hybrid carriers

Gary Grigsby's strategic level wargame covering the entire War in the Pacific from 1941 to 1945 or beyond.

Moderators: Joel Billings, wdolson, Don Bowen, mogami

Matt Erickson
Posts: 233
Joined: Sat Aug 03, 2002 4:22 am
Location: santa barbra, calif

hybrid carriers

Post by Matt Erickson »

Any chance the japanese can convert some of thier ships to carriers?[&:]
User avatar
rogueusmc
Posts: 4583
Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2004 6:21 pm
Location: Texas...what country are YOU from?
Contact:

RE: hybrid carriers

Post by rogueusmc »

ORIGINAL: Matt Erickson

Any chance the japanese can convert some of thier ships to carriers?[&:]

the CVLs were i believe
There are only two kinds of people that understand Marines: Marines and the enemy. Everyone else has a second-hand opinion.

Gen. William Thornson, U.S. Army

Image
User avatar
freeboy
Posts: 8969
Joined: Sun May 16, 2004 9:33 am
Location: Colorado

RE: hybrid carriers

Post by freeboy »

Whether you can convert, my thoughts from reading nearly all posts in the last month would be no, you can always tweek with the editor

Does anyone know if one can tweek an in process solo game?.. or switch sides ?
"Tanks forward"
User avatar
2Stepper
Posts: 950
Joined: Sat Jan 18, 2003 11:16 pm
Location: North Burbs of Omaha
Contact:

RE: hybrid carriers

Post by 2Stepper »

Well if I recall my history on the matter, I THINK the CVS Chitose and CVS Chiyoda were at least available for conversion to low-grade CVL's. I honestly don't recall if they ever did it historically or not. I would think at best it would be an "optional rule" for inclusion later in a patch if it's not in the initial release...

Just my thoughts
Image
"Send in the Infantry. Tanks cost money... the dead cost nothing..." :)
User avatar
pauk
Posts: 4156
Joined: Sun Oct 21, 2001 8:00 am
Location: Zagreb,Croatia

RE: hybrid carriers

Post by pauk »

Also if i recall correctly, i think that some of japanese BB (Ise, Fugo???) can be converted to, what you call "hybrid carriers"...

but, i'm not 100 % sure....
Image
LTCMTS
Posts: 297
Joined: Mon Jan 06, 2003 3:40 am
Location: Newnan, GA
Contact:

RE: hybrid carriers

Post by LTCMTS »

Hybrid carriers applies to ships with carrier features crossed with that of other ships. The Ise and Hyuga had their aft turrets removed and a flight deck and catapults added. The flight deck, however, never had arrestor gear, so that the chances of a/c landing back aboard were zero to nil. The flight deck really just provided a place for the staging of a/c for the catapult launches.
The Chitose and Chiyoda were converted to carriers. Real carriers, albeit, light and limited in their capabilities. The IJN also converted thsub depot ships Takasaki, Tsurugisaki, and Taigei into the CVLs, Zuiho, Shoho and Ryuho. They finished the battleship Shinano and tried to the finish the heavy cruiser Ibuki as carriers. Thy converted seven merchant ships as carriers and intended to convert three more. Finally, the Mizuho and Nisshin, near sisters of the Chiyoda and Chitose, would probably have been converted to CVLs if the IJN had had the time and resources.
TIMJOT
Posts: 1705
Joined: Mon Apr 30, 2001 8:00 am

RE: hybrid carriers

Post by TIMJOT »

IIRC, testers have stated that the both the Chitose and Chiyoda can be converted to CVs after a certain date. Unfortunately as of now the neither the Nishin or Mizuho are convertable. I think the Ise and Hyuga can be converted to the Hybrids but not sure why anyone would want to.
LTCMTS
Posts: 297
Joined: Mon Jan 06, 2003 3:40 am
Location: Newnan, GA
Contact:

RE: hybrid carriers

Post by LTCMTS »

It's probably not reflected in the game but when the Ise and Hyuga were rebuilt and modernized in 1935-36, the IJN found there was too little depth in the two aft barbettes and hull to increase turret elevation to 43 degrees. This meant that the front four turrets could range to 38,770 yds, while the two aft turrets could only range to 35,800 yards, giving two different required ballistic solutions for the same range. As a result, losing the two aft turrets probably improved the accuracy of their salvos.
Tiornu
Posts: 1126
Joined: Thu Apr 01, 2004 7:59 pm

RE: hybrid carriers

Post by Tiornu »

The conversion cost Hyuga only one turret, the other having already been lost to a turret accident in spring 1942 (an accident that came close to destroying the ship). I am skeptical of the usual description of the Ise turret situation despite its prevalence in published sources including FLEETS OF WORLD WAR II. Can anyone point to anything distinguishing Ise's aft turret from Fuso's?
Matt Erickson
Posts: 233
Joined: Sat Aug 03, 2002 4:22 am
Location: santa barbra, calif

RE: hybrid carriers

Post by Matt Erickson »

Phew! a couple of historical honchos in this thread[:D] as for the turret question is this a trivia question or do you not know,needless to say I bow down to your knowledge[&o]I was mainly hoping of taking some 10K plus cargo ships an sticking a cheap flight deck on them,as I really don't know what kind of strategic industrial options are avaible in the game,thanks for the great replies.
Matt Erickson
Posts: 233
Joined: Sat Aug 03, 2002 4:22 am
Location: santa barbra, calif

RE: hybrid carriers

Post by Matt Erickson »

oh as for the turret question I'll take a stab at it one of them had a catapult launch on it...yes[:)]no[&:]
User avatar
Onime No Kyo
Posts: 16846
Joined: Wed Apr 28, 2004 5:55 am

RE: hybrid carriers

Post by Onime No Kyo »

Unless memory has abandoned me completely, I beleive that the Ise and Hyuga had 5 turrets apeice. In this configuration, there was a magazine below the aft two. I think they put the flight decks above the Y turret barbette.
"Mighty is the Thread! Great are its works and insane are its inhabitants!" -Brother Mynok
User avatar
mogami
Posts: 11053
Joined: Wed Aug 23, 2000 8:00 am
Location: You can't get here from there

RE: hybrid carriers

Post by mogami »

Hi, They had 6 turrents before conversion and 4 after.


There is an interesting almost concerning these ships
July 1942:
To partially compensate for the loss of carrier strength at Midway, the Navy Aircraft Department begins plans to convert the ISE-class battleships to full-sized carriers each carrying 54 planes. This concept is abandoned due to lack of time and resources and the hybrid battleship/carriers concept is adopted.

As hybrids they carried 22 float planes and were worthless. As 54 plane CV they might have been interesting.
Image




I'm not retreating, I'm attacking in a different direction!
User avatar
Apollo11
Posts: 25273
Joined: Thu Jun 07, 2001 8:00 am
Location: Zagreb, Croatia
Contact:

RE: hybrid carriers

Post by Apollo11 »

Hi all,
ORIGINAL: Mogami

Hi, They had 6 turrents before conversion and 4 after.


There is an interesting almost concerning these ships
July 1942:
To partially compensate for the loss of carrier strength at Midway, the Navy Aircraft Department begins plans to convert the ISE-class battleships to full-sized carriers each carrying 54 planes. This concept is abandoned due to lack of time and resources and the hybrid battleship/carriers concept is adopted.

As hybrids they carried 22 float planes and were worthless. As 54 plane CV they might have been interesting.

Very interesting indeed...


But how would they get crammed with 54 aircraft?

Where would aircraft be stored? Is there sufficient space at all (to still retain this funny BB/CV mix)?


Leo "Apollo11"
Image

Prior Preparation & Planning Prevents Pathetically Poor Performance!

A & B: WitW, WitE, WbtS, GGWaW, GGWaW2-AWD, HttR, CotA, BftB, CF
P: UV, WitP, WitP-AE
Mike Scholl
Posts: 6187
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2003 1:17 am
Location: Kansas City, MO

RE: hybrid carriers

Post by Mike Scholl »

APPOLO If converted to CV's, I don't believe the plans included keeping any of the
Main Armament (much as the Akaki or Kaga conversions were to CV's, not Hybrids)
User avatar
Onime No Kyo
Posts: 16846
Joined: Wed Apr 28, 2004 5:55 am

RE: hybrid carriers

Post by Onime No Kyo »

ORIGINAL: Mogami

Hi, They had 6 turrents before conversion and 4 after.


There is an interesting almost concerning these ships
July 1942:
To partially compensate for the loss of carrier strength at Midway, the Navy Aircraft Department begins plans to convert the ISE-class battleships to full-sized carriers each carrying 54 planes. This concept is abandoned due to lack of time and resources and the hybrid battleship/carriers concept is adopted.

As hybrids they carried 22 float planes and were worthless. As 54 plane CV they might have been interesting.


2 turrets midships? That seems to be very strange. How did they deal with interference from the superstructure?
"Mighty is the Thread! Great are its works and insane are its inhabitants!" -Brother Mynok
Matt Erickson
Posts: 233
Joined: Sat Aug 03, 2002 4:22 am
Location: santa barbra, calif

RE: hybrid carriers

Post by Matt Erickson »

somone needs to post a pic of these ships for refreshers sake,I seem to remember two pagoda mast's,needless to say they were very plucky ships's.If only the hiei an kirishima had such luck[:-]
User avatar
Apollo11
Posts: 25273
Joined: Thu Jun 07, 2001 8:00 am
Location: Zagreb, Croatia
Contact:

RE: hybrid carriers

Post by Apollo11 »

HI all,
ORIGINAL: Mike Scholl

APPOLO If converted to CV's, I don't believe the plans included keeping any of the
Main Armament (much as the Akaki or Kaga conversions were to CV's, not Hybrids)

I think they were planned to still be hybrids and not full conversions (like in case of Kaga/Akagi in Japan and Lexington/Saratoga in US)...


Leo "Apollo11"
Image

Prior Preparation & Planning Prevents Pathetically Poor Performance!

A & B: WitW, WitE, WbtS, GGWaW, GGWaW2-AWD, HttR, CotA, BftB, CF
P: UV, WitP, WitP-AE
Matt Erickson
Posts: 233
Joined: Sat Aug 03, 2002 4:22 am
Location: santa barbra, calif

RE: hybrid carriers

Post by Matt Erickson »

Well from what I read they were implenteted pretty much after midway, a crash program if you say.
Mike Scholl
Posts: 6187
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2003 1:17 am
Location: Kansas City, MO

RE: hybrid carriers

Post by Mike Scholl »

As was the Shinano project and a number of other attempted "quick fixes". The Japs
knew about the "Two Ocean Navy Bill" and it's subsequent upgrades..., so they knew
they were going to have a steady stream of "Essex" to face starting in 1943.
Post Reply

Return to “War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945”