LCU Editor Question

[Dereck]

I've seen this both ways in the editor for a broken down division. Which is correct or "proper"?

Division Near-000-None
- Bde #1 Near-961-Wagga Wagga
- Bde #2 Near-918-Canberra
- Bde #3 Near-918-Canberra

Division Near-942-Melbourne
- Bde #1 Near-942-Melbourne
- Bde #2 Near-1455-Portsea
- Bde #3 Near-954-Sale

[Chris21wen]

Don't understand the problem?

[Dereck]

Don't understand the problem?

This is just the PARENT unit that has children:

Parent - Arrival Location -------- Arrival Date --------- Withdrawal Date
Parent - Arrival Location -------- No Arrival Date ----- Withdrawal Date
Parent - Arrival Location -------- No Arrival Date ----- No Withdrawal Date
Parent - No Arrival Location ---- Arrival Date --------- Withdrawal Date
Parent - No Arrival Location ---- No Arrival Date ----- Withdrawal Date
Parent - No Arrival Location ---- No Arrival Date ----- No Withdrawal Date

In going through the editor for a new scenario I have seen the Division/Regiment|Brigade
breakdowns in a variety of the ways above. I would think that the last one would be
more consistent for a Parent-Child relationship where the child units are the ones that
are actually on the map or set to arrive and not the entire division unit.

[PaxMondo]

I've seen this both ways in the editor for a broken down division. Which is correct or "proper"?

Division Near-000-None
- Bde #1 Near-961-Wagga Wagga
- Bde #2 Near-918-Canberra
- Bde #3 Near-918-Canberra

Use this form when the sub-units arrive at differing times/places. Particularly time, for example one of the children arrives 1 year in advance.

Division Near-942-Melbourne
- Bde #1 Near-942-Melbourne
- Bde #2 Near-1455-Portsea
- Bde #3 Near-954-Sale

This one can be used when all the children arrive about the same time.

Honestly, I don't think there is any real difference between them, but that's how I see that the dev's did it in S001.