Don't prepare to fight the next war with the last wars tools, tactics, and strategy.Zovs wrote: Tue Dec 23, 2025 11:19 am Arnt Battleships supposed to be named after states? Even though this might be a Trump class, the naming should be USS Washington or USS New Mexico, right?
Also, did not WW2 teach us that the Aircraft Carrier and not the Battleship was the way to project force?
Australian Beauties II
Moderator: maddog986
Re: Australian Beauties II
- Attachments
-
- Conte di Cavour fires a salvo from her forward guns.jpg (46.96 KiB) Viewed 822 times
Seek peace but keep your gun handy.
I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing!
“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”
; Julia Child

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing!
“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”
Re: Australian Beauties II
The U.S. doesn't have the shipyards, the labor force nor the money ($15 billion each) for the number of huge ships to replace the Burke destroyers. Hitler tried to do this same thing by making bigger and bigger tanks but it didn't work out so well. Like Stalin said, quantity has a quality of it's own. Many smaller ships with highly advanced systems and drone support would be a better strategy for today's seaforce. Ukraine has shown what tomorrows naval warfare will look like. It's not huge ships.Zovs wrote: Tue Dec 23, 2025 11:19 am Arnt Battleships supposed to be named after states? Even though this might be a Trump class, the naming should be USS Washington or USS New Mexico, right?
Also, did not WW2 teach us that the Aircraft Carrier and not the Battleship was the way to project force?
ne nothi tere te deorsum (don't let the bastards grind you down)
If duct tape doesn't fix it then you are not using enough duct tape.
Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity and I’m not sure about the universe-Einstein.
If duct tape doesn't fix it then you are not using enough duct tape.
Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity and I’m not sure about the universe-Einstein.
Re: Australian Beauties II
Thanks RangerJoe, and Lobster,
Those were basically my thoughts as well.
Those were basically my thoughts as well.

Beta Tester for: War in the East 1 & 2, WarPlan & WarPlan Pacific, Valor & Victory, Flashpoint Campaigns: Sudden Storm, Computer War In Europe 2
SPWW2 & SPMBT scenario creator
Tester for WDS games
Re: Australian Beauties II
This ship would be the main force projector in an area. It would have to have smaller escorts which could eliminate most if not all of the short ranged threats.Lobster wrote: Tue Dec 23, 2025 1:05 pmThe U.S. doesn't have the shipyards, the labor force nor the money ($15 billion each) for the number of huge ships to replace the Burke destroyers. Hitler tried to do this same thing by making bigger and bigger tanks but it didn't work out so well. Like Stalin said, quantity has a quality of it's own. Many smaller ships with highly advanced systems and drone support would be a better strategy for today's seaforce. Ukraine has shown what tomorrows naval warfare will look like. It's not huge ships.Zovs wrote: Tue Dec 23, 2025 11:19 am Arnt Battleships supposed to be named after states? Even though this might be a Trump class, the naming should be USS Washington or USS New Mexico, right?
Also, did not WW2 teach us that the Aircraft Carrier and not the Battleship was the way to project force?![]()
As far as naming goes, the system that was previously used appears to be gone. Submarines named after fish and other aquatic creatures, aircraft carriers after battles, and so on.
Seek peace but keep your gun handy.
I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing!
“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”
; Julia Child

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing!
“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”
Re: Australian Beauties II
Ukraine and Syria didn't show anything. Anyway not to politics, no safe air&land zone for an early NATO member but then asking EU for military expenditure, very much irony.Lobster wrote: Tue Dec 23, 2025 1:05 pm Ukraine has shown what tomorrows naval warfare will look like. It's not huge ships.![]()
Re: Australian Beauties II
Thanks Ranger JoeRangerJoe wrote: Wed Dec 24, 2025 9:33 amThis ship would be the main force projector in an area. It would have to have smaller escorts which could eliminate most if not all of the short ranged threats.Lobster wrote: Tue Dec 23, 2025 1:05 pmThe U.S. doesn't have the shipyards, the labor force nor the money ($15 billion each) for the number of huge ships to replace the Burke destroyers. Hitler tried to do this same thing by making bigger and bigger tanks but it didn't work out so well. Like Stalin said, quantity has a quality of it's own. Many smaller ships with highly advanced systems and drone support would be a better strategy for today's seaforce. Ukraine has shown what tomorrows naval warfare will look like. It's not huge ships.Zovs wrote: Tue Dec 23, 2025 11:19 am Arnt Battleships supposed to be named after states? Even though this might be a Trump class, the naming should be USS Washington or USS New Mexico, right?
Also, did not WW2 teach us that the Aircraft Carrier and not the Battleship was the way to project force?![]()
As far as naming goes, the system that was previously used appears to be gone. Submarines named after fish and other aquatic creatures, aircraft carriers after battles, and so on.

Beta Tester for: War in the East 1 & 2, WarPlan & WarPlan Pacific, Valor & Victory, Flashpoint Campaigns: Sudden Storm, Computer War In Europe 2
SPWW2 & SPMBT scenario creator
Tester for WDS games
Re: Australian Beauties II
You are most welcome Zov!Zovs wrote: Mon Dec 29, 2025 10:55 amThanks Ranger JoeRangerJoe wrote: Wed Dec 24, 2025 9:33 amThis ship would be the main force projector in an area. It would have to have smaller escorts which could eliminate most if not all of the short ranged threats.Lobster wrote: Tue Dec 23, 2025 1:05 pm
The U.S. doesn't have the shipyards, the labor force nor the money ($15 billion each) for the number of huge ships to replace the Burke destroyers. Hitler tried to do this same thing by making bigger and bigger tanks but it didn't work out so well. Like Stalin said, quantity has a quality of it's own. Many smaller ships with highly advanced systems and drone support would be a better strategy for today's seaforce. Ukraine has shown what tomorrows naval warfare will look like. It's not huge ships.![]()
As far as naming goes, the system that was previously used appears to be gone. Submarines named after fish and other aquatic creatures, aircraft carriers after battles, and so on.
Seek peace but keep your gun handy.
I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing!
“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”
; Julia Child

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing!
“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”
Re: Australian Beauties II
Tirpitz painted as civilian buildings,
Last edited by Aurelian on Wed Mar 25, 2026 10:06 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Building a new PC.
Re: Australian Beauties II
USS Oregon
- Attachments
-
- USS Oregon in dry dock.jpg (503.25 KiB) Viewed 328 times
Building a new PC.
- Curtis Lemay
- Posts: 15092
- Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 3:12 pm
- Location: Houston, TX
Re: Australian Beauties II
USS Oregon (BB-3) was the last of the Indiana-class BBs. Note that I posted a pic of the USS Indiana (BB-1) here: https://forums.matrixgames.com/viewtopi ... 9#p5146559
Re: Australian Beauties II
Holy war from Charlemagne to Australian Beauties II...
Re: Australian Beauties II
An interesting read concerning the demise of the HMS Hood. https://historyfirst.com/hms-hood-sunk- ... -bismarck/
ne nothi tere te deorsum (don't let the bastards grind you down)
If duct tape doesn't fix it then you are not using enough duct tape.
Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity and I’m not sure about the universe-Einstein.
If duct tape doesn't fix it then you are not using enough duct tape.
Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity and I’m not sure about the universe-Einstein.



