What Would You Like?

SPWaW is a tactical squad-level World War II game on single platoon or up to an entire battalion through Europe and the Pacific (1939 to 1945).

Moderator: MOD_SPWaW

User avatar
Warhorse
Posts: 5373
Joined: Fri May 12, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Birdsboro, PA, USA
Contact:

Post by Warhorse »

Originally posted by Von Rom:
My suggestion:

The ability to choose starting colours and/or camouflage for units before a battle would be nice Image

Keep up the great work guys.
Hello, as graphics man, this I would love to implement! Have started doing a set of winter camoflage for all affected units, which will take a while, after that I plan to start a desert set. The problem will be to have a batch file, or some routine to point to these alternate shps, sort of like Talonsoft does with their campaign series. I'm not a programmer, so as soon as I get further along on this, will have to ask Mike Wood about the possibility. There is always my favorite, of manually switching shp files!! Later.


------------------
Mike Amos
Meine Ehre Heisst Treue
Mike Amos

Meine Ehre heißt Treue
www.cslegion.com
General Midi
Posts: 1
Joined: Sat May 20, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Muurame - Finland

Post by General Midi »

Okay let's get started Image

Improvements to be done:

- Improved terrain -> Better hills / height system, meaning that there shouldn't be only hills with height of 10/15/20 but rather every hex should have their own height-value, and the terrain graphics should be drawn depending on that value. (or something like that) Though that would mean a lot of work to be done...

- Grenade / Explosives effectiveness depending on where used: In small spaces like houses/caves/bunkers the explosing effect should be more lethal to infantry.

- There MUST be some sort of way controlling the bombardment order during deplyoment/first turn. For example: I want gliders to attack AFTER my fighters/bombers have done their bombing run (so that the bombers will get shot by all the AA-fire, not my gliders/troop-aircrafts)

- There should be some way of making the troop/gliders attack orders AFTER the deployment phase, because now if I forget to make the orders in the deployment phase, they will just move something like 9mph during the game when moved one by one (realistic?)

- Hmm, what else... oh yeah! There should be MORE space for weapons for each unit. Currently the 4 slots are inadequate with some units (not all the weapons fit in)

- The melee-idea was fine in 0-range

- I remember there was some sort of weapon-gaining system in SP1 with experience (???). Or then it was a bug, but some of the units (tanks / vehicles) got more MGs or AAMGs for their vehicles when they got more experience (i don't really know). That would bring some sort of exotic element to the game (and more personal units). And relating to subject: If a tank crew should bail out willingly, they could grap the AAMGs from the tank with them (hehe, I've seen too many war-movies Image) Well that wouldn't be quite realistic (how would you fire with them without any tripod etc.)

- WHERE ARE THE FINNISH MOLOTOV-COCKTAILS? Image
The finns used lot of those because they were so badly equipped during first years of war.

- Make the Sniper units able to deploy like partisans/special forces

- Ability for enginers etc. special units to plant explosives etc. to the terraing, for example, to a bridge, and make them explode when wanted (or by turn-based timer etc etc Image).

- If both sides have fighters, they could counter each other like the Counter-battery firing with artillery (not in the screen)

- Where are the real trenches, where infantry can move without being seen? (watch the finnish movie "Talvi-Sota" and you get the point Image) Now I can use gullies to work like trenches but it isn't the same thing!

- Ability for the infantry to HIDE in terrain (better for ambushing). Like in hiding snow/mud or climbing the trees in the forest or anything like that

- Tanks should have their tracks hit more often! I haven't seen a SINGLE hit in the tracks in whole game! Is this a bug or a feature?

Well, there is lots of ideas for you, though most of them just suck Image

Also I must say that I've enjoyed playing the SPWAW, good job! Just get rid of those bugs; which remainds me:

There's one really annoying (?) bug: If unit hasn't got target selected and fires (with key f) the enemy units will start shooting the player's unit (if they have shots left). Same thing occurs when pressing key 'c' and choosing weapon slot which doesn't have a weapon in it. Okay, it seems I'm getting out of the subject, sorry! Image

Oh, one more thing! Could you tell me what programming language (c++?) & editor/compiler you used when making the SPWAW?
crazyivan
Posts: 189
Joined: Fri May 12, 2000 8:00 am
Location: New Zealand
Contact:

Post by crazyivan »

i would like to see recovery vech used to tow abandoned tanks back to a safe area to be repiared and recrewed then to send them back to the front.

trianed crews to be able to use enemy weapons and afvs that they may find in good condition.

to be able to select your own camo piant for your unit from the historical schems avalible.

chose in the campiagns wheather or not to defend or advance etc.

many thanks big guy

"The best form of defence,is attack"
nikb
Posts: 89
Joined: Sat Apr 15, 2000 8:00 am

Post by nikb »

And some more...

1. Multiple floors within the buildings.

2. Perhaps visual display of damage to AFVS.

3. Also visually, I like seeing the destroyed /immobilised tanks. Would also like to see other casulties displayed as such.

Still thinking...

Nik
Nik
User avatar
Reg
Posts: 2790
Joined: Fri May 26, 2000 8:00 am
Location: NSW, Australia

Post by Reg »

I normally don't use use the combat popup data (I think hit percentages are too much info in a WWII sim). However I just love the new penetration/effective thickness system SPWaW uses and want to see it in action. The problem is once the delay is set to a readable length the game speed bogs down as it cycles through and delays every weapon firing.

Is it possible to introduce the ability increase the popup delay to a readable delay and then to 'dismiss' the popup early with a mouseclick or something?

Is it possible to have different delays for different categories (hit percentage, damage etc).

Is it possible to suppress some/all popup categories completely?

Great Game!!! I've followed the whole sequence:- sp2ww2 spww2 and now SPWaW, the best yet. Congratulations.
Cheers,
Reg.

(One day I will learn to spell - or check before posting....)
Uh oh, Firefox has a spell checker!! What excuse can I use now!!!
ncpanther
Posts: 73
Joined: Mon May 22, 2000 8:00 am
Location: NC

Post by ncpanther »

Hey Bill,
Two things I would really like to see in the SPWAW game:
1) The continous fire option returned to the fire button. Remember that ?? Ya right click and shoot unti out of ammo. Gave me a chance to say hello to the wife!! hehe

2) This is for upcoming games as well, MORE Combat Engineer play/function. Engineers are and were an important part of any battlefield
and I'd just like to see a little more. Maybe blowing up bridges or constructing them etc. Maybe some engineer specfic missions.

3) being a paratrooper I had this thought the other day: Are paradrops going to be possible from hueys/ chinooks in SP NAM??
Would be a great thing!!

Keep up the great work guys!! AIRBORNE SAPPERS Lead the way!!

------------------
NC
NC
Airborne Sappers Lead the way!!
SAPPERS ATTACK!!!!
Desert Fox
Posts: 171
Joined: Tue May 09, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Ohio, that is all I can say.

Post by Desert Fox »

Originally posted by ncpanther:

3) being a paratrooper I had this thought the other day: Are paradrops going to be possible from hueys/ chinooks in SP NAM??
Would be a great thing!!

Paradrops from a helicopter?? That isn't exactly something a sane person would do. I don't believe that tactic is safe, much less ever used in Vietnam. I could see letting rangers rappel from it or landing and letting out troops, but paradropping is totally out of the realm of helicopter use. First you have the altitude problems. A helicopter flying high enough to drop a guy so that his parachute opens is really a sitting duck for ground fire. Second, the guy is gonna be a lot lower than if he paradropped from a plane, so a static line is the only real choice so that he gets out and the chute opens before he hits the ground. Of course, opening a parachute that close to a helicopter can cause some nasty problems. Finally, paradropping from a helicopter is completely ignoring the abilities it is so useful for, like landing vertically and hovering.
I think for Nam, paradrops are best left to C-130s while helicopters use their ability to land nearly anywhere.
Windo von Paene
Posts: 174
Joined: Tue May 16, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Seattle, WA

Post by Windo von Paene »

Originally posted by Reg:


Is it possible to introduce the ability increase the popup delay to a readable delay and then to 'dismiss' the popup early with a mouseclick or something?

Is it possible to have different delays for different categories (hit percentage, damage etc).

Is it possible to suppress some/all popup categories completely?

Well here's an idea...

Take the combat popud data, and put it in a list box somewhere else on the screen. the obvious place would be where the big ads appear...Lot of room there for a listbox
Six-pk
Posts: 43
Joined: Tue May 09, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Cal USA
Contact:

Post by Six-pk »

Ok I didn't read this whole post so I hope I'm not quoteing someing....

*Use the SPWAW engine for a sim that starts in 1950 to say 2005 or 2010.(if not 20?? then 2000)I.E. a much improved SP2 Image

*Leader units like in Squad Leader.

Thx! Six
Six-pk
ncpanther
Posts: 73
Joined: Mon May 22, 2000 8:00 am
Location: NC

Post by ncpanther »

Originally posted by Desert Fox:
Paradrops from a helicopter?? That isn't exactly something a sane person would do. I don't believe that tactic is safe, much less ever used in Vietnam. I could see letting rangers rappel from it or landing and letting out troops, but paradropping is totally out of the realm of helicopter use. First you have the altitude problems. A helicopter flying high enough to drop a guy so that his parachute opens is really a sitting duck for ground fire. Second, the guy is gonna be a lot lower than if he paradropped from a plane, so a static line is the only real choice so that he gets out and the chute opens before he hits the ground. Of course, opening a parachute that close to a helicopter can cause some nasty problems. Finally, paradropping from a helicopter is completely ignoring the abilities it is so useful for, like landing vertically and hovering.
I think for Nam, paradrops are best left to C-130s while helicopters use their ability to land nearly anywhere.
YES,DF from helicopters. We do it all the time here at FT Bragg. Blackhawks, Hueys, Chinooks. We jump from 1500 ft AGL and have a six count to allow us to fall far enough away from the bird. Yes STATIC LINE. And I'm not exactly sure of wich units were involved but there were a few drops in Nam. Good for placing smaller units behind the lines you can drop roughly a squad + with the huey and Blackhawk, and roughly a PLT + with the Chinook. I have jumped all 3 and I must say the Chinook blast is the best. I'll research the units and let you know what I find.

Oh BTW, when doing proficiency jumps from high performance aircraft (planes) we jump from 800 ft AGL. Combat jumps are from 500 ft AGL with no reserve chute. So yes you jump from much higher in the Birds than the Planes.


------------------
NC

[This message has been edited by ncpanther (edited 05-27-2000).]
NC
Airborne Sappers Lead the way!!
SAPPERS ATTACK!!!!
schmoe
Posts: 26
Joined: Thu May 25, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Portland, Oregon, USA

Post by schmoe »

Great info from ncpanther on the paradrops! From the Vietnam histories I've read, the only paradrops done were really just staged so the airborne guys could keep getting their special pay. Don't you have to do a jump at certain intervals for proficiency requirements?

Why would one want to parachute out of a helo? I suppose it would be harder for the enemy to figure out where you dropped, cuz the helos never hover. Any other reasons?
sami heimola
Posts: 421
Joined: Mon May 08, 2000 8:00 am
Location: kouvola finland

Post by sami heimola »

Hello Bill!

I have some proposals for next patch:

Can it be possible to add Israel and Arab States for 1948-49? And India vs Pakistan for 1947-48?

More scenarios about Finnish Continuation War 1941-44.

More locations for Russo-Finnish wars (as Kuuterselkä, Vuosalmi, Tali-Ihantala for example).
Originally posted by Wild Bill:
Suppose another tactical wargame on the scale of Steel Panthers, single tanks-vehicles, squads, teams, and single artillery units were going to come out in a year or so.

Tell me what you would like included. Please try to say each thing in one sentence. You can mention as many as you think important. Just keep them short.

Some points are given, better AI, better graphics...etc.

But in particular, such as, I'd like to control the type of ammo my tank uses.

I would like some form of close combat or melee between units if and when they get into the same hex.

I want dismounting cavalry, skiers, motorcycle troops, etc. etc.

Those are the kinds of things I would like to hear(read).

It can be about units, editor, just be specific. I'll be taking notes just in case it should ever happen. (G)...Wild Bill

Dave R
Posts: 113
Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2001 8:00 am
Location: England
Contact:

Post by Dave R »

[QUOTE]Originally posted by sami heimola:
Hello Bill!

I have some proposals for next patch:

Can it be possible to add Israel and Arab States for 1948-49? And India vs Pakistan for 1947-48?

I think I've mentioned something like this in another thread. The game could easily have covered the Korean war too.
In times of war we see the worst that man has to offer. But we also see the best that man has to offer.
ncpanther
Posts: 73
Joined: Mon May 22, 2000 8:00 am
Location: NC

Post by ncpanther »

Originally posted by schmoe:
Great info from ncpanther on the paradrops! From the Vietnam histories I've read, the only paradrops done were really just staged so the airborne guys could keep getting their special pay. Don't you have to do a jump at certain intervals for proficiency requirements?

Why would one want to parachute out of a helo? I suppose it would be harder for the enemy to figure out where you dropped, cuz the helos never hover. Any other reasons?
Yup we have to jump at least 0nce every three months . The choppers are better for dropping in small drop zones. Its hard to hit a small DZ from a plane. Usually use them when you have 10 seconds or less of DZ. They are also not as big a target as say a C27 or worse a C130. Alot quieter too.

anyway I was just wondering if they were gonna be in SP Nam. Started a great discussion though huh?? heheh


------------------
NC
NC
Airborne Sappers Lead the way!!
SAPPERS ATTACK!!!!
Desert Fox
Posts: 171
Joined: Tue May 09, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Ohio, that is all I can say.

Post by Desert Fox »

I still don't get it. Why would you parachute out of a helicopter? Wouldn't it be loads easier to rappel from a lower altitude? I'm guessing you guys don't parachute over wooded areas just to keep from losing everyone to a bunch of trees, so wouldn't it also be even easier to land/hover in whatever field you are dropping into? Seriously weird tactics if you ask me. Well, rest assured no one will paradrop from my helos in any game.
troopie
Posts: 644
Joined: Sat Apr 08, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Directly above the centre of the Earth.

Post by troopie »

The ability to have victory conditions other than taking and holding real estate. Commandos could seize and blow up things, then make their escape. Partisans could win by ambushing convoys

troopie
Pamwe Chete
Hauptmann6
Posts: 109
Joined: Thu May 11, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Portage, MI
Contact:

Post by Hauptmann6 »

Well, concidering how long it takes to rappel down from a helicopter that has to hover, jumping makes a fair amound of sense... good for commando units as the heli never gives a flight indication that the troops have gotten off...
Wild Bill
Posts: 6428
Joined: Fri Apr 07, 2000 4:00 pm
Location: Smyrna, Ga, 30080

Post by Wild Bill »

There is much that the game "could have" covered, much that "could have" been included. But there is an element of time involved.

What we have took us 14 months of hard work, thousands of man hours from a team of over 20, counting designers and testers.

There comes a time when you have to put the game out there to play.

I've seen a couple of SP projects that have been going on for nearly two years, some, more than that. I see no signs of completion.

So at some point, you have to say, lets play the game as it is now and enjoy it. Then we'll try to make it better.

Not perfect, not as complete as I would have liked it, but I do agree with the decision to put the game out here for you to have.

How many of these changes will you see in SPWAW? Not all of these certainly. You will see some.

But remember, Matrix is a new gaming company. We intend to design games. And that could include a more up to date tac level game that will indeed have much more.

I honestly don't think other nations will be added. I wish that they could be within the time frame we have, but being a free game, and with the investment of so much time, there is only so much that can be done.

Maybe someday...Wild Bill



------------------
Wild Bill Wilder
Coordinator, Scenario Design
Matrix Games
Image
In Arduis Fidelis
Wild Bill Wilder
Independent Game Consultant
O de B
Posts: 124
Joined: Tue Mar 28, 2000 10:00 am
Location: France, Paris

Post by O de B »

I've seen in another thread that someone mentioned the ability to keep speed between turns. I think that such a feature would be great but since there are only 24 hours a day (and even less when you have a family Image), it might be better for another game Image, hence i reply here.
I thought about this on saturday and finally i decided to post somethig about it.
I assume that tanks always had to stop for firing during WWII.
So if the game uses movement points like in SP or time points like in X-com :
- Make a big use of points when beginning a move, then a decreasing amount spent when moving faster ( example : tanks uses 10 points to move first hex, then 8 for second, 6 for third and even less when speed has been acquired...), depending of terrain type, etc.
- moving units sould begin the next turn with the speed acquired at the end of the previous one.
- When firing a point blank, the unit should be given the choice to stop before/after first shot, or to continue at full speed to escape or turn over the enemy (i read somewhere that T-34s were turning around Tigers faster than their turret when very close). Of course a big penalty should be given to accuracy Image
- When firing at average or long range, the tank has to stop. This can be done at a cost of points, more speed more points to stop, and maybe if moving at very high speed/on wet ground etc, it must have to move 1 hex further (or more, depending of the scale)
- Then firing costs points.
- The player should be able to limit the speed of the tank (maybe a max speed like the max range could be used). Therefore, there should be penalties to seeing when moving fast, maybe breakdowns if rough terrain.
- The player should be able to stop the vehicle (using max speed 0?) if it has points left, to provide cover fire. A non stopped vehicle should not be given any op fire during the opponent's turn, or at point blank/with very high penalties.
Well, of course if something like that could be implemented in SP it would be great, but it probably requires another game engine Image
Wild Bill
Posts: 6428
Joined: Fri Apr 07, 2000 4:00 pm
Location: Smyrna, Ga, 30080

Post by Wild Bill »

Some sort of control on speed and its effects on combat would indeed be an added touch of realism. I like it very much. Its another feature I will add to the list. Thank you O de B.

WB

------------------
Wild Bill Wilder
Coordinator, Scenario Design
Matrix Games
Image
In Arduis Fidelis
Wild Bill Wilder
Independent Game Consultant
Post Reply

Return to “Steel Panthers World At War & Mega Campaigns”