GC Republican AAR

Post descriptions of your brilliant victories and unfortunate defeats here.

Moderator: jwilkerson

User avatar
RangerJoe
Posts: 19446
Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2015 2:39 pm
Location: Who knows?

Re: 10/12/36

Post by RangerJoe »

Rysyonok wrote: Tue Apr 14, 2026 4:49 am Another rather quiet turn. REPs are expanding in the East. NATs in the West and the North.

SP385.png
Did you know that you are winning?

How can you tell that you are winning? You might wonder. Because you are destroying more squads than you are losing and by quite a few squads.

You will be receiving more reinforcements even though they are poorly trained but that will enable you to push where the enemy is weaker and then you can reduce the enemy's on map supply production. You also should be getting aerial superiority, you should be bombing his units in the open and especially the units that are moving.
Last edited by RangerJoe on Tue Apr 14, 2026 6:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Seek peace but keep your gun handy.

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing! :o

“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”
:twisted: ; Julia Child


Image
User avatar
jwilkerson
Posts: 8270
Joined: Sun Sep 15, 2002 4:02 am
Location: Kansas
Contact:

Re: GC Republican AAR

Post by jwilkerson »

Need another map view of the Zaragossa area ! :)
WITP Admiral's Edition - Project Lead
War In Spain - Project Lead
User avatar
Rysyonok
Posts: 2462
Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2005 12:11 am

Re: 10/12/36

Post by Rysyonok »

RangerJoe wrote: Tue Apr 14, 2026 10:34 am Did you know that you are winning?

How can you tell that you are winning? You might wonder. Because you are destroying more squads than you are losing and by quite a few squads.

You will be receiving more reinforcements even though they are poorly trained but that will enable you to push where the enemy is weaker and then you can reduce the enemy's on map supply production. You also should be getting aerial superiority, you should be bombing his units in the open and especially the units that are moving.
Good point. I think I would have preferred a Campaign-to-Date tally of the destroyed units over the last turn totals, to be honest. Or Both. One turn does not tell a story. A week, might.
User avatar
Rysyonok
Posts: 2462
Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2005 12:11 am

Re: GC Republican AAR

Post by Rysyonok »

jwilkerson wrote: Tue Apr 14, 2026 5:31 pm Need another map view of the Zaragossa area ! :)
Heard. :)
User avatar
Rysyonok
Posts: 2462
Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2005 12:11 am

10/12/36: The Eastern Front

Post by Rysyonok »

Overall, things are positive for the REP forces in the area. Some NATs were chased into the mountains. Some are falling back North. Barges are routinely sending up supply from Barcelona while picking up the remnants of NAT trophies - I'm still yet to make use of those, truly. There are a couple of regiments floating southeast of Zaragoza, but it's a matter of days at best. Up North, though, we still have a problem. And then there's that huge stack by two rivers that keeps enjoying ART pounding and 10+ squad losses per turn...
SP386.png
SP386.png (584.85 KiB) Viewed 2024 times
SP387.png
SP387.png (760.77 KiB) Viewed 2024 times
User avatar
Rysyonok
Posts: 2462
Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2005 12:11 am

10/13/36

Post by Rysyonok »

The turn of scouts, pillaging what's availabe.
SP388.png
SP388.png (147.33 KiB) Viewed 2008 times
User avatar
Rysyonok
Posts: 2462
Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2005 12:11 am

10/13/36: The South-Western Theater

Post by Rysyonok »

Ex-Malaga and Ex-Granada REP forces are sent North - what if we take Cordoba before AI realizes there are no REPs in the south?
SP389.png
SP389.png (1.45 MiB) Viewed 1996 times
User avatar
jwilkerson
Posts: 8270
Joined: Sun Sep 15, 2002 4:02 am
Location: Kansas
Contact:

Re: GC Republican AAR

Post by jwilkerson »

Rysyonok wrote: Sun Apr 19, 2026 2:06 am
jwilkerson wrote: Tue Apr 14, 2026 5:31 pm Need another map view of the Zaragossa area ! :)
Heard. :)
Thanks !
WITP Admiral's Edition - Project Lead
War In Spain - Project Lead
User avatar
Rysyonok
Posts: 2462
Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2005 12:11 am

10/14/36

Post by Rysyonok »

SP390.png
SP390.png (103.66 KiB) Viewed 1933 times
User avatar
Rysyonok
Posts: 2462
Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2005 12:11 am

Re: GC Republican AAR

Post by Rysyonok »

(Still alive - handling some other priorities - back soon)
User avatar
jwilkerson
Posts: 8270
Joined: Sun Sep 15, 2002 4:02 am
Location: Kansas
Contact:

Re: GC Republican AAR

Post by jwilkerson »

We're still waiting ;)
WITP Admiral's Edition - Project Lead
War In Spain - Project Lead
User avatar
Rysyonok
Posts: 2462
Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2005 12:11 am

10/14/36: The Southwestern Front

Post by Rysyonok »

Wow, I guess, it's been a while! So, let me tell you all about my life lately <skip 3 minutes option activated> and we're right back into action! West of Malaga it's quiet. I got 2 small groups raiding empty bases and one more recovering. Patrol boats will sail once more towards Africa in hopes of capturing something. There is a heavy stack of PA and FBs set to 18-range and 1000-altitude - enough to cover the sea from Malaga and for some deadly hits (given and received).
SP391.png
SP391.png (1.01 MiB) Viewed 1524 times
User avatar
Rysyonok
Posts: 2462
Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2005 12:11 am

10/15/36

Post by Rysyonok »

A quiet turn.

AI, I bet, is re-evaluating the positions after such a lull. So do I.
Republican-USSR ties are grudgingly re-established. A couple more convoys start to move in both directions.
SP392.png
SP392.png (535.05 KiB) Viewed 1519 times
User avatar
Rysyonok
Posts: 2462
Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2005 12:11 am

10/15/36: The Northern Front

Post by Rysyonok »

Gijon-Oviedo:

Quiet. Lots of small NAT units on the loose or still struggling with my residual garrisons. REPs have a 3K HQ stack in Oviedo, a small INF in Gijon, and a scouting cavalry unit.
SP393.png
SP393.png (956.42 KiB) Viewed 1486 times
Santander-Bilbao:

Quiet on the left, lots of NAT activity on the right. I'm trying my all-or-nothing strategy again and I'm sending the best chunks of Santander garrison east to Bilbao.
SP394.png
SP394.png (771.38 KiB) Viewed 1486 times
San Sebastian:

There are 2 NAT-REP encounters with roughly equal number of men, so I'm going to concentrate once again. The REP stack from Pamplona - these are my Barcelona, Cartagena troops! - will charge west to appropriate a huge NAT supply train stack then curve north to relieve San Sebastian. My logistics is starting to fail as I am yet to have 100% control around Zaragosa, so I'm desperately counting on the Northern cities' supply to start flowing to the main army.
SP395.png
SP395.png (536.32 KiB) Viewed 1486 times
User avatar
Rysyonok
Posts: 2462
Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2005 12:11 am

10/15/36: The Western Front

Post by Rysyonok »

Canaveral remains a mess. It's useless for REP, but for NAT it's the only railroad link to the north. Compared to the beginning of the campaign, both sides amped up their forces at least 5x. REPs appear to have more, but many need rest.
SP396.png
SP396.png (731.65 KiB) Viewed 1471 times
User avatar
Rysyonok
Posts: 2462
Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2005 12:11 am

10/16/36

Post by Rysyonok »

Oof, Germans flat out sink a REP transport. Okay, now it's on for real.
SP397.png
SP397.png (295.54 KiB) Viewed 1469 times
User avatar
Rysyonok
Posts: 2462
Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2005 12:11 am

10/16/36: The Eastern Front

Post by Rysyonok »

Troops north of Zaragosa are falling back - there are HQ units coming up from Barcelona, so we're going to try some merging. Overall, NAT resistance north of Zaragosa is stout.

Edit: The orders were lost by WiS, we will re-try later.
SP398.png
SP398.png (653.99 KiB) Viewed 1463 times
Last edited by Rysyonok on Sat May 16, 2026 7:33 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Rysyonok
Posts: 2462
Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2005 12:11 am

10/17/36

Post by Rysyonok »

A rather subdued turn compared to orders given - but apparently WIS does not save orders in real-time, so when I pressed "load game" instead of "save game", that was it - I'm going to blame this one on inefficient REP radio communications equipment :lol:
SP399.png
SP399.png (505.74 KiB) Viewed 1454 times
User avatar
Rysyonok
Posts: 2462
Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2005 12:11 am

10/17/36 (Take 2?)

Post by Rysyonok »

Okay - still blaming this on poor Intel and over-zealous commander reporting, but here's another 10/17/36 turn(?!). Strategically, there's not much difference, REPs are consolidating, NATs are sneaking in an attack here or there. NAT Airforce is definitely becoming a nuisance.
SP400.png
SP400.png (104.01 KiB) Viewed 1425 times
User avatar
Rysyonok
Posts: 2462
Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2005 12:11 am

10/18/36

Post by Rysyonok »

Not much to report. Whether any turns were lost, miscounted, doubled up, it's all good. We're rolling.
SP401.png
SP401.png (104.99 KiB) Viewed 1422 times
Post Reply

Return to “After Action Reports”