CVE question

This new stand alone release based on the legendary War in the Pacific from 2 by 3 Games adds significant improvements and changes to enhance game play, improve realism, and increase historical accuracy. With dozens of new features, new art, and engine improvements, War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition brings you the most realistic and immersive WWII Pacific Theater wargame ever!

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

Bella
Posts: 208
Joined: Sun Jun 06, 2010 10:06 pm
Contact:

CVE question

Post by Bella »

I have the first CVE (Long Island) around Darwin, after escorting a convoy there. Several IJN transport/maybe invasion fleets appeared just then, south of Java. It’s September 02, 1942. I sent Long Island north to cause some havoc but even within 3 hexes, she won’t launch the 18 SBDs she has, which are set on Naval attack.

What am I missing?
User avatar
RangerJoe
Posts: 18103
Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2015 2:39 pm
Location: Who knows?

Re: CVE question

Post by RangerJoe »

Bella wrote: Tue Nov 05, 2024 9:37 pm I have the first CVE (Long Island) around Darwin, after escorting a convoy there. Several IJN transport/maybe invasion fleets appeared just then, south of Java. It’s September 02, 1942. I sent Long Island north to cause some havoc but even within 3 hexes, she won’t launch the 18 SBDs she has, which are set on Naval attack.

What am I missing?
I can't tell from the picture that you did not post . . .
Seek peace but keep your gun handy.

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing! :o

“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”
:twisted: ; Julia Child
Image
User avatar
Platoonist
Posts: 3042
Joined: Sun May 11, 2003 4:53 am
Location: Yoyodyne Propulsion Systems

Re: CVE question

Post by Platoonist »

Is this 18 plane SBD group carrier-trained as well as carrier-capable? Does the task force the Long Island is in have any planes set to naval search? Is she in an Air Combat, CV Escort or an Air Transport task force? Plus, the Long Island only has an aircraft capacity of 16, so it's also possible her small flight deck is currently too crowded for attack missions.

But yeah, a screenshot could speak volumes.
Image
User avatar
Nazcatraz
Posts: 186
Joined: Fri May 21, 2021 2:36 am

Re: CVE question

Post by Nazcatraz »

Bella wrote: Tue Nov 05, 2024 9:37 pm I have the first CVE (Long Island) around Darwin, after escorting a convoy there. Several IJN transport/maybe invasion fleets appeared just then, south of Java. It’s September 02, 1942. I sent Long Island north to cause some havoc but even within 3 hexes, she won’t launch the 18 SBDs she has, which are set on Naval attack.

What am I missing?
Naval Attack could happen or not depends on whether the pilots could be able to find the enemies in the first place. If anything, I recommend you to check and make sure to have like 20% of them on Search. Even then, it's not guaranteed for them to be able to locate. So setting those float planes from escorting ships to search also would be a good move. And also to make sure they are both carriers trained & capable.
Image
User avatar
btd64
Posts: 14217
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2010 12:48 am
Location: Lancaster, OHIO

Re: CVE question

Post by btd64 »

As Platoonist said, the capacity of the ship is 16. 17 plane squadron might fly but I would resize the squadron to 16. It will fly then....GP
Intel i7 4.3GHz 10th Gen,16GB Ram,Nvidia GeForce MX330

AKA General Patton

DW2-Alpha/Beta Tester
SCW Manual Lead & Beta Support Team

"Do everything you ask of those you command"....Gen. George S. Patton
User avatar
PaxMondo
Posts: 10461
Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2008 3:23 pm

Re: CVE question

Post by PaxMondo »

RangerJoe wrote: Wed Nov 06, 2024 12:13 am
Bella wrote: Tue Nov 05, 2024 9:37 pm I have the first CVE (Long Island) around Darwin, after escorting a convoy there. Several IJN transport/maybe invasion fleets appeared just then, south of Java. It’s September 02, 1942. I sent Long Island north to cause some havoc but even within 3 hexes, she won’t launch the 18 SBDs she has, which are set on Naval attack.

What am I missing?
I can't tell from the picture that you did not post . . .
I'm with RJ here .. screenshots ... that microsoft snipping tool is really easy to use. Others have tried to guess, and they may well be correct. But without screenshots we're just guessing too much.

screenshots with your questions help so much ....
Pax
Chris21wen
Posts: 7485
Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2002 10:00 am
Location: Cottesmore, Rutland

Re: CVE question

Post by Chris21wen »

If you had posted a pic you would have been told instantly that the ship has too many aircraft. The max number of ac that any ship can have and stll remain flight operable is 115%. Ignoring fractions 18 ac is dead on 115% hence no ops other than air transfer. If you sent it as an escort with 18 ac it would never have flown any ops.
User avatar
HansBolter
Posts: 7457
Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2006 12:30 pm
Location: United States

Re: CVE question

Post by HansBolter »

The Escort/CAP ratio plays a very big part in the calculations determining if a mission sorties.

Given that only a small squadron of attack planes can be operationally placed on the LI with no possibility of any Escorts, it would be very unlikely to launch a strike without another carrier providing Escorts.

I use the LI to provide some CAP over my CVE Replenishment TFs. That's about all its good for.
Hans

Bella
Posts: 208
Joined: Sun Jun 06, 2010 10:06 pm
Contact:

Re: CVE question

Post by Bella »

HansBolter wrote: Sun Nov 10, 2024 12:45 pm The Escort/CAP ratio plays a very big part in the calculations determining if a mission sorties.

Given that only a small squadron of attack planes can be operationally placed on the LI with no possibility of any Escorts, it would be very unlikely to launch a strike without another carrier providing Escorts.

I use the LI to provide some CAP over my CVE Replenishment TFs. That's about all its good for.
Thanks. What’s an LI?
Alpha77
Posts: 2173
Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2010 7:38 am

Re: CVE question

Post by Alpha77 »

Bella wrote: Wed Nov 13, 2024 4:18 pm
HansBolter wrote: Sun Nov 10, 2024 12:45 pm The Escort/CAP ratio plays a very big part in the calculations determining if a mission sorties.

Given that only a small squadron of attack planes can be operationally placed on the LI with no possibility of any Escorts, it would be very unlikely to launch a strike without another carrier providing Escorts.

I use the LI to provide some CAP over my CVE Replenishment TFs. That's about all its good for.
Thanks. What’s an LI?
Long Island, a small CVE (or better it was used to transport planes)
User avatar
Sardaukar
Posts: 12464
Joined: Wed Nov 28, 2001 10:00 am
Location: Finland/Israel

Re: CVE question

Post by Sardaukar »

Remember that it works as long as you are not over 115% capacity.
"To meaningless French Idealism, Liberty, Fraternity and Equality...we answer with German Realism, Infantry, Cavalry and Artillery" -Prince von Bülov, 1870-

Image
bradfordkay
Posts: 8591
Joined: Sun Mar 24, 2002 8:39 am
Location: Olympia, WA

Re: CVE question

Post by bradfordkay »

MKmark wrote: Fri Nov 15, 2024 11:16 am
Sardaukar wrote: Wed Nov 13, 2024 7:18 pm Remember that it works as long as you are not over 115% capacity.
ejem..

exactly 16 planes no one more.
115% of 16 is 18.4
fair winds,
Brad
Chris21wen
Posts: 7485
Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2002 10:00 am
Location: Cottesmore, Rutland

Re: CVE question

Post by Chris21wen »

MKmark wrote: Fri Nov 15, 2024 11:16 am
Sardaukar wrote: Wed Nov 13, 2024 7:18 pm Remember that it works as long as you are not over 115% capacity.
ejem..

exactly 16 planes no one more.
17, I already did the maths earlier when I said 18% is dead on 115% hence no ops.
User avatar
Sardaukar
Posts: 12464
Joined: Wed Nov 28, 2001 10:00 am
Location: Finland/Israel

Re: CVE question

Post by Sardaukar »

It'd be easy to see from ship screen, if total plane number is orange, they fly, if red, they won't.

Could also be sortie amount left, if out of sorties (which in real life means bombs etc, torpedoes are counted separately), cannot fly offensive missions.
"To meaningless French Idealism, Liberty, Fraternity and Equality...we answer with German Realism, Infantry, Cavalry and Artillery" -Prince von Bülov, 1870-

Image
User avatar
Platoonist
Posts: 3042
Joined: Sun May 11, 2003 4:53 am
Location: Yoyodyne Propulsion Systems

Re: CVE question

Post by Platoonist »

Sardaukar wrote: Sat Nov 16, 2024 6:11 pm It'd be easy to see from ship screen, if total plane number is orange, they fly, if red, they won't.
The Long Island's aircraft capacity does display as orange with an 18-plane SBD group on board. I also think the lack of any possible accompanying fighters is likely making the group reluctant to attack alone. As HansBolter noted the Escort/CAP ratio plays a very big part in the calculations determining if a mission sorties.

Long-Island.jpg
Long-Island.jpg (30.84 KiB) Viewed 639 times
User avatar
Sardaukar
Posts: 12464
Joined: Wed Nov 28, 2001 10:00 am
Location: Finland/Israel

Re: CVE question

Post by Sardaukar »

Yea, those figures look just fine.

Then it's most likely that they don't have Escort fighters. And there is more, changing air unit CO to more Aggressive helps some. Putting some real nutcase into charge might backfire, though...via casualties 8-)
"To meaningless French Idealism, Liberty, Fraternity and Equality...we answer with German Realism, Infantry, Cavalry and Artillery" -Prince von Bülov, 1870-

Image
User avatar
Sardaukar
Posts: 12464
Joined: Wed Nov 28, 2001 10:00 am
Location: Finland/Israel

Re: CVE question

Post by Sardaukar »

Real issue is, CVE Long Island is no way fit for real CVE work.

It is best used for aircraft transport or convoy ASW asset.
"To meaningless French Idealism, Liberty, Fraternity and Equality...we answer with German Realism, Infantry, Cavalry and Artillery" -Prince von Bülov, 1870-

Image
User avatar
HansBolter
Posts: 7457
Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2006 12:30 pm
Location: United States

Re: CVE question

Post by HansBolter »

Or for providing a token CAP over the CVE Replenishment TFs as I use it for.

It certainly isn't adequate CAP to stop a determined sortie, but enough to ward off long range, unescorted Nettie attacks.
Hans

User avatar
Sardaukar
Posts: 12464
Joined: Wed Nov 28, 2001 10:00 am
Location: Finland/Israel

Re: CVE question

Post by Sardaukar »

MKmark wrote: Mon Nov 18, 2024 12:49 pm
Chris21wen wrote: Sat Nov 16, 2024 7:27 am
MKmark wrote: Fri Nov 15, 2024 11:16 am

ejem..

exactly 16 planes no one more.
17, I already did the maths earlier when I said 18% is dead on 115% hence no ops.
Thats it, no ops.
It is so easy to check from ship screen. Orange is good to go, red, no ops.
"To meaningless French Idealism, Liberty, Fraternity and Equality...we answer with German Realism, Infantry, Cavalry and Artillery" -Prince von Bülov, 1870-

Image
User avatar
PaxMondo
Posts: 10461
Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2008 3:23 pm

Re: CVE question

Post by PaxMondo »

MKmark wrote: Mon Nov 18, 2024 5:33 pm
you can put 24 planes if you want. or 36. go.
???

not sure I understand.


:ugeek: :ugeek: :ugeek:
Pax
Post Reply

Return to “War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition”