Is ACW better in terms of flanking and repeated attacks?

Strategic Command: American Civil War gives you the opportunity to battle for the future of the United States in this grand strategy game. Command the Confederacy in a desperate struggle for independence, or lead the Union armies in a march on Richmond.

Moderator: Fury Software

Post Reply
Polyknikes
Posts: 26
Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2022 11:06 am

Is ACW better in terms of flanking and repeated attacks?

Post by Polyknikes »

In the other SC games, I could pound a corps for 30 turns and it will regain strength and maintain morale even if it's cut off from large sources of supply. are things a bit less static in this regard?

edit:

Just watched the VTH video, it's the same thing again. 4 units hitting 1 garrison at harper's ferry from all sides and they just take a measly 1 dmg and survives all attacks. sigh.
User avatar
OldCrowBalthazor
Posts: 2836
Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 12:42 am
Location: Republic of Cascadia

Re: Is ACW better in terms of flanking and repeated attacks?

Post by OldCrowBalthazor »

That all changes once you have divisions and then corps.
Brigades can't detrench..hence why 3 brigades hammering on a regiment at Harpers Ferry at the beginning don't give much damage.
Proper HQ attachments will help overcome this with brigades.
Once larger units with upgrades combined with quality HQs take the field, combat in ACW gets quite bloody very quick.
My YouTube Channel: Balthazor's Strategic Arcana
https://www.youtube.com/c/BalthazorsStrategicArcana
SC-War in the Pacific Beta Tester
SC-ACW Beta Tester
1904 Imperial Sunrise Tester
SC-WW1 Empires in Turmoil DLC Tester
Tester of various SC Mods
Post Reply

Return to “Strategic Command: American Civil War”