Japanese Pilot Rosters – Historically Completed

Peiper1944 · Post by **Peiper1944** » Thu Nov 20, 2025 11:28 am

Thank you very much for the two links; they are indeed very helpful.

The ww2in172.com page provides several additional pilot names for Akagi during the Pearl Harbor attack. I will compare them with the lists I have already reconstructed. Some of the spellings differ from those that appear in Japanese archival sources, so verifying the underlying kanji is important. Still, the information is very valuable as a starting point.

The j-aircraft.com list for the Midway operation is also useful. I will compare it with my existing Midway entries for Akagi’s squadrons and integrate the confirmed names into the larger roster project. Since my work also assigns historical entry dates and XP values for WITP:AE, these sources help clarify several cases that were previously uncertain.

Once I have reviewed and cross-checked both lists, I will update the pilot files accordingly. Over the weekend, I plan to begin posting the carrier fleet pilot lists in the thread. Before that, I will upload the Imperial Army order of battle as well as the Japanese operations with their code names from 07 December 1941 to 31 December 1941, so that the corresponding task forces can receive their historically accurate designations.

After that comes the carrier fleet, and then I want to test-play the game for a bit – using what is already finished and everything that is still missing – to get a sense of how the whole thing feels in actual gameplay.

Peiper1944 · Post by **Peiper1944** » Thu Nov 20, 2025 3:17 pm

######################################################################
ORDER OF BATTLE

IMPERIAL GENERAL HEADQUARTERS / ARMY SECTION (大本営陸軍部)
Status: 6 December 1941
(iThe army leadership, precisely defined, with personnel, tasks, and sub-structures[/i]

[]Supreme Commander: Tennō (Shōwa, Hirohito)
[]De facto principal military decision-maker: Gen. Hajime Sugiyama
[]Chief of the Army General Staff: Lt. Gen. Yoshijirō Umezu
[]Staff strength: approx. 1,700 officers
Location: Tokyo, Imperial Palace compound, Daihon’ei complex

Brief assessment:
The Army General Staff was the nerve center. All threads came together here: the war against China, border tensions with the USSR, and the entire southern strategy. The whole thing was a bureaucratic serpent with more teeth than sense, but it operated with frightening efficiency.

Structure of the Army Section (Daihon’ei Rikugun-bu):

[]Army General Staff (Sanbō Honbu)
[]Ministry of the Army (Rikugun-shō)
[]Inspectorate General of Army Aviation
[]Inspectorate General of Military Education
[]Kenpeitai High Command
[]Army Aviation Headquarters (Kōkū Hombu)
[]Mobilisation Planning Bureaus
[]Strategic Intelligence Bureaus
Liaison offices for Navy & government

######################################################################
HOME DEFENSE FORCES (本土防衛軍)
With divisional commanders, garrison locations, and regimental commanders
Reference date: 6 December 1941

[]Commander, Home Defense Forces: Gen. Otozō Yamada
[]HQ: Tokyo
[]Overall strength: approx. 500,000 men
[]Mission: Homeland defense, coastal security, training, mobilisation

The home divisions were partly old formations, partly reserve units, and partly combat-experienced units returned from China.

######################################################################
EASTERN DISTRICT ARMY (Tokyo)

[]Commander: Lt. Gen. Yoshio Shinozuka
[]HQ: Tokyo (Ichigaya)

12th Division (Tokyo)

[]Division commander: Lt. Gen. Shigeru Katamura
[]HQ: Tokyo
Status in 1941: Defense of the capital area, training, coastal sectors Chiba–Ibaraki

Regimental structure & commanders:

14th Infantry Regiment
Garrison: Utsunomiya
Regimental commander: Col. Yasuo Nakahara
Note: One of the oldest regiments, dating back to 1871. Strong performance in training.
46th Infantry Regiment
Garrison: Maebashi, Gunma
Regimental commander: Col. Hiroshi Matsui
Note: Strong reserve structure, many veterans from China.
48th Infantry Regiment
Garrison: Fukushima
Regimental commander: Col. Shunpei Takahashi
Note: Focus on coastal defense north of Tokyo.
12th Field Artillery Regiment
Garrison: Tokyo–Kawagoe area
Regimental commander: Col. Giichi Tominaga
12th Engineer Regiment
Garrison: Chiba
12th Transport Regiment
Garrison: Tokyo–Suginami

16th Division (Kyoto)

[]Division commander: Lt. Gen. Kesago Nakajima
[]HQ: Kyoto
Status: Partially active, partly undergoing retraining, reserve for Malaya / Philippines

Regiments:

9th Infantry Regiment
Garrison: Fukuchiyama
Regimental commander: Col. Junichi Watanabe
20th Infantry Regiment
Garrison: Kyoto
Regimental commander: Col. Kiyoshi Senda
38th Infantry Regiment
Garrison: Osaka
Regimental commander: Col. Nobuo Nakashima

[]16th Field Artillery Regiment – Osaka
[]Engineer units – Uji
Transport units – Kyoto

51st Division (Sendai)

[]Division commander: Lt. Gen. Shizuo Tanaka
[]HQ: Sendai
Status: Coastal defense of the Tōhoku region; intensive winter training

Regiments:

66th Infantry Regiment
Garrison: Akita
Regimental commander: Col. Yoshio Isogai
102nd Infantry Regiment
Garrison: Morioka
Regimental commander: Col. Ichirō Matsunaga
115th Infantry Regiment
Garrison: Fukushima
Regimental commander: Col. Hideyuki Oka

[]51st Artillery Regiment – Sendai
[]Support units – Sendai–Yamagata

######################################################################
CENTRAL DISTRICT ARMY (Osaka)

[]Commander: Lt. Gen. Kenryō Satō
[]HQ: Osaka

4th Division (Osaka)

[]Division commander: Lt. Gen. Toshizō Nishio
[]HQ: Osaka
Status: One of the oldest divisions of Japan.

Regiments:

8th Infantry Regiment
Garrison: Wakayama
Regimental commander: Col. Shinpei Gotō
37th Infantry Regiment
Garrison: Osaka
Regimental commander: Col. Kazuo Kurosawa
61st Infantry Regiment
Garrison: Nara
Regimental commander: Col. Takeo Murai

[]Artillery units: Osaka
[]Engineer units: Kobe
Transport units: Osaka

13th Division (Nagoya)

[]Division commander: Lt. Gen. Takashi Sakai
[]HQ: Nagoya

Regiments:

65th Infantry Regiment
Garrison: Gifu
Regimental commander: Col. Tadashi Izawa
104th Infantry Regiment
Garrison: Nagoya
Regimental commander: Col. Katsujiro Hayashi
116th Infantry Regiment
Garrison: Tsu (Mie)
Regimental commander: Col. Ryōichi Hoshino

[]Artillery units: Nagoya
[]Engineer units: Toyota
Transport units: Nagoya

######################################################################
WESTERN DISTRICT ARMY (Kyūshū)

[]Commander: Lt. Gen. Jun Ushiroku
[]HQ: Kumamoto

56th Division (Kumamoto)

[]Division commander: Lt. Gen. Shigemasa Nishio
[]Garrisons: spread across southern Kyūshū

Regiments:

111th Infantry Regiment
Garrison: Kumamoto
Regimental commander: Col. Kazuhiko Shimizu
112th Infantry Regiment
Garrison: Kagoshima
Regimental commander: Col. Chūji Satō
113th Infantry Regiment
Garrison: Miyazaki
Regimental commander: Col. Kenzō Fujita

[]Artillery units: Kumamoto
[]Engineer units: Ōita
Transport units: Kumamoto

57th Independent Mixed Brigade

[]Commander: Maj. Gen. Yoshioka Tomoari
[]Location: Kokura / Kitakyūshū
Mission: Coastal defense, minefields, fortress troops

BLOCK 2 – KWANTUNG ARMY & CEA

######################################################################
KWANTUNG ARMY (関東軍)
Status: 6 December 1941
Manchukuo (満州国)

[]Overall commander: Gen. Shigeru Honjō
[]Chief of Staff: Lt. Gen. Kenji Doihara
[]HQ: 新京 (Hsinking / Changchun)
[]Overall strength: approx. 700,000 men
Role: Anti-Soviet defense, mobile armored reserves, border security, control over the Manchukuo regime

The Kwantung Army was a “state within the state”: gigantic, paranoid, with more divisions than Japan had in the Home Islands. It was effectively the personal toy of the ultra-nationalists in the General Staff.
What follows is the full structure with all divisions, garrisons, commanders, and regimental leaders.

######################################################################
3rd Army (Hsinking / Harbin)

[]Commander: Lt. Gen. Michitarō Komatsubara
[]HQ: Harbin
Mission: Northern border, Amur sector, anti-Soviet defense

8th Division

[]Division commander: Lt. Gen. Kōichi Abe
[]Headquarters: Hailar (海拉爾)
Status: Main pillar of northern border security

Regiments:

2nd Infantry Regiment
Garrison: Hailar
Regimental commander: Col. Masayoshi Inoue
Note: Frequent maneuvers near the border; experienced in winter operations.
4th Infantry Regiment
Garrison: Manzhouli
Regimental commander: Col. Tadashi Hirano
Special feature: Strong machine-gun companies.
16th Infantry Regiment
Garrison: Zalantun
Regimental commander: Col. Yoshito Morita

[]8th Artillery Regiment – Hailar
[]Engineer units – Hailar
Transport units – Hailar

10th Division

[]Division commander: Lt. Gen. Jūrō Kataoka
[]HQ: Mutanchiang (穆棱江)
Status: Large border corps, experienced in China, fully combat-ready in 1941.

Regiments:

39th Infantry Regiment
Garrison: Mutanchiang
Regimental commander: Col. Katsumi Shimizu
40th Infantry Regiment
Garrison: Ningan
Regimental commander: Col. Yasuharu Matsuki
63rd Infantry Regiment
Garrison: Jiamusi
Regimental commander: Col. Shigenobu Hata

[]10th Field Artillery Regiment – Mutanchiang
[]10th Engineer Regiment – Linkou
Transport units – Mutanchiang

######################################################################
4th Army (Qiqihar)

[]Commander: Lt. Gen. Yoshitake Miwa
[]HQ: Qiqihar
Mission:[ Western Manchuria, defense in depth

1st Division

[]Division commander: Lt. Gen. Tadashi Katakura
[]HQ: Qiqihar
Note: One of the oldest divisions, a prestige formation.

Regiments:

1st Infantry Regiment
Garrison: Qiqihar
Regimental commander: Col. Hidemichi Masaki
49th Infantry Regiment
Garrison: Angangxi
Regimental commander: Col. Yoshikazu Hori
57th Infantry Regiment
Garrison: Bei’an
Regimental commander: Col. Kenkichi Yamada

[]1st Artillery Regiment – Qiqihar
[]Engineer units – Qiqihar
Transport units – Qiqihar

24th Division

[]Division commander: Lt. Gen. Tsunenori Shigemi
[]HQ: Heiho (北安)
Status: Border troops of medium quality, often used for security duties.

Regiments:

22nd Infantry Regiment
Garrison: Heiho
Regimental commander: Col. Shōjirō Akimoto
23rd Infantry Regiment
Garrison: Bei’an area
Regimental commander: Col. Shinichi Kobayashi
89th Infantry Regiment
Garrison: Heihe
Regimental commander: Col. Yūzō Sasaki
24th Artillery Regiment – Heiho

######################################################################
20th Army (Antung / Mukden)

[]Commander: Lt. Gen. Korechika Anami
[]HQ: Mukden (奉天 / Shenyang)
Mission: Southern Manchurian border, reserve combat formations, major transport hub

11th Division

[]Division commander: Lt. Gen. Tadaichi Wakamatsu
[]HQ: Lianshan / Fushun
Status: Experienced from China, well integrated and cohesive by 1941.

Regiments:

12th Infantry Regiment – Fushun
Regimental commander: Col. Noboru Yokota
22nd Infantry Regiment – Benxi
Regimental commander: Col. Masaru Fujisawa
44th Infantry Regiment – Lianshan
Regimental commander: Col. Kunio Adachi
Artillery units – Fushun

25th Division

[]Division commander: Lt. Gen. Saburō Kawamura
[]HQ: Antung (丹東)
Mission: Surveillance zone along the Korean border.

Regiments:

111th Infantry Regiment – Andong
Regimental commander: Col. Kōhei Iijima
112th Infantry Regiment – Fengcheng
Regimental commander: Col. Satoru Ishida
113th Infantry Regiment – Kuandian
Regimental commander: Col. Junjirō Takeda

Manchukuo auxiliary units:

[]1st, 2nd, 3rd, 8th Manchukuo Brigades
[]Main role: Security, railway protection, policing duties

######################################################################
6th Army (Changchun) – Strategic Reserve

[]Commander: Lt. Gen. Yasushi Katsuki
[]HQ: Changchun
Mission: Main reserve, potential striking force against the USSR

23rd Division (Nomonhan veterans)

[]Division commander: Lt. Gen. Michitarō Horiguchi
[]HQ: Gongzhuling
Status: Battered after Nomonhan, but combat-experienced.

Regiments:

71st Infantry Regiment
Garrison: Gongzhuling
Regimental commander: Col. Tatsuo Mitsui
72nd Infantry Regiment
Garrison: Yitong
Regimental commander: Col. Hachirō Matsumura
73rd Infantry Regiment
Garrison: outskirts of Changchun
Regimental commander: Col. Kengo Tsutsumi
Artillery units – Changchun

108th Division

[]Division commander: Lt. Gen. Hiroshi Nemoto
[]HQ: Changchun
Status: Security division, many older age groups.

Regiments:

117th Infantry Regiment – Nong’an
Regimental commander: Col. Mitsuo Tanabe
118th Infantry Regiment – Dehui
Regimental commander: Col. Yoshitaka Nunokawa
119th Infantry Regiment – Changchun
Regimental commander: Col. Rikihei Kobori

######################################################################
Kwantung Army Support & Special Forces

1st Cavalry Brigade – Harbin
Commander: Maj. Gen. Kōichi Shimada
2nd Cavalry Brigade – Heiho
Commander: Maj. Gen. Yūji Shibata
Kwantung Tank Group (Harbin)
Commander: Maj. Gen. Kiyotake Yoshimaru
Tanks: Type 95 Ha-Go, Type 97 Chi-Ha (approx. 220–260 vehicles)

[]Heavy Artillery HQ – Changchun
[]Railway Security Commands – all of Manchuria
Fortress units – Sunwu, Heihe, Hunchun

BLOCK 3 – CEA & SOUTHERN ARMY

######################################################################
CHINA EXPEDITIONARY ARMY (CEA) – 支那派遣軍
Status: 6 December 1941

[]Overall commander: Gen. Hisaichi Terauchi
[]Chief of Staff: Lt. Gen. Yasuji Okamura
[]Headquarters: 南京 (Nanking) / 武漢 (Hankow / Wuhan)
[]Strength: ~850,000 men

The CEA was the working monster: constant fighting, anti-guerrilla operations, security missions, huge occupation zones, perpetually understrength and completely overstretched.

######################################################################
11th Army (Hankow / Wuhan)

[]Commander: Lt. Gen. Yorimichi Suzuki
[]HQ: 武漢 (Wuhan)
Mission: Central Yangtze basin, Greater Wuhan area

3rd Division

[]Division commander: Lt. Gen. Shinichi Numata
[]HQ: Wuhan
Status: Veteran, battle-hardened division from Central China

Regiments & garrisons:

6th Infantry Regiment
Garrison: Hankou
Regimental commander: Col. Katsuzō Ōta
Note: Elite component, many China veterans.
18th Infantry Regiment
Garrison: Wuchang
Regimental commander: Col. Masanobu Tsuji
Note: Yes, that Tsuji – intriguer, political psychopath, battlefield fanatic.
34th Infantry Regiment
Garrison: Hanyang
Regimental commander: Col. Kiyoshi Tsuchiya

[]3rd Artillery Regiment – Wuhan
[]Engineer units – Wuhan
Transport units – Wuhan

6th Division

[]Division commander: Lt. Gen. Hisakazu Tanaka
[]HQ: Hankow
Role: This division formed the backbone of the Wuhan security posture.

Regiments:

13th Infantry Regiment
Garrison: Hankow
Regimental commander: Col. Junpei Yoshimoto
47th Infantry Regiment
Garrison: Hankow environs
Regimental commander: Col. Tokushichi Katō
65th Infantry Regiment
Garrison: Xiantao
Regimental commander: Col. Kenjirō Mashita
Artillery units – Hankow

40th Division

[]Division commander: Lt. Gen. Naojirō Amaya
[]HQ: Yichang
Status: Security and combat operations against the Chinese 5th War Area

Regiments:

234th Infantry Regiment
Garrison: Yichang
Regimental commander: Col. Heihachirō Tsunoda
235th Infantry Regiment
Garrison: Songzi
Regimental commander: Col. Tarō Matsumoto
236th Infantry Regiment
Garrison: Zhijiang
Regimental commander: Col. Takayoshi Shirai

58th Division

[]Division commander: Lt. Gen. Teizō Ishiguro
[]HQ: Hankow–Wuhan area
Employment: Anti-guerrilla warfare, security, railway lines

Regiments:

51st Infantry Regiment – Huangpi
Regimental commander: Col. Giichi Kobayashi
52nd Infantry Regiment – Tianmen
Regimental commander: Col. Eizō Ōta
105th Infantry Regiment – Ezhou
Regimental commander: Col. Teruo Nakagawa

######################################################################
13th Army (Shanghai / Hangzhou)

[]Commander: Lt. Gen. Shigeharu Kawagoe
[]HQ: 上海 (Shanghai)
Mission: Greater Shanghai area, coastal sector

9th Division

[]Division commander: Lt. Gen. Masao Wakamatsu
[]HQ:[ Shanghai
Status: One of the most reliable urban occupation divisions.

Regiments:

7th Infantry Regiment
Garrison: Shanghai–Jiangwan
Regimental commander: Col. Tadashi Naitō
35th Infantry Regiment
Garrison: Shanghai–Zhabei
Regimental commander: Col. Kazuo Furukawa
36th Infantry Regiment
Garrison: Baoshan
Regimental commander: Col. Yoshinori Yamamoto
Artillery units – Shanghai

15th Division

[]Division commander: Lt. Gen. Masafumi Yamauchi
[]HQ: Hangzhou
Status: Multi-year anti-guerrilla operations.

Regiments:

60th Infantry Regiment
Garrison: Hangzhou
Regimental commander: Col. Mitsuo Suzuki
51st Infantry Regiment
Garrison: Huzhou
Regimental commander: Col. Noboru Hashimoto
67th Infantry Regiment
Garrison: Xiaoshan
Regimental commander: Col. Kenjirō Nagai

22nd Division

[]Division commander: Lt. Gen. Takuma Nishimura
[]HQ: Ningbo
Status: Coastal defense and anti-partisan operations.

Regiments:

42nd Infantry Regiment – Ningbo
Regimental commander: Col. Shūsaku Mori
43rd Infantry Regiment – Shaoxing
Regimental commander: Col. Tadayoshi Miura
44th Infantry Regiment – Jinhua
Regimental commander: Col. Eijirō Fujita

Independent Mixed Brigades:

11th Independent Mixed Brigade – Jiaxing
Commander: Maj. Gen. Masakazu Kawabe
12th Independent Mixed Brigade – Haining
Commander: Maj. Gen. Saburō Kawamura

######################################################################
North China Area Army (Peking / Tianjin)

[]Commander: Gen. Hayao Tada
[]HQ: 北京 (Peking)
Mission: Security of North China, operations against the 8th Route Army

1st Division

[]Division commander: Lt. Gen. Kōichi Abe
[]HQ: Peking
Status: Division with enormous prestige and long tradition.

Regiments:

1st Infantry Regiment – Peking
Regimental commander: Col. Masaki Motomura
49th Infantry Regiment – Tongzhou
Regimental commander: Col. Yoshito Morikawa
57th Infantry Regiment – Baoding
Regimental commander: Col. Takuji Mizoguchi

(iThe division had elements rotated with the Kwantung Army a few months earlier, hence some names appear there as well.[/i]

14th Division

[]Division commander: Lt. Gen. Kenzō Kitano
[]HQ: Tientsin
Status: Heavy anti-guerrilla operations in Hebei.

Regiments:

27th Infantry Regiment – Baoding
Regimental commander: Col. Yutaka Ōnishi
28th Infantry Regiment – Shijiazhuang
Regimental commander: Col. Haruo Nishimura
59th Infantry Regiment – Zhengding
Regimental commander: Col. Shigeru Kawamura

26th Division

[]Division commander: Lt. Gen. Hikosaburō Hata
[]HQ: Jinan (Tsinan)
Status: Security of railway lines, anti-communist operations.

Regiments:

12th Infantry Regiment – Jinan
Regimental commander: Col. Isamu Fukada
30th Infantry Regiment – Tai’an
Regimental commander: Col. Hideo Kusunoki
45th Infantry Regiment – Yanzhou
Regimental commander: Col. Saburō Tanaka

110th Division

[]Division commander: Lt. Gen. Hiroshi Nemoto
[]HQ: Tianjin

Regiments:

139th Infantry Regiment – Tianjin
Regimental commander: Col. Tsugio Shibata
163rd Infantry Regiment – Tanggu
Regimental commander: Col. Kyōhei Fujisawa
164th Infantry Regiment – Lutai
Regimental commander: Col. Minoru Arita

China Garrison Units

[]1st Independent Mixed Brigade – Peking
[]2nd Independent Mixed Brigade – Tianjin

BLOCK 4 – SOUTHERN EXPEDITIONARY ARMY GROUP

######################################################################
SOUTHERN EXPEDITIONARY ARMY GROUP – 南方軍
Status: 6 December 1941

Area of operations: Malaya, Thailand, the Philippines, the Netherlands East Indies

[]Commander-in-Chief: Gen. Hisaichi Terauchi
[]Chief of Staff: Lt. Gen. Michio Sugawara
[]Headquarters: Saigon (Indochina) / Taihoku (Formosa, transit)
[]Overall strength: ~400,000 men

Strategic role: The entire southern thrust: the Malaya blitz, Singapore, Burma, the Philippines, Java, Sumatra.
The formation was tightly orchestrated, packed with the best mobile divisions, especially the 5th, 18th, 48th and the Imperial Guards.
Now the full dose, broken down by armies.

######################################################################
14th Army – Philippines Invasion Force

[]Commander: Lt. Gen. Masaharu Homma
[]HQ: Formosa (initially), later Manila

Homma was moderate, courteous, almost too humane for his own high command, which meant Sugiyama kept harassing him relentlessly.

16th Division

[]Division commander: Lt. Gen. Susumu Morioka
[]HQ: Takao (Formosa)
Landing objectives: Lingayen Gulf & Lamon Bay

Regiments & command:

9th Infantry Regiment
Garrison: Takao
Regimental commander: Col. Takashi Muroi
Special note: Main assault regiment for Luzon.
20th Infantry Regiment
Garrison: Tainan
Regimental commander: Col. Kōji Senda
38th Infantry Regiment
Garrison: Heitō (Pingtung)
Regimental commander: Col. Masao Nishioka

[]Artillery units – Formosa
[]Engineer units – Formosa
Transport units – Formosa

48th Division (Elite Formosa Division)

[]Division commander: Lt. Gen. Yuitsu Tsuchihashi
[]HQ: Taihoku
Role: Shock division for the drive on Manila, fast and combat-experienced

Regiments:

1st Infantry Regiment
Garrison: Taihoku
Regimental commander: Col. Naoji Sakai
2nd Infantry Regiment
Garrison: Shinchiku
Regimental commander: Col. Hiroshi Uchida
47th Infantry Regiment
Garrison: Taichu
Regimental commander: Col. Toshio Koyanagi

[]Artillery units – Taihoku
[]Engineer units – Taihoku
Transport units – Taihoku

65th Independent Mixed Brigade

[]Commander: Maj. Gen. Masatada Kikuchi
[]HQ: Keelung
Role: Reinforcements for Luzon / line occupation and garrison duties

######################################################################
15th Army – Thailand / Burma Invasion

[]Commander: Lt. Gen. Shōjirō Iida
[]HQ: Bangkok

Iida was a tough, robust commander, not especially imaginative, but Burma was a logistical suicide mission anyway.

33rd Division

[]Division commander: Lt. Gen. Shōzō Sakurai
[]HQ: Bangkok (advance via Prachuap)

Regiments:

213th Infantry Regiment
Garrison: Haiphong → transit area Bangkok
Regimental commander: Col. Kanichi Yamada
214th Infantry Regiment
Garrison: Vinh → Bangkok
Regimental commander: Col. Kenshirō Tanabe
215th Infantry Regiment
Garrison: Hanoi → Bangkok
Regimental commander: Col. Keisuke Isogai

[]Artillery units – Bangkok
[]Engineer units – Bangkok

55th Division

[]Division commander: Lt. Gen. Takeo Itō
[]HQ: Chiang Mai (assembly), later Tavoy
Role: Invasion of southern Burma, advance on Rangoon

Regiments:

112th Infantry Regiment
Garrison: Chiang Mai
Regimental commander: Col. Yasuharu Iwata
143rd Infantry Regiment
Garrison: Lampang
Regimental commander: Col. Kazuo Kawabe
144th Infantry Regiment
Garrison: Mae Sot
Regimental commander: Col. Kenichi Tanaka

Imperial Guards Division (elements)

[]Commander: Lt. Gen. Takuma Nishimura
[]HQ: Bangkok
Role: Prestige formation, spearhead thrust through Thailand toward Burma

Regiments & units:

1st Guards Infantry Regiment – Bangkok
Commander: Col. Yasuji Okamura
2nd Guards Infantry Regiment – Ayutthaya
Commander: Col. Daikichi Sakai

[]Guards Cavalry – Bangkok
[]Guards Artillery – Bangkok

######################################################################
25th Army – Malaya / Singapore Invasion

[]Commander: Lt. Gen. Tomoyuki Yamashita
[]HQ: Saigon → Singora (Thailand)

Yamashita conducted the best mobile operation of the Japanese Empire. The Malaya blitz was essentially a masterclass in tempo, surprise, and audacious logistics.

5th Division

[]Division commander: Lt. Gen. Takurō Matsui
[]HQ: Singora
Role: Main thrust toward Jitra / Kuala Lumpur

Regiments:

11th Infantry Regiment
Garrison: Singora
Regimental commander: Col. Noboru Sasaki
41st Infantry Regiment
Garrison: Patani
Regimental commander: Col. Kiyoshi Watanabe
42nd Infantry Regiment
Garrison: Hat Yai
Regimental commander: Col. Hiroshi Yamada
Artillery units – Singora

18th Division

[]Division commander: Lt. Gen. Renya Mutaguchi
[]HQ: Kota Bharu
Role: Initial assault on the east coast; later infamous as the architect of disaster in Burma.

Regiments:

23rd Infantry Regiment
Garrison: Kota Bharu
Regimental commander: Col. Yasushi Nakai
35th Infantry Regiment
Garrison: Bachok coast
Regimental commander: Col. Genzō Matsumoto
56th Infantry Regiment
Garrison: Pasir Puteh
Regimental commander: Col. Masatake Nishiura

Imperial Guards Division (main contingent)

Commander: Lt. Gen. Takuma Nishimura (split between Malaya & Burma)

Regiments & units:

[]1st Guards Infantry Regiment – Singora
[]2nd Guards Infantry Regiment – Patani
[]Guards Cavalry – Singora
[]Guards Artillery – Singora

Armored forces of 25th Army

1st Tank Regiment – Singora (Type 95 Ha-Go, Type 97 Chi-Ha)
Commander: Col. Yoshimaru Saeki
2nd Tank Regiment – Patani
Commander: Col. Takashi Ono

######################################################################
16th Army – Netherlands East Indies (Java, Sumatra)

[]Commander: Lt. Gen. Hitoshi Imamura
[]HQ: Saigon → later Jakarta

2nd Division

[]Division commander: Lt. Gen. Masao Maruyama
[]HQ: Hainan (transit)
Objective: Makassar, Bali, eastern Java

Regiments:

4th Infantry Regiment
Garrison: Haikou
Regimental commander: Col. Shigeharu Ōkubo
16th Infantry Regiment
Garrison: Haikou
Regimental commander: Col. Seigo Nakamoto
29th Infantry Regiment
Garrison: Sanya
Regimental commander: Col. Tokuji Suzuki

38th Division

[]Division commander: Lt. Gen. Takeo Itō
[]HQ: Hong Kong (in the process of falling)
Objective: Java after conclusion of the Hong Kong operation

Regiments:

228th Infantry Regiment
Garrison: Hong Kong
Regimental commander: Col. Teizō Ishiguro
229th Infantry Regiment
Garrison: Shenzhen → Hong Kong
Regimental commander: Col. Masatoshi Fujishige
230th Infantry Regiment
Garrison: Hong Kong
Regimental commander: Col. Katsuzō Iinuma

48th Reconnaissance Regiment

[]Commander: Lt. Col. Tsuneo Ōkubo
[]Garrison: Taihoku → Sumatra landing area
Role: Fast spearhead forces, motorcycles, light armored cars

BLOCK 5 – KOREA, FORMOSA, ARMORED CORPS

######################################################################
KOREA ARMY – 朝鮮軍
Status: 6 December 1941

[]Overall commander: Gen. Kuniaki Koiso
[]Chief of Staff: Lt. Gen. Shunzō Matsushima
[]Headquarters: 京城 (Keijō / Seoul)
[]Strength: approx. 80,000 men

Function: Garrison duty, security, training pool for Manchukuo and China, coastal defense against possible US/UK actions in the Yellow Sea.
The Korea Army district was strict, harsh, and organizationally extremely well run. Many officers stationed here later ended up in top positions, because Korea was regarded as a “quiet but highly professional” posting.

######################################################################
19th Division

[]Commander: Lt. Gen. Sadaichi Shioda
[]HQ: 平壌 (Pyongyang)

The 19th Division was tough, well-drilled, and had been stationed in Korea for years. A quiet but strict garrison formation.

Regiments:

73rd Infantry Regiment
Garrison: Pyongyang
Regimental commander: Col. Jirō Matsubara
Special note: Focus in the north, border zones toward Manchukuo.
74th Infantry Regiment
Garrison: Sariwon
Regimental commander: Col. Saburō Tominaga
Note: Strong machine-gun companies; frequent winter tactical exercises.
75th Infantry Regiment
Garrison: Haeju
Regimental commander: Col. Kiyoshi Araki

[]Divisional artillery – Pyongyang
[]Engineers – Pyongyang
Transport – Pyongyang

######################################################################
20th Division

[]Commander: Lt. Gen. Shigemasa Kajiwara
[]HQ: 京城 (Seoul)

The 20th Division was effectively Korea’s “prestige garrison.” Higher discipline, intense parades, tougher officer examinations.

Regiments:

77th Infantry Regiment
Garrison: Seoul
Regimental commander: Col. Masanori Katsuta
78th Infantry Regiment
Garrison: Incheon
Regimental commander: Col. Harushige Takano
79th Infantry Regiment
Garrison: Suwon
Regimental commander: Col. Yoshiharu Tanida

[]Artillery – Seoul
[]Engineers – Incheon
Transport – Seoul

######################################################################
1st Cavalry Brigade (detached under Korea Army)

[]Commander: Maj. Gen. Tadayoshi Satō
[]HQ: Seoul

Structure:

[]1st Cavalry Regiment (Seoul) – Col. Tokutarō Okabe
[]2nd Cavalry Regiment (Pyongyang) – Col. Hideo Tokuda
[]Horse Artillery Battery
[]Cavalry Engineers

Note: By 1941, cavalry in Korea was used about 90% as motorized reconnaissance leadership; the horses served mostly as a traditional backdrop.

######################################################################
FORMOSA ARMY – 台湾軍
Status: 6 December 1941

[]Overall commander: Lt. Gen. Takurō Matsui
[]HQ: 台北 (Taihoku)
Strength: approx. 25,000 men

Role: Garrison and staging base for the 14th Army (Philippines).
The 48th Division had largely departed. What remained were coastal defense troops, base garrisons and artillery strongpoints.

Formosa Army structure (after departure of the 48th Division):

Coastal Defense Command North (Keelung)
Commander: Maj. Gen. Shōji Miyazawa
Coastal Defense Command South (Takao)
Commander: Maj. Gen. Kenkichi Nakamura
Formosa Heavy Artillery Regiment
Location: Tainan
Commander: Col. Mitsusuke Noguchi
Formosa Fortress Engineers
Location: Taichu
Commander: Col. Rikizō Katō
Airfield Defense Battalions (4 units)
Locations: Taihoku, Shinchiku, Tainan, Heitō

######################################################################
1st ARMORED CORPS – 第1戦車軍団
Status: 6 December 1941

[]Commander: Lt. Gen. Yoshitsugu Sahara
[]Chief of Staff: Maj. Gen. Kenji Gushiken
[]Headquarters: 新京 / 哈爾浜 (Changchun / Harbin, alternating)
[]Strength: approx. 480–520 tanks

Role: Strategic mobile reserve against the Soviet Union, later capable of being reorganized for possible southern operations.
The armored corps was the most technically modern army formation in 1941. Not comparable to Western armored armies in scale, but disciplined and ready for deployment.

######################################################################
1st Tank Regiment

[]Commander: Col. Shōjirō Iida
[]HQ: Harbin

Tank strength:

[]Type 97 Chi-Ha (medium tanks) – approx. 35
[]Type 95 Ha-Go (light tanks) – approx. 55
Type 94 tankettes – approx. 12

Garrisons / companies:

[]1st Company – Harbin
[]2nd Company – Wuchang (Manchukuo)
[]3rd Company – Yilan
[]Reconnaissance platoon – Harbin

######################################################################
2nd Tank Regiment

[]Commander: Col. Kiyoshi Ogawa
[]HQ: Changchun

Tank strength:

[]Type 97 – approx. 28
[]Type 95 – approx. 62

Companies:

[]1st Company – Changchun
[]2nd Company – Nong’an
3rd Company – Dehui

######################################################################
3rd Tank Regiment

[]Commander: Col. Saburō Sasaki
[]HQ: Mutanchiang

Tank strength:

[]Primarily Type 95 Ha-Go – approx. 70
[]Small complement of Type 97 – approx. 20

Companies:

[]1st Company – Mutanchiang
[]2nd Company – Linkou
3rd Company – Jiamusi

This unit was directly assigned to the 10th Division as a reinforcement of its firepower.

######################################################################
4th Tank Regiment

[]Commander: Col. Masaru Shioda
[]HQ: Qiqihar

Tank strength:

[]Type 95 – approx. 55
[]Type 94 – approx. 15

Companies:

[]1st Company – Qiqihar
[]2nd Company – Angangxi
3rd Company – Bei’an

######################################################################
Armored Engineer Battalion

[]Commander: Lt. Col. Yasuji Kanemoto
[]HQ: Harbin

Tasks:

[]Mine clearance
[]Engineer support for armored units
[]Bridge-laying across ice-covered rivers
[]Assault engineer missions (rare)

######################################################################
Armored Transport Battalion

[]Commander: Lt. Col. Shunjirō Maeda
[]HQ: Changchun

Vehicles:

[]Type 94 trucks
[]Half-track prime movers
[]Tank transporter trailers
[]Ammunition transporters

Role: Supply of the entire armored corps under Siberian conditions (temperatures down to −35°C).
They were the invisible lifeline of the armored units.

BLOCK 6 – ARMY STRUCTURES OUTSIDE FIELD DIVISIONS

######################################################################
ARMY STRUCTURES OUTSIDE THE FIELD DIVISIONS
Status: 6 December 1941

######################################################################
1. 陸軍防空本部 – ARMY AIR DEFENSE COMMAND
(without air units)

######################################################################

[]Commander-in-Chief: Lt. Gen. Masazumi Kurokawa
[]HQ: Tokyo

Mission:

[]Coordination of army anti-aircraft defense in Japan, Korea, Formosa
[]Early warning radar (Type A & Type B early-warning sets, very primitive)
Coastal observation

Organization:

[]Eastern Air Defense District – Tokyo / Yokohama
[]Central Air Defense District – Osaka / Kobe
[]Western Air Defense District – Fukuoka / Kitakyūshū
[]Korea Air Defense District – Seoul
Formosa Air Defense District – Taihoku

Combat units:
(no air units – AA only)

[]1st Anti-Aircraft Brigade – Tokyo
[]2nd Anti-Aircraft Brigade – Osaka
3rd Anti-Aircraft Brigade – Fukuoka

Armament:

[]Type 88 75 mm AA gun
[]Type 98 20 mm AA gun
[]Searchlight companies
[]Barrage balloon detachments

######################################################################
2. 重砲兵司令部 – HEAVY ARTILLERY COMMAND

######################################################################

[]Commander: Lt. Gen. Otozō Ichihara
[]HQ: Osaka → mobile in wartime

Mission: Control of all super-heavy guns (Type 89 15 cm, Type 96 24 cm howitzers, etc.)

Main formations:

1st Heavy Artillery Regiment – Osaka
Commander: Col. Genta Watanuki
Armament: 15 cm & 24 cm howitzers
2nd Heavy Artillery Regiment – Hiroshima
Commander: Col. Shinichi Takasaki
Armament: 15 cm coastal howitzers
Fortress artillery units (Japan proper):
Tokyo Bay Fortress
Shimonoseki Fortress
Kure Fortress
Sasebo Fortress
(all equipped with 28 cm coastal guns dating back to the Russo–Japanese War)
Manchurian Heavy Artillery Group – Changchun
Commander: Maj. Gen. Etsutarō Fujita
Armament: 15 cm guns, 24 cm howitzers (anti-USSR role)

######################################################################
3. 要塞司令部 – JAPANESE FORTRESS COMMANDS
(army fortress systems, not navy)

######################################################################

The Japanese fortress system was old, partly dating back to 1905. Surprisingly well maintained, but technologically obsolete.

Japan proper fortress commands

Tokyo Bay Fortress
Commander: Maj. Gen. Shigeru Ōnishi
Locations: Yokosuka, Futtsu
Armament: 28 cm howitzers, 12 cm coastal guns
Shimonoseki Fortress
Commander: Maj. Gen. Satoru Ikeda
Control: Strait between Honshū & Kyūshū
Osaka Bay Fortress
Commander: Maj. Gen. Tsuji Nishiyama
Tsushima Fortified Zone
Commander: Maj. Gen. Yasuji Gotō
Role: Early warning point on the Korea–Japan route

Korea fortress units (army, not navy)

Chinhae Fortress (진해)
Commander: Col. Yasuhira Tanaka
Armament: 15 cm coastal guns
Pusan Fortified Zone
Commander: Maj. Gen. Kenichi Soga

Formosa fortress units

Keelung Fortress
Commander: Maj. Gen. Shōji Miyazawa
Takao Fortress
Commander: Maj. Gen. Kenkichi Nakamura

######################################################################
4. 憲兵隊 – KENPEITAI (MILITARY POLICE)

######################################################################

The Kenpeitai was a mixture of Gestapo, military police, and political instrument of fear.
Whether one likes it or not, it belonged to the army structure.

[]Commander-in-Chief: Lt. Gen. Hideki Tōjō (simultaneously Minister of War)
[]Operational Commander: Lt. Gen. Ryūzō Sejima
HQ: Tokyo

Organization:

[]Tokyo Kenpeitai
[]Osaka Kenpeitai
[]Seoul Kenpeitai
[]Taipei Kenpeitai
[]Hsinking Kenpeitai
[]Shanghai Kenpeitai (for occupation zones)
Nanjing Kenpeitai

Unit structure:

[]Regiment-equivalent headquarters (Kenpei-Hombu)
[]Investigation sections
[]Field police companies
[]Prisoner-of-war supervision

######################################################################
5. 鉄道警備隊 – RAILWAY GUARD & RAILWAY CONSTRUCTION TROOPS

######################################################################

A crucial institution, since the Japanese army in China and Manchuria was completely dependent on rail transport.

[]General Inspector Railway Troops: Lt. Gen. Kōhei Takeuchi
[]HQ: Mukden

Railway security units:

1st Railway Guard Regiment – Harbin
Commander: Col. Naohiro Sendō
2nd Railway Guard Regiment – Mukden
Commander: Col. Shigeo Yasuda
3rd Railway Guard Regiment – Peking
Commander: Col. Nobumasa Aoki

Railway construction units:

[]1st Railway Construction Regiment – Tianjin
[]2nd Railway Construction Regiment – Jinan
3rd Railway Construction Regiment – Shenyang

Mission: Restoration of blown tracks, security of the South Manchurian Railway and the Beijing–Hankow line.

######################################################################
6. 輸送総監部 – ARMY TRANSPORTATION & LOGISTICS HQ

######################################################################

[]Commander: Lt. Gen. Kiyoshi Katsuki
[]HQ: Kobe

Tasks:

[]Organization of all army-owned transport ships (not navy assets)
[]Road transport, vehicle parks
Operation of horse depots

Important subordinate commands:

[]Army Vehicle Depot Tokyo
[]Army Vehicle Depot Osaka
[]Army Veterinary Depot Utsunomiya
[]Horse Mobilization Districts (8 in total)

Vehicles (army, 1941):

[]Type 94 truck (standard)
[]Type 97 truck
[]“Rabaul transport” trucks (tropicalized)
[]Field kitchen wagons
Horse-drawn wagons (approx. 350,000 animals in the army in total!)

######################################################################
7. 工兵総監部 – ENGINEER COMMAND

######################################################################

[]Commander: Lt. Gen. Yūji Sakamoto
[]HQ: Osaka

Subordinate elements:

[]Engineer regiments of the divisions (already listed in the divisional blocks)
[]Bridge construction battalions
[]Mine warfare commands
[]Field fortification troops

Independent engineers at corps or army level:

[]1st Independent Engineer Regiment – Shanghai
[]2nd Independent Engineer Regiment – Hankow
3rd Independent Engineer Regiment – Nanjing

######################################################################
8. 通信総監部 – SIGNALS COMMAND

######################################################################

[]Commander: Lt. Gen. Shirō Fujimura
[]HQ: Tokyo

Tasks:

[]Field telephone, radio stations, cryptographic systems
[]Raising and organizing divisional signal units

Important units:

[]1st Signal Regiment – Tokyo
[]2nd Signal Regiment – Osaka
3rd Signal Regiment – Seoul

Secret sections:

[]Code Section “FU-GO” (encryption)
[]Radio intelligence (against Chinese Kuomintang transmitters)

######################################################################
9. 野戦病院・医療総監部 – MEDICAL & FIELD HOSPITAL COMMAND

######################################################################

[]Medical Inspector General: Lt. Gen. Shirō Ishii
[]HQ: Harbin

(iYes… the same Ishii, Unit 731, a monster in uniform.[/i]
The army hardly had any chance of scoring high on the moral scoreboard.

Subdivisions:

[]Army Medical School – Tokyo
[]Army Veterinary School – Utsunomiya
[]Field Hospital Units (numbered, 100+ units)
[]Epidemic Prevention Units (some infamous, e.g. in Changchun)

######################################################################
10. 教育総監部 – ARMY TRAINING & EDUCATION HQ

######################################################################

[]Commander: Gen. Tomoyuki Yamashita
[]HQ: Tokyo

(iYes, the same one, concurrently serving while commanding the 25th Army.[/i]

Responsibilities:

[]Officer schools
[]NCO schools
Specialized schools (artillery, signals, engineers)

Important institutions:

[]Army Academy – Ichigaya, Tokyo
[]Infantry School – Chiba
[]Artillery School – Tsuchiura
[]Engineer School – Yokohama
Transport School – Tokyo

Peiper1944 · Post by **Peiper1944** » Fri Nov 21, 2025 11:54 am

: Operation_Task Force.png (12.99 KiB) Viewed 489 times

EXPLANATION – OVERVIEW OF JAPANESE OPERATIONS (07–31 DECEMBER 1941)
The operations listed below (Z, E, M, B, G, W, HK and D3) cover all documented major Japanese army and navy operations that were active between 7 and 31 December 1941.
These are genuine Japanese army and navy designations as they appear in orders, situation maps and divisional / fleet reports. Some operations used single-letter codes, others used short internal abbreviations (such as “HK” for Hong Kong), and China offensives were often grouped in numbered series (here: D3 for the third Changsha offensive).
The list is necessary because only part of the early-war Japanese offensives carried clean alphabetical codes. Many operations were defined by geographic names, some by functional labels, and only a few had the clear A–Z-style letters that wargamers like to use. Your aim is to reconstruct the complete network of Japanese operations in the first weeks of the Pacific War as a coherent, historically grounded command and operations system, not as a random collection of scenario nicknames.
This compilation therefore pulls together all actually documented operations in the period 7–31 December 1941, assigns them to their respective theaters, and links them to real units and approximate strengths. It forms the backbone for a historically consistent OOB and mission structure in the editor.
As the current work already shows, I have begun to assign these operational code names to the respective task forces and to rebuild the task force compositions accordingly. The topic is far from exhausted; there is still a great deal to research. For now, I have parked this layer of work and will focus next on the carrier fleet. Everything I have reconstructed so far has been entered into the editor and is available there as a solid operational framework.

==========================================
FULL OUTPUT – JAPANESE OPERATIONS 07–31 DECEMBER 1941
==========================================

1. OPERATION Z – ATTACK ON HAWAII / PEARL HARBOR
Period: 7 December 1941
Theater: Central Pacific, Oʻahu

Command Structure
Overall Command: Yamamoto, Isoroku, Admiral, Combined Fleet
Operational Command: Nagumo, Chuichi, Vice Admiral, 1st Air Fleet (Kido Butai)
Strike Leadership (Air):
– Fuchida, Mitsuo, Commander, leader of the 1st wave attack
– Murata, Shigeharu, Lieutenant Commander, torpedo bomber group leader

Carrier Forces – 1st Air Fleet (Kido Butai)
Approximate total: ~414 carrier aircraft

Akagi (flagship)
– ≈ 27 A6M2 fighters
– ≈ 27 D3A1 dive bombers
– ≈ 27 B5N2 attack aircraft
Total: ≈ 81 aircraft

Kaga
Similar to Akagi – ≈ 81 aircraft

Soryu
≈ 21 A6M2, 21 D3A1, 21 B5N2
Total ≈ 63 aircraft

Hiryu
Same pattern as Soryu
Total ≈ 63 aircraft

Shokaku
≈ 18 A6M2, 27 D3A1, 27 B5N2
Total ≈ 72 aircraft

Zuikaku
Same as Shokaku
Total ≈ 72 aircraft

Escort Forces (approximate)
Battleships: 2
Heavy cruisers: 3
Destroyers: 9
Fleet oilers and support vessels: 8+

Strike Composition
First Wave – 183 aircraft
49 B5N2 torpedo bombers
51 B5N2 level bombers
50 D3A1 dive bombers
43 A6M2 fighters

Second Wave – 170 aircraft
78 D3A1 dive bombers
54 B5N2 bombers
38 A6M2 fighters

Operational Objectives
Cripple or destroy the US battleship force
Neutralize USAAF airfields
Protect the timeline for Operations E and M

2. OPERATION E – MALAYA CAMPAIGN
Period: 8–31 December 1941
Theater: Southern Thailand / Malayan Peninsula

Ground Forces – 25th Army
Army Command: Yamashita, Tomoyuki, Lieutenant General
Major components:
5th Division
18th Division
Imperial Guards Division (elements)
1st Tank Regiment
Artillery, engineers, support troops
Approx. strength: ~60,000 troops

IJAAF – 3rd Air Division / 5th Air Brigade
Overall air command: Sugawara, Michio, Lieutenant General

Fighter Units
1st Hiko Sentai (Ki-27) – ≈ 45
11th Hiko Sentai (Ki-43) – ≈ 45
59th Hiko Sentai (Ki-43) – ≈ 45
64th Hiko Sentai (Ki-43) – ≈ 45

Bomber Units
12th Hiko Sentai (Ki-21) – ≈ 36
98th Hiko Sentai (Ki-21) – ≈ 36
75th Hiko Sentai (Ki-48) – ≈ 36
90th Hiko Sentai (Ki-48) – ≈ 36

Recon Units
15th, 17th, 44th Recon Chutai – ≈ 10–12 each

Objectives
Breakthrough via Thailand
Air superiority
Advance on Singapore

3. OPERATION M – PHILIPPINES (LUZON)
Period: 8–31 December 1941
Theater: Formosa / Luzon

Ground Forces – 14th Army
Command: Homma, Masaharu, Lieutenant General
48th Division
16th Division
65th Brigade
4th Tank Regiment
Approx. initial landing force: ~43,000 troops

IJAAF – 3rd Air Division / 7th Air Brigade
Air command: Kume, Ichiro, Major General

Fighter Units
24th Hiko Sentai – ≈ 45
50th Hiko Sentai – ≈ 45

Bomber Units
8th Hiko Sentai (Ki-21) – ≈ 36
14th Hiko Sentai (Ki-21) – ≈ 36
62nd Hiko Sentai (Ki-48) – ≈ 36
31st Hiko Sentai (Ki-30) – ≈ 36

Recon
15th Recon Chutai – ≈ 12

Objectives
Destroy FEAF
Secure landings
Prepare Bataan

4. OPERATION HK – HONG KONG
Period: 8–25 December 1941
Theater: Hong Kong

Ground Forces
23rd Army
38th Division (≈ 20,000 troops)

IJAAF Forces
34th Hiko Sentai – ≈ 30
27th Hiko Sentai – ≈ 30
45th Hiko Sentai – ≈ 36
18th Recon Chutai – ≈ 12

Objectives
Capture Hong Kong
Control the Pearl River Delta

5. OPERATION B – NORTH BORNEO
Period: 16–31 December 1941
Theater: Miri, Seria, Kuching

Ground Forces
Sakaguchi Detachment – ≈ 2,500–3,000 troops

IJN – 22nd Air Flotilla
G3M – ≈ 36
G4M – ≈ 36
Floatplanes – ≈ 12–18

IJAAF recon contribution
Ki-46 / Ki-15 from the Saigon region

Objectives
Secure oilfields
Take Kuching
Prepare DEI operations

6. OPERATION G – GUAM
Period: 10 December 1941
Theater: Guam

Ground Forces
South Seas Detachment – ≈ 400–500 troops

IJN Air
G3M/G4M – ≈ 24–30
Floatplanes (small numbers)

Objective
Eliminate US presence on Guam

7. OPERATION W – WAKE ISLAND
First Attack: 8–11 December
Second Attack: 23 December

Ground Forces
Kure 6th SNLF – 450 (1st attempt)
≈ 1,500 troops (2nd attempt)

Carrier Support
Soryu
Hiryu
Carrier air complement ≈ 36 Zero / 36 Val / 36 Kate

Objective
Capture Wake Island

8. OPERATION D3 – THIRD BATTLE OF CHANGSHA
Period: 24–31 December 1941
Theater: Changsha

Ground Forces
11th Army – ≈ 100,000 troops

IJAAF – 5th Air Division
44th Hiko Sentai – ≈ 36
60th – ≈ 36
61st – ≈ 36
90th – ≈ 36
82nd Chutai – ≈ 18
7th CSS – ≈ 18
2nd Recon – ≈ 12
8th Recon – ≈ 12

Objectives
Break Chinese defenses
Control Xiang River line
Disrupt supply networks

Tanaka · Post by **Tanaka** » Mon Aug 31, 2026 5:40 pm

Peiper1944 wrote: Wed Jul 30, 2025 10:57 am I'm starting a new thread where I will systematically document all Japanese air units featured in War in the Pacific: Admiral’s Edition.
The goal is a historically accurate and well-sourced representation of pilots and their command structures.

What I’ll be doing:

Entering correct Japanese names (Family name, Given name)

Reconstructing pilot rosters and unit leadership

Adding historically confirmed but missing pilots to the game editor

I work strictly with verifiable sources – no assumptions, no war stories.
What matters to me is accuracy and respect, not glorification.

Call for contributions:

If you have info, hints, or old records on lesser-known Japanese pilots, I’d be very grateful for your input.
Every name counts.

Because in the end, it’s not about numbers –
it’s about people.

In the next post, I’ll share a list of Japanese pilots currently included in the game editor.
I’ve been able to identify many of the missing given names – any additions or corrections are very welcome.

Hi I hope you put all of this work into a mod one day that others could put into their game!

Peiper1944 · Post by **Peiper1944** » Tue Sep 01, 2026 2:26 am

scen026.zip: (881.98 KiB) Downloaded 5 times

Tanaka wrote: Mon Aug 31, 2026 5:40 pm
Peiper1944 wrote: Wed Jul 30, 2025 10:57 am I'm starting a new thread where I will systematically document all Japanese air units featured in War in the Pacific: Admiral’s Edition.
The goal is a historically accurate and well-sourced representation of pilots and their command structures.

What I’ll be doing:

Entering correct Japanese names (Family name, Given name)

Reconstructing pilot rosters and unit leadership

Adding historically confirmed but missing pilots to the game editor

I work strictly with verifiable sources – no assumptions, no war stories.
What matters to me is accuracy and respect, not glorification.

Call for contributions:

If you have info, hints, or old records on lesser-known Japanese pilots, I’d be very grateful for your input.
Every name counts.

Because in the end, it’s not about numbers –
it’s about people.

In the next post, I’ll share a list of Japanese pilots currently included in the game editor.
I’ve been able to identify many of the missing given names – any additions or corrections are very welcome.
Hi I hope you put all of this work into a mod one day that others could put into their game!

Thank you! Yes – that has been my long-term goal from the beginning.

What originally started as an effort to complete the incomplete Japanese pilot names in WitP:AE has gradually grown into a much larger historical project.

However, I would like to make one thing very clear:

**The mod is not finished yet.**

At the moment, I have mainly collected the historical data I researched, entered it into the WitP:AE editor, and incorporated it into **Scenario 26**.

The scenario runs in the game, but the next major phase really starts now: the actual campaign progression still needs to be tested. Reinforcement timing, availability dates, experience values, force ratios, and ultimately overall game balance all need to prove themselves over the course of a longer campaign.

So I am not presenting Scenario 26 as a finished mod at this point, but rather as a **work-in-progress version for discussion, historical review, and testing**.

scen026.zip: (881.98 KiB) Downloaded 5 times

### What has been changed so far

Most of my work has focused on the Japanese side.

The current database now contains approximately **6,000 Japanese Army and Navy pilots with complete names**.

In addition, several thousand more Japanese names have been completed or corrected in the **Leader** section.

But the work has gone far beyond names alone. Among other things, I have:

* added historically documented pilots who were missing from the original database
* corrected incomplete or incorrect pilot names
* checked Japanese family names, given names, and name readings wherever reliable evidence could be found
* reviewed and corrected pilot unit assignments
* reviewed and adjusted pilot ranks
* researched and corrected entry and availability dates
* revised experience values
* added or corrected commanders and other leaders
* reviewed Japanese Army and Navy air units
* revised HQ assignments
* reworked parts of the Japanese Order of Battle
* reassigned armies, divisions, regiments, and other formations to their historical command structures wherever possible

I have tried not to simply invent missing information.

For example, if an entry date could not be confirmed, I did not automatically use a death date, loss date, victory date, or combat date as a substitute.

Likewise, with Japanese names and kanji readings, I tried to use only readings that could actually be connected to the individual person rather than relying on what merely seemed linguistically plausible.

### Sources used

For the research I used, among others:

* **JACAR – Japan Center for Asian Historical Records**
* **National Diet Library of Japan – NDL / NDL Digital Collections**
* **National Institute for Defense Studies – NIDS, Japan**
* Japanese **留守名簿 (Rusu Meibo / personnel and unit rosters)**
* **rikukaigun.org**
* **Niehorster – World War II Armed Forces, Orders of Battle and Organizations**
* Japanese unit histories
* Sentai and Kokutai records
* pilot, personnel, and casualty lists
* additional Japanese primary and secondary sources dealing with individual pilots and units

Especially with lesser-known pilots, it was often necessary to compare several different sources before I felt comfortable changing a name, unit assignment, rank, or date.

### Please treat this as a working version

I would therefore ask everyone who looks at the files **not to judge the data too harshly at this stage**.

There is an enormous amount of information here that I first had to collect, compare, and enter into the editor.

With thousands of pilots, leaders, units, dates, and assignments, there will certainly still be mistakes, inaccurate dates, questionable values, or cases where better historical sources exist.

**That is exactly why I would now like to make Scenario 26 available for discussion and review.**

If anyone finds an error or has access to better sources, I would be very grateful for corrections and additional information.

I am not claiming that every individual data entry is already final or 100% correct.

The purpose of sharing it now is to improve the historical data together.

### Allied side

There is one point that is particularly important to me.

My work so far has concentrated very heavily on the **Japanese side**.

I would therefore be extremely interested to hear from anyone who has done similar work on the **Allied pilots, leaders, units, or OOB** and would be willing to share or compare that data.

If a similarly detailed Allied database could eventually be incorporated, it would not only improve the historical accuracy of the scenario, but also help create a much more realistic **historical force balance and overall game balance**.

For me, that would be one of the most valuable next steps for the project.

I will therefore make my current version of **Scenario 26 available here as a ZIP file**.

Please regard it as a **historical working and test version**, not as a final release.

I would be very happy to receive historical corrections, additional sources, feedback on the data, and especially reports from players who actually test the scenario and see how the changes affect a campaign over time.

Because the original idea behind this project still remains the same:

**In the end, it is not only about numbers – it is about the people behind them.**

btd64 · Post by **btd64** » Tue Sep 01, 2026 9:37 am

You have put a lot of work into this. Great job....GP

LargeSlowTarget · Post by **LargeSlowTarget** » Tue Sep 01, 2026 9:38 am

Hello Landsmann (oder wie man bei mir sagt "Ei gude wie!"),

I respect any modders efforts, dedication and hard work - even if I do not agree with their choices.

And I am all for historical accuracy - within reasonable limits - like my own feeble modding effort are trying to achieve.

So please do not take the following comment as a criticism, brickbat or flak - it is just an opinion.

I think your efforts on the pilot roster are a typical case of German over-engineering.

While adding historical pilot names is laudable from a "historical" point of view, it adds little in gameplay terms.

In AE, pilots are a commodity, they are expendable and tend to die in droves - first on the Allied side, then on the Japanese side.

Basically they are cannon fodder, and the individuals do not matter.

Most players will be interested in pilot stats and performance, not in their names.

Yes, we like grow a lot of "aces" and 'mourn' the loss of an elite pilot - but their names are way less important than their achievements.

I know that in one of my past games I have had a Japanese triple ace with 15 kills - but I can't remember the name.

In other words, I believe that you are pouring an awful lot of work into the pilot rosters for little or no actual benefit.

I think your time and efforts could be spent in a more meaningful way by concentrating on leader and ORBAT issues (which I would love to read more details about).

Just my two Euro cents - und nichts für ungut.

Peiper1944 · Post by **Peiper1944** » Tue Sep 01, 2026 3:35 pm

btd64 wrote: Tue Sep 01, 2026 9:37 am You have put a lot of work into this. Great job....GP

Thank you very much, btd64.

I have been reading your posts on the WitP:AE forum for many years. I have always followed your scenario work, your contributions to the revised manual, and the many helpful answers you have provided to other players with great interest. I am also, of course, familiar with “Focus Pacific – GP’s Scenario 78.” For that reason, your praise means a great deal to me.

My project initially began with the seemingly simple task of replacing abbreviated Japanese pilot names with their complete names. Over time, however, it developed into a much more comprehensive historical revision of the Japanese side of Scenario 26.

By clearly identifying the individual pilots, I was also able to examine their ranks, unit assignments, entry and availability dates, experience levels, historical roles, and, in some cases, their subsequent military careers. So far, I have worked on approximately 6,000 pilots from the Japanese Army and Navy air services, together with several thousand additional leader and commander entries. I have also begun correcting parts of the Japanese command structure and order of battle wherever sufficient historical evidence is available.

The data has now been entered into the Scenario 26 editor files, and the scenario runs successfully from a technical standpoint. Nevertheless, I still consider the modification far from finished. The historical research and data entry provide only the foundation. The next major task will be thoroughly testing the campaign, finding errors, and ensuring that the historical corrections do not unintentionally make the Japanese side too powerful or disrupt the overall game balance.

Because I am familiar with your many years of experience with WitP:AE, scenario files, playtesting, and documentation, your recognition is a special source of motivation for me.

Once I release a suitable discussion or test version, I would greatly appreciate any observations you may have—particularly regarding possible historical errors, scenario structure, and long-term game balance. Naturally, there is absolutely no obligation.

Thank you again for your kind words, and also for all the work you have done over the years to help keep this remarkable game and its community alive.

btd64 · Post by **btd64** » Tue Sep 01, 2026 3:53 pm

Peiper1944 wrote: Tue Sep 01, 2026 3:35 pm
btd64 wrote: Tue Sep 01, 2026 9:37 am You have put a lot of work into this. Great job....GP
Thank you very much, btd64.

I have been reading your posts on the WitP:AE forum for many years. I have always followed your scenario work, your contributions to the revised manual, and the many helpful answers you have provided to other players with great interest. I am also, of course, familiar with “Focus Pacific – GP’s Scenario 78.” For that reason, your praise means a great deal to me.

My project initially began with the seemingly simple task of replacing abbreviated Japanese pilot names with their complete names. Over time, however, it developed into a much more comprehensive historical revision of the Japanese side of Scenario 26.

By clearly identifying the individual pilots, I was also able to examine their ranks, unit assignments, entry and availability dates, experience levels, historical roles, and, in some cases, their subsequent military careers. So far, I have worked on approximately 6,000 pilots from the Japanese Army and Navy air services, together with several thousand additional leader and commander entries. I have also begun correcting parts of the Japanese command structure and order of battle wherever sufficient historical evidence is available.

The data has now been entered into the Scenario 26 editor files, and the scenario runs successfully from a technical standpoint. Nevertheless, I still consider the modification far from finished. The historical research and data entry provide only the foundation. The next major task will be thoroughly testing the campaign, finding errors, and ensuring that the historical corrections do not unintentionally make the Japanese side too powerful or disrupt the overall game balance.

Because I am familiar with your many years of experience with WitP:AE, scenario files, playtesting, and documentation, your recognition is a special source of motivation for me.

Once I release a suitable discussion or test version, I would greatly appreciate any observations you may have—particularly regarding possible historical errors, scenario structure, and long-term game balance. Naturally, there is absolutely no obligation.

Thank you again for your kind words, and also for all the work you have done over the years to help keep this remarkable game and its community alive.

Thank you for your kind words. It's appreciated. As far as testing your scenario goes, I'm not sure if 1. I would be of any help because I have limited experience with the Japanese side, 2. My time is pretty packed. I'm working on other projects and volunteering for a senior meal distribution center. Plus hopefully I can find a paying part time job.

But I would deeply appreciate it if you could keep your data in a spreadsheet. The information and you may be called upon....GP

Peiper1944 · Post by **Peiper1944** » Tue Sep 01, 2026 4:11 pm

LargeSlowTarget wrote: Tue Sep 01, 2026 9:38 am Hello Landsmann (oder wie man bei mir sagt "Ei gude wie!"),

I respect any modders efforts, dedication and hard work - even if I do not agree with their choices.

And I am all for historical accuracy - within reasonable limits - like my own feeble modding effort are trying to achieve.

So please do not take the following comment as a criticism, brickbat or flak - it is just an opinion.

I think your efforts on the pilot roster are a typical case of German over-engineering.

While adding historical pilot names is laudable from a "historical" point of view, it adds little in gameplay terms.

In AE, pilots are a commodity, they are expendable and tend to die in droves - first on the Allied side, then on the Japanese side.

Basically they are cannon fodder, and the individuals do not matter.

Most players will be interested in pilot stats and performance, not in their names.

Yes, we like grow a lot of "aces" and 'mourn' the loss of an elite pilot - but their names are way less important than their achievements.

I know that in one of my past games I have had a Japanese triple ace with 15 kills - but I can't remember the name.

In other words, I believe that you are pouring an awful lot of work into the pilot rosters for little or no actual benefit.

I think your time and efforts could be spent in a more meaningful way by concentrating on leader and ORBAT issues (which I would love to read more details about).

Just my two Euro cents - und nichts für ungut.

Ei gude zurück, Landsmann! Bei uns im schönen Südhessen an der alten „Strata Montana“ begrüßt man sich genauso. I understand your point very well.

If this project consisted only of replacing an initial with a complete given name, I would largely agree with you. That alone does not change a single combat calculation in AE.

However, the complete names were only the starting point. Accurately identifying an individual allows me to research and correct his unit assignment, rank, entry and availability dates, experience, and historical role. These factors do affect gameplay and the historical balance.

The project has since developed into a much broader revision of the Japanese side of Scenario 26. My work so far includes:

* **Approximately 6,000 Japanese pilots:** Incomplete names, Japanese name readings, romanizations, and spelling variants for both the Army and Navy air forces were reviewed and completed.

* **Several thousand leaders:** The names and roles of air, naval, and ground commanders, as well as leaders at the various HQ levels, were corrected or completed.

* **Missing historical personnel:** Documented pilots, squadron leaders, and commanders absent from the original database were added.

* **Historical pilot rosters:** The pilots who actually served with numerous Sentai, Kokutai, Chutai, Hikotai, and carrier air groups were reconstructed.

* **Ranks and roles:** Wherever possible, pilots and leaders received the rank and position they actually held on their entry date or at the relevant scenario date.

* **Unit assignments and entry dates:** Historical transfers, availability dates, and periods of service were taken into account. Dates of death, loss, or aerial victories were not simply reused as entry dates.

* **Realistically graded XP values:** Training quality, China and carrier experience, previous combat service, operational role, and known achievements determine each pilot’s starting experience.

* **Decline in pilot training:** The scenario represents the progression from Japan’s highly trained pre-war pilots to the increasingly poorly prepared replacements of 1944 and 1945.

* **Eight leader attributes:** Leadership, Inspiration, Administration, Aggression, and the Land, Air, Naval, and Political ratings were adjusted according to each leader’s historical role.

* **Japanese air units:** The designations, commanders, command assignments, availability dates, and locations of Sentai, Kokutai, detachments, carrier groups, and training units were reviewed.

* **Naval and ground formations:** Fleet formations, task forces, armies, divisions, brigades, regiments, and support units were also revised.

* **HQs and OOB:** Historical command relationships were reconstructed more accurately, from Imperial General Headquarters down to individual regiments and detachments. Leaders and ORBAT are therefore not neglected alternatives to the pilot work; they are already the project’s second major pillar.

* **Starting locations:** Airfields, ports, garrisons, and assembly areas were brought as close as possible to their historical positions on 7 December 1941.

* **Task forces and operations:** Japanese carrier, covering, invasion, transport, and support forces were represented with their missions, starting positions, and Japanese operational designations.

* **Source verification:** Sources included JACAR, NDL, NIDS, Japanese personnel records, Sentai and Kokutai histories, combat reports, rikukaigun.org, and Niehorster. Uncertain information was not presented as established fact.

Your example of the Japanese triple ace with 15 kills actually illustrates why the names matter to me. Fifteen aerial victories are an exceptional achievement, yet after the campaign only the number remained in your memory. The individual and his story disappeared.

In my campaign, by contrast, I experience a pilot’s career from the beginning. He arrives at his squadron as an inexperienced rookie, flies his first missions, gains experience, and perhaps scores his first victories. I watch him develop from a beginner into a veteran and eventually an ace.

His survival is by no means guaranteed. Through my operational planning, I decide when and where his squadron will be committed, when it needs to be rested, and when the risk has become too great. If he survives his front-line service, I can eventually withdraw him from combat and post him as an experienced instructor to one of my flight schools. There, he can pass his experience on to the next generation of pilots.

An anonymous database entry thus becomes a complete military career: rookie, operational pilot, veteran, ace, and finally instructor. His statistics still determine his performance, but his complete name connects all those stages into a personal campaign history.

The ancient Egyptians expressed a similar idea: “Speak my name so that I may live again.” That is also how I feel about this project. By restoring a historical pilot’s complete name and making his career visible, he remains more than an interchangeable number.

I am therefore not placing names above achievements. I am connecting the two. Your unnamed ace with 15 victories is precisely the kind of pilot whom my project is intended to prevent from becoming just another forgotten number.

The game engine may treat pilots as interchangeable database entries or “cannon fodder.” Historically, however, Japan’s well-trained aircrews were among the Empire’s most valuable and difficult resources to replace. Their mounting losses had a direct effect on Japanese operational effectiveness.

Typical German over-engineering? I suppose I must plead guilty.

However, I am simply trying to research the subject as accurately as the available sources and game mechanics allow. With its exceptional depth and extensive editor, WitP:AE makes it possible to turn such a broad historical reconstruction into something that is actually playable.

This is not only about names. It is about the connection between individuals, units, command structures, operational locations, entry dates, experience levels, training quality, and Japan’s increasing military attrition.

All of this information has now been entered into WitP:AE and incorporated into Scenario 26. The scenario can be started and runs properly in the game. However, it is not yet a finished release, but a historical working and test version.

The next step is to test reinforcement schedules, availability dates, XP progression, force ratios, and long-term balance over the course of longer campaigns.

I would be very pleased if other forum members were willing to examine, correct, and further develop my Japanese data. Contributors with comparable information for the Allied side would be especially valuable. They could help expand the database with Allied pilots, leaders, units, and OOB structures.

My goal is not to give Japan a one-sided advantage, but to create the most balanced and historically credible starting situation possible for both sides. A comparable level of historical detail for the Japanese and Allied sides could eventually produce a genuinely balanced historical scenario.

I am deliberately presenting my research for discussion and look forward to an open exchange of knowledge and opinions. Please do not hesitate to offer either praise or constructive criticism. As a German, I do not regard criticism as a personal attack, but as an incentive to continue researching and improve the scenario.

And do not worry: I certainly will not commit seppuku over critical feedback.

RangerJoe · Post by **RangerJoe** » Tue Sep 01, 2026 4:13 pm

I agree with LargeSlowTarget about what may be concerning Obsessive Compulsive Behavior with this caveat; while it really doesn't matter for this game it might be interesting for some who are interested in history if this were to be turned into something like a book but also include what the survivors think about the war later on if that is known.

Also include things like Sakai not shooting down a Dutch DC-3 flying to Australia because a blonde woman (who looked like his English teacher) had a little boy on her lap and the boy waved at Sakai.

Peiper1944 · Post by **Peiper1944** » Tue Sep 01, 2026 4:38 pm

RangerJoe wrote: Tue Sep 01, 2026 4:13 pm I agree with LargeSlowTarget about what may be concerning Obsessive Compulsive Behavior with this caveat; while it really doesn't matter for this game it might be interesting for some who are interested in history if this were to be turned into something like a book but also include what the survivors think about the war later on if that is known.

Also include things like Sakai not shooting down a Dutch DC-3 flying to Australia because a blonde woman (who looked like his English teacher) had a little boy on her lap and the boy waved at Sakai.

I almost regard the comment about a certain degree of obsessive behavior as a badge of honor.

My wife can confirm that I have been like this for about a year. She says that since I became so deeply absorbed in my data, I have had far less time to keep an eye on her or notice her little mishaps. Apparently, this project has therefore been rather beneficial to domestic harmony.

It actually all began with Saburō Sakai. I merely wanted to enter his full name and historically adjust his rank, experience, and arrival date. That single pilot eventually grew into approximately 6,000 Japanese pilots, together with several thousand additional leaders. After a year of intensive research and data entry, I am now looking forward to finally playing the actual game again—this time with my own historical data.

The story you mentioned about Sakai is an excellent example. Sakai later recalled encountering a civilian Dutch passenger aircraft during the campaign over Java. Through one of its windows, he saw a blonde woman with a child about three years old. The woman reminded him of Mrs. Martin, the American wife of his former teacher, who had occasionally taught him and treated him kindly. He therefore decided not to attack the aircraft. The pilot and passengers reportedly saluted him afterward.

The incident is generally dated to 28 February 1942, east of Surabaya. Some sources identify the aircraft as a DC-3, while Sakai described it as a DC-4 in a later interview. The story should therefore be treated as Sakai’s personal recollection rather than as a fully verified historical event.

Perhaps you are right: these data might eventually become something more than just a scenario. For now, however, after a year of work, I would finally like to discover whether I can still remember how to play the game at all.

Peiper1944 · Post by **Peiper1944** » Tue Sep 01, 2026 4:46 pm

btd64 wrote: Tue Sep 01, 2026 3:53 pm
Peiper1944 wrote: Tue Sep 01, 2026 3:35 pm
btd64 wrote: Tue Sep 01, 2026 9:37 am You have put a lot of work into this. Great job....GP
Thank you very much, btd64.

I have been reading your posts on the WitP:AE forum for many years. I have always followed your scenario work, your contributions to the revised manual, and the many helpful answers you have provided to other players with great interest. I am also, of course, familiar with “Focus Pacific – GP’s Scenario 78.” For that reason, your praise means a great deal to me.

My project initially began with the seemingly simple task of replacing abbreviated Japanese pilot names with their complete names. Over time, however, it developed into a much more comprehensive historical revision of the Japanese side of Scenario 26.

By clearly identifying the individual pilots, I was also able to examine their ranks, unit assignments, entry and availability dates, experience levels, historical roles, and, in some cases, their subsequent military careers. So far, I have worked on approximately 6,000 pilots from the Japanese Army and Navy air services, together with several thousand additional leader and commander entries. I have also begun correcting parts of the Japanese command structure and order of battle wherever sufficient historical evidence is available.

The data has now been entered into the Scenario 26 editor files, and the scenario runs successfully from a technical standpoint. Nevertheless, I still consider the modification far from finished. The historical research and data entry provide only the foundation. The next major task will be thoroughly testing the campaign, finding errors, and ensuring that the historical corrections do not unintentionally make the Japanese side too powerful or disrupt the overall game balance.

Because I am familiar with your many years of experience with WitP:AE, scenario files, playtesting, and documentation, your recognition is a special source of motivation for me.

Once I release a suitable discussion or test version, I would greatly appreciate any observations you may have—particularly regarding possible historical errors, scenario structure, and long-term game balance. Naturally, there is absolutely no obligation.

Thank you again for your kind words, and also for all the work you have done over the years to help keep this remarkable game and its community alive.
Thank you for your kind words. It's appreciated. As far as testing your scenario goes, I'm not sure if 1. I would be of any help because I have limited experience with the Japanese side, 2. My time is pretty packed. I'm working on other projects and volunteering for a senior meal distribution center. Plus hopefully I can find a paying part time job.

But I would deeply appreciate it if you could keep your data in a spreadsheet. The information and you may be called upon....GP

Thank you very much for your open and friendly reply, btd64.

I completely understand your situation. Please do not feel under any obligation to test my scenario. Your own projects, your volunteer work distributing meals to senior citizens, and your search for a suitable part-time job naturally take priority. I wish you every success with them.

Your suggestion to preserve the data separately in a spreadsheet is very helpful. At present, most of the information is stored directly in the Scenario 26 editor files. However, I could gradually transfer it into a clearly organized spreadsheet.

Did you have a standard Excel workbook, CSV files, or both formats in mind? I could provide an Excel workbook together with separate CSV files in a ZIP archive and make them available here in the thread as a work-in-progress discussion version. This would allow other players to review the data, report errors, suggest additions, or perhaps even contribute equivalent data for the Allied side.

Would that be roughly what you had in mind?

Thank you again for your advice. If I later encounter a specific question for which your experience would be especially valuable, I hope you would not mind if I occasionally asked for your opinion—of course, only whenever your time permits.

btd64 · Post by **btd64** » Tue Sep 01, 2026 5:16 pm

A excel workbook, zipped up is good. Can you email me the file when complete. I want someone to look at it....GP

btd64 · Post by **btd64** » Tue Sep 01, 2026 5:17 pm

Oh with csv....GP

LargeSlowTarget · Post by **LargeSlowTarget** » Tue Sep 01, 2026 8:35 pm

Hello Peiper1944,

„Strata Montana“ - LOL. Ich bin zwar Oberhesse, habe aber lange Jahre in Darmstadt verbracht, also nur etwas nördlich von Dir.

I appreciate your reaction and thank you for the details you have given about the other changes you have made apart from correcting pilot names and adding more historical pilots.

I am not going to nitpick them (like, rank does not effect gameplay), in fact I agree with many, esp. adding missing leaders, the correction of availability dates and correct starting locations.
I have done that for many ships in my mod and it took many hours, I cannot even imagine how much time your research on Japanese pilots must have taken.

Is your mod for human vs computer or only for PBEM?
Many "unhistorical" starting locations and command relationships in the stock scenarios have been deliberately chosen in order to optimise the scenarios for the most common setup - Allied human vs Japanese computer.
If you have tinkered in these areas, it may have unwanted effects on the AI scripts of the Japanese computer opponent.

The idea of following a single pilot throughout a campaign is interesting, but given the scope of the game, might be a bit "too much of attention" on that single individual.
But it could make for an interesting AAR, to relate the campaign through the eyes of a (very well informed) pilot - akin to Cuttlefish's legendary "Small Ship, Big War - The Voyages of the Hibiki" AAR.

Your statement "It actually all began with Saburō Sakai. I merely wanted to enter his full name and historically adjust his rank, experience, and arrival date." made me smile.
My modding efforts also began many years ago with "I just want to add my favourite ship" - the Pamir, a 'tall ship' (sailing ship) which was seized as a prize of war by the New Zealand government in 1941 while in port at Wellington and used for commercial voyages to the US and Australia during the war. Then more stuff was added, data was verified and corrected, new ideas emerged, input from outside was included etc. - and it isn't finished yet.
Btw, in an uncanny parallel to Saburo's DC-3 incident, the Pamir was spared as well when encountering a Japanese submarine in 1943.

Hope you will enjoy modding this monster game as much as I do. I'll take a look at your scen26.

Bis denne.

Peiper1944 · Post by **Peiper1944** » Wed Sep 02, 2026 4:14 pm

LargeSlowTarget wrote: Tue Sep 01, 2026 8:35 pm Hello Peiper1944,

„Strata Montana“ - LOL. Ich bin zwar Oberhesse, habe aber lange Jahre in Darmstadt verbracht, also nur etwas nördlich von Dir.

I appreciate your reaction and thank you for the details you have given about the other changes you have made apart from correcting pilot names and adding more historical pilots.

I am not going to nitpick them (like, rank does not effect gameplay), in fact I agree with many, esp. adding missing leaders, the correction of availability dates and correct starting locations.
I have done that for many ships in my mod and it took many hours, I cannot even imagine how much time your research on Japanese pilots must have taken.

Is your mod for human vs computer or only for PBEM?
Many "unhistorical" starting locations and command relationships in the stock scenarios have been deliberately chosen in order to optimise the scenarios for the most common setup - Allied human vs Japanese computer.
If you have tinkered in these areas, it may have unwanted effects on the AI scripts of the Japanese computer opponent.

The idea of following a single pilot throughout a campaign is interesting, but given the scope of the game, might be a bit "too much of attention" on that single individual.
But it could make for an interesting AAR, to relate the campaign through the eyes of a (very well informed) pilot - akin to Cuttlefish's legendary "Small Ship, Big War - The Voyages of the Hibiki" AAR.

Your statement "It actually all began with Saburō Sakai. I merely wanted to enter his full name and historically adjust his rank, experience, and arrival date." made me smile.
My modding efforts also began many years ago with "I just want to add my favourite ship" - the Pamir, a 'tall ship' (sailing ship) which was seized as a prize of war by the New Zealand government in 1941 while in port at Wellington and used for commercial voyages to the US and Australia during the war. Then more stuff was added, data was verified and corrected, new ideas emerged, input from outside was included etc. - and it isn't finished yet.
Btw, in an uncanny parallel to Saburo's DC-3 incident, the Pamir was spared as well when encountering a Japanese submarine in 1943.

Hope you will enjoy modding this monster game as much as I do. I'll take a look at your scen26.

Bis denne.

Ei gude !

Then, after all those years you spent in Darmstadt, you really did live almost in my neighbourhood. Thank you for your friendly and constructive reply.

You are right: a pilot’s rank does not directly affect the combat calculations. Nevertheless, it is important for my data work because it allows me to assign an initial standardised XP baseline. Rank is not definitive proof of flying ability, but rather a first historical reference point.

The complete name is likewise far more than a decorative detail. It allows me to identify the pilot correctly, avoid confusing individuals with the same family name, and then research his flying school, training class, unit, transfers, role, and operational history.

The entry date establishes the historical point at which the pilot is evaluated. This allows me to consider the phase of the war in which he becomes available, the usual standard of training at that time, and the experience he could actually have accumulated by then. Later achievements must not be used retroactively to increase his earlier XP value.

Rank, training period, and entry date first provide a standardised baseline XP value. I then examine the pilot individually: Had he already served in China or at Nomonhan? Did he have carrier experience? How many missions had he flown? Had he served as a flight leader, squadron commander, test pilot, or instructor? Were any aerial victories or exceptional flying achievements already documented by his entry date? Such verifiable experience results in a cautious XP bonus.

A particularly clear example from my own data is the comparison between Sakai, Saburō (XP 76) and Tarui, Mitsuyoshi (XP 90).

By 6 December 1941, Sakai, Saburō was already a highly trained naval aviator with combat experience over China. However, his most famous operations over the Philippines, the Netherlands East Indies, and New Guinea were still in the future. They must not be used retroactively to increase his XP at the beginning of the scenario. This gives him the still-high starting value of 76 XP.

Tarui, Mitsuyoshi is far less well known today, yet by the same date he had already completed an exceptional military career. In 1934, he joined the first intake of the Army’s juvenile aviator programme at Tokorozawa Army Flying School. He subsequently received fighter combat training at Akeno and was assigned to the 1st Sentai.

During the 1939 Nomonhan conflict, Tarui flew numerous combat missions in the Ki-27. By the armistice, he had been credited with 28 aerial victories, giving him the second-highest total of the campaign according to Japanese records. He also led his own flight and, on 28 June 1939, even landed in enemy territory to rescue his formation leader, who had bailed out. In July 1941, he was commissioned as a second lieutenant and then returned to the 1st Sentai.

Even if the Japanese victory claims at Nomonhan are treated cautiously and not every reported victory is regarded as conclusively confirmed, Tarui’s actual combat experience remains exceptional. He therefore receives 90 XP on his entry date of 6 December 1941—not because he is famous today, but because of the training, operational service, combat experience, and leadership responsibility he had already accumulated.

This comparison illustrates my method particularly clearly: the world-famous Sakai, Saburō begins with 76 XP, while the far less well-known Tarui, Mitsuyoshi receives 90 XP. Public fame is not the deciding factor; what matters is the military career that can be documented up to the pilot’s respective entry date.

A famous name therefore does not automatically result in high XP, nor is an unknown pilot automatically rated lower. If insufficient individual information is available, the pilot receives the conservative standard value for his training-period, date, and rank group. Unknown does not mean inexperienced.

General XP and specialised skills must also be considered separately. An experienced torpedo or reconnaissance pilot is not automatically an excellent fighter pilot. Likewise, an instructor may possess extensive flying and technical experience without ever having achieved a high number of aerial victories.

Rank therefore has no direct effect within the game. Together with the complete name and entry date, however, it provides the foundation for a historically reasoned individual XP value—and that XP value certainly does affect the pilot’s performance.

In its present working state, Scenario 26 is intended primarily for a human Japanese player against the Allied AI. The Japanese AI scripts are not used in that setup, but the scenario has not yet been tested sufficiently for an Allied human player against the Japanese AI. It is therefore explicitly not yet a final AI-compatible version. A later PBEM version would also be possible, but the Allied side and the long-term balance would first require thorough examination.

Your warning about starting locations and command relationships is therefore very valuable. I understand that some apparently unhistorical decisions in the stock scenarios were made deliberately to ensure that the Japanese AI scripts function properly. Little would be gained from greater historical accuracy if it prevented the computer opponent from conducting its operations correctly.

Before I eventually describe the scenario as a finished mod, these interactions must be tested in longer campaigns. If my changes impair the Japanese AI, it might be possible to distinguish between a more historically focused PBEM version and a specifically AI-compatible version. For now, however, Scenario 26 remains a historical working and test version.

I also like your AAR idea very much. I will have to think about how I might accomplish something like that!

Your story about the Pamir made me smile in return. Apparently, we both fell into the same modder’s trap: yours began with “I only want to add my favourite ship,” while mine began with “I only want to enter the complete name of Sakai, Saburō.” Many years—or thousands of database entries—later, each project has become something much larger.

The fact that the Pamir was also spared during an encounter with a Japanese submarine in 1943 is a remarkable parallel to Sakai, Saburō and his encounter with the DC-3. I had not heard that story before. Do you happen to know which Japanese submarine encountered the Pamir?

Thank you for being willing to examine Scenario 26. Please do not regard it as a finished mod yet, but as a historical working version presented for testing and discussion. Comments from experienced modders are especially helpful in bringing together historical accuracy, functional game mechanics, and long-term balance.

And I suspect that neither of us will ever truly finish modding this monster of a game. But perhaps that is part of its appeal.

Bis denne!

Peiper1944 · Post by **Peiper1944** » Wed Sep 02, 2026 5:13 pm

Hello everyone,

the following question explicitly concerns both Japanese and Allied air units:

When a historically important commander becomes unavailable, the challenge is the same on both sides: What qualities should his successor possess in order to preserve the unit’s existing level of effectiveness without giving it an ahistorical advantage?

For my historical project based on Scenario 26, I have now largely identified the Japanese pilots and recorded their ranks, experience levels, and entry dates.

My next step will be to assign the commanders to their respective air units as accurately as possible and to evaluate their eight key leader attributes in a transparent and historically grounded manner. After that, I intend to conduct several test games using Scenario 26.

As a specific example, I am using Tainan Kōkūtai S-1:

If Masahisa Saito becomes unavailable, what qualities should a replacement commander possess in order for the Tainan Kōkūtai to retain its effectiveness as an elite fighter unit?

Saito is currently listed as the unit commander in my database:

Saito, Masahisa – CDR (18) – XP 67 – Entry 1941/12/06
Skill: 74
Inspiration: 78
Naval: 58
Air: 80
Land: 20
Admin: 72
Aggression: 58
Political: 7

I am particularly interested in the following questions:

Which attributes are genuinely the most important for the commander of an elite fighter unit: Air, Inspiration, Skill, Admin, or Aggression?
What minimum values should a successor possess to prevent a significant decline in the unit’s morale, training, and operational performance?
Does a replacement commander need to approach Saito’s values, or is the effectiveness of the Tainan Kōkūtai primarily determined by the quality and experience of its pilots?
How important are Naval and Political for the commander of a land-based fighter unit? Does Political only affect the cost of changing the unit commander?
Who would be the most historically plausible successor?
Yasuna Kozono, the deputy commander and Hikōchō
Hideki Shingo, the Hikōtaichō who directly commanded the fighter force
or another available naval aviation officer
Should a historically plausible successor deliberately receive somewhat lower values than Saito in order to represent the disruption caused by a change of command and the loss of an experienced commander?
Do the same requirements apply to Allied fighter, bomber, and carrier air units, or should the eight attributes be weighted differently because of their different command structures and operational doctrines?

My intention is not simply to assign the strongest available leader to a unit. I want to represent historically plausible changes of command without artificially weakening Japanese or Allied air units or making them stronger through inflated leader values.

Pilot Roster – Tainan Kōkūtai S-1

Date: 6 December 1941
Strength: 48 pilots

Command Staff
Saito, Masahisa – CDR (18) – XP 67 – Entry 1941/12/06
Kozono, Yasuna – LCDR (17) – XP 70 – Entry 1941/12/06
Shingo, Hideki – LT (16) – XP 70 – Entry 1941/12/06
Officers, Warrant Officers, and CPOs
Seto, Masuzo – LT (16) – XP 65 – Entry 1941/12/06
Wakao, Akira – LTJG (15) – XP 63 – Entry 1941/12/06
Watanabe, Kiyoharu – LTJG (15) – XP 59 – Entry 1941/12/06
Tomita, Mitsuo – ENS (14) – XP 58 – Entry 1941/12/06
Toyoda, Mitsuo – ENS (14) – XP 56 – Entry 1941/12/06
Sasai, Junichi – ENS (14) – XP 43 – Entry 1941/12/06
Miyazaki, Gitaro – WO (13) – XP 74 – Entry 1941/12/06
Isozaki, Chitoshi – WO (13) – XP 75 – Entry 1941/12/06
Sato, Yasuhisa – CPO (12) – XP 62 – Entry 1941/12/06
Koike, Yoshio – CPO (12) – XP 61 – Entry 1941/12/06
PO1 Pilots
Tanaka, Kuniyoshi – PO1 (11) – XP 79 – Entry 1941/12/06
Sakai, Saburo – PO1 (11) – XP 76 – Entry 1941/12/06
Ota, Toshio – PO1 (11) – XP 62 – Entry 1941/12/06
Hirose, Yoshio – PO1 (11) – XP 62 – Entry 1941/12/06
Harada, Yoshimitsu – PO1 (11) – XP 61 – Entry 1941/12/06
Kikuchi, Toshio – PO1 (11) – XP 61 – Entry 1941/12/06
Kuratomi, Hiroshi – PO1 (11) – XP 60 – Entry 1941/12/06
Higa, Masaharu – PO1 (11) – XP 60 – Entry 1941/12/06
Kono, Yasujiro – PO1 (11) – XP 59 – Entry 1941/12/06
Hidaka, Yoshimi – PO1 (11) – XP 59 – Entry 1941/12/06
Shinohara, Yoshie – PO1 (11) – XP 59 – Entry 1941/12/06
Kanaizumi, Yoshio – PO1 (11) – XP 59 – Entry 1941/12/06
Arichi, Kazuo – PO1 (11) – XP 59 – Entry 1941/12/06
Nishioka, Tamotsu – PO1 (11) – XP 58 – Entry 1941/12/06
Adachi, Shigenobu – PO1 (11) – XP 58 – Entry 1941/12/06
Iwayama, Takashi – PO1 (11) – XP 58 – Entry 1941/12/06
PO2 Pilots
Ishii, Shizuo – PO2 (10) – XP 72 – Entry 1941/12/06
Ishihara, Susumu – PO2 (10) – XP 63 – Entry 1941/12/06
Honda, Toshiaki – PO2 (10) – XP 61 – Entry 1941/12/06
Shimakawa, Masaaki – PO2 (10) – XP 60 – Entry 1941/12/06
Ueda, Makoto – PO2 (10) – XP 55 – Entry 1941/12/06
Nakamizo, Ryoichi – PO2 (10) – XP 55 – Entry 1941/12/06
Kume, Takeo – PO2 (10) – XP 55 – Entry 1941/12/06
Nozawa, Shigeo – PO2 (10) – XP 54 – Entry 1941/12/06
Yokokawa, Kazuo – PO2 (10) – XP 54 – Entry 1941/12/06
Minato, Kosaku – PO2 (10) – XP 54 – Entry 1941/12/06
Nozawa, Saburo – PO2 (10) – XP 53 – Entry 1941/12/06
Fukuyama, Kiyotake – PO2 (10) – XP 53 – Entry 1941/12/06
Oshodani, Soichi – PO2 (10) – XP 53 – Entry 1941/12/06
Seki, Akimizu – PO2 (10) – XP 53 – Entry 1941/12/06
Hata, Shusaku – PO2 (10) – XP 53 – Entry 1941/12/06
Aoki, Yoshio – PO2 (10) – XP 52 – Entry 1941/12/06
Motoyoshi, Yoshio – PO2 (10) – XP 52 – Entry 1941/12/06
Fujimura, Haruo – PO2 (10) – XP 50 – Entry 1941/12/06
Tamai, Kan – PO2 (10) – XP 50 – Entry 1941/12/06

I would particularly appreciate opinions on how the eight leader attributes should be weighted, as well as suggestions for a historically and mechanically plausible replacement commander profile—for both Japanese and Allied air units.

RangerJoe · Post by **RangerJoe** » Wed Sep 02, 2026 5:25 pm

What would be nice if it was possible to "cut and paste" some of these changes into other mods without having to enter each one individually.

Tanaka · Post by **Tanaka** » Thu Sep 03, 2026 1:47 am

Peiper1944 wrote: Wed Sep 02, 2026 4:14 pm
LargeSlowTarget wrote: Tue Sep 01, 2026 8:35 pm Hello Peiper1944,

„Strata Montana“ - LOL. Ich bin zwar Oberhesse, habe aber lange Jahre in Darmstadt verbracht, also nur etwas nördlich von Dir.

I appreciate your reaction and thank you for the details you have given about the other changes you have made apart from correcting pilot names and adding more historical pilots.

I am not going to nitpick them (like, rank does not effect gameplay), in fact I agree with many, esp. adding missing leaders, the correction of availability dates and correct starting locations.
I have done that for many ships in my mod and it took many hours, I cannot even imagine how much time your research on Japanese pilots must have taken.

Is your mod for human vs computer or only for PBEM?
Many "unhistorical" starting locations and command relationships in the stock scenarios have been deliberately chosen in order to optimise the scenarios for the most common setup - Allied human vs Japanese computer.
If you have tinkered in these areas, it may have unwanted effects on the AI scripts of the Japanese computer opponent.

The idea of following a single pilot throughout a campaign is interesting, but given the scope of the game, might be a bit "too much of attention" on that single individual.
But it could make for an interesting AAR, to relate the campaign through the eyes of a (very well informed) pilot - akin to Cuttlefish's legendary "Small Ship, Big War - The Voyages of the Hibiki" AAR.

Your statement "It actually all began with Saburō Sakai. I merely wanted to enter his full name and historically adjust his rank, experience, and arrival date." made me smile.
My modding efforts also began many years ago with "I just want to add my favourite ship" - the Pamir, a 'tall ship' (sailing ship) which was seized as a prize of war by the New Zealand government in 1941 while in port at Wellington and used for commercial voyages to the US and Australia during the war. Then more stuff was added, data was verified and corrected, new ideas emerged, input from outside was included etc. - and it isn't finished yet.
Btw, in an uncanny parallel to Saburo's DC-3 incident, the Pamir was spared as well when encountering a Japanese submarine in 1943.

Hope you will enjoy modding this monster game as much as I do. I'll take a look at your scen26.

Bis denne.
Ei gude ! Then, after all those years you spent in Darmstadt, you really did live almost in my neighbourhood. Thank you for your friendly and constructive reply.

You are right: a pilot’s rank does not directly affect the combat calculations. Nevertheless, it is important for my data work because it allows me to assign an initial standardised XP baseline. Rank is not definitive proof of flying ability, but rather a first historical reference point.

The complete name is likewise far more than a decorative detail. It allows me to identify the pilot correctly, avoid confusing individuals with the same family name, and then research his flying school, training class, unit, transfers, role, and operational history.

The entry date establishes the historical point at which the pilot is evaluated. This allows me to consider the phase of the war in which he becomes available, the usual standard of training at that time, and the experience he could actually have accumulated by then. Later achievements must not be used retroactively to increase his earlier XP value.

Rank, training period, and entry date first provide a standardised baseline XP value. I then examine the pilot individually: Had he already served in China or at Nomonhan? Did he have carrier experience? How many missions had he flown? Had he served as a flight leader, squadron commander, test pilot, or instructor? Were any aerial victories or exceptional flying achievements already documented by his entry date? Such verifiable experience results in a cautious XP bonus.

A particularly clear example from my own data is the comparison between Sakai, Saburō (XP 76) and Tarui, Mitsuyoshi (XP 90).

By 6 December 1941, Sakai, Saburō was already a highly trained naval aviator with combat experience over China. However, his most famous operations over the Philippines, the Netherlands East Indies, and New Guinea were still in the future. They must not be used retroactively to increase his XP at the beginning of the scenario. This gives him the still-high starting value of 76 XP.

Tarui, Mitsuyoshi is far less well known today, yet by the same date he had already completed an exceptional military career. In 1934, he joined the first intake of the Army’s juvenile aviator programme at Tokorozawa Army Flying School. He subsequently received fighter combat training at Akeno and was assigned to the 1st Sentai.

During the 1939 Nomonhan conflict, Tarui flew numerous combat missions in the Ki-27. By the armistice, he had been credited with 28 aerial victories, giving him the second-highest total of the campaign according to Japanese records. He also led his own flight and, on 28 June 1939, even landed in enemy territory to rescue his formation leader, who had bailed out. In July 1941, he was commissioned as a second lieutenant and then returned to the 1st Sentai.

Even if the Japanese victory claims at Nomonhan are treated cautiously and not every reported victory is regarded as conclusively confirmed, Tarui’s actual combat experience remains exceptional. He therefore receives 90 XP on his entry date of 6 December 1941—not because he is famous today, but because of the training, operational service, combat experience, and leadership responsibility he had already accumulated.

This comparison illustrates my method particularly clearly: the world-famous Sakai, Saburō begins with 76 XP, while the far less well-known Tarui, Mitsuyoshi receives 90 XP. Public fame is not the deciding factor; what matters is the military career that can be documented up to the pilot’s respective entry date.

A famous name therefore does not automatically result in high XP, nor is an unknown pilot automatically rated lower. If insufficient individual information is available, the pilot receives the conservative standard value for his training-period, date, and rank group. Unknown does not mean inexperienced.

General XP and specialised skills must also be considered separately. An experienced torpedo or reconnaissance pilot is not automatically an excellent fighter pilot. Likewise, an instructor may possess extensive flying and technical experience without ever having achieved a high number of aerial victories.

Rank therefore has no direct effect within the game. Together with the complete name and entry date, however, it provides the foundation for a historically reasoned individual XP value—and that XP value certainly does affect the pilot’s performance.

In its present working state, Scenario 26 is intended primarily for a human Japanese player against the Allied AI. The Japanese AI scripts are not used in that setup, but the scenario has not yet been tested sufficiently for an Allied human player against the Japanese AI. It is therefore explicitly not yet a final AI-compatible version. A later PBEM version would also be possible, but the Allied side and the long-term balance would first require thorough examination.

Your warning about starting locations and command relationships is therefore very valuable. I understand that some apparently unhistorical decisions in the stock scenarios were made deliberately to ensure that the Japanese AI scripts function properly. Little would be gained from greater historical accuracy if it prevented the computer opponent from conducting its operations correctly.

Before I eventually describe the scenario as a finished mod, these interactions must be tested in longer campaigns. If my changes impair the Japanese AI, it might be possible to distinguish between a more historically focused PBEM version and a specifically AI-compatible version. For now, however, Scenario 26 remains a historical working and test version.

I also like your AAR idea very much. I will have to think about how I might accomplish something like that!

Your story about the Pamir made me smile in return. Apparently, we both fell into the same modder’s trap: yours began with “I only want to add my favourite ship,” while mine began with “I only want to enter the complete name of Sakai, Saburō.” Many years—or thousands of database entries—later, each project has become something much larger.

The fact that the Pamir was also spared during an encounter with a Japanese submarine in 1943 is a remarkable parallel to Sakai, Saburō and his encounter with the DC-3. I had not heard that story before. Do you happen to know which Japanese submarine encountered the Pamir?

Thank you for being willing to examine Scenario 26. Please do not regard it as a finished mod yet, but as a historical working version presented for testing and discussion. Comments from experienced modders are especially helpful in bringing together historical accuracy, functional game mechanics, and long-term balance.

And I suspect that neither of us will ever truly finish modding this monster of a game. But perhaps that is part of its appeal.

Bis denne!

Great discussions. A big part of my first love of the games Uncommon Valor and WITP began with Sakai and his book Samurai. I loved keeping up with these individual pilots I had learned about. No other game that I know of that you can do that. So I can really appreciate what you are doing here and all of the work you are putting into it.

On a side note regarding how you guys got into modding it was the same for me. I just wanted to improve and fix something missing in the game Strategic Command American Civil War which were some missing forts in Mobile Bay. Well one thing led to another and the next thing I know I have created a huge campaign mod for the game with lots of changes and improvements. If any of you enjoy the game I invite you to try it out.

Cheers to all of the mad hatter modders out there!

Japanese Pilot Rosters – Historically Completed

Re: Japanese Pilot Rosters – Historically Completed

Re: Japanese Pilot Rosters – Historically Completed

Re: Japanese Pilot Rosters – Historically Completed

Re: Japanese Pilot Rosters – Historically Completed

Re: Japanese Pilot Rosters – Historically Completed

Re: Japanese Pilot Rosters – Historically Completed

Re: Japanese Pilot Rosters – Historically Completed

Re: Japanese Pilot Rosters – Historically Completed

Re: Japanese Pilot Rosters – Historically Completed

Re: Japanese Pilot Rosters – Historically Completed

Re: Japanese Pilot Rosters – Historically Completed

Re: Japanese Pilot Rosters – Historically Completed

Re: Japanese Pilot Rosters – Historically Completed

Re: Japanese Pilot Rosters – Historically Completed

Re: Japanese Pilot Rosters – Historically Completed

Re: Japanese Pilot Rosters – Historically Completed

Re: Japanese Pilot Rosters – Historically Completed

Re: Japanese Pilot Rosters – Historically Completed

Re: Japanese Pilot Rosters – Historically Completed

Re: Japanese Pilot Rosters – Historically Completed