Great to get your feedback from the other side! Yes we will see how it ends just offering my perspective as the match goes on and the historical perspective as far as the naval bombardments.OldCrowBalthazor wrote: Wed Jul 24, 2024 7:28 pmI think you should wait for to see from the US point of view before coming to a conclusion here. The US is in 12 turns out of 24 to finished in our match, and most of the Mpps are gone. Quite a few units are worn to the bone and supply is acute. I don't want to give spoilers but if I have to I will.Tanaka wrote: Wed Jul 24, 2024 6:58 pmGreat to hear! I would be ok with that otherwise but the laser guided pinpoint accuracy of the allied ships and CVL aircraft in bombarding and destroying dug in Japanese units in tunnels and caves and pillboxes one by one is pretty frustrating without having any way to deal any damage back to them. I am having entire units wiped out just by naval, air, and artillery bombardments which is not very realistic or historical. My opponent rarely has to use his units but to just finish them off. Maybe reduce the allied ship bombarding range to the max gun range of the Japanese naval guns? And reduce their damage to land units? The allied artillery is already enough to deal with combine this with the lethal naval artillery and everything evaporates.Robert24 wrote: Wed Jul 24, 2024 6:23 pm
Tanaka,
I hear you! Let me explain my thoughts on the design. Yes, I omitted a significant aspect of the battle for Iwo Jima in that I just wanted to focus on the Marine (and Army) landings. Maybe I can do more in the future.
Robert
"The problem that occurred with the shelling was it was not enough and not done well for what little time was allowed. So it had limited effect on the well prepared and dug in IJA positions. Gen. Schmidt USMC was not happy over this failure. He stated “We only got about 13 hours worth of fire support during the 34hours of available daylight.” Side note: Due in part to this “shelling” failure the battle of Iwo Jima was the only U.S. Marine battle that the American casualties exceeded those of the IJA."
Also, I want to be polite here, but you have lost opportunities to totally eliminate quite a few of my units by not concentrating your artillery on ONE target. I did this as Japan in my Beta MP match vs Similcro with the Marianas scenario. I would concentrate on one target and at times counter-attack with infantry on a damaged, demoralized US unit, especially ones in low supply.
We could do a mirror match of this if you wish to check balance and in the name of science, if you wish.
That sort of goes with what I am saying I don't really think units should be eliminated by artillery and bombardment attacks alone I think they are too lethal.
And yes I have spread things out to reduce the morale and readiness as much as possible to prevent fresh units and I hate to give spoilers but I do eliminate a unit with just artillery but that is sort of my point.
This is not about you OCB you are my favorite opponent and doing everything you are supposed to be doing. Just my perspective on the scenario itself.


