A small bone of contention.......

Strategic Command WWII: War in the Pacific is a turn-based strategy game. It offers a comprehensive experience of the Pacific Theater, challenging you to achieve victory in one of history's greatest conflicts.
Post Reply
User avatar
HansBolter
Posts: 7410
Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2006 12:30 pm
Location: United States

A small bone of contention.......

Post by HansBolter »

In an attempt to gain time to get reinforcements into Rangoon, I pushed the Burmese garrisons forward.

When the "partisan" event fired releasing attacks on "Forces in Burma", the garrison not in Burma was attacked and took a step loss, but fortunately, survived to continue to be a block to the Axis advance.

I went looking for this script to get the details, but was unable to locate it. Can anyone give me a heads up where to find it? I would like to discover why my unit in Thailand was attacked by Burmese partisans.

Is this WAD, or an oversight because no one ever considered this possibility?
Attachments
Not in Burma.jpg
Not in Burma.jpg (747.86 KiB) Viewed 174 times
Hans

User avatar
BillRunacre
Posts: 6561
Joined: Mon Jul 22, 2013 2:57 pm
Contact:

Re: A small bone of contention.......

Post by BillRunacre »

I think it's an oversight as normally the Axis are the aggressive ones.

It's a Strength script that is used to implement this.
Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/FurySoftware

We're also on Facebook! https://www.facebook.com/FurySoftware/
User avatar
HansBolter
Posts: 7410
Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2006 12:30 pm
Location: United States

Re: A small bone of contention.......

Post by HansBolter »

Thanks. I went looking in the Partisan script category.

I'm always looking for creative ways to accomplish my goals as can be evidenced by my earlier post about evacuating a Philippine corps to Australia. I gave up on that avenue as the 25% chance for survival in exile didn't hit for me and it was a waste of very valuable early MPPs.
Hans

User avatar
BillRunacre
Posts: 6561
Joined: Mon Jul 22, 2013 2:57 pm
Contact:

Re: A small bone of contention.......

Post by BillRunacre »

I'll have a think about this, although I suppose it could be rationalised that by moving the forces out of Burma, their supply lines are more vulnerable to such attacks... hence the hit.
Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/FurySoftware

We're also on Facebook! https://www.facebook.com/FurySoftware/
User avatar
OldCrowBalthazor
Posts: 2725
Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 12:42 am
Location: Republic of Cascadia

Re: A small bone of contention.......

Post by OldCrowBalthazor »

BillRunacre wrote: Mon Jul 07, 2025 8:36 am I'll have a think about this, although I suppose it could be rationalised that by moving the forces out of Burma, their supply lines are more vulnerable to such attacks... hence the hit.
I would not change a thing. Pro-Jpn Burmese partisan strikes on a UK unit crossing into Thailand makes sense to me.
My YouTube Channel: Balthazor's Strategic Arcana
https://www.youtube.com/c/BalthazorsStrategicArcana
SC-War in the Pacific Beta Tester
SC-ACW Beta Tester
1904 Imperial Sunrise Tester
SC-WW1 Empires in Turmoil DLC Tester
Tester of various SC Mods
User avatar
HansBolter
Posts: 7410
Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2006 12:30 pm
Location: United States

Re: A small bone of contention.......

Post by HansBolter »

OK, I'm willing to buy into both rationalizations.
Hans

Post Reply

Return to “Strategic Command WWII: War in the Pacific”