Large amphibious landing

Share your gameplay tips, secret tactics and fabulous strategies with fellow gamers here.

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

Post Reply
DKF12
Posts: 90
Joined: Tue Mar 16, 2021 1:00 pm
Location: San Leon Tx.

Large amphibious landing

Post by DKF12 »

Axis vs AI
Grand Campaign
Jan. 1945

I am preparing to make a large amphibious landing on Guam. Is it best to break it up into 2-3 waves ?
Guam has 25K troops
Thanks
User avatar
RangerJoe
Posts: 19485
Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2015 2:39 pm
Location: Who knows?

Re: Large amphibious landing

Post by RangerJoe »

Oh yes, ask the same question twice.
Seek peace but keep your gun handy.

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing! :o

“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”
:twisted: ; Julia Child


Image
DKF12
Posts: 90
Joined: Tue Mar 16, 2021 1:00 pm
Location: San Leon Tx.

Re: Large amphibious landing

Post by DKF12 »

When I posted first time it said it had timed out and incorrectly thought it had not posted.
User avatar
Bo Rearguard
Posts: 767
Joined: Sun Apr 06, 2008 9:08 pm
Location: Basement of the Alamo

Re: Large amphibious landing

Post by Bo Rearguard »

DKF12 wrote: Sat Jul 25, 2026 4:56 pm When I posted first time it said it had timed out and incorrectly thought it had not posted.
Yeah, unintended multiple thread creation is an issue I've been seeing on a lot of forum pages lately. Usually, at some point a moderator comes along and cleans them up.

Thread Clones.jpg
Thread Clones.jpg (24.08 KiB) Viewed 74 times
"They couldn't hit an elephant at this dist ...." Union General John Sedgwick, 1864
User avatar
RangerJoe
Posts: 19485
Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2015 2:39 pm
Location: Who knows?

Re: Large amphibious landing

Post by RangerJoe »

DKF12 wrote: Fri Jul 24, 2026 2:20 pm Axis vs AI
Grand Campaign
Jan. 1945

I am preparing to make a large amphibious landing on Guam. Is it best to break it up into 2-3 waves ?
Guam has 25K troops
Thanks
One main wave with all of your combat units, then have your support units that will build up the base stay on ships.

Or, have an initial "wave" of troops land by fast transport so the main invasion will then be treated as reinforcements and not as the initial assault.
Last edited by RangerJoe on Sat Jul 25, 2026 10:44 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Seek peace but keep your gun handy.

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing! :o

“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”
:twisted: ; Julia Child


Image
DKF12
Posts: 90
Joined: Tue Mar 16, 2021 1:00 pm
Location: San Leon Tx.

Re: Large amphibious landing

Post by DKF12 »

Thanks Ranger JOE will follow your advise. And I will watch out for those double posts
User avatar
RangerJoe
Posts: 19485
Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2015 2:39 pm
Location: Who knows?

Re: Large amphibious landing

Post by RangerJoe »

DKF12 wrote: Sat Jul 25, 2026 9:38 pm Thanks Ranger JOE will follow your advise. And I will watch out for those double posts
You are welcome.

The units that land by a fast transport TF will not trigger a shock attack. They could even land the turn prior. The landing should trigger an automatic bombardment attack by any enemy units. Your fast transport TF will bombard, you can even put battleships in that task force.
Seek peace but keep your gun handy.

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing! :o

“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”
:twisted: ; Julia Child


Image
Post Reply

Return to “The War Room”