Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition
Re: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
Like the mine hit damage on that heavy CA?
Re: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
The graphics are fine to me.
Larger but just a little fuzzy but definitely readable.
Seek peace but keep your gun handy.
I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing!
“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”
; Julia Child

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing!
“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”

- CaptBeefheart
- Posts: 2603
- Joined: Fri Jul 04, 2003 2:42 am
- Location: Seoul, Korea
Re: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
Graphics might be better. Anyway, no problem with your graphics since you changed the map.
Cheers,
CB
Cheers,
CB
Beer, because barley makes lousy bread.
Re: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
All fine to look at from my point of view
Re: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
Nov 13, 1943
Our subs continue nailing Japanese ships around Java...
I jiggered my graphic settings some more....I am still awaiting the turn....so this from the night of the 12th replay, viewed on the 13th.
Our subs continue nailing Japanese ships around Java...
I jiggered my graphic settings some more....I am still awaiting the turn....so this from the night of the 12th replay, viewed on the 13th.
Re: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
Nov 14th, 1943
Japan attacks the shipping at Pakhoi...which, to be honest usually is packed with a lot of high value ships.
Japan attacks the shipping at Pakhoi...which, to be honest usually is packed with a lot of high value ships.
Last edited by Lowpe on Mon Dec 04, 2023 4:37 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
Doing well so far with our sea lane protection strategy....
Re: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
A modest naval strike on the IJA Tank Division....
Re: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
Another screen draws an aerial attack...Hellcats are on the job!
Re: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
Nanning block holds again....up against some stiff IJA divisions.
Ground combat at Nanning (72,55)
Japanese Deliberate attack
Attacking force 32921 troops, 557 guns, 1090 vehicles, Assault Value = 1133
Defending force 22610 troops, 433 guns, 639 vehicles, Assault Value = 746
Japanese adjusted assault: 756
Allied adjusted defense: 707
Japanese assault odds: 1 to 1
Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), preparation(-)
Attacker:
Japanese ground losses:
1543 casualties reported
Squads: 9 destroyed, 111 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 25 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 4 disabled
Vehicles lost 77 (10 destroyed, 67 disabled)
Allied ground losses:
371 casualties reported
Squads: 4 destroyed, 22 disabled
Non Combat: 12 destroyed, 16 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 4 disabled
Guns lost 22 (13 destroyed, 9 disabled)
Vehicles lost 22 (7 destroyed, 15 disabled)
Ground combat at Nanning (72,55)
Japanese Deliberate attack
Attacking force 32921 troops, 557 guns, 1090 vehicles, Assault Value = 1133
Defending force 22610 troops, 433 guns, 639 vehicles, Assault Value = 746
Japanese adjusted assault: 756
Allied adjusted defense: 707
Japanese assault odds: 1 to 1
Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), preparation(-)
Attacker:
Japanese ground losses:
1543 casualties reported
Squads: 9 destroyed, 111 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 25 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 4 disabled
Vehicles lost 77 (10 destroyed, 67 disabled)
Allied ground losses:
371 casualties reported
Squads: 4 destroyed, 22 disabled
Non Combat: 12 destroyed, 16 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 4 disabled
Guns lost 22 (13 destroyed, 9 disabled)
Vehicles lost 22 (7 destroyed, 15 disabled)
Last edited by Lowpe on Mon Dec 04, 2023 4:19 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
More Japanese plane losses...
Last edited by Lowpe on Mon Dec 04, 2023 6:44 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
I think that you included an incorrect picture here. Is this part of you campaign of confusing us? Really, you should be trying to confuse the enemy!
I think that your Nanning holding force is doing well, now for some attack bombers to clear the path just in case there is enemy CAP/LRCAP there so your regular bombers can pound the enemy. You do have a good mix of forces for your defense there.
Seek peace but keep your gun handy.
I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing!
“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”
; Julia Child

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing!
“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”

Re: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
SSshhhhhh . . . . it happens!
It is much better now, a good win/loss ratio!
Seek peace but keep your gun handy.
I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing!
“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”
; Julia Child

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing!
“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”

Re: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
Nov 15, 1943
A look at Singers defenses: more Commonwealth troops are headed here....
A look at Singers defenses: more Commonwealth troops are headed here....
Re: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
Lots going on here....waiting a bit on Pakhoi and Vinh to become size 9 runways....plus for all the troops to catch up. Prep building for next invasions...
Re: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
Nov 18th, 1943
One more large Chinese Corp to ferry over from Vinh to Pakhoi, and then onto the Formosa invasion. I am not looking forward to it, as it is so many clicks. Oh well.
Slogging forward at Hanoi and Samah.
One more large Chinese Corp to ferry over from Vinh to Pakhoi, and then onto the Formosa invasion. I am not looking forward to it, as it is so many clicks. Oh well.
Slogging forward at Hanoi and Samah.
Re: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
The battle results:
Ground combat at Hanoi (68,56)
Allied Deliberate attack
Attacking force 39422 troops, 678 guns, 1824 vehicles, Assault Value = 1778
Defending force 22209 troops, 260 guns, 460 vehicles, Assault Value = 900
Allied engineers reduce fortifications to 4
Allied adjusted assault: 739
Japanese adjusted defense: 718
Allied assault odds: 1 to 1 (fort level 4)
Allied Assault reduces fortifications to 4
Combat modifiers
Defender: disruption(-), preparation(-), experience(-)
Attacker:
Japanese ground losses:
2035 casualties reported
Squads: 23 destroyed, 199 disabled
Non Combat: 21 destroyed, 24 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 10 disabled
Guns lost 24 (7 destroyed, 17 disabled)
Vehicles lost 34 (21 destroyed, 13 disabled)
Units destroyed 1
Allied ground losses:
1172 casualties reported
Squads: 7 destroyed, 63 disabled
Non Combat: 2 destroyed, 36 disabled
Engineers: 17 destroyed, 26 disabled
Guns lost 15 (1 destroyed, 14 disabled)
Vehicles lost 107 (4 destroyed, 103 disabled)
Assaulting units:
I Aus Corps Engineer Battalion
7th Infantry Division
627th Tank Destroyer Battalion
1st Marine Division
50th Tank Brigade
767th Tank Battalion
254th Armoured Brigade
255th Armoured Brigade
2/9th Armoured Regiment
1st Army Tank Regiment
3rd USMC Tank Battalion
766th Tank Battalion
4th USMC Tank Battalion
3rd Cavalry Regiment
2nd USMC Field Artillery Battalion
134th Field Artillery Battalion
2nd Medium Regiment
131st Field Artillery Battalion
145th Field Artillery Battalion
97th Field Artillery Battalion
15th Marine Defense Battalion
2/1st Med Regiment
33rd Medium Regiment
14th Marine Defense Battalion
3rd (Special Force) Division
Defending units:
5th Armored Car Co
17th Ind.Mixed Brigade
34th Division
2nd Tank Division
22nd JAAF AF Bn
36th JAAF AF Bn /1
15th Ind.Medium Field Artillery Regiment
94th JAAF AF Bn /1
Ground combat at Hanoi (68,56)
Allied Deliberate attack
Attacking force 39422 troops, 678 guns, 1824 vehicles, Assault Value = 1778
Defending force 22209 troops, 260 guns, 460 vehicles, Assault Value = 900
Allied engineers reduce fortifications to 4
Allied adjusted assault: 739
Japanese adjusted defense: 718
Allied assault odds: 1 to 1 (fort level 4)
Allied Assault reduces fortifications to 4
Combat modifiers
Defender: disruption(-), preparation(-), experience(-)
Attacker:
Japanese ground losses:
2035 casualties reported
Squads: 23 destroyed, 199 disabled
Non Combat: 21 destroyed, 24 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 10 disabled
Guns lost 24 (7 destroyed, 17 disabled)
Vehicles lost 34 (21 destroyed, 13 disabled)
Units destroyed 1
Allied ground losses:
1172 casualties reported
Squads: 7 destroyed, 63 disabled
Non Combat: 2 destroyed, 36 disabled
Engineers: 17 destroyed, 26 disabled
Guns lost 15 (1 destroyed, 14 disabled)
Vehicles lost 107 (4 destroyed, 103 disabled)
Assaulting units:
I Aus Corps Engineer Battalion
7th Infantry Division
627th Tank Destroyer Battalion
1st Marine Division
50th Tank Brigade
767th Tank Battalion
254th Armoured Brigade
255th Armoured Brigade
2/9th Armoured Regiment
1st Army Tank Regiment
3rd USMC Tank Battalion
766th Tank Battalion
4th USMC Tank Battalion
3rd Cavalry Regiment
2nd USMC Field Artillery Battalion
134th Field Artillery Battalion
2nd Medium Regiment
131st Field Artillery Battalion
145th Field Artillery Battalion
97th Field Artillery Battalion
15th Marine Defense Battalion
2/1st Med Regiment
33rd Medium Regiment
14th Marine Defense Battalion
3rd (Special Force) Division
Defending units:
5th Armored Car Co
17th Ind.Mixed Brigade
34th Division
2nd Tank Division
22nd JAAF AF Bn
36th JAAF AF Bn /1
15th Ind.Medium Field Artillery Regiment
94th JAAF AF Bn /1
Re: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
Our subs can't seem to get another big warship hit on the IJN stranded in the DEI, sigh.
Well, the Dutch approached twice at least. Mutsu shows up as sunk on the reports again today....so she is somewhat damaged.
ASW attack near Pamekasan at 58,103
Japanese Ships
BB Mutsu
CA Atago
CA Chikuma
DD Akatsuki
DD Ariake
DD Arashio
DD Tokitsukaze
DD Shiranui
DD Yamanagiri
DD Satsuki
DD Ikazuchi
Allied Ships
SS O20, hits 1
ASW attack near Pamekasan at 58,103
Japanese Ships
BB Mutsu
CA Atago
CA Chikuma
DD Ikazuchi
DD Akatsuki
DD Arashio
DD Tokitsukaze
DD Shiranui
DD Yamanagiri
DD Satsuki
DD Ariake
Allied Ships
SS O20
SS O20 is sighted by escort
DD Yamanagiri fails to find sub and abandons search
DD Satsuki attacking submerged sub ....
ASW attack near Pamekasan at 58,103
Japanese Ships
BB Mutsu
CA Atago
CA Chikuma
DD Akatsuki
DD Ariake
DD Arashio
DD Tokitsukaze
DD Shiranui
DD Yamanagiri
DD Satsuki
DD Ikazuchi
Allied Ships
SS O20, hits 1
ASW attack near Pamekasan at 58,103
Japanese Ships
BB Mutsu
CA Atago
CA Chikuma
DD Ikazuchi
DD Akatsuki
DD Arashio
DD Tokitsukaze
DD Shiranui
DD Yamanagiri
DD Satsuki
DD Ariake
Allied Ships
SS O20
SS O20 is sighted by escort
DD Yamanagiri fails to find sub and abandons search
DD Satsuki attacking submerged sub ....
Re: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
Japan lost about 9% of their troops as casualties. Depending on supply, support and days without action some of those disablements might recover.
Allies only lost about 3.5% casualties. Keep attacking (I know you will) and you might set some badly disrupted/fatigued units to reserve. The big thing is to get moving on Lang Son to relieve those troops, IMO.
If Chinese units near Pakhoi are getting supply they could be getting anti-tank guns now. They can be a real help in grinding the IJA tanks.
Thanks for posting at this busy time. This AAR is the most interesting I have seen in a long time so I watch for updates daily. And Merry Christmas/Happy New Year if you get too busy to post again for a while!
Allies only lost about 3.5% casualties. Keep attacking (I know you will) and you might set some badly disrupted/fatigued units to reserve. The big thing is to get moving on Lang Son to relieve those troops, IMO.
If Chinese units near Pakhoi are getting supply they could be getting anti-tank guns now. They can be a real help in grinding the IJA tanks.
Thanks for posting at this busy time. This AAR is the most interesting I have seen in a long time so I watch for updates daily. And Merry Christmas/Happy New Year if you get too busy to post again for a while!
- Attachments
-
- Minions Christmas Choir.jpg (300.77 KiB) Viewed 634 times
No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth




