Aircraf identification at bases

Uncommon Valor: Campaign for the South Pacific covers the campaigns for New Guinea, New Britain, New Ireland and the Solomon chain.

Moderators: Joel Billings, Tankerace, siRkid

Post Reply
Koenig
Posts: 12
Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2003 11:42 pm
Location: Milan, Italy

Aircraf identification at bases

Post by Koenig »

When I recon an enemy base I'm given generical info on the number of 'Fighters', 'Bombers' and 'Auxiliary' planes based there.
It's easy to suppose that Fighters and Fighter-Bombers are labelled as 'Fighter' and Level Bombers are 'Bombers', but what about other classes?
Are they all 'Auxiliary'?
Sorry but I can't find it on the manual.

Thank you in advance for the reply.

Koenig
User avatar
DoomedMantis
Posts: 1357
Joined: Sat Aug 24, 2002 4:00 pm
Location: Sydney, Australia

RE: Aircraf identification at bases

Post by DoomedMantis »

Search planes, recon, transports
I shall make it a felony to drink small beer.

- Shakespeare
Rainerle
Posts: 463
Joined: Wed Jul 24, 2002 11:52 am
Location: Burghausen/Bavaria
Contact:

RE: Aircraf identification at bases

Post by Rainerle »

HI,
it would be nice if the bombers figure could be broken down into single-/twin- and 4-engine bombers. This info can make a huge difference.
Image
Image brought to you by courtesy of Subchaser!
AmiralLaurent
Posts: 3351
Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2003 8:53 pm
Location: Near Paris, France

RE: Aircraf identification at bases

Post by AmiralLaurent »

It seems to me that dive bombers, torpedo planes and fighter-bombers are all auxiliary.
User avatar
DoomedMantis
Posts: 1357
Joined: Sat Aug 24, 2002 4:00 pm
Location: Sydney, Australia

RE: Aircraf identification at bases

Post by DoomedMantis »

could be right, I should count them one day
I shall make it a felony to drink small beer.

- Shakespeare
Maserati
Posts: 33
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2004 5:07 am

RE: Aircraf identification at bases

Post by Maserati »

If AdmLaurent is right I need to take a piece out of Rabaul and soon.

The current game is going well, I've just extended to Rendova and have most of NG in hand. But I am not Deeply Concerned about the numbers I'm seeing at Rabaul and Shortlands.
Veteran, Bermuda Triangle Expeditionary Force, 1991-1953
User avatar
CatLord
Posts: 312
Joined: Mon Oct 21, 2002 1:35 pm
Location: Lausanne, Switzerland
Contact:

RE: Aircraf identification at bases

Post by CatLord »

ORIGINAL: AmiralLaurent

It seems to me that dive bombers, torpedo planes and fighter-bombers are all auxiliary.
Sorry for diging an old thread, but I cannot find this information either, and it seems this guy is right.

Could someone confirm me what auxiliary are on a base, because I cannot believe the Japanese to have 100+ of just recon/transport/patrol aircrafts on Rabaul...

Thanks,

Cat
Member of the Revolution Under Siege development team.
User avatar
toraq
Posts: 405
Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 7:51 pm

RE: Aircraf identification at bases

Post by toraq »

This is a good question. I did some "research" but I was unable to get a final conclusion. But, as far as I know:

1) If there is a CAP over the base, CAP fighters are not included in the generical information.
2) Recon planes usually make a mistake in distinguishing planes:

Examples:
-Rabaul
Recon indicates: 16 Fighters, 22 Bombers, 11 Aux
Present aircraft: 35 bombers (Nells and Betties), 35 Zeroes
-PM
Recon indicates: 38 fighters, 33 bombers, 48 aux
Present aircraft: 33 P39, 15 SBD, 16 Hudson, 9 PBY

So it is difficult to get a rule [&:]. But I need more examples to study!
User avatar
crsutton
Posts: 9590
Joined: Fri Dec 06, 2002 8:56 pm
Location: Maryland

RE: Aircraf identification at bases

Post by crsutton »

Don't forget FOW as well. I think you have to recon a base many times and keep your altitude low to get an accurate picture of what is really there.
I am the Holy Roman Emperor and am above grammar.

Sigismund of Luxemburg
Post Reply

Return to “Uncommon Valor - Campaign for the South Pacific”