Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition
Re: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
You are doing good as far as I can see.
- Attachments
-
- Orchid Mantis on a blue flower.png (410.69 KiB) Viewed 866 times
Seek peace but keep your gun handy.
I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing!
“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”
; Julia Child

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing!

“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”


Re: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
Decided to flee from the surging IJN SAGs near Finn...just putting subs in their way.
Meanwhile the Merauke invasion is steaming towards there...Deathstar is moving to support this invasion...
Kusaie Invasion loading...recon reports only 1 unit and 500 troops there, so I have assembled a four CA SAG to bombard and then a paratroop landing followed by the normal invasion...
Dispatched a fast battleship to Lunga to counter IJN slow battleships. My other two active fast battleships don't have the night crew experience yet to tangle with them. The fourth has reduced their flood damage down to the 60s and will start repairing the 44 sys damage shortly.
A few sweep in place, another attack at Akyab, the Chinese will hopefully finish off a mixed bde in the mountains, and Tulagi has been cleared...
IJA mixed bde surrounded and wiped out shortly:
Ground combat at 71,49 (near Kunming)
Allied Deliberate attack
Attacking force 25008 troops, 97 guns, 93 vehicles, Assault Value = 798
Defending force 4318 troops, 19 guns, 10 vehicles, Assault Value = 11
Allied adjusted assault: 119
Japanese adjusted defense: 4
Allied assault odds: 29 to 1
Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), disruption(-), fatigue(-), experience(-)
supply(-)
Attacker: fatigue(-), supply(-)
Japanese ground losses:
206 casualties reported
Squads: 30 destroyed, 0 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 3 disabled
Engineers: 1 destroyed, 0 disabled
Guns lost 4 (4 destroyed, 0 disabled)
Allied ground losses:
24 casualties reported
Squads: 1 destroyed, 1 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Vehicles lost 1 (1 destroyed, 0 disabled)
Assaulting units:
254th Armoured Brigade
37th Chinese Corps
60th Chinese Corps
1st Artillery Regiment
20th Artillery Regiment
Defending units:
1st Ind.Mixed Brigade
Meanwhile the Merauke invasion is steaming towards there...Deathstar is moving to support this invasion...
Kusaie Invasion loading...recon reports only 1 unit and 500 troops there, so I have assembled a four CA SAG to bombard and then a paratroop landing followed by the normal invasion...
Dispatched a fast battleship to Lunga to counter IJN slow battleships. My other two active fast battleships don't have the night crew experience yet to tangle with them. The fourth has reduced their flood damage down to the 60s and will start repairing the 44 sys damage shortly.
A few sweep in place, another attack at Akyab, the Chinese will hopefully finish off a mixed bde in the mountains, and Tulagi has been cleared...
IJA mixed bde surrounded and wiped out shortly:
Ground combat at 71,49 (near Kunming)
Allied Deliberate attack
Attacking force 25008 troops, 97 guns, 93 vehicles, Assault Value = 798
Defending force 4318 troops, 19 guns, 10 vehicles, Assault Value = 11
Allied adjusted assault: 119
Japanese adjusted defense: 4
Allied assault odds: 29 to 1
Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), disruption(-), fatigue(-), experience(-)
supply(-)
Attacker: fatigue(-), supply(-)
Japanese ground losses:
206 casualties reported
Squads: 30 destroyed, 0 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 3 disabled
Engineers: 1 destroyed, 0 disabled
Guns lost 4 (4 destroyed, 0 disabled)
Allied ground losses:
24 casualties reported
Squads: 1 destroyed, 1 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Vehicles lost 1 (1 destroyed, 0 disabled)
Assaulting units:
254th Armoured Brigade
37th Chinese Corps
60th Chinese Corps
1st Artillery Regiment
20th Artillery Regiment
Defending units:
1st Ind.Mixed Brigade
Re: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
March 3, 1943
First port strike with beasts...from experience this normally looks worse than in reality it is as it is hard to sink ships unless they are loaded with supplies or fuel in port strikes with 500 pound bombs.
First port strike with beasts...from experience this normally looks worse than in reality it is as it is hard to sink ships unless they are loaded with supplies or fuel in port strikes with 500 pound bombs.
Re: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
Expecting a fairly quick fight here...
Re: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
IJN pulls back...got one sub attack in...and spotted the Kirishima at Manus but missed...as expected IJN didn't even bombard the bases as they were leery of a surface clash.
Last edited by Lowpe on Fri Sep 09, 2022 10:44 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
Burma/China
Re: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
Took somebody's advice way back to use Long Island to ferry planes...but I bet they didn't mean for her to ferry four squadrons at a time!
Haven't seen any Iboats east of Pearl in a long time...

Haven't seen any Iboats east of Pearl in a long time...
Re: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
Mine hits...
TF 53 encounters mine field at Finschhafen (100,126)
Japanese Ships
CL Kuma, Mine hits 1
DD Matsukaze, Mine hits 1, on fire, heavy damage
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TF 405 encounters mine field at Finschhafen (100,126)
Japanese Ships
DD Hasu
DD Hamakaze
DD Isokaze
CA Takao, Mine hits 1
DD Tsuga
6 mines cleared
TF 53 encounters mine field at Finschhafen (100,126)
Japanese Ships
CL Kuma, Mine hits 1
DD Matsukaze, Mine hits 1, on fire, heavy damage
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TF 405 encounters mine field at Finschhafen (100,126)
Japanese Ships
DD Hasu
DD Hamakaze
DD Isokaze
CA Takao, Mine hits 1
DD Tsuga
6 mines cleared
- Macquarrie1999
- Posts: 77
- Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2021 6:52 am
- Location: California
Re: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
I love when minefields workLowpe wrote: Fri Sep 09, 2022 11:14 pm Mine hits...
TF 53 encounters mine field at Finschhafen (100,126)
Japanese Ships
CL Kuma, Mine hits 1
DD Matsukaze, Mine hits 1, on fire, heavy damage
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TF 405 encounters mine field at Finschhafen (100,126)
Japanese Ships
DD Hasu
DD Hamakaze
DD Isokaze
CA Takao, Mine hits 1
DD Tsuga
6 mines cleared
Re: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
March 4th, 1943
Starting to send out plenty of ships behind the lines with no escorts carrying fragments of troops left behind...relying upon aerial ASW to prevent mishaps. I dislike having fragments.
Destroying IJA troopers in China is always hard, but here we netted an entire mixed brigade which are strong units. I might have a shot at destroying another but those surrounded IJA troopers are just two hexes from a Japanese runway so it will be much harder.
Akyab will fall shortly and then perhaps we can start shipping in supplies to Ramree Island. Need to rest before another attack though as disruption is a bit high.
Starting to send out plenty of ships behind the lines with no escorts carrying fragments of troops left behind...relying upon aerial ASW to prevent mishaps. I dislike having fragments.

Destroying IJA troopers in China is always hard, but here we netted an entire mixed brigade which are strong units. I might have a shot at destroying another but those surrounded IJA troopers are just two hexes from a Japanese runway so it will be much harder.
Akyab will fall shortly and then perhaps we can start shipping in supplies to Ramree Island. Need to rest before another attack though as disruption is a bit high.
Re: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
Nazdab is the best airbase in the region....with a sps 1 port to boot!
I am going to bet it is not occupied....and will task some paratroopers to take it, and then we will be able to barge up engineers from Buna to build it up.
I am going to bet it is not occupied....and will task some paratroopers to take it, and then we will be able to barge up engineers from Buna to build it up.
Re: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
Looks like Palliser sunk a CL at the clash two days ago at Akyab. Color me surprised! 

Re: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
March 5, 1943
Getting closer to supplying the Darwin push...
Getting closer to supplying the Darwin push...
Re: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
More sub goodness!
Sub attack near Ponape at 119,113
Japanese Ships
AMc Narita Maru, Torpedo hits 2, on fire, heavy damage
AMc Nikki Maru
Allied Ships
SS S-30
SS S-30 launches 2 torpedoes at AMc Narita Maru
S-30 bottoming out ....
AMc Nikki Maru fails to find sub, continues to search...
AMc Nikki Maru fails to find sub, continues to search...
AMc Nikki Maru fails to find sub, continues to search...
AMc Nikki Maru fails to find sub, continues to search...
AMc Nikki Maru fails to find sub, continues to search...
Escort abandons search for sub
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sub attack near Ponape at 119,113
Japanese Ships
AMc Nikki Maru, Torpedo hits 1, heavy damage
Allied Ships
SS S-30
SS S-30 launches 2 torpedoes at AMc Nikki Maru
S-30 bottoming out ....
Sub escapes detection
Sub attack near Ponape at 119,113
Japanese Ships
AMc Narita Maru, Torpedo hits 2, on fire, heavy damage
AMc Nikki Maru
Allied Ships
SS S-30
SS S-30 launches 2 torpedoes at AMc Narita Maru
S-30 bottoming out ....
AMc Nikki Maru fails to find sub, continues to search...
AMc Nikki Maru fails to find sub, continues to search...
AMc Nikki Maru fails to find sub, continues to search...
AMc Nikki Maru fails to find sub, continues to search...
AMc Nikki Maru fails to find sub, continues to search...
Escort abandons search for sub
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sub attack near Ponape at 119,113
Japanese Ships
AMc Nikki Maru, Torpedo hits 1, heavy damage
Allied Ships
SS S-30
SS S-30 launches 2 torpedoes at AMc Nikki Maru
S-30 bottoming out ....
Sub escapes detection
Re: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
Missed a good opportunity...oh well, the Commander must have seen something to be timid!
Re: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
Now that you mention Nadzab, wasn't there something in the thread about map updates saying that it shows a port but that is a mapping error - it should not?
No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth
Re: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
Map definitely shows it is not a port. Would have been fun to snake barges upriver though.
River play is a bit buggy or under implemented, but very fun!
River play is a bit buggy or under implemented, but very fun!

Re: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
Reid River, 1 hex SE of Townsville, also shows a port but my ships would not go there to drop off troops.
Of course, the Aussies did not really want a couple of divisions of Japanese troops there. I would post a picture of a Japanese person that they would like there but that is now verboten.
Of course, the Aussies did not really want a couple of divisions of Japanese troops there. I would post a picture of a Japanese person that they would like there but that is now verboten.
- Attachments
-
- Sand Dragon.jpg (81.92 KiB) Viewed 559 times
Seek peace but keep your gun handy.
I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing!
“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”
; Julia Child

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing!

“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”


Re: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
March 6, 1943
Marblehead and company catch two merchants...there were 7 ships in this task force intel reports. The IJN sacrificed two so the rest could get away.
Marblehead and company catch two merchants...there were 7 ships in this task force intel reports. The IJN sacrificed two so the rest could get away.
Re: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
A look at the night time intelligence Japan has of my ship movement. Interesting...especially the lack of intel on the Solomons...sinking sounds heard.