Next Generation Tracker: Staff Officer Companion

This new stand alone release based on the legendary War in the Pacific from 2 by 3 Games adds significant improvements and changes to enhance game play, improve realism, and increase historical accuracy. With dozens of new features, new art, and engine improvements, War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition brings you the most realistic and immersive WWII Pacific Theater wargame ever!

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

tc464
Posts: 127
Joined: Fri Feb 27, 2004 4:33 pm
Location: Sodom on Potomac

Re: Next Generation Tracker: Staff Officer Companion

Post by tc464 »

I'm currently in a PBEM against Mike Solli and have just started using this tool. I have all my convoy lanes set up and had assigned the TF's to them over the last couple of turns and things were fine. I ran todays turn and now all of the lanes report no units assigned to them. Further, NGT also says I only have 7 convoys. Any thoughts on what may be happening here ? Using 6.90
User avatar
Dereck
Posts: 3328
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2004 10:43 pm
Location: Romulus, MI

Re: Next Generation Tracker: Staff Officer Companion

Post by Dereck »

Probably over thinking this but I just can't get my head around the Campaign/Operations.

Which of these is closest to working with the operations/campaigns?

Operation: AUSTRALIA - Brisbane Actions
T1: Enlarge Brisbane Port [Port: 5(4)]
T2: Enlarge Brisbane fortifications [Fort: 0(9)]
T3: Enlarge Brisbane Air Field [AF: 4(7)]
T4: No. 23 Sqn RAAF Det - Naval Search/20% Training/10% Rest +Upg +Repl
T5: xAPs meet with xAPs from Sydney and proceed to San Francisco
T6: xAKL from Brisbane to Sydney
T7: xAKs meet with xAKs from Sydney and proceed to San Francisco
T8: PGs go on ASW patrol around Brisbane

option 2:
Operation: AUSTRALIA - Brisbane Logistics
T1: Enlarge port [Port: 5(4)]
T2: Enlarge fortifications [Fort: 0(9)]
T3: Enlarge air field [AF: 4(7)]

Operation: AUSTRALIA - Air Operations
T1: Brisbane: No. 23 Sqn RAAF Det - Naval Search/20% Training/10% Rest +Upg +Repl

Operation: AUSTRALIA - Merchant Shipping Operations
T1: Brisbane: xAPs meet with xAPs from Sydney and proceed to San Francisco
T2: Brisbane: xAKs meet with xAKs from Sydney and proceed to San Francisco
T3: Brisbane: xAKLs to Sydney

Operation: AUSTRALIS - Naval Operations
T1: Brisbane: PGs go on ASW patrol
PO2 US Navy (1980-1986);
USS Midway CV-41 (1981-1984)
Whidbey Island, WA (1984-1986)
Naval Reserve (1986-1992)
RedConkristador
Posts: 96
Joined: Sat Jan 20, 2024 7:45 pm

Re: Next Generation Tracker: Staff Officer Companion

Post by RedConkristador »

All of those could be used as an operation. For example:

In CAMPAIGN PLAN, you create a line of effort called “Australia Defense” and assign it to SWPA Theater. You then create a milestone called “BRISBANE DEFENSE” and assign it to that campaign.

In OPERATIONS, you create Operation Dereck and indicate it’s meant to fulfill the Brisbane Defense milestone (or you can assign it to the LOE generally). Within the Operation, you then create the T1 through T8 key tasks you described and can further assign specific units to those tasks.

If your Brisbane Defense needs a series of operations, you can link them together as part of their own campaign (separate from the campaign plan- I might change the terminology here). IE you can replicate the Central Pacific Drive by connecting all the subordinated amphibious assaults.

Let me know if that helps or if I misunderstood your question.
RedConkristador
Posts: 96
Joined: Sat Jan 20, 2024 7:45 pm

Re: Next Generation Tracker: Staff Officer Companion

Post by RedConkristador »

tc464 wrote: Sun Sep 13, 2026 9:48 pm I'm currently in a PBEM against Mike Solli and have just started using this tool. I have all my convoy lanes set up and had assigned the TF's to them over the last couple of turns and things were fine. I ran todays turn and now all of the lanes report no units assigned to them. Further, NGT also says I only have 7 convoys. Any thoughts on what may be happening here ? Using 6.90
Thanks for feedback. Can you send me screenshots?
RedConkristador
Posts: 96
Joined: Sat Jan 20, 2024 7:45 pm

Re: Next Generation Tracker: Staff Officer Companion

Post by RedConkristador »

tc464 wrote: Sun Sep 13, 2026 9:48 pm I'm currently in a PBEM against Mike Solli and have just started using this tool. I have all my convoy lanes set up and had assigned the TF's to them over the last couple of turns and things were fine. I ran todays turn and now all of the lanes report no units assigned to them. Further, NGT also says I only have 7 convoys. Any thoughts on what may be happening here ? Using 6.90
Also - you can export your NGT state in Staff Duty/Staff Duty Officer/Dossier, If you send me that, I can look at what could be the specific issues.
User avatar
RangerJoe
Posts: 19750
Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2015 2:39 pm
Location: Who knows?

Re: Next Generation Tracker: Staff Officer Companion

Post by RangerJoe »

RedConkristador wrote: Sun Sep 13, 2026 10:47 pm All of those could be used as an operation. For example:

In CAMPAIGN PLAN, you create a line of effort called “Australia Defense” and assign it to SWPA Theater. You then create a milestone called “BRISBANE DEFENSE” and assign it to that campaign.

In OPERATIONS, you create Operation Dereck and indicate it’s meant to fulfill the Brisbane Defense milestone (or you can assign it to the LOE generally). Within the Operation, you then create the T1 through T8 key tasks you described and can further assign specific units to those tasks.

If your Brisbane Defense needs a series of operations, you can link them together as part of their own campaign (separate from the campaign plan- I might change the terminology here). IE you can replicate the Central Pacific Drive by connecting all the subordinated amphibious assaults.

Let me know if that helps or if I misunderstood your question.
Maybe instead of "campaign" you could use "operational goal" for the end result.
Seek peace but keep your gun handy.

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing! :o

“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”
:twisted: ; Julia Child


Image
Diliwitm
Posts: 141
Joined: Thu Sep 05, 2024 3:54 pm

Re: Next Generation Tracker: Staff Officer Companion

Post by Diliwitm »

Weird characters there.
WITP_NGT690.jpg
WITP_NGT690.jpg (211.97 KiB) Viewed 499 times
RedConkristador
Posts: 96
Joined: Sat Jan 20, 2024 7:45 pm

Re: Next Generation Tracker: Staff Officer Companion

Post by RedConkristador »

Diliwitm wrote: Mon Sep 14, 2026 8:04 pm Weird characters there.WITP_NGT690.jpg
Interesting. I haven’t seen that before. I’ll look into it
RedConkristador
Posts: 96
Joined: Sat Jan 20, 2024 7:45 pm

Re: Next Generation Tracker: Staff Officer Companion

Post by RedConkristador »

Updated to NGT 6.95. Fixed some language and coding issues.
RedConkristador
Posts: 96
Joined: Sat Jan 20, 2024 7:45 pm

Re: Next Generation Tracker: Staff Officer Companion

Post by RedConkristador »

NGT 8.02:

- fixed some coding inefficiencies

- added turn workflow
Diliwitm
Posts: 141
Joined: Thu Sep 05, 2024 3:54 pm

Re: Next Generation Tracker: Staff Officer Companion

Post by Diliwitm »

Thanks
Edit: part of report has truncated text.
gggboard-1.jpg
gggboard-1.jpg (70.71 KiB) Viewed 158 times
Diliwitm
Posts: 141
Joined: Thu Sep 05, 2024 3:54 pm

Re: Next Generation Tracker: Staff Officer Companion

Post by Diliwitm »

In CAP composition at least one instance says the allied cap was with a6m2
6m-2.jpg
6m-2.jpg (73.2 KiB) Viewed 157 times
User avatar
BBfanboy
Posts: 20760
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 5:36 pm
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Contact:

Re: Next Generation Tracker: Staff Officer Companion

Post by BBfanboy »

Diliwitm wrote: Fri Sep 25, 2026 5:56 pm In CAP composition at least one instance says the allied cap was with a6m26m-2.jpg
That would be the Zeke that landed on a US Carrier during the Coral Sea battle - ;)
No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth
RedConkristador
Posts: 96
Joined: Sat Jan 20, 2024 7:45 pm

Re: Next Generation Tracker: Staff Officer Companion

Post by RedConkristador »

Thanks Diliwitm. Just posted 8.05 which addresses these.
User avatar
Dereck
Posts: 3328
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2004 10:43 pm
Location: Romulus, MI

Re: Next Generation Tracker: Staff Officer Companion

Post by Dereck »

Version 8.05 bug.

In Air Crew records screen I get this following error when trying to view the aircrew record of any ALLIED pilots (the only pilots I can see). I am playing the ALLIED side so I shouldn't be getting this.

Edit: Checking the factions and going through them all here are the results:
Factions:
Soviet - Yes
US Navy - No
US Army - No
US Marines - No
Australian - No
Philippines - Yes
Indian - Yes
British - No
New Zealand - No

Edit 2: This is a single player game set up as single player.

NGT Bug.jpg
NGT Bug.jpg (169.67 KiB) Viewed 57 times
Last edited by Dereck on Sat Sep 26, 2026 9:30 pm, edited 1 time in total.
PO2 US Navy (1980-1986);
USS Midway CV-41 (1981-1984)
Whidbey Island, WA (1984-1986)
Naval Reserve (1986-1992)
User avatar
BBfanboy
Posts: 20760
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 5:36 pm
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Contact:

Re: Next Generation Tracker: Staff Officer Companion

Post by BBfanboy »

If you are doing PBEM and the IJ side just gave you the file, Tracker would see that as IJ info you are not supposed to see? Perhaps you need to make some changes to the Allied side and save the file before Tracker recognizes that you are Allied?
No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth
User avatar
Dereck
Posts: 3328
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2004 10:43 pm
Location: Romulus, MI

Re: Next Generation Tracker: Staff Officer Companion

Post by Dereck »

BBfanboy wrote: Sat Sep 26, 2026 8:57 pm If you are doing PBEM and the IJ side just gave you the file, Tracker would see that as IJ info you are not supposed to see? Perhaps you need to make some changes to the Allied side and save the file before Tracker recognizes that you are Allied?
Added this above. This is a single player game and it is set up that way and as me being the Allies. All the information I see is Allied but I just can't see the pilot detail for most of the factions.
PO2 US Navy (1980-1986);
USS Midway CV-41 (1981-1984)
Whidbey Island, WA (1984-1986)
Naval Reserve (1986-1992)
RedConkristador
Posts: 96
Joined: Sat Jan 20, 2024 7:45 pm

Re: Next Generation Tracker: Staff Officer Companion

Post by RedConkristador »

Thank. I'll address this in next update. Aircrew Records lists two kinds of pilot: those in your squadrons, and those in your replacement pools, who have no squadron. A pool pilot is put on the list by his own record's side marker. The service record that opens when you click a name used a different test: it only accepted a pilot whose squadron was one of yours. A pool pilot has no squadron, so NGT refused.
Post Reply

Return to “War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition”