troops, 253 guns, 515 vehicles, Assault Value = 700

Defending force 19220 troops, 196 guns, 77 vehicles, Assault Value = 305

Japanese engineers reduce fortifications to 0

Japanese adjusted assault: 530

Allied adjusted defense: 475

Japanese assault odds: 1 to 1 (fort level 0)

Japanese Assault reduces fortifications to 0

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), leaders(+)
Attacker: shock(+)

Japanese ground losses:
336 casualties reported
Squads: 1 destroyed, 35 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 11 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 3 disabled
Guns lost 4 (2 destroyed, 2 disabled)
Vehicles lost 22 (1 destroyed, 21 disabled)

Allied ground losses:
1902 casualties reported
Squads: 67 destroyed, 67 disabled
Non Combat: 21 destroyed, 33 disabled
Engineers: 1 destroyed, 2 disabled
Vehicles lost 12 (2 destroyed, 10 disabled)

Assaulting units:
7th Ind.Tank Brigade
6th Tank Regiment
5th Division
14th Guards Rgt /6
16th Guards Regiment
5th Guards Cav Regiment
41st Guard Battalion
Yokosuka 2nd SNLF /5
1st Hvy.Artillery Regiment
10th Ind. Mountain Gun Regiment
3rd Ind.Hvy.Art. Battalion
2nd Ind.Hvy.Art. Battalion
20th Ind. Mtn Gun Battalion

Defending units:
1st KNIL Landstorm Battalion
1st KNIL Regiment
1st Regt Cavalerie
2nd KNIL Regiment
4th KNIL Landstorm Battalion
Batavia Coastal Gun Battalion
Roodenburg Battalion
ABDA
1 ML-KNIL Aviation
ML-KNIL
Merak Base Force
KNIL Army Command
1st KNIL AA Battalion
Batavia Base Force
I am glad to see him doing Shock Attacks, it costs him more and I consider all units in the DEI to be lost from day 1.

Small bombing raids on Bataan units.
User avatar
Nomad
Posts: 7273
Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2001 8:00 am
Location: West Yellowstone, Montana

More Variants - The Allies ride again - No xargun please

Post by Nomad »

April 22, 1942

Another SA at Batavia

Ground combat at Batavia (49,98)

Japanese Shock attack

Attacking force 22134 troops, 252 guns, 515 vehicles, Assault Value = 674

Defending force 17993 troops, 196 guns, 75 vehicles, Assault Value = 220

Japanese adjusted assault: 587

Allied adjusted defense: 323

Japanese assault odds: 1 to 1 (fort level 1)

Japanese Assault reduces fortifications to 0

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), leaders(+), leaders(-), experience(-)
Attacker: shock(+)

Japanese ground losses:
524 casualties reported
Squads: 11 destroyed, 37 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 18 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 9 disabled
Vehicles lost 45 (1 destroyed, 44 disabled)

Allied ground losses:
1324 casualties reported
Squads: 44 destroyed, 55 disabled
Non Combat: 3 destroyed, 21 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 5 disabled
Guns lost 23 (5 destroyed, 18 disabled)
Vehicles lost 10 (2 destroyed, 8 disabled)

Assaulting units:
7th Ind.Tank Brigade
41st Guard Battalion
14th Guards Rgt /6
5th Guards Cav Regiment
6th Tank Regiment
16th Guards Regiment
5th Division
Yokosuka 2nd SNLF /5
10th Ind. Mountain Gun Regiment
1st Hvy.Artillery Regiment
3rd Ind.Hvy.Art. Battalion
2nd Ind.Hvy.Art. Battalion
20th Ind. Mtn Gun Battalion

Defending units:
2nd KNIL Regiment
1st Regt Cavalerie
1st KNIL Regiment
Roodenburg Battalion
Batavia Coastal Gun Battalion
1st KNIL AA Battalion
1st KNIL Landstorm Battalion
KNIL Army Command
1 ML-KNIL Aviation
ML-KNIL
Merak Base Force
ABDA
4th KNIL Landstorm Battalion
Batavia Base Force
And a DA at Bandoeng

Ground combat at Bandoeng (50,100)

Japanese Deliberate attack

Attacking force 28171 troops, 252 guns, 79 vehicles, Assault Value = 953

Defending force 5642 troops, 128 guns, 69 vehicles, Assault Value = 168

Japanese adjusted assault: 603

Allied adjusted defense: 214

Japanese assault odds: 2 to 1 (fort level 2)

Japanese Assault reduces fortifications to 1

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), leaders(-), experience(-)
Attacker:

Japanese ground losses:
528 casualties reported
Squads: 6 destroyed, 33 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 1 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 2 disabled
Guns lost 2 (1 destroyed, 1 disabled)

Allied ground losses:
217 casualties reported
Squads: 1 destroyed, 19 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 7 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled

Assaulting units:
I./4th Infantry Battalion
33rd Division
I/81st Naval Guard Unit
4th Guards Division

Defending units:
Mobiele Eenheid Battalion
4th KNIL Regiment
3rd KNIL AA Battalion
Kalidjati Base Force
Bandoeng Base Force
Some more bombing at Bataan
User avatar
Nomad
Posts: 7273
Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2001 8:00 am
Location: West Yellowstone, Montana

More Variants - The Allies ride again - No xargun please

Post by Nomad »

April 23, 1942

I am not sure why, but he seems to like doing Shock Attacks.

Ground combat at Batavia (49,98)

Japanese Shock attack

Attacking force 21776 troops, 252 guns, 514 vehicles, Assault Value = 629

Defending force 17157 troops, 193 guns, 73 vehicles, Assault Value = 164

Japanese adjusted assault: 390

Allied adjusted defense: 263

Japanese assault odds: 1 to 1 (fort level 1)

Japanese Assault reduces fortifications to 0

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), experience(-)
Attacker: shock(+)

Japanese ground losses:
906 casualties reported
Squads: 43 destroyed, 21 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 23 disabled
Engineers: 6 destroyed, 8 disabled
Guns lost 5 (1 destroyed, 4 disabled)

Allied ground losses:
701 casualties reported
Squads: 48 destroyed, 34 disabled
Non Combat: 7 destroyed, 60 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 9 disabled
Guns lost 34 (1 destroyed, 33 disabled)
Vehicles lost 22 (5 destroyed, 17 disabled)
Units destroyed 1

Assaulting units:
16th Guards Regiment
14th Guards Rgt /6
Yokosuka 2nd SNLF /5
5th Guards Cav Regiment
5th Division
7th Ind.Tank Brigade
6th Tank Regiment
41st Guard Bn /4
1st Hvy.Artillery Regiment
2nd Ind.Hvy.Art. Battalion
10th Ind. Mountain Gun Regiment
3rd Ind.Hvy.Art. Battalion
20th Ind. Mtn Gun Battalion

Defending units:
2nd KNIL Regiment
1st Regt Cavalerie
1st KNIL Regiment
Roodenburg Battalion
1 ML-KNIL Aviation
4th KNIL Landstorm Battalion
1st KNIL AA Battalion
ML-KNIL
ABDA
1st KNIL Landstorm Battalion
Batavia Coastal Gun Battalion
KNIL Army Command
Merak Base Force
Batavia Base Force

=======================================================


Ground combat at Bandoeng (50,100)

Japanese Shock attack

Attacking force 27775 troops, 251 guns, 79 vehicles, Assault Value = 945

Defending force 5465 troops, 128 guns, 69 vehicles, Assault Value = 149

Japanese engineers reduce fortifications to 0

Japanese adjusted assault: 841

Allied adjusted defense: 232

Japanese assault odds: 3 to 1 (fort level 0)

Japanese forces CAPTURE Bandoeng !!!

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), leaders(-), experience(-)
Attacker: shock(+)

Japanese ground losses:
345 casualties reported
Squads: 8 destroyed, 19 disabled
Non Combat: 20 destroyed, 3 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 1 disabled
Guns lost 3 (2 destroyed, 1 disabled)
Units destroyed 1

Allied ground losses:
5911 casualties reported
Squads: 189 destroyed, 0 disabled
Non Combat: 301 destroyed, 0 disabled
Engineers: 19 destroyed, 0 disabled
Guns lost 94 (94 destroyed, 0 disabled)
Vehicles lost 90 (90 destroyed, 0 disabled)
Units destroyed 5

Assaulting units:
I/81st Naval Guard Unit
33rd Division
I./4th Infantry Battalion
4th Guards Division
16th Guards Rgt /4

Defending units:
Mobiele Eenheid Battalion
4th KNIL Regiment
Kalidjati Base Force
3rd KNIL AA Battalion
Bandoeng Base Force
He took Bandoeng, but took some losses doing it

Landings at Endeh, Pantar, and Waingapoe, all in the DEI. These are part of his clean up operations.

I can see movement into Siangtan. The mouseover shows 7 units. I know that the 6th division and the 1st Mortar Battalion are among them.
I have 878 Assault Strength in Siangtan. I have 1300 more on the move and an ART unit with 16 x 105mm howitzers. I hope it is enough.
420424 Siangtan.png
420424 Siangtan.png (473.89 KiB) Viewed 727 times
User avatar
Nomad
Posts: 7273
Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2001 8:00 am
Location: West Yellowstone, Montana

More Variants - The Allies ride again - No xargun please

Post by Nomad »

April 24, 1942

Not much. Pantar and Waingapoe fall.
Post Reply

Return to “After Action Reports”