Isolating a C3 Bunker

Take command of air and naval assets from post-WW2 to the near future in tactical and operational scale, complete with historical and hypothetical scenarios and an integrated scenario editor.

Moderator: MOD_Command

Post Reply
User avatar
SeaQueen
Posts: 1436
Joined: Sat Apr 14, 2007 4:20 am
Location: Washington D.C.

Isolating a C3 Bunker

Post by SeaQueen »

Communications disruption is enabled. I created a series of LUA scripts to destroy the comm systems of a C3 bunker whenever I destroyed a nearby antenna. By destroying the nearby antennas with GBU-54s I was able to destroy in turn the MF, HF, LF and SATCOM in the C3 Bunker.

The remaining comms at the C3 Bunker are:

VHF Radio [Unsecure]
UHF Radio [Unsecure]
VHF Radio [Secure]
UHF Radio [Secure]

To complete the isolation of the C3 Bunker my EC-130H [Baseline 1] trucked in blaring comms jamming. The database viewer says:

1x Generic Comms Jammer - Communications Jammer, Early 2000 Technology, Operating bands VHF/UHF

If the comms jammer is a VHF/UHF jammer, how come I'm not seeing it go "NO COMMS?"

Does the [Secure] flag on the VHF/UHF radios have anything to do with it? Making it effectively jam proof?

I'm looking at trying to make scenarios that allow for a little more sophisticated game play.
User avatar
SeaQueen
Posts: 1436
Joined: Sat Apr 14, 2007 4:20 am
Location: Washington D.C.

Re: Isolating a C3 Bunker

Post by SeaQueen »

Never mind. I'm mixing my versions up screwing around at home.
ExNusquam
Posts: 531
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2014 11:26 pm
Location: Washington, D.C.

Re: Isolating a C3 Bunker

Post by ExNusquam »

If it's a bunker, why not have a land-line? ;)
User avatar
SeaQueen
Posts: 1436
Joined: Sat Apr 14, 2007 4:20 am
Location: Washington D.C.

Re: Isolating a C3 Bunker

Post by SeaQueen »

ExNusquam wrote: Thu Jan 04, 2024 4:10 am If it's a bunker, why not have a land-line? ;)
:D

They very well might.

All the more reason to attack the phone trunks.
Post Reply

Return to “Command: Modern Operations series”