The World at War ELO Tournament

Umeu
Posts: 322
Joined: Tue Dec 27, 2022 7:58 am

Re: The World at War ELO Tournament

Post by Umeu »

hasmat_slith wrote: Sat May 16, 2026 3:06 pm
HarrySmith wrote: Tue May 12, 2026 11:11 am
petedalby wrote: Tue May 12, 2026 10:49 am Increasingly players are using these:

1. No diplo on Majors
2. No Barbarossa before 1941
3. No diplo on Bulgaria
4. No Allied DoW on Japan before PH
5. No Italian navy outside Med before DoW
6. No using garrison transports as scouts
7. No using neutral ships / transports as scouts
8. No XP farming
9. No German navy blocking of the Russian navy spawn points

Amphibious research cap of 4
To me these are what should be standard
Question on #4: What exactly is 'PH' in this context? Is it historical, i.e. 'no Allied DoW before December 7, 1941'? Or is it some ambiguous timing based on when Japan eventually strikes? I've assumed this is historical but wanted to confirm with others who might be more aware of its origins.
In my experience, it's not the historical date, but rather, the in game date that Japan attacks the Western Allies (usually UK & Britain together, but either one will suffice).
LoneRunner
Posts: 498
Joined: Sun Aug 16, 2020 4:30 pm

Re: The World at War ELO Tournament

Post by LoneRunner »

Umeu wrote: Sun May 17, 2026 1:22 am
hasmat_slith wrote: Sat May 16, 2026 3:06 pm
HarrySmith wrote: Tue May 12, 2026 11:11 am
To me these are what should be standard
Question on #4: What exactly is 'PH' in this context? Is it historical, i.e. 'no Allied DoW before December 7, 1941'? Or is it some ambiguous timing based on when Japan eventually strikes? I've assumed this is historical but wanted to confirm with others who might be more aware of its origins.
In my experience, it's not the historical date, but rather, the in game date that Japan attacks the Western Allies (usually UK & Britain together, but either one will suffice).
In this context PH stands for Pearl Harbor. I think #4 "No Allied DoW on Japan before PH" really means, No Allied DoW on Japan before Japan is at war with the United States.

It's possible that Pearl Harbor never happens. For example if the US declares war on Japan due to reaching the mobilization limit or if for some reason Japan decides to attack the Philippines and not PH. The house rule couldn't be "No Allied DoW on Japan before Japan is at war with the Allies" because Japan could declare war on the USSR and the house rule would still stand until Japan is at war with the United States. Anyway, that's my humble interpretation of the house rule.
HarrySmith
Posts: 268
Joined: Tue Aug 06, 2019 7:31 pm
Location: Australia

Re: The World at War ELO Tournament

Post by HarrySmith »

LoneRunner wrote: Sun May 17, 2026 7:13 pm
Umeu wrote: Sun May 17, 2026 1:22 am
hasmat_slith wrote: Sat May 16, 2026 3:06 pm

Question on #4: What exactly is 'PH' in this context? Is it historical, i.e. 'no Allied DoW before December 7, 1941'? Or is it some ambiguous timing based on when Japan eventually strikes? I've assumed this is historical but wanted to confirm with others who might be more aware of its origins.
In my experience, it's not the historical date, but rather, the in game date that Japan attacks the Western Allies (usually UK & Britain together, but either one will suffice).
In this context PH stands for Pearl Harbor. I think #4 "No Allied DoW on Japan before PH" really means, No Allied DoW on Japan before Japan is at war with the United States.

It's possible that Pearl Harbor never happens. For example if the US declares war on Japan due to reaching the mobilization limit or if for some reason Japan decides to attack the Philippines and not PH. The house rule couldn't be "No Allied DoW on Japan before Japan is at war with the Allies" because Japan could declare war on the USSR and the house rule would still stand until Japan is at war with the United States. Anyway, that's my humble interpretation of the house rule.
I believe that is totally correct what is stated by lonerunner
hasmat_slith
Posts: 34
Joined: Sun Feb 23, 2025 11:11 pm

Re: The World at War ELO Tournament

Post by hasmat_slith »

Thanks Umeu, Lonerunner and Harry for the responses. I'm glad I asked, as I clearly had it wrong!
HarrySmith
Posts: 268
Joined: Tue Aug 06, 2019 7:31 pm
Location: Australia

Re: The World at War ELO Tournament

Post by HarrySmith »

HarrySmith (Allies) defeats hasmat_slith (Axis) SEP 42
Great game that I thought could progress further. Rob made quick work of Poland and France and great inroads into Russia. Captured Stalingrad and all the Caucasus and threatening Moscow. Unfortunately for him not major inroads into China and Italy surrendered leaving gaps in Robs defences. Basically he didn't have enough units to spread around with Italy and Greece now becoming secondary fronts. Africa was captured early by Allies, allowing an early invasion of Italy. Naval wise Italian and German subs took high losses and couldn't threaten supply lines. Enjoyable and a great land game played by Rob.
New game started as a rematch
HarrySmith Allies vs hasnat_slith Axis.
hasmat_slith
Posts: 34
Joined: Sun Feb 23, 2025 11:11 pm

Re: The World at War ELO Tournament

Post by hasmat_slith »

HarrySmith wrote: Sun May 17, 2026 10:54 pm HarrySmith (Allies) defeats hasmat_slith (Axis) SEP 42
Great game that I thought could progress further. Rob made quick work of Poland and France and great inroads into Russia. Captured Stalingrad and all the Caucasus and threatening Moscow. Unfortunately for him not major inroads into China and Italy surrendered leaving gaps in Robs defences. Basically he didn't have enough units to spread around with Italy and Greece now becoming secondary fronts. Africa was captured early by Allies, allowing an early invasion of Italy. Naval wise Italian and German subs took high losses and couldn't threaten supply lines. Enjoyable and a great land game played by Rob.
New game started as a rematch
HarrySmith Allies vs hasnat_slith Axis.
A great 'everything' game by Harry - air, land and sea. The spanking was total with my achilles heel(s) quickly recognized and exploited to the fullest. Really very impressive. High Command has many assumptions to reconsider...
Umeu
Posts: 322
Joined: Tue Dec 27, 2022 7:58 am

Re: The World at War ELO Tournament

Post by Umeu »

LoneRunner wrote: Sun May 17, 2026 7:13 pm
Umeu wrote: Sun May 17, 2026 1:22 am
hasmat_slith wrote: Sat May 16, 2026 3:06 pm

Question on #4: What exactly is 'PH' in this context? Is it historical, i.e. 'no Allied DoW before December 7, 1941'? Or is it some ambiguous timing based on when Japan eventually strikes? I've assumed this is historical but wanted to confirm with others who might be more aware of its origins.
In my experience, it's not the historical date, but rather, the in game date that Japan attacks the Western Allies (usually UK & Britain together, but either one will suffice).
In this context PH stands for Pearl Harbor. I think #4 "No Allied DoW on Japan before PH" really means, No Allied DoW on Japan before Japan is at war with the United States.

It's possible that Pearl Harbor never happens. For example if the US declares war on Japan due to reaching the mobilization limit or if for some reason Japan decides to attack the Philippines and not PH. The house rule couldn't be "No Allied DoW on Japan before Japan is at war with the Allies" because Japan could declare war on the USSR and the house rule would still stand until Japan is at war with the United States. Anyway, that's my humble interpretation of the house rule.
I do not consider Russia (or India) to be part of the Western Allies, but I should have been clearer on that.

I agree with the above, but IMO and IME, if Japan attacks Britain, then Russia and the US should be allowed to DoW Japan. Though it rarely happens that Japan attacks Britain so early that this doesn't bring the US into the war. Without this though, there is a possible scenario where Japan attacks UK and India without DoW on the US. This will mobilize the US but not put them at war with Japan. (Just like how a Japanese attack on US doesn't make the US at war with Germany). Pearl Harbor / PH just refers I think to a broad range of scenarios of invasions in the pacific that brings the Japanese into a collision with US or UK.

I suppose the clearest way to write it then is to say, no Allied DoW on Japan until US is at 100% mobilization.
petedalby
Posts: 557
Joined: Fri Dec 18, 2020 3:22 pm

Re: The World at War ELO Tournament

Post by petedalby »

I suppose the clearest way to write it then is to say, no Allied DoW on Japan until US is at 100% mobilization.
Agreed. Let's adopt this. It's unambiguous. Thanks Umeu.
LoneRunner
Posts: 498
Joined: Sun Aug 16, 2020 4:30 pm

Re: The World at War ELO Tournament

Post by LoneRunner »

Sounds good to me too. Thanks Umeu.
gronivaure
Posts: 30
Joined: Wed Mar 22, 2017 5:06 pm
Location: Golfe-Juan France

Re: The World at War ELO Tournament

Post by gronivaure »

ELO Game started Jonny25k (Allies) vs gronivaure (Axis) [May 20, 2026)

Good Luck!
HarrySmith
Posts: 268
Joined: Tue Aug 06, 2019 7:31 pm
Location: Australia

Re: The World at War ELO Tournament

Post by HarrySmith »

What Umeu says is mainly correct. The point I would totally disagree is India not being part of the western Allies. India was definitely part of the western Allies. It was a critical part of the Commonwealth and the game question at the start of whether the British Envoy should declare war on Germany or not highlights this fact. India was ultimately still under the British umbrella and as per all Commonwealth countries and declared war on Germany and would act the same with Japan. If Japan just invaded India for example it would of been at war with the UK and I am sure pushed the US to mobilise.
LoneRunner
Posts: 498
Joined: Sun Aug 16, 2020 4:30 pm

Re: The World at War ELO Tournament

Post by LoneRunner »

New ELO game begins:

phenix_slith (Allies) vs LoneRunner (Axis)

We are using the following house rules:

1. No diplo on Majors
2. No Barbarossa before 1941
3. No diplo on Bulgaria
4. No Allied DoW on Japan until US is at 100% mobilization
5. No Italian navy outside Med before DoW
6. No using garrison transports as scouts
7. No using neutral ships / transports as scouts
8. No XP farming
9. No German navy blocking of the Russian navy spawn points
10. Amphibious research is capped at 4 levels
User avatar
Taifun
Posts: 1314
Joined: Thu Dec 28, 2006 9:23 pm
Location: Spain

Re: The World at War ELO Tournament

Post by Taifun »

petedalby wrote: Mon Apr 20, 2026 8:26 pm New ELO game begins:
Taifun (Allies) vs petedalby (Axis)
Game ends:
Taifun (Allies) defeats petedalby (Axis)

AAR available with summary of the game ;)
La clé est l'état d'esprit
kjgokc2007
Posts: 176
Joined: Tue Dec 10, 2013 1:54 pm
Location: Oklahoma USA

Re: The World at War ELO Tournament

Post by kjgokc2007 »

New ELO Game started 06-24-2026

Taifun (Axis) Vs kjgokc2007 (Allies) the Rematch of the Matrix Tournament #1 vs #2.

:mrgreen:
petedalby
Posts: 557
Joined: Fri Dec 18, 2020 3:22 pm

Re: The World at War ELO Tournament

Post by petedalby »

Fresh from my drubbing by Taifun I'm taking on another excellent player. Hoping to learn some more lessons.

kjgokc2007 (Allies) vs Petedalby (Axis)

New ELO rules apply.
HarrySmith
Posts: 268
Joined: Tue Aug 06, 2019 7:31 pm
Location: Australia

Re: The World at War ELO Tournament

Post by HarrySmith »

petedalby wrote: Wed May 27, 2026 8:05 am Fresh from my drubbing by Taifun I'm taking on another excellent player. Hoping to learn some more lessons.

kjgokc2007 (Allies) vs Petedalby (Axis)

New ELO rules apply.
You have the right attitude Pete in that often the best way to learn is to play better players. Players out there shouldn't look at not playing the better players as you should improve your game by doing so. Mind you, you are one of the better players yourself. I do find it doesn't matter who you play, you can always learn something from them too.
firsteds
Posts: 170
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2021 1:12 pm

Re: The World at War ELO Tournament

Post by firsteds »

Hi troops. New ELO ranking to be published on Monday June 1. Please remember to send any results to the list.
gronivaure
Posts: 30
Joined: Wed Mar 22, 2017 5:06 pm
Location: Golfe-Juan France

Re: The World at War ELO Tournament

Post by gronivaure »

gronivaure wrote: Wed May 20, 2026 4:44 pm ELO Game started Jonny25k (Allies) vs gronivaure (Axis) [May 20, 2026)

Good Luck!
Jonny25k won the game. I learned a good lesson and I enjoyed it.
My impression as a War in Europe player is that everything has to be faster in World at War. It took me a while to adjust to this change in pace. Johnny25k does everything faster than me, and I'm learning a lot from him. I manage a few tactical victories, but overall, strategically, I have to concede defeat. He quickly took Africa, and Italy surrendered in the summer of '42. That same summer, he destroyed the Japanese fleet. He kindly offered me a rematch. Thanks to him.

Thanks also to the community for all these AARs. I see all the strategic possibilities, and it's fascinating.
Last edited by gronivaure on Thu Jun 11, 2026 12:38 pm, edited 2 times in total.
gronivaure
Posts: 30
Joined: Wed Mar 22, 2017 5:06 pm
Location: Golfe-Juan France

Re: The World at War ELO Tournament

Post by gronivaure »

ELO Game started Jonny25k (Allies) vs gronivaure (Axis) [May 29, 2026)

Good Luck!
firsteds
Posts: 170
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2021 1:12 pm

Re: The World at War ELO Tournament

Post by firsteds »

Latest ELO rankings. Comments and corrections welcome.
Attachments
Screenshot 2026-06-01 153525.png
Screenshot 2026-06-01 153525.png (86.17 KiB) Viewed 179 times
Post Reply

Return to “Multiplayer Sessions”