Advanced Tactics Development Poll

[Vic]

Hi guys,

Please hop over here to vote:
https://www.vrdesigns.net/?p=2234

And please share any additional thoughts below.

Best wishes,
Vic

[sIg3b]

If you can do ONE thing, please make the AI able to use carriers. It being not able to do that makes the game vs. AI both asymmetric and ahistoric.

If you can do TWO things, please make random maps more random, more interesting and more natural-looking (unpredictable mixture of irregular-shaped large and small continents and islands) at the expense of balance/fairness.
(More similar to the original AT, ideally including something like the original sliders for map generation)
Having a rather symmetrical map of fairly equal-sized fairly round blobs is both unnatural-looking and strategically boring imo. Please give us radically asymmetrical random maps, at least as an option!

[eddieballgame]

UI Scaling, similar to what is offered in Shadow Empire would be great, thank you.

[Khanti]

It looks like most people are opting for user interface and AI.
If one can be done in the future is Time between turns (Game/AI speed) for me.
And AI "thinking" as second choice.

[Khanti]

Forget about other things.
I started playing again.
And again this makes me crazy.
Kills that are stupid and impossible.

[Ormand]

Right now, AI thinking is the top priority. Trying to make an AI worth fighting.

As for the kills. You mentioned this before. Well, random numbers do what they do. You can also think of it in this case, that the Pz I Hund was in five previous battles, and was a bit worn down and those riflemen got a satchel charge in there. But, at some point, I could try to look and see if there is some unwanted bias helping low odds.

[Khanti]

Right now, AI thinking is the top priority. Trying to make an AI worth fighting.

As for the kills. You mentioned this before. Well, random numbers do what they do. You can also think of it in this case, that the Pz I Hund was in five previous battles, and was a bit worn down and those riflemen got a satchel charge in there. But, at some point, I could try to look and see if there is some unwanted bias helping low odds.

Thanks for that answer. I understand AI as priority. About low odds: for me in these cases there should be RETREAT, not KILL. Killing should be excluded with that LOW odds.

Look at picture of AC vs. AC battle. I can understand it fought earlier and probably could be be damaged but 52: 2570 should be RETREAT always, not kill.
(Phoenix random game)

[ernieschwitz]

I once heard a quote, which is apt. I'll paraphrase.

If a meteor has a less than 1.000.000th chance of hitting a planet at any time, then sooner or later it will. That is just statistics.