Can't wait!!!



Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition
You comment on SS is spot on. Would love that idea.RangerJoe wrote: Wed Sep 17, 2025 1:10 am One thing that I mentioned to someone else would be to reduce the durability of the Japanese submarines but then give them a 0 day refit to increase their durability. That is just to reduce their cost, the cost of producing submarines should not be 3 times the cost of a destroyer of equivalent tonnage. That could also make it harder to discontinue useful submarine production. I do not know how the mini-submarines are produced but if they also use shipyard points, then the same thing could be done there.
Also, some of the CVEs that in the normal game are being produced were conversions of existing ships, just like the Junyo and Hiyo but I don't know how a person would handle that.
I do like what you have done.
So, not knowing your airframes exactly in this mod, I might be wrong here. few comments:
I never got that far against the AI but your comments of the Sally 1c does now make sense to build that version and go to the Thalia as the transport. But I think that a lot of people like to convert the 1E bombers to Nicks for more fighters.PaxMondo wrote: Fri Sep 19, 2025 2:00 pmSo, not knowing your airframes exactly in this mod, I might be wrong here. few comments:
1. I like to build out the Sally 1c. A lot of the 1E bombers in China require the Sally 1c in order to upgrade without PP's to 2E bombers.
2. Since I'm committing the Ha-5 engines to the Sally, I build Thalia instead of Topsy.
3. I don't build the Lilly as the bombload is just too small AND it uses Ha-35 engines which I want for my fighters.
4. I don't build the Dinah I or II. The extra supply expense to operate them (2x) just isn't worth the small increase in range, not to mention they also take double the air field space which also is always at a premium. I just make do with Babs until the Dinah III arrives.
Your air frame progression may preclude some of these comments ... so use as you see fit.
He is a good friend and I call Georgia about every 6 months to touch base. He is doing fine and approaching retirement. he is a VERY GOOD man!CaptBeefheart wrote: Fri Sep 19, 2025 7:44 am I want to chime in saying I'll be reading this probably once a week. You have very enjoyable AARs and I wouldn't change the format. My only suggestion would be to keep the posting up even after the "happy time" is over, although I understand how your enthusiasm could wane.
By the way, have you been in touch with Canoerebel in a while? Hopefully he's doing well. You two had one of the best ever matches going on back in the day.
Cheers,
CB
Interesting thoughts Pax. I am headed to the cabin for a three day weekend and will address your thoughts when I get back. We don't have very good wifi at 8500Ft!PaxMondo wrote: Fri Sep 19, 2025 2:00 pmSo, not knowing your airframes exactly in this mod, I might be wrong here. few comments:
1. I like to build out the Sally 1c. A lot of the 1E bombers in China require the Sally 1c in order to upgrade without PP's to 2E bombers.
2. Since I'm committing the Ha-5 engines to the Sally, I build Thalia instead of Topsy.
3. I don't build the Lilly as the bombload is just too small AND it uses Ha-35 engines which I want for my fighters.
4. I don't build the Dinah I or II. The extra supply expense to operate them (2x) just isn't worth the small increase in range, not to mention they also take double the air field space which also is always at a premium. I just make do with Babs until the Dinah III arrives.
Your air frame progression may preclude some of these comments ... so use as you see fit.
Man, pass on the best wishes to CR from all of us.John 3rd wrote: Fri Sep 19, 2025 4:38 pmHe is a good friend and I call Georgia about every 6 months to touch base. He is doing fine and approaching retirement. he is a VERY GOOD man!CaptBeefheart wrote: Fri Sep 19, 2025 7:44 am I want to chime in saying I'll be reading this probably once a week. You have very enjoyable AARs and I wouldn't change the format. My only suggestion would be to keep the posting up even after the "happy time" is over, although I understand how your enthusiasm could wane.
By the way, have you been in touch with Canoerebel in a while? Hopefully he's doing well. You two had one of the best ever matches going on back in the day.
Cheers,
CB
+1PaxMondo wrote: Mon Sep 22, 2025 12:18 amMan, pass on the best wishes to CR from all of us.John 3rd wrote: Fri Sep 19, 2025 4:38 pmHe is a good friend and I call Georgia about every 6 months to touch base. He is doing fine and approaching retirement. he is a VERY GOOD man!CaptBeefheart wrote: Fri Sep 19, 2025 7:44 am I want to chime in saying I'll be reading this probably once a week. You have very enjoyable AARs and I wouldn't change the format. My only suggestion would be to keep the posting up even after the "happy time" is over, although I understand how your enthusiasm could wane.
By the way, have you been in touch with Canoerebel in a while? Hopefully he's doing well. You two had one of the best ever matches going on back in the day.
Cheers,
CB
![]()
![]()
![]()
Excellent! Yes indeed, he's a great guy. Next time you talk, please tell him we miss his great AARs.John 3rd wrote: Fri Sep 19, 2025 4:38 pmHe is a good friend and I call Georgia about every 6 months to touch base. He is doing fine and approaching retirement. he is a VERY GOOD man!CaptBeefheart wrote: Fri Sep 19, 2025 7:44 am I want to chime in saying I'll be reading this probably once a week. You have very enjoyable AARs and I wouldn't change the format. My only suggestion would be to keep the posting up even after the "happy time" is over, although I understand how your enthusiasm could wane.
By the way, have you been in touch with Canoerebel in a while? Hopefully he's doing well. You two had one of the best ever matches going on back in the day.
Cheers,
CB