My advise.. don't use Wirraway's

Gary Grigsby's strategic level wargame covering the entire War in the Pacific from 1941 to 1945 or beyond.

Moderators: Joel Billings, wdolson, Don Bowen, mogami

DJAndrews
Posts: 305
Joined: Sun Jan 26, 2003 1:26 am
Location: Toronto, ON, CA

RE: My advise.. don't use Wirraway's

Post by DJAndrews »

Wirraways were primarily used as trainers or fighter bombers, not fighters.

They are very useful once you're trying to counter the gazillion barges the Japanese use to run supplies locally. Other larger bombers don't consider barges worthwhile. You'll be thankful for them after you've had a few barges sink your submarines that go after them. They're just as useful as PT boats (and just as limited - once they get the BB-killer PT boat thing ironed out).
User avatar
Jaws_slith
Posts: 618
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2002 10:00 am

RE: My advise.. don't use Wirraway's

Post by Jaws_slith »

Seems all you guys learned a lot about those Wirraway's. Thanks for the tip about Barges.. I never seen those in the game, but I will keep my planes ready to encounter them[:)]
Good Hunting
User avatar
Jaws_slith
Posts: 618
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2002 10:00 am

RE: My advise.. don't use Wirraway's

Post by Jaws_slith »

After months of recovery the Wirraway's were ready for a naval attack mission.... And here are the results.[:@]

Image
Attachments
Help.jpg
Help.jpg (124.04 KiB) Viewed 267 times
Good Hunting
User avatar
Caranorn
Posts: 397
Joined: Fri Aug 31, 2001 8:00 am
Location: Luxembourg
Contact:

RE: My advise.. don't use Wirraway's

Post by Caranorn »

Could you have picked a worse target then Yamato and two heavy cruisers?

In any case, I tend to get good use out of my Wirraways. You just have to learn they are not first class fighters. If I had to use them as fighters (Australia is a bit short on those in the early game), I'd consider attritional results of 6 Wirraways lost for 1 Zero over my base acceptable (but to get that the Wirraway pilots probably have to learn a few tricks first and raise their morale). In the early war I feel it's all about attrition, the Japanese cannot produce new planes and pilots at a rate anywhere near the allies (any other fighter/fb my usual rate is 1/3 in 41 and 42), so go and shoot down or damage even a few Zeroes far from their bases.

But never attack a major naval unit;-) or you'll play the Aussie version of kamikaze.

Marc aka Caran...
Marc aka Caran... ministerialis
User avatar
Bobthehatchit
Posts: 838
Joined: Sun Apr 27, 2003 7:15 pm
Location: GREAT BRITAIN

RE: My advise.. don't use Wirraway's

Post by Bobthehatchit »

ORIGINAL: Jaws43

After months of recovery the Wirraway's were ready for a naval attack mission.... And here are the results.[:@]

Image

Ah....... no not good idea.....

Against barges yes, transports yes and light escort ships yes, fleet units no not a good idea.[:-]
"Look at yours before laughing at mine". Garfield 1984.

Wanted: ISDII Low millage in Imperial gray.


Just my 2 pence worth.
I might not be right.
Hell I am probaby wrong.
But thats my opinion for what its worth!
Harpoon_GER
Posts: 9
Joined: Sat Jul 03, 2004 2:16 pm

RE: My advise.. don't use Wirraway's

Post by Harpoon_GER »

I use them to suppress remote japanese bases and cut them off supply lines, where only some occasional IJN transports would go. Got me some AKs & TKs this way.
Image
User avatar
Hartley
Posts: 255
Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2003 4:21 pm

RE: My advise.. don't use Wirraway's

Post by Hartley »

ORIGINAL: Fallschirmjager

Even against unescorted bombers they suck.

But they still offer some deterence against them, when the bombers make their pre-mission checks.
Halsey
Posts: 4688
Joined: Fri Feb 06, 2004 10:44 pm

RE: My advise.. don't use Wirraway's

Post by Halsey »

Wirraway's are pretty good in the ground support role. Send them to India where there are more close support operations to do.[8D]

Never ever fly CAP during the daylight with them.[X(]
User avatar
crsutton
Posts: 9590
Joined: Fri Dec 06, 2002 8:56 pm
Location: Maryland

RE: My advise.. don't use Wirraway's

Post by crsutton »

You have to remember that the wirraway was nothing but a souped up T-6 texan training aircraft. Not really a front line plane and certainly not capable of fighting zeros. It was a two seater. The usual configuration only had two 30 cal mgs firing forward. Any use of them in an area where serious air oppositions or AA should bring massive losses.

http://www.warbirdalley.com/wirraway.htm
I am the Holy Roman Emperor and am above grammar.

Sigismund of Luxemburg
User avatar
crsutton
Posts: 9590
Joined: Fri Dec 06, 2002 8:56 pm
Location: Maryland

RE: My advise.. don't use Wirraway's

Post by crsutton »

Well, calling it a T-6 is a bit of a simplifcation. Here is a good history of the wirraway.

http://www.australianwarbirds.com.au/survivors.htm
I am the Holy Roman Emperor and am above grammar.

Sigismund of Luxemburg
User avatar
Jaws_slith
Posts: 618
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2002 10:00 am

RE: My advise.. don't use Wirraway's

Post by Jaws_slith »

ORIGINAL: crsutton

Well, calling it a T-6 is a bit of a simplifcation. Here is a good history of the wirraway.

http://www.australianwarbirds.com.au/survivors.htm

Good story[:)] And it tells us that WitP simulate this aircraft well. So I will send all my Wirraway's to Perth and let them hunt for sharks until upgrades are available[:D]
Good Hunting
dacharls
Posts: 12
Joined: Thu May 23, 2002 3:38 pm
Location: Sweden

RE: My advise.. don't use Wirraway's

Post by dacharls »

The only thing wirraways are useful for is 100ft attacks on barges and transports. They are useless for everything else. But against barges they are both accurate and quite stirdy.

To bad you cant upgrade them to P39.
Xargun
Posts: 4416
Joined: Fri Feb 13, 2004 11:34 pm
Location: Near Columbus, Ohio
Contact:

RE: My advise.. don't use Wirraway's

Post by Xargun »

ORIGINAL: Fallschirmjager

Might as well spot your opponent a few dozen points rather than using those pieces of shit.

They are quite possibly the most useless plane in the game. Its a shame you cant upgrade them to Hurricanes or P-39's

Really ? Worse than Buffalos ? I find that hard to believe... I've hard 6 zeros wipe out 15+ Buffalos before...

Xargun
User avatar
Jaws_slith
Posts: 618
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2002 10:00 am

RE: My advise.. don't use Wirraway's

Post by Jaws_slith »

ORIGINAL: Xargun
ORIGINAL: Fallschirmjager

Might as well spot your opponent a few dozen points rather than using those pieces of shit.

They are quite possibly the most useless plane in the game. Its a shame you cant upgrade them to Hurricanes or P-39's

Really ? Worse than Buffalos ? I find that hard to believe... I've hard 6 zeros wipe out 15+ Buffalos before...

Xargun

It must be on the field[:D]

If those Buffalos have some experience they can hold out a while.
Good Hunting
aspqrz02
Posts: 1038
Joined: Tue Jul 20, 2004 3:01 am

RE: My advise.. don't use Wirraway's

Post by aspqrz02 »

Of course, the upgrade path should be to Boomerangs.

And thereby hangs an interesting tale.

A couple of years ago a friend and I were in Melbourne (he'd never seen it, and I'd told him it was a hole, compared to Sydney ... he didn't believe me so we went down, and now he agrees [:D] and we went down to the RAAF museum where they had a display on the Boomerang.

According to the details it was designed in an incredibly short space of time, c. 2-3 months, IIRC, from Wirraway components, mainly ... which is amazing enough in and of itself.

The *really* strange thing was that it was designed by an Austrian or German refugee (forget whether he was Jewish or merely "political") who was classed as an "enemy alien" and had to report to the local Police Station daily [X(]

I doubt anyone can top *that* story of weird aircraft origins [;)]

Phil
Author, Space Opera (FGU); RBB #1 (FASA); Road to Armageddon; Farm, Forge and Steam; Orbis Mundi; Displaced (PGD)
----------------------------------------------
Email: aspqrz@tpg.com.au
User avatar
Captain Cruft
Posts: 3749
Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2004 12:49 pm
Location: England

RE: My advise.. don't use Wirraway's

Post by Captain Cruft »

From reading this - http://www.australianwarbirds.com.au/survivors.htm - it seems like this plane might be better modelled as a Recon or maybe even a Transport plane! Much like the Lysander "fighter bomber" ...

Incidentally, why do we have the different plane types at all? Wouldn't it be better to have a more comprehensive set of missions and doctrines instead? Number of engines and loadouts could still be considered.
User avatar
Jaws_slith
Posts: 618
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2002 10:00 am

RE: My advise.. don't use Wirraway's

Post by Jaws_slith »

ORIGINAL: aspqrz

Of course, the upgrade path should be to Boomerangs.

And thereby hangs an interesting tale.

A couple of years ago a friend and I were in Melbourne (he'd never seen it, and I'd told him it was a hole, compared to Sydney ... he didn't believe me so we went down, and now he agrees [:D] and we went down to the RAAF museum where they had a display on the Boomerang.

According to the details it was designed in an incredibly short space of time, c. 2-3 months, IIRC, from Wirraway components, mainly ... which is amazing enough in and of itself.

The *really* strange thing was that it was designed by an Austrian or German refugee (forget whether he was Jewish or merely "political") who was classed as an "enemy alien" and had to report to the local Police Station daily [X(]

I doubt anyone can top *that* story of weird aircraft origins [;)]

Phil

After developing such a plane… he came away very good with only reporting to the local police[;)]
Good Hunting
Post Reply

Return to “War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945”