Defend Luzon 2028

Post new mods and scenarios here.

Moderator: MOD_Command

User avatar
blu3s
Posts: 1395
Joined: Fri Jul 08, 2022 9:45 am

Re: Defend Luzon 2028

Post by blu3s »

Defend Luzon v023 (BETA)

Changed
- Scenario results reworked. What ends the scenario says who achieved their objective; the winner's own losses decide whether the win is Strategic or Tactical:
- RED operation broken (C2 Center sunk, amphibious group withdrawing, or 2 or fewer amphibious ships left): Blue Strategic or Tactical Win depending on BLUE losses. If BLUE paid too high a price, it is a Blue and Red Tactical or Strategic Loss. It is never a Red win.
- BLUE collapse (over 75% of BLUE aircraft lost, or heavy BLUE losses) with the RED operation intact: Red Strategic or Tactical Win depending on RED air and naval losses.
- Amphibious landing: Red Strategic Win (unchanged).
- Time limit reached with the RED operation intact and BLUE still standing: Blue Tactical Win (was Blue Strategic Win).
- BLUE losses are now graded on the real share of air and land forces lost. Before, mid-size forces (10-100 points) could never drop below the Strategic grade, however much they lost. Expect fewer Blue Strategic Wins: losing over 75% of your air or land forces now makes it a Tactical Win, and losing both makes it a Blue and Red Tactical Loss.
- RED suicide drones tweaks
- RED landing ships now count in the score and RED losses: Type 071 LPD 15 points, Type 072A LST 6 points (both were 0).
- HUMINT capability now makes the HUMINT advisory about the disguised PLA collectors more likely. Before, it made it less likely, and in practice it never applied because the roll happened before BLUE bought anything.

Fixed
- Lua exception at scenario setup ('attempt to index a nil value (field NKE)') in about half of the games. When it happened, the biological sea contacts and the collector detection trigger were not created.
- Losing the last AAW escort could fail to make the amphibious group withdraw until another escort was lost.
- Ending the scenario with exactly 2 amphibious ships left was not counted as a RED defeat.
- RED surface action group strikes skipped some ships when assigning them.
- Duplicate "EndScenarioRed" event errors when RED lost several amphibious ships.
- Lua console errors for contacts RED has lost during its 15-minute evaluation.
- Lost contacts came back in RED's contact list after save/reload.
- Blue Strategic Win with almost no RED losses (e.g. one corvette and one landing ship sunk). A game ended by the time limit or by BLUE losing over 75% of its aircraft was scored as a Blue Strategic Win. Now it is a Blue Tactical Win or a Red win (see Changed).
- Scenario time limit was 102 hours after setup instead of 47h55m.
- Suicide drones launched as soon as they received their targets (since v022). They are timed again to arrive shortly before the landing, as a single wave with no follow-up attacks, and launch right away only if they could not reach their targets in time.
Attachments
DefendLuzon_23.zip
(541.41 KiB) Downloaded 21 times
Nikel
Posts: 3546
Joined: Tue Mar 24, 2009 10:51 am

Re: Defend Luzon 2028

Post by Nikel »

Thanks again for the new version :)


Now I cannot get the strategic victory window with these Red side losses (20 ships), and minimal Blue side losses.

And the subs are out of torpedos, never happened before.

Line in the Lua history file.

Function:ScenEdit_SetSpecialAction (0) Error:Unable to identify the desired Special Action!


AS OF: 12-Mar-28 10:59:57

SIDE: RED
===========================================================

LOSSES:
-------------------------------
14x GJ-11 Sharp Sword UCAV
8x J-15T Flying Shark [Su-33 Copy]
2x Type 048 Daguan [88 Xu Xiake]
1x Type 052DL Luyang III Mod [125 Cangzhou]
1x Type 054 Jiangkai I [525 Manshan]
1x Type 054A Jiangkai II [599 Anyang]
2x Type 056A Jiangdao II [625 Bazhong]
5x Type 071 Yuzhao [998 Kunlun Shan]
1x Type 072 Yantai
3x Type 072A Yuting II [981 Dabie Shan]
1x Type 076
2x Type 903A Fuchi [889 Taihu]
1x Type 920 Anwei [866 Daishan Dao]
6x WZ-7 Soaring Dragon UAV
5x WZ-8 UAV
3x Z-18F Sea Eagle
3x Z-18J Bat
2x Z-20F
16x Z-9C Haitun [AS.565SA]
3x Z-9DF Haitun


EXPENDITURES:
------------------
3x 130mm China H/PJ-38 HE
3x 30mm China H/PJ-14 [Type 1130, 500 rnds]
8x AKF-98A
53x CH-AA-10 Abaddon [PL-15]
3x CH-AA-9 [PL-10]
4x China Towed Acoustic Decoy
3x China Type 87 ASW Rocket Salvo [6 rnds]
31x CH-SSC-13 Splinter [CJ-100, Conventional]
6x CH-SSC-9 [CJ-10]
48x CH-SSC-9 [CJ-10]
132x CH-SSC-9 [CJ-10K]
6x CSS-18 [DF-26, Submunitions]
15x CSS-18 Mod 1 [DF-26B, 1200kg Conventional]
6x CSS-18 Mod 1 [DF-26B, 1200kg Conventional] RV
16x CSS-5 Mod 4 [DF-21C, 2000kg Conventional]
19x CSS-X-24 [DF-27, 500kg HE Conventional]
18x CSS-X-24 [DF-27, 500kg HE Conventional] RV
11x Generic Chaff Rocket
4x Generic Chaff Salvo [4x Cartridges]
37x HHQ-9B
27x HQ-16A [SA-17 Semi-Copy]
3x RSL-12 ASW Rocket [32kg HE]
72x Shahed-238
2x YJ-21 [480kg HE]
2x YJ-21 [480kg HE] RV
3x Yu-11
4x Yu-11 ASROC
19x Yu-7



SIDE: BLUE
===========================================================

LOSSES:
-------------------------------
1x A/C Hangar (2x Small Aircraft)
3x Building (Airport Terminal)
1x Building (Control Tower)
1x Radar (ELM-2288ER AD-STAR)


EXPENDITURES:
------------------
60x 20mm/85 M61A2 Vulcan Burst [100 rnds]
2x ADC Mk2 Mod 3 Torpedo Decoy
2x ADC Mk3 Mod 1 Torpedo Countermeasure
2x ADC Mk4 Mod 1 Sonar Jammer
96x AIM-260 JATM
32x AIM-9X-2 Sidewinder Blk II
4x Blackwing SL-UAV
2x MIM-104E Patriot PAC-2 GEM+
4x MIM-104F Patriot PAC-3 CRI
4x MIM-104F Patriot PAC-3 MSE
76x Mk48 Mod 7 CBASS
18x RIM-161C SM-3 NTW Blk IB
18x RIM-161D SM-3 NTW Blk IIA
88x RIM-174A ERAM SM-6 Blk IA
33x RIM-66M-5 SM-2MR Blk IIIB
15x THAAD C-2 CEC
40x UGM-109J Tomahawk Blk Va MST



SIDE: BLUE DECOY
===========================================================

LOSSES:
-------------------------------


EXPENDITURES:
------------------



SIDE: Civilian
===========================================================

LOSSES:
-------------------------------
1x Commercial Tanker - Large Range 1 [75,000t DWT]


EXPENDITURES:
------------------



SIDE: Civilian
===========================================================

LOSSES:
-------------------------------


EXPENDITURES:
------------------



SIDE: Biol
===========================================================

LOSSES:
-------------------------------


EXPENDITURES:
------------------



SIDE: BLUE HUMINT
===========================================================

LOSSES:
-------------------------------


EXPENDITURES:
------------------



SIDE: BLUE HUMINT N
===========================================================

LOSSES:
-------------------------------


EXPENDITURES:
------------------
Last edited by Nikel on Wed Oct 21, 2026 5:46 am, edited 2 times in total.
User avatar
blu3s
Posts: 1395
Joined: Fri Jul 08, 2022 9:45 am

Re: Defend Luzon 2028

Post by blu3s »

I updated the db so could be a change in the torpedo magazines.

Do you remember what special action did you try to execute?

I probably increase a bit the true difficulty for the level 3
Nikel
Posts: 3546
Joined: Tue Mar 24, 2009 10:51 am

Re: Defend Luzon 2028

Post by Nikel »

The Lua error happens at the beginning, when you select the difficulty.

Selected hard and 1000 $, if that matters.


My mistake, the CRAW is anti-sub and anti-torpedo only, cannot sink surface ships.

However is strange it is not used in defense vs the torpedos launched at them.
Nikel
Posts: 3546
Joined: Tue Mar 24, 2009 10:51 am

Re: Defend Luzon 2028

Post by Nikel »

Continued playing today with the last save.

Finally the strategic win window appeared with the losses listed below.

21 ships now, the new is a Zibo Destroyer, that sunk due to the damage already sustained, because could not attack anymore.


This error in the lua hitory file.
Function:Tool_Range (0) Error:Can't find guid CWVLA7-0HNPEQPTG415A

AS OF: 12-Mar-28 11:30:02

SIDE: RED
===========================================================

LOSSES:
-------------------------------
14x GJ-11 Sharp Sword UCAV
8x J-15T Flying Shark [Su-33 Copy]
2x J-16 Flying Shark [Su-30MKK Copy]
2x Type 048 Daguan [88 Xu Xiake]
1x Type 052DL Luyang III Mod [125 Cangzhou]
1x Type 052DL Luyang III Mod [156 Zibo]
1x Type 054 Jiangkai I [525 Manshan]
1x Type 054A Jiangkai II [599 Anyang]
2x Type 056A Jiangdao II [625 Bazhong]
5x Type 071 Yuzhao [998 Kunlun Shan]
1x Type 072 Yantai
3x Type 072A Yuting II [981 Dabie Shan]
1x Type 076
2x Type 903A Fuchi [889 Taihu]
1x Type 920 Anwei [866 Daishan Dao]
6x WZ-7 Soaring Dragon UAV
5x WZ-8 UAV
3x Z-18F Sea Eagle
3x Z-18J Bat
2x Z-20F
17x Z-9C Haitun [AS.565SA]
3x Z-9DF Haitun


EXPENDITURES:
------------------
3x 130mm China H/PJ-38 HE
3x 30mm China H/PJ-14 [Type 1130, 500 rnds]
28x AKF-98A
53x CH-AA-10 Abaddon [PL-15]
2x CH-AA-12 Auger [PL-17]
3x CH-AA-9 [PL-10]
4x China Towed Acoustic Decoy
3x China Type 87 ASW Rocket Salvo [6 rnds]
48x CH-SSC-13 Splinter [CJ-100, Conventional]
6x CH-SSC-9 [CJ-10]
48x CH-SSC-9 [CJ-10]
132x CH-SSC-9 [CJ-10K]
6x CSS-18 [DF-26, Submunitions]
6x CSS-18 [DF-26, Submunitions] RV
18x CSS-18 Mod 1 [DF-26B, 1200kg Conventional]
6x CSS-18 Mod 1 [DF-26B, 1200kg Conventional] RV
16x CSS-5 Mod 4 [DF-21C, 2000kg Conventional]
16x CSS-5 Mod 4 [DF-21C, 2000kg Conventional] RV
28x CSS-X-24 [DF-27, 500kg HE Conventional]
28x CSS-X-24 [DF-27, 500kg HE Conventional] RV
11x Generic Chaff Rocket
6x Generic Chaff Salvo [4x Cartridges]
37x HHQ-9B
27x HQ-16A [SA-17 Semi-Copy]
3x RSL-12 ASW Rocket [32kg HE]
72x Shahed-238
4x YJ-19
2x YJ-21 [480kg HE]
2x YJ-21 [480kg HE] RV
4x Yu-11
4x Yu-11 ASROC
20x Yu-7



SIDE: BLUE
===========================================================

LOSSES:
-------------------------------
1x A/C Hangar (2x Medium Aircraft)
1x A/C Hangar (2x Small Aircraft)
1x Ammo Pad
1x AvGas (150k Liter Underground Tank)
3x Building (Airport Terminal)
1x Building (Control Tower)
2x Building (Large Government Building)
3x Building (Uplink Relay Station)
1x E-7A Wedgetail
3x F-22A Raptor
1x FIM-92E Stinger MANPADS
2x Patriot M903
1x Patriot M903
1x Radar (ELM-2288ER AD-STAR)
1x THAAD C-2


EXPENDITURES:
------------------
50x 20mm/85 M61A2 Vulcan Burst [100 rnds]
2x ADC Mk2 Mod 3 Torpedo Decoy
2x ADC Mk3 Mod 1 Torpedo Countermeasure
2x ADC Mk4 Mod 1 Sonar Jammer
96x AIM-260 JATM
30x AIM-9X-2 Sidewinder Blk II
4x Blackwing SL-UAV
6x FIM-92E Stinger RMP Blk I
1x Generic Flare Salvo [3x Cartridges, Single Spectral]
94x MIM-104E Patriot PAC-2 GEM+
113x MIM-104F Patriot PAC-3 CRI
132x MIM-104F Patriot PAC-3 MSE
9x MIM-120C-7 NASAMS [AMRAAM]
76x Mk48 Mod 7 CBASS
36x RIM-161C SM-3 NTW Blk IB
18x RIM-161D SM-3 NTW Blk IIA
126x RIM-174A ERAM SM-6 Blk IA
33x RIM-66M-5 SM-2MR Blk IIIB
111x THAAD C-2 CEC
40x UGM-109J Tomahawk Blk Va MST



SIDE: BLUE DECOY
===========================================================

LOSSES:
-------------------------------


EXPENDITURES:
------------------



SIDE: Civilian
===========================================================

LOSSES:
-------------------------------
1x Commercial Tanker - Large Range 1 [75,000t DWT]


EXPENDITURES:
------------------



SIDE: Civilian
===========================================================

LOSSES:
-------------------------------


EXPENDITURES:
------------------



SIDE: Biol
===========================================================

LOSSES:
-------------------------------


EXPENDITURES:
------------------



SIDE: BLUE HUMINT
===========================================================

LOSSES:
-------------------------------


EXPENDITURES:
------------------



SIDE: BLUE HUMINT N
===========================================================

LOSSES:
-------------------------------


EXPENDITURES:
------------------
Nikel
Posts: 3546
Joined: Tue Mar 24, 2009 10:51 am

Re: Defend Luzon 2028

Post by Nikel »

The CRAW issue is a db one?

Can only be launched at 0 m, and so not used at all because the subs in the defensive maneuvers do not surface, I guess.

C.png
C.png (41.39 KiB) Viewed 436 times



When the sub is surfaced it works perfectly.

C.gif
C.gif (3.69 MiB) Viewed 436 times
User avatar
blu3s
Posts: 1395
Joined: Fri Jul 08, 2022 9:45 am

Re: Defend Luzon 2028

Post by blu3s »

Looks like a DB one, it shouldn't be able to launch only at 0m (maybe db guys place 0m to make it launch at any depth but I think that's not how it works for torpedos)
Nikel
Posts: 3546
Joined: Tue Mar 24, 2009 10:51 am

Re: Defend Luzon 2028

Post by Nikel »

Ok, thanks. I hope it is fixed in the next db :)


I did another test, fake. But perhaps with some useful data for you to improve the scenario.

In my previous tests the scenario ended in victory or because could not continue due to the slowdown after the out of comms attack.

But what happens after that?


No Blue side units selected. As this side has already buildings and airbases that may be attacked perhaps the test is OK after all.

The first try I had a CTD, lua related it seems, the SM windows before it appeared blank.

The second try I see the same error in the lua file, but this time the SMs were displayed correctly and no CTD happened, could continue.


The most strange thing is that when the message of the PLA have reached the beach, the scenario did not end, should it?

L.png
L.png (65.18 KiB) Viewed 391 times


After that there were still many hours left, only weather messages appeared until the scenario ended by time.



Attached is the Lua history file of this test with some errors, valid or not.


AS OF: 14-Mar-28 00:00:19

SIDE: RED
===========================================================

LOSSES:
-------------------------------


EXPENDITURES:
------------------
1x 130mm China H/PJ-38 HE
1x 30mm China H/PJ-14 [Type 1130, 500 rnds]
48x CH-SSC-13 Splinter [CJ-100, Conventional]
24x CH-SSC-9 [CJ-10]
108x CH-SSC-9 [CJ-10K]
12x CSS-18 [DF-26, Submunitions]
12x CSS-18 [DF-26, Submunitions] RV
16x CSS-2 Mod 1 [DF-3A, 480kg Conventional]
16x CSS-2 Mod 1 [DF-3A, 480kg Conventional] RV
18x CSS-X-24 [DF-27, 500kg HE Conventional]
18x CSS-X-24 [DF-27, 500kg HE Conventional] RV
4x Generic Chaff Rocket
48x Shahed-238
2x YJ-21 [480kg HE]
2x YJ-21 [480kg HE] RV



SIDE: BLUE
===========================================================

LOSSES:
-------------------------------
1x A/C Hangar (2x Large Aircraft)
2x Ammo Pad
1x AvGas Tank Farm (10 x 75k Liter Tank)
1x AvGas Tank Farm (40 x 40k Liter Tank)
2x Building (Airport Terminal)
2x Building (Control Tower)
1x Building (Large Government Building)
1x Building (Very Large Leadership Compound)
1x Diesel (150k Liter Tank)
1x Structure (Power Station - Coal)
1x Structure (Power Station - Gas)


EXPENDITURES:
------------------



SIDE: BLUE DECOY
===========================================================

LOSSES:
-------------------------------


EXPENDITURES:
------------------



SIDE: Civilian
===========================================================

LOSSES:
-------------------------------


EXPENDITURES:
------------------



SIDE: Civilian
===========================================================

LOSSES:
-------------------------------


EXPENDITURES:
------------------



SIDE: Biol
===========================================================

LOSSES:
-------------------------------


EXPENDITURES:
------------------



SIDE: BLUE HUMINT
===========================================================

LOSSES:
-------------------------------


EXPENDITURES:
------------------



SIDE: BLUE HUMINT N
===========================================================

LOSSES:
-------------------------------


EXPENDITURES:
------------------
Attachments
LuaHistory_2026-10-21.txt
(9.62 KiB) Downloaded 15 times
User avatar
blu3s
Posts: 1395
Joined: Fri Jul 08, 2022 9:45 am

Re: Defend Luzon 2028

Post by blu3s »

Mmm there should be a trigger about 40mins after that message, I'll check.

Thank you!
User avatar
blu3s
Posts: 1395
Joined: Fri Jul 08, 2022 9:45 am

Re: Defend Luzon 2028

Post by blu3s »

---024---
Defend Luzon v024 (BETA)

Changed
- RED strike missions now end at their time on target: missile batteries and ships 1 minute before it, aircraft 5 minutes after it (then they return to base). Before, a strike stayed open after its target was destroyed and then went after every BLUE target RED had detected.
- RED strikes ordered late (less than 3 hours before the landing, or after it) are now timed to arrive 3 hours after they are ordered. Before, they launched about 10 minutes after being ordered, with no time on target.

Fixed
- The game stalled for 1-3 seconds every minute as it went on. Finished RED strikes picked up every BLUE target RED had detected (300-400 of them), and J-16s that could not take off re-planned them every minute.
- A RED J-16 strike left with a single aircraft (its wingman already lost) never took off.
- A PLA landing on the beach did not end the scenario (broken since v021). The game ran on to the time limit and was scored as a Blue Tactical Win instead of a Red Strategic Win.
- Games where BLUE bought nothing in the store: Lua errors when units were lost or capability effects ran, and no result screen at the time limit.
Attachments
DefendLuzon_v24.zip
(542.92 KiB) Downloaded 7 times
Nikel
Posts: 3546
Joined: Tue Mar 24, 2009 10:51 am

Re: Defend Luzon 2028

Post by Nikel »

Thanks for the new version.


Tested the sub strategy that worked with the losses listed below, 17 Red Warships were enough this time. The subs were not fast enough and 2 Burkes were sunk. Still enough for a Blue Strategic Win.

Next I will test the Air Strategy, and the "Fake" with no buys if you think is useful.



Noticed in this test:

- The already commented CTDs, I had to reload from saves several times.

- The No Comms slowdown still present, as it is not in the list of fixes you posted.

- Lua history file with no new errors, the last line repeated multiple times.

BLUE INITIAL SET
Adding SBX 1
...
Function:Tool_Range (0) Error:Can't find guid CWVLA7-0HNPN6R7M3MNC

AS OF: 12-Mar-28 10:43:02

SIDE: RED
===========================================================

LOSSES:
-------------------------------
14x GJ-11 Sharp Sword UCAV
8x J-15T Flying Shark [Su-33 Copy]
2x Type 048 Daguan [88 Xu Xiake]
1x Type 055 Renhai [101 Nanchang]
2x Type 056A Jiangdao II [625 Bazhong]
6x Type 071 Yuzhao [998 Kunlun Shan]
1x Type 072 Yantai
1x Type 072A Yuting II [981 Dabie Shan]
1x Type 076
2x Type 903A Fuchi [889 Taihu]
1x Type 920 Anwei [866 Daishan Dao]
6x WZ-7 Soaring Dragon UAV
4x WZ-8 UAV
3x Z-18F Sea Eagle
3x Z-18J Bat
16x Z-9C Haitun [AS.565SA]
3x Z-9DF Haitun


EXPENDITURES:
------------------
1x 130mm China H/PJ-38 HE
1x 30mm China H/PJ-14 [Type 1130, 500 rnds]
70x CH-AA-10 Abaddon [PL-15]
8x CH-AA-12 Auger [PL-17]
16x CH-SSC-13 Splinter [CJ-100, Conventional]
48x CH-SSC-9 [CJ-10]
108x CH-SSC-9 [CJ-10K]
18x CSS-18 [DF-26, Submunitions]
16x CSS-18 [DF-26, Submunitions] RV
15x CSS-18 Mod 1 [DF-26B, 1200kg Conventional]
10x CSS-18 Mod 1 [DF-26B, 1200kg Conventional] RV
48x CSS-X-24 [DF-27, 500kg HE Conventional]
48x CSS-X-24 [DF-27, 500kg HE Conventional] RV
4x Generic Chaff Rocket
2x Generic Chaff Salvo [4x Cartridges]
19x HHQ-9B
2x HQ-10
1x HQ-16A [SA-17 Semi-Copy]
36x Shahed-238
2x YJ-21 [480kg HE]
2x YJ-21 [480kg HE] RV
1x Yu-11
2x Yu-11 ASROC
1x Yu-7



SIDE: BLUE
===========================================================

LOSSES:
-------------------------------
2x A/C Hangar (4x Very Large Aircraft)
2x Ammo Pad
1x Building (Airport Terminal)
1x Building (Control Tower)
1x Building (Large Government Building)
2x DDG 125 Jack H. Lucas [Arleigh Burke Flight III]
1x Diesel (150k Liter Tank)
1x E-7A Wedgetail
2x MH-60R Seahawk
1x Structure (Power Station - Coal)


EXPENDITURES:
------------------
3x 20mm/85 M61A2 Vulcan Burst [100 rnds]
80x AIM-260 JATM
10x AIM-9X-2 Sidewinder Blk II
5x Generic Flare Salvo [3x Cartridges, Dual Spectral]
1x Generic Flare Salvo [3x Cartridges, Single Spectral]
7x MIM-104E Patriot PAC-2 GEM+
30x Mk214 Sea Gnat Chaff [Seduction]
16x Mk234 Nulka
72x Mk48 Mod 7 CBASS
8x Mk59 Mod 0 Floating Decoy
36x RIM-161C SM-3 NTW Blk IB
18x RIM-161D SM-3 NTW Blk IIA
19x RIM-162A ESSM
126x RIM-174A ERAM SM-6 Blk IA
37x RIM-66M-5 SM-2MR Blk IIIB
192x THAAD C-2 CEC
40x UGM-109J Tomahawk Blk Va MST



SIDE: BLUE DECOY
===========================================================

LOSSES:
-------------------------------


EXPENDITURES:
------------------



SIDE: Civilian
===========================================================

LOSSES:
-------------------------------


EXPENDITURES:
------------------



SIDE: Civilian
===========================================================

LOSSES:
-------------------------------
1x Commercial Container Vessel - Feeder [1,600 TEU, 20,000t DWT]


EXPENDITURES:
------------------



SIDE: Biol
===========================================================

LOSSES:
-------------------------------


EXPENDITURES:
------------------



SIDE: BLUE HUMINT
===========================================================

LOSSES:
-------------------------------


EXPENDITURES:
------------------



SIDE: BLUE HUMINT N
===========================================================

LOSSES:
-------------------------------


EXPENDITURES:
------------------
Nikel
Posts: 3546
Joined: Tue Mar 24, 2009 10:51 am

Re: Defend Luzon 2028

Post by Nikel »

Another test, this time no subs. Hard 1000$.

ADs, 3 Burkes and 2 squadrons of F-22s for defense.

6 of F-35As, 6 of F-35Bs and the 4 B-52Js allowed, to attack the invasion fleet.

All the capabilities acquired.




Short AAR:

- The first air wave was a fiasco, launched too soon, when the fleet is still far away for the range of the F-35s, only a few of the StormBreakers and of the Krakens were used, still a few losses for the red side and 0 losses for the Blue side.

- The Red HUMINT unis appeared on the map and they were engaged with Krakens because I had Engage Opportunities activated.

- While the 2nd wave was readying, used the defense capabilities (Comms Jamming and GPS jamming) and they worked, several hours passed in calm.

- Then messages that these defenses had stopped working. And the Red side started the attack, the squadrons of F-22s were used in the defense and sustained losses in suicide missions vs the Fagins, after spending missiles vs Shaheds.

- For that time the 2nd wave was ready and was launched in mass in a mission, 144 F-35s and 4 B-52s, targets only the amphibious ships.

- It was successful, but IMO too heavy losses. Strange flightplans when off-axis is not ticked, and the attack coincided with Red ACs in opposition, that were not attacked in defense. My fault probably in the settings of the mission, and above all it is impossible to coordinate too many aircrafts from a single AB.

- Only 9 ships sunk and even with the ACs losses, specially the F-35s, it was considered a Blue strategic victory. 2 sats though, are they considered for the victory?

Note the first video, already reported that there is a blue and a red sat together, fortunately the SM-3 destroyed the correct one :lol:

In the second, the SM-3 sees to have problems with the trajectory.


ASAT.gif
ASAT.gif (3.39 MiB) Viewed 122 times
ASAT2.gif
ASAT2.gif (2.64 MiB) Viewed 122 times

Some questions:

- Misplaced unit, not in land, can be reverted or the unit is just lost?

- Is it possible to add a randomized startup position for the invasion fleet?

- There are false civilian ships, what to do against them? You could add boarding and capture by Marines :)




- Lua History file of this testing attached.


AS OF: 12-Mar-28 13:58:31

SIDE: RED
===========================================================

LOSSES:
-------------------------------
5x GJ-11 Sharp Sword UCAV
3x Inf Sec (Recon)
14x J-15T Flying Shark [Su-33 Copy]
2x J-16 Flying Shark [Su-30MKK Copy]
2x J-16 Flying Shark [Su-30MKK Copy]
1x J-20 Fagin
1x LKW
1x Tianhui
1x Type 054 Jiangkai I [525 Manshan]
1x Type 055 Renhai [101 Nanchang]
3x Type 071 Yuzhao [998 Kunlun Shan]
1x Type 072 Yantai
3x Type 072A Yuting II [981 Dabie Shan]
8x WZ-7 Soaring Dragon UAV
5x WZ-8 UAV
1x Z-18F Sea Eagle
2x Z-18J Bat
12x Z-9C Haitun [AS.565SA]
1x Z-9DF Haitun


EXPENDITURES:
------------------
3x 130mm China H/PJ-38 HE
15x 30mm China H/PJ-14 [Type 1130, 500 rnds]
12x 30mm/65 H/PJ-13 Burst [400 rnds]
2x 37mm/63 Twin Burst [20 rnds]
5x AKF-98A
1x AS-17 Krypton C [Kh-31P, ARM]
229x CH-AA-10 Abaddon [PL-15]
4x CH-AA-7 Adze [PL-12]
12x CH-AA-9 [PL-10]
45x CH-SSC-13 Splinter [CJ-100, Conventional]
12x CH-SSC-9 [CJ-10]
72x CH-SSC-9 [CJ-10]
78x CH-SSC-9 [CJ-10K]
11x CSS-18 Mod 1 [DF-26B, 1200kg Conventional]
11x CSS-18 Mod 1 [DF-26B, 1200kg Conventional] RV
6x CSS-5 Mod 4 [DF-21C, 2000kg Conventional]
5x CSS-5 Mod 4 [DF-21C, 2000kg Conventional] RV
6x CSS-X-24 [DF-27, 500kg HE Conventional]
6x CSS-X-24 [DF-27, 500kg HE Conventional] RV
24x Generic Chaff Rocket
19x Generic Chaff Salvo [4x Cartridges]
45x Generic Flare Rocket [Single Spectral]
149x HHQ-9B
65x HQ-10
50x HQ-10A
36x Shahed-238
5x YJ-19
2x YJ-21 [480kg HE]
2x YJ-21 [480kg HE] RV



SIDE: BLUE
===========================================================

LOSSES:
-------------------------------
1x
1x Ammo Shelter
1x AvGas (1500k Liter Underground Tank)
1x Building (Airport Terminal)
1x Building (Communication Hub)
1x Building (Control Tower)
1x Building (Large Government Building)
1x Building (Uplink Relay Station)
1x Bunker (SIGINT Station)
1x E-3G Sentry
1x EA-37B Compass Call
7x F-22A Raptor
31x F-35A Lightning II
52x F-35B Lightning II
1x HELIOS Jammer
1x NASAMS II HML [Hawkei]


EXPENDITURES:
------------------
30x AGM-158C LRASM
136x AGM-184A Kraken
21x AIM-120D AMRAAM P3I.4
240x AIM-260 JATM
10x AIM-9X-3 Sidewinder Blk II+
2x AN/ALE-70 FOTD
15x AN/ALE-70(V)/T-1687 Expendable Decoy
123x GBU-53/B StormBreaker
34x Generic Chaff Salvo [5x Cartridges]
9x Generic Chaff Salvo [8x Cartridges]
5x Generic Flare Salvo [3x Cartridges, Dual Spectral]
53x MIM-104E Patriot PAC-2 GEM+
33x MIM-104F Patriot PAC-3 CRI
27x MIM-104F Patriot PAC-3 MSE
26x MIM-120C-7 NASAMS [AMRAAM]
34x RIM-161C SM-3 NTW Blk IB
18x RIM-161D SM-3 NTW Blk IIA
50x RIM-162A ESSM
126x RIM-174A ERAM SM-6 Blk IA
72x RIM-66M-5 SM-2MR Blk IIIB
39x THAAD C-2 CEC



SIDE: BLUE DECOY
===========================================================

LOSSES:
-------------------------------


EXPENDITURES:
------------------



SIDE: Civilian
===========================================================

LOSSES:
-------------------------------
1x Commercial Container Vessel - Small Feeder [100 TEU, 5,750t DWT]


EXPENDITURES:
------------------



SIDE: Civilian
===========================================================

LOSSES:
-------------------------------


EXPENDITURES:
------------------



SIDE: Biol
===========================================================

LOSSES:
-------------------------------


EXPENDITURES:
------------------



SIDE: BLUE HUMINT
===========================================================

LOSSES:
-------------------------------


EXPENDITURES:
------------------



SIDE: BLUE HUMINT N
===========================================================

LOSSES:
-------------------------------


EXPENDITURES:
------------------
Attachments
LuaHistory_2026-10-31.txt
(22 KiB) Downloaded 4 times
User avatar
blu3s
Posts: 1395
Joined: Fri Jul 08, 2022 9:45 am

Re: Defend Luzon 2028

Post by blu3s »

It's weird, testing here the slowdown was mostly from red missions with hundreds of targets that were autopopulated once the original target was destroyed.

I'll take another look

Yes, units misplaced are lost, ships and subs if placed outside of the deployed area are placed in a specific location.

Do you have the .save of the BLUE strategic victory ?

There's nothing to do with the false civilian ships, those are the minor of the problems from BLUE haha

Yes, the fleet start in a slightly different point. I'll be looking of ways to improve the RED behavior, also probably will be adding some RED infrastructure in the Parcel Islands.
Nikel
Posts: 3546
Joined: Tue Mar 24, 2009 10:51 am

Re: Defend Luzon 2028

Post by Nikel »

Thanks for the answers :)


Ah, perhaps it is not the No Comms, but the number of missiles and weapons in the air, coinciding with the No Comms?

Regarding the starting point of the Red Fleet, is it not possible to add more distance or variations?

I have many saves. Do you want the save of the second testing? When the victory is already declared or the last save before that?
User avatar
blu3s
Posts: 1395
Joined: Fri Jul 08, 2022 9:45 am

Re: Defend Luzon 2028

Post by blu3s »

The one when the vicotry is already declared, I'd like to check the numbers that made it a strategic victory


For the position, what I'm trying to do is to select start positions that will sail in time to reach near the landing zone before scenario ends, so I'm a bit limited by that, but I'll try to improve it.
Nikel
Posts: 3546
Joined: Tue Mar 24, 2009 10:51 am

Re: Defend Luzon 2028

Post by Nikel »

OK, here it is.
Attachments
Defend Luzon Air Capabilities 25 Final Victory.zip
(2.97 MiB) Not downloaded yet
Post Reply

Return to “Mods and Scenarios”