CV surface combat against...

Gary Grigsby's strategic level wargame covering the entire War in the Pacific from 1941 to 1945 or beyond.

Moderators: Joel Billings, wdolson, Don Bowen, mogami

Post Reply
User avatar
Grotius
Posts: 5842
Joined: Fri Oct 18, 2002 5:34 pm
Location: The Imperial Palace.

CV surface combat against...

Post by Grotius »

PT boats! Yes, on June 9, 1942 -- almost six months to the day after Pearl Harbor -- the (AI's) Japanese CVs have decided to take the direct approach against my little squadron of PT boats. I know the AI spotted the PTs a couple turns ago, so it's not like the CVs stumbled on them. Those PTs are virtually the last remaining American assets in the Phillipines; they've been hanging out at Puerto Princesa since Manila fell.

In engagements like this, I root for the AI. I really don't want to see my PT boats sinking a fleet carrier. Here's an excerpt from the combat report, and a screenshot:

Day Time Surface Combat, near Puerto Princesa at 38,55

Japanese Ships
CV Shokaku
CV Zuikaku
CA Myoko
CA Nachi
CL Sendai
DD Sawakaze
DD Yakaze
DD Yukaze
DD Wakatake
DD Sanae

Allied Ships
PT PT-31, Shell hits 34, and is sunk
PT PT-32
PT PT-33
PT PT-34
PT PT-35
PT PT-41

Image
Attachments
KB Surface.. smaller.jpg
KB Surface.. smaller.jpg (107.59 KiB) Viewed 511 times
Image
User avatar
Grotius
Posts: 5842
Joined: Fri Oct 18, 2002 5:34 pm
Location: The Imperial Palace.

RE: CV surface combat against...

Post by Grotius »

In case you're wondering, no, neither CV got a chance to fire its guns. Oh man, I was really hoping to see that. Maybe next turn. :D
Image
User avatar
Grotius
Posts: 5842
Joined: Fri Oct 18, 2002 5:34 pm
Location: The Imperial Palace.

RE: CV surface combat against...

Post by Grotius »

Here's a bigger screenshot. Wasn't sure 800 x 600 would fit, but I think it does:

Image
Attachments
KB Surface Combat.jpg
KB Surface Combat.jpg (122.6 KiB) Viewed 511 times
Image
User avatar
Grotius
Posts: 5842
Joined: Fri Oct 18, 2002 5:34 pm
Location: The Imperial Palace.

RE: CV surface combat against...

Post by Grotius »

Here's the situation on the turn immediately following that surface combat, which took place at the end of the turn. Oddly, the IJN Air Combat TF now seems to be one hex east of Puerto Princesa. I thought there were only two phases of naval movement -- one at night, and one before the air operations phases. How did KB move again?

Note, by the way, that the AI has done a decent job of turning me out of the Phillipines. I shall return. [8D]

Image
Attachments
Phillipine..e 9 1942.jpg
Phillipine..e 9 1942.jpg (146.3 KiB) Viewed 512 times
Image
User avatar
Platoonist
Posts: 3042
Joined: Sun May 11, 2003 4:53 am
Location: Yoyodyne Propulsion Systems

RE: CV surface combat against...

Post by Platoonist »

Hey that looks familar! I guess CV versus PT battles aren't that uncommon in this game. I had one off Batavia. Couldn't believe my eyes when I saw the Soryu score a hit. [:D]

Day Time Surface Combat, near Batavia at 19,59

Japanese Ships
CV Akagi
CV Kaga
CV Hiryu
CV Soryu
CV Shokaku
CA Tone
CA Chikuma
DD Shiranuhi
DD Oshio
DD Umikaze
DD Sanae
DD Kiji

Allied Ships
PT TM-4
PT TM-5, Shell hits 1, and is sunk
PT TM-6
PT TM-7, Shell hits 2, and is sunk
PT TM-8
PT TM-9, Shell hits 4, on fire, heavy damage
Image
User avatar
Grotius
Posts: 5842
Joined: Fri Oct 18, 2002 5:34 pm
Location: The Imperial Palace.

RE: CV surface combat against...

Post by Grotius »

Aw, lucky you -- your CV fired its guns! I didn't get to see that. [:(]
Image
User avatar
Platoonist
Posts: 3042
Joined: Sun May 11, 2003 4:53 am
Location: Yoyodyne Propulsion Systems

RE: CV surface combat against...

Post by Platoonist »

What really breaks my heart is that I botched the screenshot of Soryu with the surface gun graphic. Copied something else into the clipboard afterwards without thinking. Live and learn. [:(]
Image
User avatar
freeboy
Posts: 8969
Joined: Sun May 16, 2004 9:33 am
Location: Colorado

RE: CV surface combat against...

Post by freeboy »

what utter and compleat nonsense that during a day turn a torp platform could manuver within range and launch against gun weilding ships of any class...

Really silly and NON historical
"Tanks forward"
User avatar
tabpub
Posts: 1019
Joined: Sun Aug 10, 2003 8:32 am
Location: The Greater Chicagoland Area

RE: CV surface combat against...

Post by tabpub »

ORIGINAL: freeboy

what utter and compleat nonsense that during a day turn a torp platform could manuver within range and launch against gun weilding ships of any class...

Really silly and NON historical

About as unhistorical as the Hoel and Johnston (among others) engaging Kurita off Samar....
Sing to the tune of "Man on the Flying Trapeze"
..Oh! We fly o'er the treetops with inches to spare,
There's smoke in the cockpit and gray in my hair.
The tracers look fine as a strafin' we go.
But, brother, we're TOO God damn low...
User avatar
freeboy
Posts: 8969
Joined: Sun May 16, 2004 9:33 am
Location: Colorado

RE: CV surface combat against...

Post by freeboy »

sorry , you lost me? My pont is that ships with 5 and 8 inch guns that could easily knock up, out a plywood hulled boat maxing out at 35knots or so would never allow in good condition, an attack like this... granted in extream weather maybe, but then how would the non radar capable pt's know? or a straight, or a straight flush..
ok..
point made
"Tanks forward"
User avatar
dtravel
Posts: 4533
Joined: Wed Jul 07, 2004 6:34 pm

RE: CV surface combat against...

Post by dtravel »

PT Boats were very successful when they were used in the right locations. The Solomons, the Philippines, places where there were lots of islands. When they could use the islands and shores as cover for ambushes they could pull successful hit-n-run torpedo attacks even on battleships. Since they were mostly wood, radar had a hard time getting a return off them. And their low profile made them hard for lookouts to see. But in the open ocean they were not as effective (although German E-boats did pretty well in the English Channel).

PT Boats IMHO should either get a bonus when in coastal hexes or a penalty in open ocean (different ways to get the same effect) but I can understand why Matrix wouldn't want to try to program for that.
This game does not have a learning curve. It has a learning cliff.

"Bomb early, bomb often, bomb everything." - Niceguy

Any bugs I report are always straight stock games.

Image
User avatar
freeboy
Posts: 8969
Joined: Sun May 16, 2004 9:33 am
Location: Colorado

RE: CV surface combat against...

Post by freeboy »

right, and if you where the commander of a tf with valuable ships, would steaming close to shore in reach of pt's and artillery be something even remotely done?
I do conceed the surprise affect in coast waters, but never ever in the big wide open, after all these are 60 nm heses, and a bb or cv shouldn't be caught in close...
my .02$ worth
"Tanks forward"
User avatar
mongo
Posts: 260
Joined: Wed Jun 30, 2004 4:06 pm
Location: Ohio, USA

RE: CV surface combat against...

Post by mongo »

Navigational error? [:)]
"Mongo only pawn..in game of life"
Image
Mike Scholl
Posts: 6187
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2003 1:17 am
Location: Kansas City, MO

RE: CV surface combat against...

Post by Mike Scholl »

ORIGINAL: dtravel

PT Boats were very successful when they were used in the right locations. The Solomons, the Philippines, places where there were lots of islands. When they could use the islands and shores as cover for ambushes they could pull successful hit-n-run torpedo attacks even on battleships. Since they were mostly wood, radar had a hard time getting a return off them. And their low profile made them hard for lookouts to see. But in the open ocean they were not as effective (although German E-boats did pretty well in the English Channel).

PT Boats IMHO should either get a bonus when in coastal hexes or a penalty in open ocean (different ways to get the same effect) but I can understand why Matrix wouldn't want to try to program for that.

Please tell the rest of us where you found these "examples" of PT boats making suc-
sessful "hit and run" attacks "even on battleships"? I've run across them in Comics,
Novels, and Movies..., but never in a history book.
User avatar
freeboy
Posts: 8969
Joined: Sun May 16, 2004 9:33 am
Location: Colorado

RE: CV surface combat against...

Post by freeboy »

lol
"Tanks forward"
JohnK
Posts: 285
Joined: Thu Feb 08, 2001 10:00 am

RE: CV surface combat against...

Post by JohnK »

The only US PT boat attacks against BBs in WWII I'm aware of was the Surigao Strait action, and I don't believe they scored any hits, and got badly shot up in the process.

I don't think US PTs sank anything larger than a destroyer in WWII, did they?
User avatar
freeboy
Posts: 8969
Joined: Sun May 16, 2004 9:33 am
Location: Colorado

RE: CV surface combat against...

Post by freeboy »

only in hollywild, remember "They where expendable"?
"Tanks forward"
User avatar
Caltone
Posts: 651
Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2001 8:00 am
Location: Raleigh, NC USA

RE: CV surface combat against...

Post by Caltone »

I think PT's are overpowered still. It's the ability to move them anywhere (across huge ranges) and also to stack LARGE numbers of them in a base.

Probably worth a look by testers.
"Order AP Hill to prepare for battle" -- Stonewall Jackson
JohnK
Posts: 285
Joined: Thu Feb 08, 2001 10:00 am

RE: CV surface combat against...

Post by JohnK »

Whether it's from "They Were Expendable" or the whole PT-109 incident and Kennedy, the PT Boat is one of those weapons that has gotten romanticized to a degree beyond its actual performance.

I question whether the resources devoted to them in terms of trained men and money building them wouldn't have been better used building more destroyers.
spence
Posts: 5421
Joined: Sun Apr 20, 2003 6:56 am
Location: Vancouver, Washington

RE: CV surface combat against...

Post by spence »

I think the largest ship torpedoed by a PT boat was the CL Abukuma. If I'm not mistaken though the torpedo was actually aimed at a different cruiser in Adm Shima's force at Surigao Strait (Nachi maybe). I believe that PT boats did actually sink the occasional destroyer during the war and I'm pretty sure that PTs got an I-Boat off Guadalcanal in late 42 or Jan 43. They were quite useful in attacking barges in the Solomons, along the New Guinea coast and in the Philippines in both 1942 and 1944-45: so much so that many in those areas actually had the torpedos removed to make room for additional gun armaments in the form of 20mm's, 37mm AT guns, and 40mm's. Fairly certain that not all such modifications were approved by BUSHIPS.
Post Reply

Return to “War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945”