Question for Rules Chairman

Gary Grigsby's strategic level wargame covering the entire War in the Pacific from 1941 to 1945 or beyond.

Moderators: Joel Billings, wdolson, Don Bowen, mogami

User avatar
TF 38
Posts: 29
Joined: Sat Jul 17, 2004 4:08 pm

Question for Rules Chairman

Post by TF 38 »

Does the landing depicted in the image below invoke rule 8.3.2?

TF 38

Image
Attachments
Rule 8.3.2.jpg
Rule 8.3.2.jpg (49.72 KiB) Viewed 268 times
User avatar
rogueusmc
Posts: 4583
Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2004 6:21 pm
Location: Texas...what country are YOU from?
Contact:

RE: Question for Rules Chairman

Post by rogueusmc »

lol...like a sub full of troops is gonna do anything to the old US of A...[:D]
There are only two kinds of people that understand Marines: Marines and the enemy. Everyone else has a second-hand opinion.

Gen. William Thornson, U.S. Army

Image
User avatar
Fallschirmjager
Posts: 3555
Joined: Mon Mar 18, 2002 12:46 am
Location: Chattanooga, Tennessee

RE: Question for Rules Chairman

Post by Fallschirmjager »

If that was Canada in 2004 that platoon and their AT gun would be marching on Ottawa right now...
User avatar
carnifex
Posts: 1294
Joined: Mon Jul 01, 2002 8:47 pm
Location: Latitude 40° 48' 43N Longtitude 74° 7' 29W

RE: Question for Rules Chairman

Post by carnifex »

you think those 5 support guys are manning that AT gun or are they cooks?

or both?

just wonderin...
User avatar
TF 38
Posts: 29
Joined: Sat Jul 17, 2004 4:08 pm

RE: Question for Rules Chairman

Post by TF 38 »

you think those 5 support guys are manning that AT gun or are they cooks?

or both?

just wonderin...

It's a film crew for the documentary. [;)]
Drongo
Posts: 1391
Joined: Fri Jul 12, 2002 1:03 pm
Location: Melb. Oztralia

RE: Question for Rules Chairman

Post by Drongo »

ORIGINAL: TF 38

Does the landing depicted in the image below invoke rule 8.3.2?

TF 38

Is this a trick question???

On the turn following this landing, San Fran will be overflowing with troops, etc.

Are you asking this because what was specified in the manual didn't happen?
Have no fear,
drink more beer.
User avatar
TF 38
Posts: 29
Joined: Sat Jul 17, 2004 4:08 pm

RE: Question for Rules Chairman

Post by TF 38 »

No,

I was just wondering if what could otherwise be construed as an undermanned commando raid could cause the U.S. and Canada to divert their focus from a "Europe First" strategy to one focusing on Japan.

TF 38
User avatar
TheHellPatrol
Posts: 1588
Joined: Fri Jul 02, 2004 9:41 pm

RE: Question for Rules Chairman

Post by TheHellPatrol »

ORIGINAL: Drongo
ORIGINAL: TF 38

Does the landing depicted in the image below invoke rule 8.3.2?

TF 38

Is this a trick question???

On the turn following this landing, San Fran will be overflowing with troops, etc.

Are you asking this because what was specified in the manual didn't happen?
Correction...two turns. One turn would be spent doubled over laughing..."Ha Ha Ha , we surrender[&o], Ha Ha Ha[:D][;)].
A man is rich in proportion to the number of things he can afford to let alone.
Henry David Thoreau

Drongo
Posts: 1391
Joined: Fri Jul 12, 2002 1:03 pm
Location: Melb. Oztralia

RE: Question for Rules Chairman

Post by Drongo »

Ah, so it wasn't a trick question but a loaded one. [:)]
Have no fear,
drink more beer.
User avatar
Captain Ed
Posts: 533
Joined: Sun Mar 21, 2004 3:53 am
Location: Victoria BC

RE: Question for Rules Chairman

Post by Captain Ed »

Hey that is Canada and they have obviously just invaded Estevan Point off Sooke where I live The Japs did shell the lighthouse there during WW2 they won`t be there for long though as we have some raggedy ass loggers there who would make short work of them
as an aside a lot of that area has been bought by japanese interests in recent years so you see they got it anyway[:D][:D]
THE FIRST DAY OF YOUR DIET IS THE HARDEST
THE SECOND DAY IS EASY CAUSE YOU QUIT
User avatar
TF 38
Posts: 29
Joined: Sat Jul 17, 2004 4:08 pm

RE: Question for Rules Chairman

Post by TF 38 »

Jeez,

Can you imagine how much trouble the raid C.O. would be in when the brass figured how badly he'd pissed off the Canucks? [X(]
User avatar
carnifex
Posts: 1294
Joined: Mon Jul 01, 2002 8:47 pm
Location: Latitude 40° 48' 43N Longtitude 74° 7' 29W

RE: Question for Rules Chairman

Post by carnifex »

I was just wondering if what could otherwise be construed as an undermanned commando raid could cause the U.S. and Canada to divert their focus from a "Europe First" strategy to one focusing on Japan.

no of course not

but for game purposes it makes no difference

in the game the japanese would never send a commando raid because it would have no effect - not even a minimal one

so there doesn't need to be a mechanism for a proportional response on the part of the allies since any landing can be assumed to be massive
PeckingFury
Posts: 116
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 4:56 am

RE: Question for Rules Chairman

Post by PeckingFury »

Go ahead and laugh, those civilians sun bathing on the beach there wont think its funny when the dreaded Japanese wakeboard kamikazes land in force [X(]
User avatar
von Murrin
Posts: 1611
Joined: Tue Nov 13, 2001 10:00 am
Location: That from which there is no escape.

RE: Question for Rules Chairman

Post by von Murrin »

LOL[:D]

I think this would trigger the 8.3.2. However, I really can't come up with a better definition of "boxing" the system either.[:'(]
I give approximately two fifths of a !#$% at any given time!
Xargun
Posts: 4396
Joined: Fri Feb 13, 2004 11:34 pm
Location: Near Columbus, Ohio
Contact:

RE: Question for Rules Chairman

Post by Xargun »

ORIGINAL: TF 38

Does the landing depicted in the image below invoke rule 8.3.2?

TF 38

According to the manual your landing at hex 133,28 will NOT trigger the allied speedup... BUT, if you move 1 hex east it will.. Hex 132 (inclusive) and east triggers the allied affect. Anything west of 132 is fair game... - pretty much all alaska..

Xargun
Drongo
Posts: 1391
Joined: Fri Jul 12, 2002 1:03 pm
Location: Melb. Oztralia

RE: Question for Rules Chairman

Post by Drongo »

ORIGINAL: Xargun
According to the manual your landing at hex 133,28 will NOT trigger the allied speedup... BUT, if you move 1 hex east it will.. Hex 132 (inclusive) and east triggers the allied affect. Anything west of 132 is fair game... - pretty much all alaska..

Xargun

Xargun,

Is your monitor upside down? Hex row 133 is EAST of hex row 132.
Have no fear,
drink more beer.
User avatar
Arnir
Posts: 482
Joined: Fri Oct 11, 2002 11:07 pm
Location: Alberta. In Texas.

RE: Question for Rules Chairman

Post by Arnir »

Interesting. I would figure that Ottawa at least would freak if the Japanese landed on Vancouver Island.

Even if a small raid landed on the West Coast, I would imagine that public opinion would demand a shift towards safeguarding the coast. A small raid is often a precursor to a big raid, at least in the eyes of the public. The public may or may not be assuaged by the small force size. They might just state (read: yell and scream) that they managed to get to the West Coast once, they may do it again.
Xargun
Posts: 4396
Joined: Fri Feb 13, 2004 11:34 pm
Location: Near Columbus, Ohio
Contact:

RE: Question for Rules Chairman

Post by Xargun »

ORIGINAL: Drongo

Xargun,

Is your monitor upside down? Hex row 133 is EAST of hex row 132.

Hmmm... I don't think it is.... BUt maybe my whole apartment is... But alas you are correct... I'm just tired and staring at the monitor waiting for my next PBEM turn [:D]

Xargun
Drongo
Posts: 1391
Joined: Fri Jul 12, 2002 1:03 pm
Location: Melb. Oztralia

RE: Question for Rules Chairman

Post by Drongo »

For a minute there I thought it was because I live in Australia.
Have no fear,
drink more beer.
Xargun
Posts: 4396
Joined: Fri Feb 13, 2004 11:34 pm
Location: Near Columbus, Ohio
Contact:

RE: Question for Rules Chairman

Post by Xargun »

ORIGINAL: Drongo

For a minute there I thought it was because I live in Australia.

Well there is that too

Xargun
Post Reply

Return to “War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945”