No Early End, ends early...why?

Please post any bugs or technical issues found here for official support.

Moderator: Joel Billings

Post Reply
Jeff_Ahl
Posts: 231
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2018 5:13 pm

No Early End, ends early...why?

Post by Jeff_Ahl »

Me and Moichris was on the last turns of an No Early End with a large winter offensive from my side...but then the game ended. Why? Is not "No Early End" precisly what it says?
Why.png
Why.png (224.22 KiB) Viewed 1168 times
User avatar
Dereck
Posts: 3303
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2004 10:43 pm
Location: Romulus, MI

Re: No Early End, ends early...why?

Post by Dereck »

Jeff_Ahl wrote: Sat Sep 09, 2023 8:43 am Me and Moichris was on the last turns of an No Early End with a large winter offensive from my side...but then the game ended. Why? Is not "No Early End" precisly what it says?

Why.png
Take a look at Game Event #78 - Western Allies Take Berlin. It becomes active 1945-06-01. I wonder if you got hit by that event (one I plan to remove in my next campaign if there ever is one).
PO2 US Navy (1980-1986);
USS Midway CV-41 (1981-1984)
Whidbey Island, WA (1984-1986)
Naval Reserve (1986-1992)
User avatar
M60A3TTS
Posts: 4857
Joined: Fri May 13, 2011 1:20 am

Re: No Early End, ends early...why?

Post by M60A3TTS »

Have another look at the scenario description and you should see the reason.
User avatar
Joel Billings
Posts: 33695
Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Santa Rosa, CA
Contact:

Re: No Early End, ends early...why?

Post by Joel Billings »

Yes, the start of 1945 check against the HWM is WAD even in No Early End scenarios. The mechanism of the Axis HWM and the January 45 victory check gives the Axis extra incentive to take more ground early in the war, as it allows them to win if they can then delay the Soviets later in the war. We wanted some form of political pressure on the Axis player to not just stop and dig in inside the USSR without pushing to take more territory when it would have been expected of the German Army. This 1945 victory check is a big part of that. The NEE game just removes the quarterly interim Victory checks that start in 1941.
All understanding comes after the fact.
-- Soren Kierkegaard
LordSAS
Posts: 91
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2025 4:42 pm

Re: No Early End, ends early...why?

Post by LordSAS »

Joel Billings wrote: Mon Sep 11, 2023 3:58 pm Yes, the start of 1945 check against the HWM is WAD even in No Early End scenarios. The mechanism of the Axis HWM and the January 45 victory check gives the Axis extra incentive to take more ground early in the war, as it allows them to win if they can then delay the Soviets later in the war. We wanted some form of political pressure on the Axis player to not just stop and dig in inside the USSR without pushing to take more territory when it would have been expected of the German Army. This 1945 victory check is a big part of that. The NEE game just removes the quarterly interim Victory checks that start in 1941.
Is there anyway to remove this and make the victory only via the western forces taking Berlin or the USSSR?
User avatar
Joel Billings
Posts: 33695
Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Santa Rosa, CA
Contact:

Re: No Early End, ends early...why?

Post by Joel Billings »

Yes, recent versions added some game options. Under Difficulty, select No Early End for the Campaign End Conditions. This will skip the end of 1944 victory check. In 2 player games, this cannot be changed once the game has started (can be changed in games versus the AI).
All understanding comes after the fact.
-- Soren Kierkegaard
LordSAS
Posts: 91
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2025 4:42 pm

Re: No Early End, ends early...why?

Post by LordSAS »

Joel Billings wrote: Fri Apr 17, 2026 4:16 pm Yes, recent versions added some game options. Under Difficulty, select No Early End for the Campaign End Conditions. This will skip the end of 1944 victory check. In 2 player games, this cannot be changed once the game has started (can be changed in games versus the AI).
Thanks!!
Post Reply

Return to “Tech Support”