Confusion with Soviet Artillery TOE and Devices

A complete overhaul and re-development of Gary Grigsby's War in the East, with a focus on improvements to historical accuracy, realism, user interface and AI.

Moderator: Joel Billings

Post Reply
User avatar
Dereck
Posts: 3303
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2004 10:43 pm
Location: Romulus, MI

Confusion with Soviet Artillery TOE and Devices

Post by Dereck »

I've noticed a number of Soviet artillery TOEs that have me confused. They all follow the same pattern as the example below:

The Soviet Light Artillery Regiment's TOE (42 Light Artillery Regiment) goes from 1942-01 through the end of the war. It uses the 76.2mm USV Field Gun which is only being produced from 1939-12 through 1942-12 and there seems to be no upgrade for the gun.

When I look in the editor I see "Last Year: 1942 (scrap 1945)".

Can anybody please explain what's going on? It seems like there are artillery TOEs that keep using weapons that are no longer being produced (some even stopped before the war began).

Thank you
PO2 US Navy (1980-1986);
USS Midway CV-41 (1981-1984)
Whidbey Island, WA (1984-1986)
Naval Reserve (1986-1992)
User avatar
56ajax
Posts: 2301
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2007 3:43 am
Location: Cairns, Australia

Re: Confusion with Soviet Artillery TOE and Devices

Post by 56ajax »

I think the idea was that when other TOEs get upgraded they shed large numbers of those guns into the pool.
Molotov : This we did not deserve.

Foch : This is not peace. This is a 20 year armistice.

C'est la guerre aérienne
User avatar
Dereck
Posts: 3303
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2004 10:43 pm
Location: Romulus, MI

Re: Confusion with Soviet Artillery TOE and Devices

Post by Dereck »

56ajax wrote: Mon Sep 04, 2023 10:28 pm I think the idea was that when other TOEs get upgraded they shed large numbers of those guns into the pool.
Thanks
PO2 US Navy (1980-1986);
USS Midway CV-41 (1981-1984)
Whidbey Island, WA (1984-1986)
Naval Reserve (1986-1992)
Teo41_ITA
Posts: 517
Joined: Thu Sep 02, 2021 12:45 pm

Re: Confusion with Soviet Artillery TOE and Devices

Post by Teo41_ITA »

Just be aware that TOEs are filled up based on equipment categories rather than type. So even if you don't have enough 76.2mm USV Field Gun but you have plenty of 76.2mm ZiS, F-22 or M1902 Field Guns (all light artillery), then expect these to be used in the respective TOEs.
User avatar
Dereck
Posts: 3303
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2004 10:43 pm
Location: Romulus, MI

Re: Confusion with Soviet Artillery TOE and Devices

Post by Dereck »

Would the pieces used in an artillery formation - such as Light Artillery formations - also be used in a infantry formation or are the weapons separate?
PO2 US Navy (1980-1986);
USS Midway CV-41 (1981-1984)
Whidbey Island, WA (1984-1986)
Naval Reserve (1986-1992)
Teo41_ITA
Posts: 517
Joined: Thu Sep 02, 2021 12:45 pm

Re: Confusion with Soviet Artillery TOE and Devices

Post by Teo41_ITA »

It depends if the TOE of other formations (Rifle divisions/corps, Artillery divisions/brigades/regiments) includes Light Artillery in their TOE. If they do, then yes, this equipment will be "diluted" across the entire units (unless you either disband them or you set their TOE < 100%).
Post Reply

Return to “Gary Grigsby's War in the East 2”