US bombs over rated!

Gary Grigsby's strategic level wargame covering the entire War in the Pacific from 1941 to 1945 or beyond.

Moderators: Joel Billings, wdolson, Don Bowen, mogami

Post Reply
User avatar
tigercub
Posts: 2026
Joined: Mon Feb 03, 2003 12:25 pm
Location: brisbane oz

US bombs over rated!

Post by tigercub »

THE JAP BOMBS LOSE ABOUT 40% OF THERE POWER BECAUSE THEY ARE AP TYPE BOMBS .the US gp /semi ap bombs lose 0% what gives they are not HE bombs and are getting the best of both worlds penetration & power!!!

ps. no HE bombs in game?

Struggle Against Japan or US
Image
You have enemies? Good. That means you've stood up for something, sometime in your life
hithere
Posts: 432
Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2004 7:52 pm
Location: Atlanta

RE: US bombs over rated!

Post by hithere »

Where did you get that information? is it in the manual? I seem to be seeing the opposite.....I am hitting merchant ships with 1000 pound bombs but they do not seem to be doing anything. I hit one (the Augusta ? Maru ? if i remember) 5 or six times and it did not sink
Quote from one of my drill sergeants, "remember, except for the extreme heat, intense radiation, and powerful blast wave, a nuclear explosion is just like any other explosion"
le Jason
Posts: 14
Joined: Wed May 24, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Hamburg, Germany
Contact:

RE: US bombs over rated!

Post by le Jason »

On the other Side i hit a US AK with 100kg bombs 18 times. And it did not sink as well.
I did not even sink after I attacked it several times with my KI ANN or KI Sonja Dive bombers (Alway hitting sevral times with 100 kg bombs).
hithere
Posts: 432
Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2004 7:52 pm
Location: Atlanta

RE: US bombs over rated!

Post by hithere »

I'm not trying to say that US bombs are or are not over-rated..I'm sure you can find examples to support each arguement...i'm mostly asking where he got his information. it seems pretty specific. One thing though....and i understand that a bomb is a bomb...but 100 KG bombs are only about 200 lb's. 18 is alot and prob should blow the heck out of a ship though.
Quote from one of my drill sergeants, "remember, except for the extreme heat, intense radiation, and powerful blast wave, a nuclear explosion is just like any other explosion"
User avatar
PeteG662
Posts: 1263
Joined: Mon Jun 07, 2004 1:01 pm

RE: US bombs over rated!

Post by PeteG662 »

2.2 kgs to a lb.
hithere
Posts: 432
Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2004 7:52 pm
Location: Atlanta

RE: US bombs over rated!

Post by hithere »

Thanks...I knew it was alittle over double but could not remember the exact amount..so 220 lbs....still not alot....well i guess if you are standing next to it it is [:D] ...
Quote from one of my drill sergeants, "remember, except for the extreme heat, intense radiation, and powerful blast wave, a nuclear explosion is just like any other explosion"
Damien Thorn
Posts: 1107
Joined: Thu Jul 24, 2003 3:20 am

RE: US bombs over rated!

Post by Damien Thorn »

ORIGINAL: hithere

Where did you get that information?

The numbers come from one of the patches to UV where Japanese bombs were reduced in EFFECT and increased in PENETRATION because they are AP bombs. You can confirm that this was carried over to WitP by looking in the database editor. GP bombs have a effect equal to their weight in pounds. The Japanese bombs have less. The 250 kg bomb should have an EFFECT of 551 if if was GP (general purpose) but the effect is less: 370. The PENETRATION is 65, which is only a little more than the smaller US 500 lb bomb at 45. The US 1000 lb bomb has a PENETRATION of 70 and an effect of 1000, showing that it is a GP bomb. He is saying that the PENETRATION values of the GP bombs are higher than they should be.
hithere
Posts: 432
Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2004 7:52 pm
Location: Atlanta

RE: US bombs over rated!

Post by hithere »

ok..thanks..
Quote from one of my drill sergeants, "remember, except for the extreme heat, intense radiation, and powerful blast wave, a nuclear explosion is just like any other explosion"
User avatar
denisonh
Posts: 2083
Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2001 10:00 am
Location: Upstate SC

RE: US bombs over rated!

Post by denisonh »

Or is that 2.2 lbs per kg? [:D]
ORIGINAL: Tallyman662

2.2 kgs to a lb.
"Life is tough, it's even tougher when you're stupid" -SGT John M. Stryker, USMC
User avatar
PeteG662
Posts: 1263
Joined: Mon Jun 07, 2004 1:01 pm

RE: US bombs over rated!

Post by PeteG662 »

Who knows which way it goes.....its 2.2 something.....LOL
User avatar
RUPD3658
Posts: 6921
Joined: Wed Aug 28, 2002 2:25 am
Location: East Brunswick, NJ

RE: US bombs over rated!

Post by RUPD3658 »

I thought it was double it and add 32......
"The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has limits"- Darwin Awards 2003

"No plan survives contact with the enemy." - Field Marshall Helmuth von Moltke
[img]https://www.matrixgames.com/forums/upfi ... EDB99F.jpg[/img]
User avatar
GoofTrooper
Posts: 54
Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2004 12:35 pm
Location: USA

RE: US bombs over rated!

Post by GoofTrooper »

ORIGINAL: RUPD3658

I thought it was double it and add 32......

That’s for converting Celsius to Fahrenheit. Its 2.2046 lbs to 1 kg.
Image
User avatar
Fallschirmjager
Posts: 3555
Joined: Mon Mar 18, 2002 12:46 am
Location: Chattanooga, Tennessee

RE: US bombs over rated!

Post by Fallschirmjager »

The 250 KG bomb penetrates CA's and BB's
The 500lb GP bomb for the Allies when it hits deck armor or turrets will not penetrate CA's or BB's.
1000lb GP bombs are found on very few planes. The 500lb GP bomb is good but cant even damage the heavier ships in the game.
I would much rather have a load the 250 kg AP bomb myself.
User avatar
2Stepper
Posts: 948
Joined: Sat Jan 18, 2003 11:16 pm
Location: North Burbs of Omaha
Contact:

RE: US bombs over rated!

Post by 2Stepper »

<PLUNK>

Tossing my 2 cents in here... In my game I'm playing I did a Pearl Harbor style raid on Kwajalain and happened to catch the IJN BB the Harauna there. I hit that bugger with MULTIPLE 1000lb bombs from SBD's and got this...

"Deck armor hit"
"Deck armor hit"
etc, etc, etc....

Oddly enough? It sunk two days later. One thing that has to be considered in some of this is FOW. I know it REPEATEDLY keeps coming up, but why wouldn't it? I mean if you're zipping away from a strike after a hit on a target ship, you probably aren't going to spend as much time trying to determine if you had a clean hit or not. And the other guys in your flight might or might not report it accurately.

Which makes me wonder if this isn't just a FOW debate rather then a battle over the strength of bombs...
Image
"Send in the Infantry. Tanks cost money... the dead cost nothing..." :)
User avatar
Fallschirmjager
Posts: 3555
Joined: Mon Mar 18, 2002 12:46 am
Location: Chattanooga, Tennessee

RE: US bombs over rated!

Post by Fallschirmjager »

1000lb bombs will pen the heaviest armor. The largest ship a 500 lb bomb can damage is a CL. And even then the armor on the CL tends to help keep the damage low.
User avatar
tigercub
Posts: 2026
Joined: Mon Feb 03, 2003 12:25 pm
Location: brisbane oz

RE: US bombs over rated!

Post by tigercub »

in the game edit for all the info on ratings!
Image
You have enemies? Good. That means you've stood up for something, sometime in your life
User avatar
tigercub
Posts: 2026
Joined: Mon Feb 03, 2003 12:25 pm
Location: brisbane oz

RE: US bombs over rated!

Post by tigercub »

like i said they are over rated! GP lost about 20%-25% of there explosive content so they can penetrate some armor!
and the ap bombs lose about 40% explosive content so they can penetrate even more armor!
but this game rates then as if they HE type bombs.

just as well there is a good edit!
Image
You have enemies? Good. That means you've stood up for something, sometime in your life
JohnK
Posts: 285
Joined: Thu Feb 08, 2001 10:00 am

RE: US bombs over rated!

Post by JohnK »

I had a really interesting conversation with a friend (who has designed wargames for 20+ years, and currently works for the US Navy doing simulations for the design of the DDX and LCS) about Dauntlesses and Vals and 1000 lb. vs. 500 lb bombs his weekend, and he stated that interestingly (and counter-intuitively) a 1000 lb. bomb doesn't have TWICE the damage effect of a 500 lb. bomb (if it penetrates)...it only has about 25% more effect.....and all games that simply double damage for a bomb (which is basically every wargame I've ever heard of) that are 2x heavier are wrong.
Post Reply

Return to “War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945”