[DB REQUEST] Some bombs lack a carrier platform (1468 CIV)

Post bug reports and ask for game support here.

Moderator: MOD_Command

Post Reply
Desna
Posts: 23
Joined: Sun Sep 15, 2024 6:28 pm

[DB REQUEST] Some bombs lack a carrier platform (1468 CIV)

Post by Desna »

Greetings.I noticed it yesterday.that some bombs lack a carrier platform (for example, FAB-5000, FAB-9000).how can I register an armament carrier for this ammunition?
Raptorx7_slith
Posts: 726
Joined: Fri Jul 26, 2013 10:14 pm

Re: There is no ammunition carrier (1468 CIV)

Post by Raptorx7_slith »

Those are only available on Soviet bombers in the CWDB not in DB3K
Desna
Posts: 23
Joined: Sun Sep 15, 2024 6:28 pm

Re: There is no ammunition carrier (1468 CIV)

Post by Desna »

Raptorx7_slith wrote: Tue Oct 22, 2024 6:06 am Those are only available on Soviet bombers in the CWDB not in DB3K
Figured it out! Thank you very much! Can you tell me more about the FAB-4000 bomb In which database it can be used? The CWDB did not find a platform for it.
thewood1
Posts: 10103
Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2005 6:24 pm
Location: Boston

Re: Some bombs lack a carrier platform (1468 CIV)

Post by thewood1 »

What is the FAB-4000? I have heard of the 3000 and 5000, but not 4000. I know the FAB-5000 was only used in WW2. I thought the FAB-3000 replaced the FAB-5000 post-WW2.
Desna
Posts: 23
Joined: Sun Sep 15, 2024 6:28 pm

Re: Some bombs lack a carrier platform (1468 CIV)

Post by Desna »

That's the point.But for some reason, this bomb is listed in the database between 3000 and 5000... I myself do not know and have not heard about this version of FAB
Nikel
Posts: 2301
Joined: Tue Mar 24, 2009 10:51 am

Re: Some bombs lack a carrier platform (1468 CIV)

Post by Nikel »

The 4000 is not listed in this wikipedia article.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soviet_an ... rial_bombs
User avatar
blu3s
Posts: 1099
Joined: Fri Jul 08, 2022 9:45 am

Re: Some bombs lack a carrier platform (1468 CIV)

Post by blu3s »

Might be an issue with the CWDB,

I'd recommend open a ticket in the github tracker

https://github.com/PygmalionOfCyprus/cmo-db-requests
boogabooga
Posts: 986
Joined: Wed Jul 18, 2018 12:05 am

Re: Some bombs lack a carrier platform (1468 CIV)

Post by boogabooga »

Nikel wrote: Wed Oct 23, 2024 8:04 am The 4000 is not listed in this wikipedia article.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soviet_an ... rial_bombs
Well, if it's not on Wikipedia, I guess that settles it then.
The boogabooga doctrine for CMO: Any intentional human intervention needs to be able to completely and reliably over-ride anything that the AI is doing at any time.
Desna
Posts: 23
Joined: Sun Sep 15, 2024 6:28 pm

Re: Some bombs lack a carrier platform (1468 CIV)

Post by Desna »

Let it be so
Nikel
Posts: 2301
Joined: Tue Mar 24, 2009 10:51 am

Re: Some bombs lack a carrier platform (1468 CIV)

Post by Nikel »

boogabooga wrote: Thu Oct 24, 2024 2:41 am
Well, if it's not on Wikipedia, I guess that settles it then.
It is not even in the russian article of the wikipedia :mrgreen:

Anyway if you find a better reference, just post it, it will surely, absolutely and effectively settle the issue.
thewood1
Posts: 10103
Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2005 6:24 pm
Location: Boston

Re: Some bombs lack a carrier platform (1468 CIV)

Post by thewood1 »

Harpia's "Russia's Air-launched Weapons mentions the 3000 and the 5000, but no 4000.
Post Reply

Return to “Tech Support”