IJN Wet Dream

Post descriptions of your brilliant successes and unfortunate demises.

Moderators: wdolson, Don Bowen, mogami

Post Reply
User avatar
carnifex
Posts: 1294
Joined: Mon Jul 01, 2002 8:47 pm
Location: Latitude 40° 48' 43N Longtitude 74° 7' 29W

IJN Wet Dream

Post by carnifex »

Japanese in the Guadalcanal scenario vs Very Hard AI.

The four US carriers are rampaging around Guadalcanal. I lose several small ships trying to re-supply my troops there. Once in a while Shortlands gets nuked. All is well.

Two weeks into the scenario, I receive two CV, one CVL, and an empty CVE, which I arm with two zeros and a val. I form up, attach all sorts of supporting TF, and sail for Rabaul the back way.

Meanwhile on Rabaul all my bombers are max range six. They haven't flown yet this scenario. All fresh.

The US carriers move closer to Rabaul, close to Shortlands.

My submariners, who are shadowing the US CV's at horrendous cost (over 75% subs lost at this time), report one torpedo hit each on the Hornet and the Wasp, with explosions below decks and fire. However, the next day the four US CV's are together, meaning all that lying about all that damage and fire will come back to haunt CMDR Takahara if his sub ever makes it back.

My CV's are ordered on do not retire to the hex south of Rabaul, max range on air set to 5. The US CV's float near Shortlands, blowing up an AV and some escorts.

The next day I come in my pants.

The US launches several strikes against my carriers in the morning. My Zero's put up a good fight, but are decimated, and both my main CV's report five bomb hits. However, there is no exploding ordinance, which bodes well for the counter strike.

My carrier planes find the Hornet and she receives six torpedo hits, with magazine explosions galore. My pilots basically report a giant fireball. My ground based strike out of Rabaul lashes out at the Enterprise, with 40 out of 100 Betty's getting through. Plane losses are horrendous, but the torpedo's go in.

The afternoon exchange finds the Shokaku on fire and listing badly. But it is the Wasp that pays the ultimate price, being the target of a combined effort from all my survivors.

Next day all the survivors from both side scatter into the wind. The Shokaku limps into Rabaul, but the situation is very precarious with 81 damage and 26 flood. At least the fires are out.

The Saratoga, undamaged, steams back towrrds Noumea. The IJN now has total control of the Air-Sea battle in this scenario. In the coming months, I will receive even more carriers, and the Allies will not. I will slowly build back my decimated air, and take Guadalcanal back from the Americans.

The carrier battle was very iffy. I had two CV's and some garbage to his four fine flattops. But the Betty's made the difference. When 40 get through, and they all have torps, something is going to sink.

Image
Attachments
mycarriers.jpg
mycarriers.jpg (12.89 KiB) Viewed 174 times
User avatar
carnifex
Posts: 1294
Joined: Mon Jul 01, 2002 8:47 pm
Location: Latitude 40° 48' 43N Longtitude 74° 7' 29W

RE: IJN Wet Dream

Post by carnifex »

My chewed up carrier air.

Image
Attachments
mycvplanes.jpg
mycvplanes.jpg (29.37 KiB) Viewed 173 times
User avatar
carnifex
Posts: 1294
Joined: Mon Jul 01, 2002 8:47 pm
Location: Latitude 40° 48' 43N Longtitude 74° 7' 29W

RE: IJN Wet Dream

Post by carnifex »

My chewed up ground based air.

Image
Attachments
mygroundplanes.jpg
mygroundplanes.jpg (38.14 KiB) Viewed 172 times
User avatar
carnifex
Posts: 1294
Joined: Mon Jul 01, 2002 8:47 pm
Location: Latitude 40° 48' 43N Longtitude 74° 7' 29W

RE: IJN Wet Dream

Post by carnifex »

American surviving carrier air.

Image
Attachments
hisplanes.jpg
hisplanes.jpg (23.04 KiB) Viewed 172 times
User avatar
carnifex
Posts: 1294
Joined: Mon Jul 01, 2002 8:47 pm
Location: Latitude 40° 48' 43N Longtitude 74° 7' 29W

RE: IJN Wet Dream

Post by carnifex »

Under the sea,
Under the sea,
There'll be no accusations,
Just friendly crustaceans
Under the Seeeeeeeeeeeeea!

-- Admiral H. Simpson

Image
Attachments
hiscarriers.jpg
hiscarriers.jpg (18.88 KiB) Viewed 172 times
Alikchi2
Posts: 1786
Joined: Thu May 13, 2004 9:29 pm
Contact:

RE: IJN Wet Dream

Post by Alikchi2 »

Wow! Well done. [&o]

It's going to be quite a task replacing all those Betties.
User avatar
carnifex
Posts: 1294
Joined: Mon Jul 01, 2002 8:47 pm
Location: Latitude 40° 48' 43N Longtitude 74° 7' 29W

RE: IJN Wet Dream

Post by carnifex »

Oh, forgot the total air losses display. Looks like my Betty losses were based upon inital frightened reports. I should be able to replace this in two months.

Image
Attachments
all_air_losses.jpg
all_air_losses.jpg (37.52 KiB) Viewed 172 times
User avatar
Mr.Frag
Posts: 11195
Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2002 5:00 pm
Location: Purgatory

RE: IJN Wet Dream

Post by Mr.Frag »

Learn the lesson of fighting within range of your land bases well! They don't sink! [:D]

A textbook example of coordination between land and sea (or why the USA doesn't automatically win). [&o]
User avatar
Hortlund
Posts: 2162
Joined: Fri Oct 13, 2000 8:00 am

RE: IJN Wet Dream

Post by Hortlund »

It could also be interpreted as a textbook example of why playing against the AI is pointless. [:)]
The era of procrastination, of half-measures, of soothing and baffling expedients, of delays, is coming to a close.
In its place we are entering a period of consequences..
User avatar
Grotius
Posts: 5842
Joined: Fri Oct 18, 2002 5:34 pm
Location: The Imperial Palace.

RE: IJN Wet Dream

Post by Grotius »

Playing against the AI isn't pointless. It looks to me like it's giving him a good, fun game. If you never save-and-reload against the AI (which is the ultimate human cheat), and play it on Very Hard, and don't play too far outside the box, it can give you a good game.

It's certainly giving me one. Sure, you can "break" it if you play far outside the box. But I actually prefer a game that parallels history, and if you play this way, the AI gives you a reasonably good game. For some people, this style of game might be preferable to PBEM, which often diverges more from history.

There's another point to playing the AI. It's faster. I can play 9 or 10 turns a day against the AI, thus giving me a chance to play the whole war in less than a year. On top of that, the AI won't care if you take a week off. And it will fight on no matter what.

Don't get me wrong, I enjoyed PBEM in UV. But I think the AI in this game is better, and I'm enjoying playing it.
Image
User avatar
Tanaka
Posts: 5317
Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2003 3:42 am
Location: USA
Contact:

RE: IJN Wet Dream

Post by Tanaka »

ORIGINAL: Mr.Frag

Learn the lesson of fighting within range of your land bases well! They don't sink! [:D]

A textbook example of coordination between land and sea (or why the USA doesn't automatically win). [&o]


USA does automatically win. Its carriers are automatically respawned. [;)]
Image

Check out my mod for Strategic Command American Civil War!

https://forums.matrixgames.com/viewtopic.php?t=413785
User avatar
Hortlund
Posts: 2162
Joined: Fri Oct 13, 2000 8:00 am

RE: IJN Wet Dream

Post by Hortlund »

Well, I just dont think that many human players would send his carriers to attack a Jap carrier force hovering the hex below Rabaul...
The era of procrastination, of half-measures, of soothing and baffling expedients, of delays, is coming to a close.
In its place we are entering a period of consequences..
UncleBuck
Posts: 633
Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2003 8:35 pm
Location: San Diego, CA, USA

RE: IJN Wet Dream

Post by UncleBuck »

Not thread related,

Panzerjager is that a picture of a red headed Natilie Portman? Looks liek her.

UB
Image
bombata
Posts: 63
Joined: Tue Jun 15, 2004 7:39 pm

RE: IJN Wet Dream

Post by bombata »

lety cross the fingers and hope that the "AI tweak" patch (which matrix is working about) comes soon.

a question about playing the very hard setting against the AI:

do you feel that your ships take system damage from the sea easier then in the historical setting?

bye
User avatar
Hortlund
Posts: 2162
Joined: Fri Oct 13, 2000 8:00 am

RE: IJN Wet Dream

Post by Hortlund »

Natalie Portman, yes.
The era of procrastination, of half-measures, of soothing and baffling expedients, of delays, is coming to a close.
In its place we are entering a period of consequences..
Post Reply

Return to “After Action Reports”