Combat Report Suggestion...

Gary Grigsby's strategic level wargame covering the entire War in the Pacific from 1941 to 1945 or beyond.

Moderators: Joel Billings, wdolson, Don Bowen, mogami

Post Reply
User avatar
The Gnome
Posts: 1215
Joined: Fri May 17, 2002 2:52 am
Location: Philadelphia, PA

Combat Report Suggestion...

Post by The Gnome »

I know the devs are probably up to their ears with suggestions and wish lists at this point but I'll add this one anyway. Could we get a list of Aircraft Destroyed and Ships Sunk upon capturing an enemy Airfield/Port?

I love seeing the havoc taking an enemy base has caused and it's also something my troops should be able to verify rather easily!
User avatar
Nikademus
Posts: 22517
Joined: Sat May 27, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Alien spacecraft

RE: Combat Report Suggestion...

Post by Nikademus »

you can see the # of aircraft destroyed in the intel screen. They'll be listed as 'destroyed on ground'

if ships are scuttled in port you'll get ingame announcement
User avatar
Mr.Frag
Posts: 11195
Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2002 5:00 pm
Location: Purgatory

RE: Combat Report Suggestion...

Post by Mr.Frag »

If memory serves, the ships also show up in the Ships Sunk list with a damage type Unknown.
User avatar
mbatch729
Posts: 534
Joined: Wed May 23, 2001 8:00 am
Location: North Carolina

RE: Combat Report Suggestion...

Post by mbatch729 »

ORIGINAL: Mr.Frag
If memory serves, the ships also show up in the Ships Sunk list with a damage type Unknown.
What, no Mark VII Scuttling Charge? No Type 69 Limpet mine? [:D]
Later,
FC3(SW) Batch
USS Iowa
DJAndrews
Posts: 305
Joined: Sun Jan 26, 2003 1:26 am
Location: Toronto, ON, CA

RE: Combat Report Suggestion...

Post by DJAndrews »

I encountered a bug when playing UV and posted it there, but perhaps one of the testers should check that it is not occuring in WITP. When I captured Rabaul there were a half dozen badly damaged Japanese ships that were in port and unable to escape. There was no listing of ships sunk anywhere and no change in points to suggest FOW. I went to head-to-head mode and lo and behold, all the damaged ships had been repaired and returned to the ship pool in Japan and were listed as available. In my case they were only DDs and PCs but it would be really aggravating to have the enemy get a brand new BB or CV when you had thought you'd captured a hulk.
User avatar
Mr.Frag
Posts: 11195
Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2002 5:00 pm
Location: Purgatory

RE: Combat Report Suggestion...

Post by Mr.Frag »

I encountered a bug when playing UV and posted it there, but perhaps one of the testers should check that it is not occuring in WITP. When I captured Rabaul there were a half dozen badly damaged Japanese ships that were in port and unable to escape. There was no listing of ships sunk anywhere and no change in points to suggest FOW. I went to head-to-head mode and lo and behold, all the damaged ships had been repaired and returned to the ship pool in Japan and were listed as available. In my case they were only DDs and PCs but it would be really aggravating to have the enemy get a brand new BB or CV when you had thought you'd captured a hulk.

Not a bug in UV, ships in port get sent home [:D]

They will show up in xxx turns again at Truk or Noumea.
User avatar
paullus99
Posts: 1671
Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2002 10:00 am

RE: Combat Report Suggestion...

Post by paullus99 »

I just had an instance in UV where I captured Shortlands Island w/BB Kongo in port with heavy damage. I then checked the sunk list - no listing......I also went and checked from the Japanese side (head to head) & it was not listed on the sunk list there or on the available ship list.....its like it just disappeared.....
Never Underestimate the Power of a Small Tactical Nuclear Weapon...
User avatar
Mr.Frag
Posts: 11195
Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2002 5:00 pm
Location: Purgatory

RE: Combat Report Suggestion...

Post by Mr.Frag »

FYI: Operations Report:

AK City of Dalhart scuttled at Tjilitjap to prevent capture!
AK Columbian scuttled at Tjilitjap to prevent capture!
AK West Ivis scuttled at Tjilitjap to prevent capture!
PT PT-32 scuttled at Tjilitjap to prevent capture!
PT PT-33 scuttled at Tjilitjap to prevent capture!
PT PT-34 scuttled at Tjilitjap to prevent capture!
PT PT-35 scuttled at Tjilitjap to prevent capture!
PT PT-36 scuttled at Tjilitjap to prevent capture!
PT PT-37 scuttled at Tjilitjap to prevent capture!
PT PT-38 scuttled at Tjilitjap to prevent capture!
PT PT-39 scuttled at Tjilitjap to prevent capture!
PT PT-40 scuttled at Tjilitjap to prevent capture!
PT PT-41 scuttled at Tjilitjap to prevent capture!
PT PT-42 scuttled at Tjilitjap to prevent capture!
PT PT-43 scuttled at Tjilitjap to prevent capture!
panda124c
Posts: 1517
Joined: Tue May 23, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Houston, TX, USA

RE: Combat Report Suggestion...

Post by panda124c »

Is there a small chance that the ships will escape when the port is captured or are they automaticly scuttled. You know the old sailing out the harbor entrence just as the enemy troops spill out onto the docks.
User avatar
redman1
Posts: 109
Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2004 5:55 pm

RE: Combat Report Suggestion...

Post by redman1 »

Another request I'd make regarding the combat reports is to have them date-stamped like the Combat replays and the saved turns are. That way you can save them as-is in a folder containing your PBEM match with someone without having to take the time to rename each one.
"Never send a monster to do the work of an evil scientist!"
User avatar
siRkid
Posts: 4177
Joined: Tue Jan 29, 2002 10:00 am
Location: Orland FL

RE: Combat Report Suggestion...

Post by siRkid »

ORIGINAL: pbear

Is there a small chance that the ships will escape when the port is captured or are they automaticly scuttled. You know the old sailing out the harbor entrence just as the enemy troops spill out onto the docks.


There is a chance they can get away.
Former War in the Pacific Test Team Manager and Beta Tester for War in the East.

Image
User avatar
Mr.Frag
Posts: 11195
Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2002 5:00 pm
Location: Purgatory

RE: Combat Report Suggestion...

Post by Mr.Frag »

Yes, generally they will attempt to flee the port only to get nailed by Bettys and Nells, it's quite sad to watch.

Look at Nik vs Pry thread and you can see it in action.
User avatar
The Gnome
Posts: 1215
Joined: Fri May 17, 2002 2:52 am
Location: Philadelphia, PA

RE: Combat Report Suggestion...

Post by The Gnome »

ORIGINAL: Nikademus

you can see the # of aircraft destroyed in the intel screen. They'll be listed as 'destroyed on ground'

if ships are scuttled in port you'll get ingame announcement

Yes, I realise I can look on the intel screen but I won't know what types of aircraft I destroyed and it's a lot more convenient to have all the battle results in one spot. Another problem with this work around, is that if two ports/airfields are taken on the same turn you won't be able to differentiate which base they were destroyed at.

This isn't a huge problem but would be a very nice enhancement and has been on my wish list while playing UV.
ORIGINAL: Mr Frag
AK City of Dalhart scuttled at Tjilitjap to prevent capture!
AK Columbian scuttled at Tjilitjap to prevent capture!
AK West Ivis scuttled at Tjilitjap to prevent capture!
PT PT-32 scuttled at Tjilitjap to prevent capture!
PT PT-33 scuttled at Tjilitjap to prevent capture!
PT PT-34 scuttled at Tjilitjap to prevent capture!
PT PT-35 scuttled at Tjilitjap to prevent capture!
PT PT-36 scuttled at Tjilitjap to prevent capture!
PT PT-37 scuttled at Tjilitjap to prevent capture!
PT PT-38 scuttled at Tjilitjap to prevent capture!
PT PT-39 scuttled at Tjilitjap to prevent capture!
PT PT-40 scuttled at Tjilitjap to prevent capture!
PT PT-41 scuttled at Tjilitjap to prevent capture!
PT PT-42 scuttled at Tjilitjap to prevent capture!
PT PT-43 scuttled at Tjilitjap to prevent capture!

Thanks! That's exactly what I had imagined (or close enough! ;) ) For aircraft something like the following would be great!

23 X A6M3 Zero destroyed on the field at Lunga!
Wilson ESQ
Posts: 61
Joined: Wed May 22, 2002 7:48 pm
Location: Buffalo now East TN

RE: Combat Report Suggestion...

Post by Wilson ESQ »

My one year old son sits on my lap when I play UV. He loves the the Combat animations. Will WITP have these like UV?
"A foolish man is put in a flutter by every word."
Heraclitus
User avatar
Mr.Frag
Posts: 11195
Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2002 5:00 pm
Location: Purgatory

RE: Combat Report Suggestion...

Post by Mr.Frag »

My one year old son sits on my lap when I play UV. He loves the the Combat animations. Will WITP have these like UV?

Yes, and they look pretty too, new artwork really looks much better then UV.
User avatar
redman1
Posts: 109
Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2004 5:55 pm

RE: Combat Report Suggestion...

Post by redman1 »

ORIGINAL: redman1

Another request I'd make regarding the combat reports is to have them date-stamped like the Combat replays and the saved turns are. That way you can save them as-is in a folder containing your PBEM match with someone without having to take the time to rename each one.
Just wanted to bump this one up and see if there were any takers.
"Never send a monster to do the work of an evil scientist!"
User avatar
Mr.Frag
Posts: 11195
Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2002 5:00 pm
Location: Purgatory

RE: Combat Report Suggestion...

Post by Mr.Frag »



It's there somewhere ... as a request ...
User avatar
redman1
Posts: 109
Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2004 5:55 pm

RE: Combat Report Suggestion...

Post by redman1 »

kewl! Thanks. [:)]
"Never send a monster to do the work of an evil scientist!"
User avatar
Nikademus
Posts: 22517
Joined: Sat May 27, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Alien spacecraft

RE: Combat Report Suggestion...

Post by Nikademus »

ORIGINAL: The Gnome

Yes, I realise I can look on the intel screen but I won't know what types of aircraft I destroyed and it's a lot more convenient to have all the battle results in one spot. Another problem with this work around, is that if two ports/airfields are taken on the same turn you won't be able to differentiate which base they were destroyed at.

This isn't a huge problem but would be a very nice enhancement and has been on my wish list while playing UV.

True but at least you can differentiate the airframe types....in WitP you can click aircraft losses and it will list each specific plane type for # lost on that day and in total, and how they were destroyed.....so if Rabaul is taken and 60 aircraft are listed as destroyed, the aircraft losses screen would display the indiv types as (for example) 30 A6M and 30 G4M destroyed on the ground.

Believe the aircraft destroyed on base capture/combat report is on da list
Post Reply

Return to “War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945”