1.11.12a high command skill roll overrided by OHQ boni skills roll

[JeanleChauve]

The fight uses the high skill command AND, if an OHQ is attached, the operational command/offensive tactics/tank tactics when starting the fight.
These bonuses multiply the attack value.

But, in the odds calculation, the high skill command roll is OVERRIDDEN by the OHQ bonus attached to the unit (depending on the effectiveness (distance) 100/75/25/0%).

How to reproduce the case: same unit is used and is attached/detached in a row. SHQ->OHQ1->OHQ2->SHQ

modifiers SHQ

etape1.png (631.28 KiB) Viewed 338 times

Set OHQ 1

etape2.png (228.37 KiB) Viewed 338 times

By the way there is a little typo : ADMINSTRATION instead of ADMINISTRATION

modifiers OHQ 1 100% effective

etape3.png (552.5 KiB) Viewed 338 times

modifiers OHQ 1 50% effective

etape4.png (630.44 KiB) Viewed 338 times

[JeanleChauve]

modifiers OHQ 1 0% effective

etape5.png (597.35 KiB) Viewed 337 times

Effectiveness OHQ 2 100% effective

etape6.png (269.09 KiB) Viewed 337 times

modifiers OHQ 2 100% effective

etape7.png (549.18 KiB) Viewed 337 times

modifiers OHQ 2 50% effective

etape8.png (580.21 KiB) Viewed 337 times

[JeanleChauve]

modifiers OHQ 2 25% effective

etape10.png (611.48 KiB) Viewed 335 times

modifiers OHQ 2 0% effective

etape11.png (601.59 KiB) Viewed 335 times

Reattached to only SHQ

etape13.png (538.87 KiB) Viewed 335 times

Leader skill modifiers tooltips should be:
Average High command bonus for "unit" is (High command skill roll) AND average OHQ bonus for "unit" is (OHQ Boni skill roll).
----------------------------
total average bonus = (High command skill roll+OHQ Boni skill roll).

For the case with the 1st proposed OHQ (2MG) and 100% effective, leader skill modifiers tooltips should be:
Average High command bonus for Rover IV is 51% AND average OHQ bonus for Rover IV is 18%.
----------------------------
total average bonus for Rover IV = 69%.

[JeanleChauve]

If the AI ever uses the odds estimation calculation, fixing this issue could also improve its tactical choices.

[Vic]

Thanks for the in-depth presentation of the issue. I have confirmed its not working as intended. Will be improved upon in upcoming patch.